Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Revolutionize Microalgae Biotechnology: Unlocking Sustainable Solutions for High-Value Compounds and Carbon Neutrality
Open accessAbstract
Microalgae offer significant potential in diverse fields, including biofuels, carbon capture, and high-value bioproducts. However, optimizing and scaling microalgae cultivation systems present several challenges due to the dynamic interactions among environmental factors such as light intensity, temperature, pH, nutrient concentration, and CO2 levels, as well as species-specific biological variability. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML) and automation, have provided innovative solutions to these challenges. This review explored the role of AI in enhancing microalgae technology, focusing on optimizing cultivation conditions, improving CO2 capture, maximizing biomass production, and automating system processes. Key case studies highlight successful applications of AI in biofuel production, carbon capture projects, and high-value compound manufacturing. Key case studies demonstrate that AI-driven models can increase biomass productivity by up to 15–57%, improve CO2 biofixation efficiency, and enhance lipid and high-value compound yields by more than 20–43% compared to traditional methods. Additionally, we discussed the limitations of current AI models, particularly in data availability and species-specific variability, and suggested future research directions to enhance the integration of AI and microalgae systems. By leveraging AI’s potential, microalgae technologies can become more efficient, scalable, and economically viabl…
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that AI and machine learning can optimize microalgae cultivation, CO2 capture, biomass production, and high-value compound yields, with reported improvements of up to 15–57% in biomass productivity and over 20–43% in lipid/high-value compound yields. It also highlights persistent barriers in data quality, standardization, and species-specific model generalization.
Key findings
- AI-driven models can increase biomass productivity by up to 15–57%, improve CO2 biofixation efficiency, and enhance lipid and high-value compound yields by more than 20–43% compared with traditional methods.
- An ANN-GA-optimized Scenedesmus sp. process achieved a 57% productivity increase, CO2 sequestration of 578.1 ± 23.1 mg L−1 d−1, COD reduction of 95.9 ± 2.4%, and lipid productivity of 106.4 mg L−1 d−1.
- A DNN for C. vulgaris temperature optimization identified 29.55 °C with 95% prediction accuracy within ±1 °C and a 15% biomass productivity increase over traditional temperature control.
- ML harvesting models performed well: XGBoost reached R2 = 0.932 for magnetic nanoparticle flocculation, and GA-BPNN reached R2 = 0.923 with MAE = 0.041 for ballasted flotation.
Methods
- Narrative review of AI/ML applications across microalgae biotechnology, including cultivation optimization, CO2 capture, biomass production, biofuel production, high-value compounds, and automation.
- Synthesizes cited case studies using methods such as ANN, GA, SVR, LSTM, XGBoost, DNN, RSM, FBA, and metabolic flux analysis.
- No primary experimental dataset or systematic review protocol is reported; the paper organizes evidence through narrative sections, tables, and figures.
Limitations
- The paper states that high-quality, standardized datasets are limited; species and environmental variability require adaptable algorithms; data integration and interoperability are hindered by differing methods, formats, and metrics; and models may have limited predictive capability under varied conditions.
- Evident from the text: as a review, the reported performance figures depend on cited case studies and are not independently validated here, and no systematic search or inclusion criteria are described.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
13 of 82 cited sources checked · 8 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Tummawai et al. (2024) found constant 24 h lighting improved biomass productivity by 7.19% compared to a 12 h cycle in a closed tubular photobioreactor.
“A constant 24 h lighting strategy improved biomass productivity by 7.19% compared to a 12 h cycle, demonstrating the critical role of light optimization in high-efficiency microalgae systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Tummawai, 2024, Application of artificial intelligence and image processing for the cultivation of Chlorella sp. using tubular photobioreactors, ACS Omega source
In Results and Discussion, under “Comparison of Light Exposure Durations,” the paper reports greater biomass accumulation under 24 h lighting in a tubular photobioreactor. But 7.19% is the increase within the 24 h condition; the 12 h condition increased by 2.09%. The paper does not report a 7.19% improvement relative to the 12 h cycle. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
XGBoost model achieved superior accuracy in growth prediction with R2 0.9997, MSE 0.0063, RMSE 0.0792 compared to random forest MSE 0.0604, RMSE 0.2458.
“The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model demonstrated superior accuracy in growth prediction, achieving an R2 of 0.9997 and significantly lower error metrics (MSE: 0.0063, RMSE: 0.0792) compared to the random forest model (MSE: 0.0604, RMSE: 0.2458), indicating a more precise fit to the training data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Tummawai, 2024, Application of artificial intelligence and image processing for the cultivation of Chlorella sp. using tubular photobioreactors, ACS Omega source
- Premisecitation
An integrated AI-driven cultivation framework offers potential to improve biomass yield by 30-50% for large-scale production.
“An integrated, AI-driven cultivation framework offers the potential to improve biomass yield by 30–50%, reduce nutrient and energy consumption, and enhance process control accuracy for large-scale production [15,16,17].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [15] Oruganti, 2023, Artificial intelligence and machine learning tools for high-performance microalgal wastewater treatment and algal biorefinery: A critical review, Sci. Total Environ. source
- cites [16] Lim, H.R., Khoo, K.S., Chia, W.Y., Chew, K.W., Ho, S.-H., and Show, P.L. (2022). Smart microalgae farming with internet-of-things for sustainable agriculture. Biotechnol. Adv., 57. source
- cites [17] Imamoglu, E. (2024). Artificial intelligence and/or machine learning algorithms in microalgae bioprocesses. Bioengineering, 11. source
The Introduction and Section 5.2 say AI/ML can optimize microalgae cultivation and improve biomass production. They do not support the claimed 30–50% yield increase for large-scale production: Section 4 reports a 20% output increase with IoT integration, while Section 5.2 reports a 90% biomass-yield increase in a specific optimization study. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
An integrated AI-driven cultivation framework offers potential to enhance process control accuracy for large-scale production.
“An integrated, AI-driven cultivation framework offers the potential to improve biomass yield by 30–50%, reduce nutrient and energy consumption, and enhance process control accuracy for large-scale production [15,16,17].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [15] Oruganti, 2023, Artificial intelligence and machine learning tools for high-performance microalgal wastewater treatment and algal biorefinery: A critical review, Sci. Total Environ. source
- cites [16] Lim, H.R., Khoo, K.S., Chia, W.Y., Chew, K.W., Ho, S.-H., and Show, P.L. (2022). Smart microalgae farming with internet-of-things for sustainable agriculture. Biotechnol. Adv., 57. source
- cites [17] Imamoglu, E. (2024). Artificial intelligence and/or machine learning algorithms in microalgae bioprocesses. Bioengineering, 11. source
- Premisecitation
An integrated AI-driven cultivation framework offers potential to reduce nutrient and energy consumption.
