The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revisiting the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis in 208 counties: The roles of trade openness, human capital, renewable energy and natural resource rent
Abstract
Achieving carbon neutral requires a comprehensive understanding of the effect of different key factors on carbon emissions. To this end, this study investigates the effect of trade openness, human capital, renewable energy and natural resource rent on carbon emissions within the framework of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis. Second-generation econometric tests, Generalized Method of Moments and Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares estimator were developed based on the aggregated dataset of 208 countries from 1990 to 2018. The results show that (i) the EKC hypothesis is validated when the effects of trade openness, human capital, renewable energy consumption, and natural resource rents are considered. The relationship between income level and carbon emissions shows an "inverted U-shaped" curve at the global level. Besides, the real GDP per capita corresponding to the EKC turning point is 19,203$. (ii) Renewable energy consumption and human capital have heterogeneous effects on carbon emissions in before- and after-EKC turning points. Specifically, renewable energy consumption has a better emission reduction effect for countries before the EKC turning point, with effects of -0.4754 and -0.2452, respectively; human capital has a better emission reduction effect for countries after the EKC turning point, with effects of -0.5052 and -0.3398, respectively.(iii) the mitigation effect of trade openness on carbon emissions is only effective in countries with weak decoupling after EKC turning points, with a mitigating effect of -0.0615. However, natural resource rents increase carbon emissions in most countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. M. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261725 · Cited by 17,711
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(03)00092-7 · Cited by 15,435
Environment, health, and human capital
Graff Zivin, J., & Neidell, M. (2013) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.51.3.689 · Cited by 576
Cited by
Chang, H., Ding, Q., Zhao, W., Hou, N., & Liu, W. (2023) · Energy Strategy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2023.101218 · Cited by 293
The impact of AI on carbon emissions: evidence from 66 countries
Zhong, J., Zhong, Y., Han, M., Yang, T., & Zhang, Q. (2024) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2023.2203461 · Cited by 105
D'Adamo, I., Gastaldi, M., Giannini, M., & Nizami, A.-S. (2024) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2024.118163 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Q., Zhang, F., & Li, R.
- Venue
- Environmental Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 216
- Issue
- Pt 3
- Pages
- 114637
- ISSN
- 0013-9351 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4307111886
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 97.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisiting the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis in 208 counties: The roles of trade openness, human capital, renewable energy and natural resource rent. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114637
- The paper
- Wang, Q., Zhang, F., & Li, R. (2023). Revisiting the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis in 208 counties: The roles of trade openness, human capital, renewable energy and natural resource rent. Environmental Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114637
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.