Microalgal cultures for the remediation of wastewaters with different nitrogen to phosphorus ratios: Process modelling using artificial neural networks
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A case study on C. vulgaris under varying N:P molar ratios (2-67) demonstrated that nitrogen or phosphorus limitation significantly affected nutrient uptake efficiency, although biomass productivity remained relatively stable.
“Additionally, a case study on C. vulgaris cultivation under varying N:P molar ratios (2–67) demonstrated that nitrogen or phosphorus limitation significantly affected nutrient uptake efficiency, although biomass productivity remained relatively stable.”
From Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Revolutionize Microalgae Biotechnology: Unlocking Sustainable Solutions for High-Value Compounds and Carbon Neutrality (2025) · cites this paper as [33]
GA-optimized ANN models achieved high predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.951) for biomass productivity in C. vulgaris under varying N:P ratios.
“Using GA-optimized ANN models, the study achieved high predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.951 for biomass productivity), highlighting the relevance of nitrogen limitation strategies for optimizing nutrient removal and informing lipid induction approaches in microalgal systems [33].”
From Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Revolutionize Microalgae Biotechnology: Unlocking Sustainable Solutions for High-Value Compounds and Carbon Neutrality (2025) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Yaakob, M. A., Mohamed, R. M. S. R., Al-Gheethi, A., Aswathnarayana Gokare, R., & Ambati, R. R. (2021) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells10020393 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
Multifaceted roles of microalgae in the application of wastewater biotreatment: a review
Chai, W. S., Tan, W. G., Halimatul Munawaroh, H. S., Gupta, V. K., Ho, S.-H., & Show, P. L. (2021) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116236 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Wastewater polishing by consortia of Chlorella vulgaris and activated sludge native bacteria
Gonçalves, A. L., Pires, J. C. M., & Simões, M. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.109 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationGil-Izquierdo, A., Pedreño, M. A., Montoro-García, S., Tárraga-Martínez, M., Iglesias, P., Ferreres, F., Barceló, D., Núñez-Delicado, E., & Gabaldón, J. A. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143613 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Gonçalves, A.L., Pires, J.C., Simões, M., 2017. A review on the use of microalgal consortia for wastewater treatment. Algal Res. 24, 403-415.
- Jawad, J., Hawari, A.H., Zaidi, S.J., 2021. Artificial neural network modeling of wastewater treatment and desalination using membrane processes: a review. Chem. Eng. J. 419, 129540.
- Katoch, S., Chauhan, S.S., Kumar, V., 2021. A review on genetic algorithm: past, present, and future. Multimed. Tool. Appl. 80, 8091-8126.
- Li, K., Liu, Q., Fang, F., Luo, R., Lu, Q., Zhou, W., Huo, S., Cheng, P., Liu, J., Addy, M., 2019. Microalgae-based wastewater treatment for nutrients recovery: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 291, 121934.
- Mirjalili, S., Song Dong, J., Sadiq, A.S., Faris, H., 2020. Genetic algorithm: theory, literature review, and application in image reconstruction. In: Mirjalili, S., et al. (Eds.), Nature-Inspired Optimizers: Theories, Literature Reviews and Applications. Springer Nature, Switzerland, pp. 69-85.
- Mohsenpour, S.F., Hennige, S., Willoughby, N., Adeloye, A., Gutierrez, T., 2021. Integrating micro-algae into wastewater treatment: a review. Sci. Total Environ. 752, 142168.
- Salgado, E.M., Pires, J.C., 2023. Photobioreactors modeling and simulation - photobioreactors : design and applications. In: Sirohi, R., et al. (Eds.), Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Elsevier Science & Technology, pp. 89-120.
- Umdu, E., 2020. Univ, Y., Building integrated photobioreactor. In: Pacheco-Torgal, F., et al. (Eds.), Bio-Based Materials and Biotechnologies for Eco-Efficient Construction. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, UK, pp. 243-258.
- Vale, M.A., Ferreira, A., Pires, J.C.M., Gonçalves, A.L., 2020. CO 2 capture using microalgae. In: Rahimpour, M.R., et al. (Eds.), Advances in Carbon Capture: Methods, Technologies and Applications. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, United Kingdom, pp. 381-405.
- Wang, G., Jia, Q.-S., Zhou, M., Bi, J., Qiao, J., Abusorrah, A., 2022. Artificial neural networks for water quality soft-sensing in wastewater treatment: a review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 55, 565-587.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wu, Y., Shan, L., Zhao, W., & Lu, X. (2025) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md23050184 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
- Authors
- Salgado, E. M., Esteves, A. F., Gonçalves, A. L., & Pires, J. C. M.
- Venue
- Environmental Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-08
- Volume
- 231
- Pages
- 116076
- ISSN
- 0013-9351
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- Universidade do Porto (UIDB/00511/2020)
- Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PTDC/BTA-BTA/2902/2021, LA/P/0045/2020, 2021.07412)
- European Regional Development Fund
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