“An integrated, AI-driven cultivation framework offers the potential to improve biomass yield by 30–50%, reduce nutrient and energy consumption, and enhance process control accuracy for large-scale production [15,16,17].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [15] Oruganti, 2023, Artificial intelligence and machine learning tools for high-performance microalgal wastewater treatment and algal biorefinery: A critical review, Sci. Total Environ. source
- cites [16] Lim, H.R., Khoo, K.S., Chia, W.Y., Chew, K.W., Ho, S.-H., and Show, P.L. (2022). Smart microalgae farming with internet-of-things for sustainable agriculture. Biotechnol. Adv., 57. source
- cites [17] Imamoglu, E. (2024). Artificial intelligence and/or machine learning algorithms in microalgae bioprocesses. Bioengineering, 11. source
Section 4 (page not provided) reports that AI-based monitoring of cultivation conditions, including nutrient concentrations, enhanced energy efficiency. It does not say that nutrient consumption was reduced; monitoring nutrient levels is not evidence of reduced use. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
GA-optimized ANN models achieved high predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.951) for biomass productivity in C. vulgaris under varying N:P ratios.
“Using GA-optimized ANN models, the study achieved high predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.951 for biomass productivity), highlighting the relevance of nitrogen limitation strategies for optimizing nutrient removal and informing lipid induction approaches in microalgal systems [33].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Salgado, 2023, Microalgal cultures for the remediation of wastewaters with different nitrogen to phosphorus ratios: Process modelling using artificial neural networks, Environ. Res. source
- Premisecitation
Wu et al. (2014) found key metabolite concentrations, including ATP and acetyl-CoA, elevated under heterotrophic conditions.
“Optimal conditions for biomass and fatty acid production were identified, with key metabolite concentrations, including ATP and acetyl-CoA, elevated under heterotrophic conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Wu, 2014, Genome-based metabolic mapping and 13C flux analysis reveal systematic properties of an oleaginous microalga Chlorella protothecoides, Plant Physiol. source
- Interpretationcitation
AI-driven models can improve CO2 biofixation efficiency compared to traditional methods.
“Key case studies demonstrate that AI-driven models can increase biomass productivity by up to 15–57%, improve CO2 biofixation efficiency, and enhance lipid and high-value compound yields by more than 20–43% compared to traditional methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Hossain, 2022, Modeling and multi-objective optimization of microalgae biomass production and CO2 biofixation using hybrid intelligence approaches, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
- Premisecitation
Fed-batch cultivation of Desmodesmus sp. in anaerobically digested wastewater resulted in a 2.7-fold increase in biomass concentration (1.039 g L−1) compared to batch cultivation.
“sp. in anaerobically digested wastewater resulted in a 2.7-fold increase in biomass concentration (1.039 g L−1) and over a 3.1-fold increase in lipid production (261.8 mg L−1) compared to batch cultivation, effectively mitigating nutrient limitation and ammonia inhibition while enhancing overall productivity [52].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] Ji, 2015, Fed-batch cultivation of Desmodesmus sp. in anaerobic digestion wastewater for improved nutrient removal and biodiesel production, Bioresour. Technol. source
- Premisecitation
The SVR model had prediction error less than 3%.
“The SVR model had a prediction error of less than 3%, highlighting its effectiveness in balancing nutrient ratios for optimal growth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Hossain, 2022, Soft-computing modeling and multiresponse optimization for nutrient removal process from municipal wastewater using microalgae, J. Water Process Eng. source
- Premisecitation
Yang et al. (2021) pH-responsive fed-batch cultivation with automated photobioreactor elevated astaxanthin productivity to 4.5 mg L−1 d−1 under mixotrophic conditions.
“Yang et al. (2021) [58] developed a pH-responsive fed-batch cultivation strategy, integrated with an automated photobioreactor system, to enhance H. pluvialis growth and astaxanthin production under mixotrophic conditions. By coupling nutrient delivery to real-time pH monitoring, the system increased biomass concentration by 90.6% and elevated astaxanthin productivity to 4.5 mg L−1 d−1, showcasing”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Yang, S., Zhao, W., Mou, H., and Sun, H. (2021). Improving astaxanthin production of Haematococcus pluvialis by an efficient fed-batch strategy in a photobioreactor. Algal Res.-Biomass Biofuels Bioprod., 60. source
- Premisecitation
The DNN model achieved a 15% increase in biomass productivity compared to traditional temperature control methods.
“Specifically, the DNN model achieved a 15% increase in biomass productivity compared to traditional temperature control methods, highlighting the significant benefits of AI-driven temperature optimization and control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Janjua, M.Y., Azfar, A., Asghar, Z., and Shehzad Quraishi, K. (2024). Modeling and optimization of biomass productivity of Chlorella vulgaris using response surface methodology, analysis of variance and machine learning for carbon dioxide capture. Bioresour. Technol., 400. source
- Premisecitation
Mixotrophic cultivation of Tetraselmis sp. FTC 209 optimized using ANN and RSM resulted in a biomass concentration of 12.38 g L−1.
“Similarly, mixotrophic cultivation of Tetraselmis sp. FTC 209, optimized using ANN and RSM, resulted in high biomass concentration (12.38 g L−1) and lipid productivity (173.11 mg L−1 day−1) by modeling the effects of three key medium components: glucose (organic carbon source), NaNO3 (primary nitrogen source), and yeast extract (a supplementary source of nitrogen, amino acids, and vitamins) [53].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] Mohamed, 2013, Comparative analyses of response surface methodology and artificial neural network on medium optimization for Tetraselmis sp FTC209 grown under mixotrophic condition, Sci. World J. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Premisecitation
A random forest model predicted Phaeocystis growth stages with 98.1% accuracy.
“A random forest model predicted Phaeocystis growth stages with 98.1% accuracy, highlighting the potential of integrating hyperspectral imaging with ML for real-time monitoring and optimization in microalgae cultivation systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Xu, 2020, Classification, identification, and growth stage estimation of microalgae based on transmission hyperspectral microscopic imaging and machine learning, Opt. Express source
- Premisecitation
ANN models outperform traditional approaches by capturing complex nonlinear relationships more efficiently.
“The ANN model outperforms traditional approaches by capturing complex nonlinear relationships between variables more efficiently. For example, while mechanistic models require extensive parameter tuning and assumptions, the ANN model provides a data-driven, flexible approach with significantly higher prediction accuracy and reduced error rates [22].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Keulen, 2024, Using artificial neural networks to accelerate flowsheet optimization for downstream process development, Biotechnol. Bioeng. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Premisecitation
Parichehreh et al. (2019) FBA model of C. vulgaris predicted a lipid content of 43.6% under nitrogen starvation.
“Their model, validated by batch and fed-batch cultivation data, predicted a lipid content of 43.6% under nitrogen starvation, demonstrating FBA’s effectiveness in identifying key metabolic and environmental factors influencing lipid biosynthesis in microalgae.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] Parichehreh, 2019, Optimization of lipid production in Chlorella vulgaris for biodiesel production using flux balance analysis, Biochem. Eng. J. source
- Premisecitation
Microalgae photosynthetic efficiencies are significantly higher than terrestrial plants like maize (~1.5%).
“For example, some microalgae species, such as Chlorella vulgaris and Arthrospira platensis, have demonstrated photosynthetic efficiencies of up to 5–6%, significantly higher than terrestrial plants like maize (~1.5%) [2,3].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [2] Xu, 2019, Progress, challenges and solutions of research on photosynthetic carbon sequestration efficiency of microalgae, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
- cites [3] Wang, 2023, Realization process of microalgal biorefinery: The optional approach toward carbon net-zero emission, Sci. Total Environ. source
- Premisecitation
Fed-batch cultivation of Desmodesmus sp. in anaerobically digested wastewater resulted in over a 3.1-fold increase in lipid production (261.8 mg L−1) compared to batch cultivation.
