Environment, health, and human capital
Abstract
In this review, we discuss three major contributions economists have made to our understanding of the relationship between the environment and individual well-being. First, in explicitly recognizing how optimizing behavior, particularly in the form of residential sorting, can lead to nonrandom assignment of pollution, economists have employed a wide range of quasi-experimental techniques to develop causal estimates of the effect of pollution. Second, economic research has placed a considerable focus on the role of avoidance behavior, which is an important component for understanding the difference between biological and behavioral effects of pollution and for proper welfare calculations. Lastly, economic research has expanded the focus of analysis beyond traditional health outcomes to include measures of human capital, including labor supply, productivity, and cognition. Our review of the quasi-experimental evidence on this topic suggests that pollution does indeed have a wide range of effects on individual well-being, even at levels well below current regulatory standards. Given the importance of health and human capital as an engine for economic growth, these findings underscore the role of environmental conditions as an important factor of production. (JEL I12, I31, J24, Q51, Q53)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacts human capital through its negative effect on adolescent mental health.
“Furthermore, because of the importance of mental health as a component of human capital (Goldsmith et al., 1997; Graff and Neidell, 2013), our findings suggest a negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on human capital (O’Connell et al., 2022).”
From COVID-19 pandemic and adolescent mental health in China: Micro evidence and socioeconomic mechanisms (2022) · cites this paper as Graff and Neidell, 2013
Cites
Inference with Difference-in-Differences and Other Panel Data
Donald, S. G., & Lang, K. (2007) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.89.2.221 · Cited by 1,324 · see citing works
Climate change, mortality, and adaptation: Evidence from annual fluctuations in weather in the US
Deschênes, O., & Greenstone, M. (2011) · American Economic Journal: Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.3.4.152 · Cited by 1,064 · see citing works
Traffic-Related Air Pollution, Particulate Matter, and Autism
Volk, H. E., Lurmann, F., Penfold, B., Hertz-Picciotto, I., & McConnell, R. (2013) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.266 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
Does Medicare Save Lives? <sup>*</sup>
Card, D., Dobkin, C., & Maestas, N. (2009) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.597 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What Do We Learn from the Weather? The New Climate-Economy Literature
Dell, M., Jones, B. F., & Olken, B. A. (2014) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.52.3.740 · Cited by 2,300 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of country-level studies on environmental change and migration
Hoffmann, R., Dimitrova, A., Muttarak, R., Crespo Cuaresma, J., & Peisker, J. (2020) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0898-6 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Heal, G., & Park, J. (2016) · Review of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1093/reep/rew007 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Hoffmann, R., Šedová, B., & Vinke, K. (2021) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102367 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Temperature Extremes, Health, and Human Capital
Zivin, J. G., & Shrader, J. (2016) · The Future of Children · doi:10.1353/foc.2016.0002 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationCOVID-19 pandemic and adolescent mental health in China: Micro evidence and socioeconomic mechanisms
Chen, B., Zhao, C., Li, X., & Liu, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041376 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Graff Zivin, J., & Neidell, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Diego, and National Bureau of Economic Research.
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- ORCID
- Neidell, Matthew
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Literature
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2013-09-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 689-730
- ISSN
- 0022-0515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118680768
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 18.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Literature (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Keywords
- environmental pollution, health effects of pollution, human capital, well-being, residential sorting, pollution exposure, avoidance behavior, labor supply, productivity, cognition, quasi-experimental evidence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review