“sp. in anaerobically digested wastewater resulted in a 2.7-fold increase in biomass concentration (1.039 g L−1) and over a 3.1-fold increase in lipid production (261.8 mg L−1) compared to batch cultivation, effectively mitigating nutrient limitation and ammonia inhibition while enhancing overall productivity [52].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] Ji, 2015, Fed-batch cultivation of Desmodesmus sp. in anaerobic digestion wastewater for improved nutrient removal and biodiesel production, Bioresour. Technol. source
- Premisecitation
iCre1355 demonstrated enhanced predictive accuracy for growth rates, lipid yields, and metabolic responses under varying conditions, including nitrogen starvation and increased light intensity.
“The model demonstrated enhanced predictive accuracy for growth rates, lipid yields, and metabolic responses under varying conditions, including nitrogen starvation and increased light intensity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] Imam, 2015, A refined genome-scale reconstruction of Chlamydomonas metabolism provides a platform for systems-level analyses, Plant J. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Premisecitation
Imam et al. (2015) iCre1355 model for C. reinhardtii incorporated 1355 genes, 2394 reactions, and 1133 metabolites across nuclear, chloroplast, and mitochondrial genomes.
“Imam et al. (2015) [57] introduced iCre1355, an improved genome-scale metabolic model for C. reinhardtii, incorporating 1355 genes, 2394 reactions, and 1133 metabolites across nuclear, chloroplast, and mitochondrial genomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] Imam, 2015, A refined genome-scale reconstruction of Chlamydomonas metabolism provides a platform for systems-level analyses, Plant J. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Interpretationreasoning
Optimizing CO2 supply to industrial flue gas levels can significantly enhance microalgae growth rates.
“Industrial flue gases typically contain 2–10% v/v CO2 and optimizing CO2 supply to these levels can significantly enhance microalgae growth rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Industrial flue gases typically contain 2–10% v/v CO2.
- Premisecitation
Mixotrophic cultivation of Tetraselmis sp. FTC 209 optimized using ANN and RSM resulted in a lipid productivity of 173.11 mg L−1 day−1.
“Similarly, mixotrophic cultivation of Tetraselmis sp. FTC 209, optimized using ANN and RSM, resulted in high biomass concentration (12.38 g L−1) and lipid productivity (173.11 mg L−1 day−1) by modeling the effects of three key medium components: glucose (organic carbon source), NaNO3 (primary nitrogen source), and yeast extract (a supplementary source of nitrogen, amino acids, and vitamins) [53].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] Mohamed, 2013, Comparative analyses of response surface methodology and artificial neural network on medium optimization for Tetraselmis sp FTC209 grown under mixotrophic condition, Sci. World J. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Interpretationreasoning
AI models can predict the optimal conditions for maximizing lipid accumulation in specific microalgae strains by correlating variables with lipid yield data.
“By correlating these variables with lipid yield data, AI models can predict the optimal conditions for maximizing lipid accumulation in specific microalgae strains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Over 35 days, algae cultivated with the microcontroller system achieved a 16.5% higher concentration than those grown under natural indoor conditions.
“Over 35 days, algae cultivated with the microcontroller system achieved a 16.5% higher concentration than those grown under natural indoor conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Kim, 2016, Developing an algae culturing system using a microcontroller platform, Int. J. Biotechnol. Food Sci.
- Premisecitation
Some strains, such as Nannochloropsis gaditana and C. vulgaris, accumulate lipids up to 50-70% of their dry weight under nitrogen deprivation or high light stress conditions.
“Some strains, such as Nannochloropsis gaditana and C. vulgaris, have been reported to accumulate lipids up to 50–70% of their dry weight under nitrogen deprivation or high light stress conditions [5].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Sajjadi, 2018, Microalgae lipid and biomass for biofuel production: A comprehensive review on lipid enhancement strategies and their effects on fatty acid composition, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
- Premisecitation
Dong et al. (2006) mixed culture of P. rhodozyma and H. pluvialis revealed a 20% increase in carbon flux toward astaxanthin synthesis in P. rhodozyma, attributed to oxygen enrichment from H. pluvialis photosynthesis.
“The study revealed a 20% increase in carbon flux toward astaxanthin synthesis in P. rhodozyma, attributed to oxygen enrichment from H. pluvialis photosynthesis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] Dong, 2006, Metabolic flux analysis of the two astaxanthin-producing microorganisms Haematococcus pluvialis and Phaffia rhodozyma in the pure and mixed cultures, Biotechnol. J. source
- Premisecitation
A ML approach predicted harvesting efficiency of magnetic nanoparticles for microalgae flocculation based on 1151 data points, with optimal XGBoost achieving R2 = 0.932.
“For example, a ML approach was used to predict the harvesting efficiency (HE) of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) for microalgae flocculation based on 1151 data points incorporating nanoparticle properties, microalgal traits, and operational conditions. The optimal XGBoost model achieved strong predictive performance (R2 = 0.932), and SHAP analysis further revealed key factors influencing HE, thus”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Fu, 2025, Predicting harvesting efficiency of microalgae with magnetic nanoparticles using machine learning models, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. source
- Interpretationcitation
AI-driven models can enhance lipid and high-value compound yields by more than 20-43% compared to traditional methods.
“Key case studies demonstrate that AI-driven models can increase biomass productivity by up to 15–57%, improve CO2 biofixation efficiency, and enhance lipid and high-value compound yields by more than 20–43% compared to traditional methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [28] 2024, Application of an artificial neural network coupled to a genetic algorithm for the production of polyphenols in Parachlorella kessleri grown under mixotrophic conditions, Algal Res. source
- cites [42] Nayak, 2018, Artificial intelligence driven process optimization for cleaner production of biomass with co-valorization of wastewater and flue gas in an algal biorefinery, J. Clean. Prod. source
- Premisecitation
Some microalgae species, such as Chlorella vulgaris and Arthrospira platensis, have photosynthetic efficiencies of up to 5-6%.
“For example, some microalgae species, such as Chlorella vulgaris and Arthrospira platensis, have demonstrated photosynthetic efficiencies of up to 5–6%, significantly higher than terrestrial plants like maize (~1.5%) [2,3].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [2] Xu, 2019, Progress, challenges and solutions of research on photosynthetic carbon sequestration efficiency of microalgae, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
- cites [3] Wang, 2023, Realization process of microalgal biorefinery: The optional approach toward carbon net-zero emission, Sci. Total Environ. source
- Premisecitation
The interaction between P. rhodozyma and H. pluvialis resulted in a 2.8-fold increase in carbon flux directed toward astaxanthin synthesis compared to pure cultures.
“This interaction resulted in a 2.8-fold increase in carbon flux directed toward astaxanthin synthesis compared to pure cultures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] Dong, 2006, Metabolic flux analysis of the two astaxanthin-producing microorganisms Haematococcus pluvialis and Phaffia rhodozyma in the pure and mixed cultures, Biotechnol. J. source
- Premisecitation
Dynamic modeling predicted consistent maintenance energy of 1.5 mmol g−1 DCW h−1.
“Dynamic modeling predicted consistent maintenance energy of 1.5 mmol g−1 DCW h−1, highlighting dFBA’s utility in accurately capturing”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Muthuraj, 2013, Flux balance analysis of Chlorella sp. FC2 IITG under photoautotrophic and heterotrophic growth conditions, Photosynth. Res. source
- Premisecitation
Yang et al. (2021) pH-responsive fed-batch cultivation with automated photobioreactor increased H. pluvialis biomass concentration by 90.6% under mixotrophic conditions.
“Yang et al. (2021) [58] developed a pH-responsive fed-batch cultivation strategy, integrated with an automated photobioreactor system, to enhance H. pluvialis growth and astaxanthin production under mixotrophic conditions. By coupling nutrient delivery to real-time pH monitoring, the system increased biomass concentration by 90.6% and elevated astaxanthin productivity to 4.5 mg L−1 d−1, showcasing”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Yang, S., Zhao, W., Mou, H., and Sun, H. (2021). Improving astaxanthin production of Haematococcus pluvialis by an efficient fed-batch strategy in a photobioreactor. Algal Res.-Biomass Biofuels Bioprod., 60. source
- Interpretationcitation
AI-driven models can increase microalgae biomass productivity by up to 15-57% compared to traditional methods.
“Key case studies demonstrate that AI-driven models can increase biomass productivity by up to 15–57%, improve CO2 biofixation efficiency, and enhance lipid and high-value compound yields by more than 20–43% compared to traditional methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [30] Janjua, M.Y., Azfar, A., Asghar, Z., and Shehzad Quraishi, K. (2024). Modeling and optimization of biomass productivity of Chlorella vulgaris using response surface methodology, analysis of variance and machine learning for carbon dioxide capture. Bioresour. Technol., 400. source
- cites [42] Nayak, 2018, Artificial intelligence driven process optimization for cleaner production of biomass with co-valorization of wastewater and flue gas in an algal biorefinery, J. Clean. Prod. source
- Premisecitation
An ANN-GA-optimized process integrating flue gas CO2 sequestration and domestic wastewater utilization enhanced Scenedesmus sp. biomass production, achieving a 57% increase in productivity under optimal conditions.
“For instance, an ANN-GA-optimized process integrating flue gas CO2 sequestration and domestic wastewater utilization was developed to enhance Scenedesmus sp. biomass production, achieving a 57% increase in productivity under optimal conditions (light intensity: 124 μmol m−2 s−1, photoperiod: 17:7 h, temperature: 27.5 °C, pH: 9.5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Nayak, 2018, Artificial intelligence driven process optimization for cleaner production of biomass with co-valorization of wastewater and flue gas in an algal biorefinery, J. Clean. Prod. source
- Interpretationreasoning
AI can expedite selection of high-lipid microalgae strains through data-driven approaches that identify the best candidates for biofuel production.
“AI can expedite this process through data-driven approaches that identify the best candidates for biofuel production.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Traditional methods of microalgae strain selection are labor-intensive and time-consuming.
- Interpretationcitation
AI has shown immense potential in synthetic biology and genetic engineering for enhancing yield of high-value compounds from microalgae.
“AI has shown immense potential in the field of synthetic biology and genetic engineering, particularly for enhancing the yield of high-value compounds from microalgae.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Numerous microalgae studies focus on specific strains or experimental conditions, overlooking diversity of environmental factors such as temperature, light intensity, and nutrient concentrations.
“For instance, numerous microalgae studies focus on specific strains or experimental conditions, overlooking the diversity of environmental factors (such as temperature, light intensity, and nutrient concentrations) [54].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] Sun, 2021, Powerful tools for productivity improvements in microalgal production, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
- Premisecitation
AI-enabled control systems have been deployed to regulate CO2 input and light regimes, improving consistency and yield in semi-automated cultivation facilities.
“AI-enabled control systems have been deployed to regulate CO2 input and light regimes, improving consistency and yield in semi-automated cultivation facilities [64].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Abdullah, 2025, AI-driven algae biorefineries: A new era for sustainable bioeconomy, Curr. Pollut. Rep. source
- Premisecitation
Microalgae are a rich source of high-value products, including astaxanthin, β-carotene, lutein, phycocyanin, EPA, and DHA, which are widely sought after for nutraceutical and pharmaceutical properties.
“Microalgae are not only a source of biofuels and carbon capture, but they are also a rich source of high-value products, including astaxanthin, β-carotene, lutein, phycocyanin, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), which are widely sought after for their nutraceutical and pharmaceutical properties [4].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Yang, 2024, Technological readiness of commercial microalgae species for foods, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. source
- Interpretationreasoning
Integration and interoperability of data between different research institutions and projects is a major challenge.
“Another major challenge is the integration and interoperability of data between different research institutions and projects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Models developed from studies focusing on specific strains or conditions may have limited predictive capability under varied conditions, affecting effectiveness in large-scale applications.
“Consequently, the models developed may have limited predictive capability under varied conditions, thereby affecting their effectiveness in large-scale applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In microalgae research, the quality and availability of data are often limited.
“However, in the field of microalgae research, the quality and availability of data are often limited.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
AI technologies, particularly ML algorithms, can analyze complex datasets to identify optimal growth conditions that maximize production of specific high-value compounds.
“AI technologies, particularly ML algorithms, can analyze complex datasets to identify optimal growth conditions that can maximize the production of specific high-value compounds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Production of high-value compounds from microalgae depends heavily on cultivation conditions, and factors such as light intensity, nutrient composition, and cultivation mode can significantly influence yield.
- Interpretationreasoning
Lack of representative data can lead to suboptimal performance of AI models in practical applications.
“This lack of representative data can lead to suboptimal performance of AI models in practical applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
By leveraging genomic and metabolomic data, AI algorithms can analyze characteristics of various microalgae strains and predict their lipid production capabilities.
“By leveraging genomic and metabolomic data, AI algorithms can analyze the characteristics of various microalgae strains and predict their lipid production capabilities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Due to varying experimental methods and data formats, data become difficult to share and compare, complicating cross-study analyses.
“Due to varying experimental methods and data formats employed by different research teams, data become difficult to share and compare, thus complicating cross-study analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
By leveraging genomic data and advanced computational techniques, researchers can identify genetic modifications that improve production of specific metabolites.
“By leveraging genomic data and advanced computational techniques, researchers can identify genetic modifications that improve the production of specific metabolites [61].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Wang, 2023, Stimulating carbon and nitrogen metabolism of Chlorella pyrenoidosa to treat aquaculture wastewater and produce high-quality protein in plate photobioreactors, Sci. Total Environ. source
- May combine two claims. 40
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 5
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPyruvate cultures of C. tepidum exhibited higher CO2 fixation flux and biomass yield (YX/S = 9.2) compared to acetate cultures (YX/S = 6.4), albeit with slower growth rates.
“Pyruvate cultures exhibited higher CO2 fixation flux and biomass yield (YX/S = 9.2) compared to acetate cultures (YX/S = 6.4), albeit with slower growth rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] Feng, 2010, Metabolic flux analysis of the mixotrophic metabolisms in the green sulfur bacterium Chlorobaculum tepidum, J. Biol. Chem. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFeng et al. (2010) metabolic flux analysis of Chlorobaculum tepidum under mixotrophic conditions uncovered an alternative isoleucine synthesis pathway via citramalate synthase and key CO2 fixation routes such as the TCA cycle and pyruvate synthesis pathway.
“Feng et al. (2010) [62] investigated carbon metabolism in Chlorobaculum tepidum under mixotrophic conditions using metabolic flux analysis (MFA), uncovering an alternative isoleucine synthesis pathway via citramalate synthase and key CO2 fixation routes such as the TCA cycle and the pyruvate synthesis pathway.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] Feng, 2010, Metabolic flux analysis of the mixotrophic metabolisms in the green sulfur bacterium Chlorobaculum tepidum, J. Biol. Chem. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMicroalgae can simultaneously yield lipids, proteins, pigments, and bioactive compounds, enhancing economic feasibility.
“Unlike soybeans, microalgae can simultaneously yield lipids, proteins, pigments, and bioactive compounds, significantly enhancing economic feasibility [1,13,14].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [1] Yang, 2024, Microalgal protein for sustainable and nutritious foods: A joint analysis of environmental impacts, health benefits and consumer’s acceptance, Trends Food Sci. Technol. source
- cites [13] Oostlander, 2020, Microalgae production cost in aquaculture hatcheries, Aquaculture source
The Conclusion (section 4; page unavailable) discusses reducing microalgae biomass production costs through lighting, improved yield and lower labour requirements. Our copy does not address simultaneous production of lipids, proteins, pigments and bioactive compounds, compare microalgae with soybeans, or link those products to economic feasibility. Searches for those products, co-production and soybeans found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [14] Blaustein-Rejto, D., Merener, N., and Smith, A. (2024). The potential footprint of alternative meat adoption on corn and soybean producers. Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 8. source
The Introduction and Materials and methods (§2.1–2.2; pages unavailable) discuss soybean use in animal feed and plant-based meat, including soybean meal, oil, and protein. Searches for microalgae, pigments, bioactive compounds, and coproducts found no passage addressing whether microalgae yields the listed products or whether doing so improves economic feasibility. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA case study on C. vulgaris under varying N:P molar ratios (2-67) demonstrated that nitrogen or phosphorus limitation significantly affected nutrient uptake efficiency, although biomass productivity remained relatively stable.
“Additionally, a case study on C. vulgaris cultivation under varying N:P molar ratios (2–67) demonstrated that nitrogen or phosphorus limitation significantly affected nutrient uptake efficiency, although biomass productivity remained relatively stable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Salgado, 2023, Microalgal cultures for the remediation of wastewaters with different nitrogen to phosphorus ratios: Process modelling using artificial neural networks, Environ. Res. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNonstationary 13C flux analysis revealed low photorespiration in phototrophic cells and high TCA cycle activity in heterotrophic cells.
“Nonstationary 13C flux analysis revealed low photorespiration in phototrophic cells and high TCA cycle activity in heterotrophic cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Wu, 2014, Genome-based metabolic mapping and 13C flux analysis reveal systematic properties of an oleaginous microalga Chlorella protothecoides, Plant Physiol. source
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThis review summarized case studies demonstrating up to 57% improvement in biomass productivity and over 43% enhancement in lipid and high-value compound yields.
“This review highlighted the transformative role of AI in microalgae biotechnology, summarizing case studies that demonstrated up to 57% improvement in biomass productivity and over 43% enhancement in lipid and high-value compound yields.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMakaranga et al. (2023) co-culturing Chlorella saccharophila UTEX247 with Exiguobacterium sp. achieved lutein productivity of 298.97 μg L−1 d−1, 1.45 times higher than monocultures.
“Makaranga et al. (2023) [59] optimized lutein production in Chlorella saccharophila UTEX247 through co-culturing with Exiguobacterium sp., thereby achieving a lutein productivity of 298.97 µg L−1 d−1—1.45 times higher than monocultures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] Makaranga, 2023, Dynamic metabolomic crosstalk between Chlorella saccharophila and its new symbiotic bacteria enhances lutein production in microalga without compromising its biomass, Enzym. Microb. Technol. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNannochloropsis species can achieve annual biomass production of approximately 127.8 metric ton/acre/year, outpacing traditional oilseed crops.
“Research demonstrated that Nannochloropsis species could achieve an annual biomass production of approximately 127.8 metric ton/acre/year, outpacing traditional oilseed crops [6].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Mohammady, 2022, Preliminary study on the economic assessment of culturing Nannochloropsis sp. in Egypt for the production of biodiesel and high-value biochemicals, Biomass Convers. Biorefin. source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCurrent AI models have limitations in data availability and species-specific variability.
“Additionally, we discussed the limitations of current AI models, particularly in data availability and species-specific variability, and suggested future research directions to enhance the integration of AI and microalgae systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMuthuraj et al. (2013) performed flux balance analysis and dynamic FBA on Chlorella sp. FC2 IITG, revealing metabolic shifts including inactivity of pentose phosphate pathway under photoautotrophic growth and elevated glycolytic flux coupled with lipid induction during light phase.
“In addition, Muthuraj et al. (2013) [50] performed flux balance analysis (FBA) and dynamic FBA (dFBA) on Chlorella sp. FC2 IITG to study carbon flux distribution under light–dark cycles under photoautotrophic and heterotrophic conditions. The study revealed metabolic shifts, including the inactivity of the pentose phosphate pathway under photoautotrophic growth and elevated glycolytic flux coupled”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Muthuraj, 2013, Flux balance analysis of Chlorella sp. FC2 IITG under photoautotrophic and heterotrophic growth conditions, Photosynth. Res. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationZhao et al. (2021) melatonin treatment enhanced coproduction of astaxanthin and lipids in H. pluvialis, increasing yields 1.78- and 1.3-fold, respectively.
“Zhao et al. (2021) [60] demonstrated that melatonin (MT) treatment enhanced the coproduction of astaxanthin and lipids in H. pluvialis, increasing yields 1.78- and 1.3-fold, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Zhao, Y., Wang, H.-P., Yu, C., Ding, W., Han, B., Geng, S., Ning, D., Ma, T., and Yu, X. (2021). Integration of physiological and metabolomic profiles to elucidate the regulatory mechanisms underlying the stimulatory effect of melatonin on astaxanthin and lipids coproduction in Haematococcus pluvialis under inductive stress conditions. Bioresour. Technol., 319. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPanahi et al. (2019) combined RNA-seq meta-analysis with supervised ML to explore salt stress responses of Dunaliella salina and D. tertiolecta, identifying core meta-genes linked to lipid and nitrogen metabolism, photosynthetic apparatus proteins, autophagy, and ROS-related pathways.
“Panahi et al. (2019) [41] combined RNA-seq meta-analysis with supervised ML to explore the salt stress responses of Dunaliella salina and Dunaliella tertiolecta. Using Fisher’s p-value combination for cross-species analysis, the study identified core meta-genes linked to lipid and nitrogen metabolism, photosynthetic apparatus proteins, autophagy, and ROS-related pathways.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Panahi, B., Frahadian, M., Dums, J.T., and Hejazi, M.A. (2019). Integration of cross species RNA-Seq meta-analysis and machine-learning models identifies the most important salt stress–responsive pathways in microalga Dunaliella. Front. Genet., 10. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe system was validated using a separate dataset, demonstrating prediction accuracy of 92%.
“The system was validated using a separate dataset, demonstrating a prediction accuracy of 92%, thus showcasing its effectiveness in optimizing environmental parameters for enhanced microalgae growth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Kim, 2016, Developing an algae culturing system using a microcontroller platform, Int. J. Biotechnol. Food Sci.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMicroalgal cultivation in an outdoor photobioreactor removed 9-17% of industrial CO2 from cement flue gas, with efficiencies reaching 20-60% under optimal conditions and carbon recovery up to 10 g m2 d−1.
“Previous study demonstrated that microalgal cultivation in an outdoor photobioreactor removed 9–17% of industrial CO2 from cement flue gas, with efficiencies reaching 20–60% under optimal conditions and carbon recovery up to 10 g m2 d−1 [7].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Lindehoff, E., Mattsson, L., Olofsson, M., Svensson, F., Farnelid, H., and Legrand, C. (2024). Biomass performance and stability of 5-year outdoor microalgal cultivation for CO2 removal from cement flue gas. Bioresour. Technol. Rep., 25. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWang et al. (2012) label-free proteomics identified 896 proteins and quantified 329, while iTRAQ identified 639 proteins and quantified 124 in two C. reinhardtii strains.
“The label-free method identified 896 proteins and quantified 329, while iTRAQ identified 639 proteins and quantified 124, highlighting mechanisms driving lipid production in sta6.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] Wang, 2012, Comprehensive Comparison of iTRAQ and label-free LC-based quantitative proteomics approaches using two Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strains of interest for biofuels engineering, J. Proteome Res. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenVariability among microalgae species and environmental conditions requires development of adaptable AI algorithms capable of generalizing across diverse systems.
“Additionally, the variability among microalgae species and environmental conditions requires the development of adaptable AI algorithms capable of generalizing across diverse systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHaematococcus pluvialis produces astaxanthin up to 50 mg g−1 dry biomass under stress conditions.
“For instance, Haematococcus pluvialis, known for its high astaxanthin content, has demonstrated production levels of up to 50 mg g−1 of dry biomass under stress conditions [11].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Sun, 2015, Enhancement of cell biomass and cell activity of astaxanthin-rich Haematococcus pluvialis, Bioresour. Technol. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA BPNN optimized with GA and PSO predicted harvesting efficiency in ballasted flotation, with GA-BPNN showing best performance (R2 = 0.923, MAE = 0.041).
“A backpropagation neural network (BPNN) was applied to predict harvesting efficiency in a ballasted flotation based on diverse input features, including microalgal and LDM properties. To improve predictive accuracy, the BPNN model was optimized using GA and particle swarm optimization (PSO), with GA-BPNN showing the best performance (R2 = 0.923, MAE = 0.041).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Xu, K., Zhu, Z., Yu, H., and Zou, X. (2025). Prediction of microalgae harvesting efficiency and identification of important parameters for ballasted flotation using an optimized machine learning model. Algal Res.-Biomass Biofuels Bioprod., 87. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAvailability of high-quality, standardized datasets is a major hurdle for training AI models in microalgae technology.
“A major hurdle is the availability of high-quality, standardized datasets for training AI models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the Chlorella saccharophila UTEX247 co-culture, biomass increased 0.84-fold under optimal conditions, and metabolomics identified 75 metabolites, 46 of which were unique.
“Biomass increased 0.84-fold under optimal conditions, with metabolomics identifying 75 metabolites in the co-culture, 46 of which were unique.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] Makaranga, 2023, Dynamic metabolomic crosstalk between Chlorella saccharophila and its new symbiotic bacteria enhances lutein production in microalga without compromising its biomass, Enzym. Microb. Technol. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHossain et al. (2022a) applied SVR with GA to optimize N:P ratio for Chlorella kessleri in municipal wastewater, identifying optimal N:P 6:1 and achieving nutrient removal efficiencies over 93% at 29.3 °C and continuous light.
“For instance, Hossain et al. (2022a) [32] applied SVR combined with a GA to optimize the nitrogen–phosphorus (N:P) ratio for Chlorella kessleri in municipal wastewater treatment. Their model identified an optimal N:P ratio of 6:1, achieving nutrient removal efficiencies of over 93% under conditions of 29.3 °C and continuous light (24/0 h/h).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Hossain, 2022, Soft-computing modeling and multiresponse optimization for nutrient removal process from municipal wastewater using microalgae, J. Water Process Eng. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe process resulted in a CO2 sequestration rate of 578.1 ± 23.1 mg L−1 d−1, COD reduction of 95.9 ± 2.4%, and lipid productivity of 106.4 mg L−1 d−1, with biodiesel quality meeting international standards.
“The process resulted in a CO2 sequestration rate of 578.1 ± 23.1 mg L−1 d−1, COD reduction of 95.9 ± 2.4%, and lipid productivity of 106.4 mg L−1 d−1, with biodiesel quality meeting international standards [42].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Nayak, 2018, Artificial intelligence driven process optimization for cleaner production of biomass with co-valorization of wastewater and flue gas in an algal biorefinery, J. Clean. Prod. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationXu et al. (2020) developed THMI combined with ML, achieving spatial and spectral resolutions of 4 μm and 3 nm, and classifying microalgae species with 94.4% accuracy using PCA and SVM.
“Xu et al. (2020) [37] developed a transmission hyperspectral microscopic imager (THMI) combined with ML for microalgae cultivation optimization. The system achieved high spatial and spectral resolutions (4 µm and 3 nm), using principal component analysis (PCA) and support vector machine (SVM) to classify microalgae species with 94.4% accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Xu, 2020, Classification, identification, and growth stage estimation of microalgae based on transmission hyperspectral microscopic imaging and machine learning, Opt. Express source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChristian Barbosa et al. (2020) developed a cost-effective sensor for real-time monitoring of microalgae biomass concentration, showing strong linearity with dry weight in the range 40-800 mg L−1.
“Christian Barbosa et al. (2020) [43] developed a cost-effective sensor for real-time monitoring of microalgae biomass concentration, addressing challenges in optimizing growth conditions. The sensor, utilizing ultraviolet and near-infrared wavelengths, showed strong linearity with dry weight (DW) measurements in the range of 40–800 mg L−1, closely matching spectrophotometer readings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Soares, 2020, Low-cost and versatile sensor based on multi-wavelengths for real-time estimation of microalgal biomass concentration in open and closed cultivation systems, Comput. Electron. Agric. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe DNN model achieved prediction accuracy of 95% with error within ±1 °C.
“The DNN model achieved a prediction accuracy of 95% with a prediction error within ±1 °C, demonstrating its precision in temperature optimization, leading to enhanced CO2 capture efficiency and biomass productivity, in turn emphasizing the critical role of precise temperature control in microalgae cultivation systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Janjua, M.Y., Azfar, A., Asghar, Z., and Shehzad Quraishi, K. (2024). Modeling and optimization of biomass productivity of Chlorella vulgaris using response surface methodology, analysis of variance and machine learning for carbon dioxide capture. Bioresour. Technol., 400. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationJanjua et al. (2024) identified optimal temperature of 29.55 °C for C. vulgaris CO2 capture using DNN, outperforming RSM prediction of 28.74 °C.
“Their study identified an optimal temperature of 29.55 °C with DNN, outperforming RSM’s prediction of 28.74 °C.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Janjua, M.Y., Azfar, A., Asghar, Z., and Shehzad Quraishi, K. (2024). Modeling and optimization of biomass productivity of Chlorella vulgaris using response surface methodology, analysis of variance and machine learning for carbon dioxide capture. Bioresour. Technol., 400. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe ANN model by Yu et al. was validated using a separate dataset, demonstrating prediction error less than 5%.
“The model was validated using a separate dataset, demonstrating a prediction error of less than 5%, which highlights its robustness and reliability in optimizing microalgae growth, thereby demonstrating its effectiveness in optimizing microalgae growth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Yu, T., Fan, F., Huang, L., Wang, W., Wan, M., and Li, Y. (2024). Artificial neural networks prediction and optimization based on four light regions for light utilization from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Bioresour. Technol., 394. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationYu et al. (2024) developed an ANN growth model for Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 based on four light regions, achieving validation R2 of 0.97, 76.36% more accurate than traditional light-dark models.
“For example, Yu et al. (2024) [21] developed an artificial neural network (ANN) growth model for Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 based on four light regions (FLRs), achieving a validation R2 value of 0.97, 76.36% more accurate than traditional light–dark models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Yu, T., Fan, F., Huang, L., Wang, W., Wan, M., and Li, Y. (2024). Artificial neural networks prediction and optimization based on four light regions for light utilization from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Bioresour. Technol., 394. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFernández Izquierdo et al. (2024) used ANN-GA to optimize light conditions for polyphenol production in Parachlorella kessleri, identifying white light at 1000 lx and 12:12 light-dark cycle as optimal, yielding 28 mg GAE/g DW.
“For instance, Fernández Izquierdo et al. (2024) [28] employed an ANN coupled with a genetic algorithm (ANN-GA) to optimize light conditions for polyphenol production in Parachlorella kessleri. The model identified white light at an intensity of 1000 lx and a 12:12 light–dark cycle as optimal, contributing to a polyphenol yield of 28 mg gallic acid equivalents per gram dry weight (GAE/g DW),”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] 2024, Application of an artificial neural network coupled to a genetic algorithm for the production of polyphenols in Parachlorella kessleri grown under mixotrophic conditions, Algal Res. source
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationThe ANN model demonstrated superior computational efficiency and better generalization across light intensities and photoperiods than mechanistic and hybrid models.
“Furthermore, the ANN model demonstrated superior computational efficiency, requiring significantly less time for training and prediction compared to the mechanistic and hybrid models.”
- Also stated in: § 2.1. Optimizing Cultivation Conditions · plain
“Furthermore, the ANN model showed better generalization capabilities, performing well across a range of light intensities and photoperiods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] 2024, Application of an artificial neural network coupled to a genetic algorithm for the production of polyphenols in Parachlorella kessleri grown under mixotrophic conditions, Algal Res. source
- Also stated in: § 2.1. Optimizing Cultivation Conditions · plain
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHossain et al. (2022b) used SVR with Bayesian optimization to enhance C. vulgaris biomass productivity and CO2 biofixation, achieving R2 of 0.911 and optimal conditions of 40 °C, N:P 1:1, 12/12 light-dark, yielding 0.0979 g L−1 d−1 BP and 0.1408 g L−1 d−1 RCO2.
“For instance, Hossain et al. (2022b) [25] used SVR with Bayesian optimization to enhance C. vulgaris biomass productivity (BP) and CO2 biofixation (RCO2), achieving a high R2 of 0.911 and optimizing conditions to 40 °C, an N:P ratio of 1:1, and a 12/12 light–dark cycle, yielding 0.0979 g L−1 d−1 BP and 0.1408 g L−1 d−1 RCO2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Hossain, 2022, Modeling and multi-objective optimization of microalgae biomass production and CO2 biofixation using hybrid intelligence approaches, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the mixed culture, H. pluvialis benefited from pyruvate and CO2 excreted by P. rhodozyma, reducing carbon flux from the Calvin cycle to catabolic pathways by 33% while increasing flux to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate by 25%.
“Conversely, H. pluvialis benefited from pyruvate and CO2 excreted by P. rhodozyma, reducing carbon flux from the Calvin cycle to catabolic pathways by 33% while increasing flux to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate by 25%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] Dong, 2006, Metabolic flux analysis of the two astaxanthin-producing microorganisms Haematococcus pluvialis and Phaffia rhodozyma in the pure and mixed cultures, Biotechnol. J. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHeidari Baladehi et al. (2021) established a reference ramanome database from over 9000 cells of 27 microalgal species and classified species and growth states with 97% accuracy using ensemble ML.
“Heidari Baladehi et al. (2021) [39] established a reference ramanome database comprising single-cell Raman spectra (SCRS) from over 9000 cells of 27 diverse microalgal species in stationary and exponential phases. By combining pre-quenching “pigment spectrum” (PS) and post-quenching “whole spectrum” (WS) signals, species and growth states were classified with 97% accuracy using ensemble ML,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Hekmatara, 2021, Culture-free identification and metabolic profiling of microalgal single cells via ensemble learning of Ramanomes, Anal. Chem. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCoşgun et al. (2021) analyzed a dataset of 4670 instances from 102 published studies using ML and identified 11 combinations linked to high biomass productivity and 13 for high lipid content.
“Coşgun et al. (2021) [49] analyzed a dataset of 4670 instances from 102 published studies, using ML to evaluate the impact of cultivation and processing parameters on microalgal biomass and lipid production. By applying decision trees and association rule mining, they identified 11 combinations linked to high biomass productivity and 13 for high lipid content, demonstrating that ML can effectively”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] Cosgun, 2021, Exploring the critical factors of algal biomass and lipid production for renewable fuel production by machine learning, Renew. Energy source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKim et al. (2016) developed a microcontroller-based system with MG-811 CO2 sensor that maintained CO2 concentrations above 350 ppm, triggering at 2.75 V.
“Kim et al. (2016) [36] developed a microcontroller-based system incorporating an MG-811 CO2 sensor to manage CO2 levels in microalgae cultivation. The sensor, highly sensitive to CO2 and equipped with a heating circuit, maintained concentrations above 350 ppm, thereby triggering responses at a voltage of 2.75 V.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Kim, 2016, Developing an algae culturing system using a microcontroller platform, Int. J. Biotechnol. Food Sci.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe incorporation of AI in the production process enhances the economic viability of high-value microalgae products by improving yields, reducing production costs, and accelerating time-to-market.
“The incorporation of AI in the production process enhances the economic viability of these products by improving yields, reducing production costs, and accelerating time-to-market.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The global market for high-value products derived from microalgae is rapidly expanding, driven by increasing consumer demand for natural and sustainable products.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGenome-scale reconstructions (GEMs) are developed using databases such as KEGG and MetaCyc, which provide comprehensive information on metabolic pathways and enzymes from various organisms.
“Genome-scale reconstructions (GEMs) are developed using databases such as KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) and MetaCyc, which provide comprehensive information on metabolic pathways and enzymes from various organisms [54].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] Sun, 2021, Powerful tools for productivity improvements in microalgal production, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWu et al. (2014) reconstructed metabolic network of C. protothecoides included 272 reactions, enabling simulations of phototrophic and heterotrophic growth.
“The reconstructed metabolic network included 272 reactions, enabling simulations of phototrophic and heterotrophic growth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Wu, 2014, Genome-based metabolic mapping and 13C flux analysis reveal systematic properties of an oleaginous microalga Chlorella protothecoides, Plant Physiol. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenData and model limitations pose significant challenges to implementation and optimization of AI-driven solutions in microalgae technologies.
“In the research and development of microalgae technologies, data and model limitations pose significant challenges to the implementation and optimization of AI-driven solutions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMany microalgae experiments are conducted on a small scale, resulting in datasets that may not be sufficiently comprehensive to represent a broader range of environmental and operational conditions.
“Many microalgae experiments are conducted on a small scale, resulting in datasets that may not be sufficiently comprehensive to represent a broader range of environmental and operational conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhile challenges such as data quality and model generalization remain, the integration of AI offers a promising pathway to achieve scalable, efficient, and economically viable microalgae-based solutions for biofuel and high-value product production.
“While challenges such as data quality and model generalization remain, the integration of AI offers a promising pathway to achieve scalable, efficient, and economically viable microalgae-based solutions for biofuel and high-value product production.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThrough real-time monitoring, predictive modeling, and automated control systems, AI has proven effective in optimizing cultivation parameters, enhancing CO2 sequestration, and streamlining harvesting and processing.
“Through real-time monitoring, predictive modeling, and automated control systems, AI has proven effective in optimizing cultivation parameters, enhancing CO2 sequestration, and streamlining harvesting and processing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome studies utilized different metrics (such as photosynthetic efficiency and carbon dioxide absorption rates) to evaluate microalgal performance, making it challenging to combine diverse datasets.
“For example, some studies utilized different metrics (such as photosynthetic efficiency and carbon dioxide absorption rates) to evaluate microalgal performance [65], making it challenging to combine diverse datasets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Helmy, 2023, Perspective: Multiomics and machine learning help unleash the alternative food potential of microalgae, Adv. Nutr. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAt the current stage of development, AI can be effectively applied to optimize specific cultivation parameters, monitor growth dynamics, predict yields, and support decision-making in laboratory and pilot-scale operations.
“At the current stage of development, AI can be effectively applied to optimize specific cultivation parameters, monitor growth dynamics, predict yields, and support decision-making in laboratory and pilot-scale operations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe integration of AI in production of high-value products from microalgae has the potential to optimize yield, enhance extraction processes, and accelerate product development.
“The integration of AI in the production of high-value products from microalgae has the potential to optimize yield, enhance extraction processes, and accelerate product development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
There is currently a lack of comprehensive solutions that integrate AI to optimize microalgae cultivation and reduce production costs.
“Currently, there is a lack of comprehensive solutions that integrate advanced technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) to optimize microalgae cultivation and reduce production costs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most existing approaches focus on isolated aspects of the cultivation process and fail to address the complex interplay of environmental, biological, and operational factors.
“Most existing approaches focus on isolated aspects of the cultivation process, failing to address the complex interplay of environmental, biological, and operational factors.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Microalgal biomass production costs are USD 4–8 per kg under industrial-scale conditions.
“Recent techno-economic analyses estimate production costs of microalgal biomass at USD 4–8 per kg under industrial-scale conditions, depending on the cultivation system and co-product valorization strategies employed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Industrial flue gases typically contain 2–10% v/v CO2.
“Industrial flue gases typically contain 2–10% v/v CO2 and optimizing CO2 supply to these levels can significantly enhance microalgae growth rates.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The global market for high-value products derived from microalgae is rapidly expanding, driven by increasing consumer demand for natural and sustainable products.
“Furthermore, the global market for high-value products derived from microalgae is rapidly expanding, driven by increasing consumer demand for natural and sustainable products.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Traditional methods of microalgae strain selection are labor-intensive and time-consuming.
“Traditional methods of strain selection can be labor-intensive and time-consuming.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Production of high-value compounds from microalgae depends heavily on cultivation conditions, and factors such as light intensity, nutrient composition, and cultivation mode can significantly influence yield.
“The production of high-value compounds from microalgae, such as astaxanthin, phycocyanin, and omega-3 fatty acids, depends heavily on cultivation conditions. Factors such as light intensity, nutrient composition, and cultivation mode can significantly influence the yield of these compounds.”
The paper relies on this without support.
High-quality data are fundamental for developing effective AI models.
“High-quality data are fundamental for developing effective AI models.”
Cites
AI revolutionizing industries worldwide: A comprehensive overview of its diverse applications
Rashid, A. B., & Kausik, M. A. K. (2024) · Hybrid Advances · doi:10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100277 · Cited by 764 · see citing works
Sajjadi, B., Chen, W.-Y., Raman, A. A. A., & Ibrahim, S. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.050 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Jensen, W. A. (2017) · Journal of Quality Technology · doi:10.1080/00224065.2017.11917988 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Oruganti, R. K., Biji, A. P., Lanuyanger, T., Show, P. L., Sriariyanun, M., Upadhyayula, V. K. K., Gadhamshetty, V., & Bhattacharyya, D. (2023) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162797 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Xu, X., Gu, X., Wang, Z., Shatner, W., & Wang, Z. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.050 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Nayak, M., Dhanarajan, G., Dineshkumar, R., & Sen, R. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.048 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Smart microalgae farming with internet-of-things for sustainable agriculture
Lim, H. R., Khoo, K. S., Chia, W. Y., Chew, K. W., Ho, S.-H., & Show, P. L. (2022) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.107931 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Microalgae with Artificial Intelligence: A Digitalized Perspective on Genetics, Systems and Products
Teng, S. Y., Yew, G. Y., Sukačová, K., Show, P. L., Máša, V., & Chang, J.-S. (2020) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107631 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and/or Machine Learning Algorithms in Microalgae Bioprocesses
Imamoglu, E. (2024) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering11111143 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Wang, H., Alvarez, S., & Hicks, L. M. (2012) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr2008225 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Microalgae Production Cost in Aquaculture Hatcheries
Oostlander, P. C., van Houcke, J., Wijffels, R. H., & Barbosa, M. J. (2020) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735310 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Coşgun, A., Günay, M. E., & Yıldırım, R. (2021) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.034 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Xu, Z., Jiang, Y., Ji, J., Forsberg, E., Li, Y., & He, S. (2020) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.406036 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Wu, C., Xiong, W., Dai, J., & Wu, Q. (2015) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.114.250688 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Ji, F., Zhou, Y., Pang, A., Ning, L., Rodgers, K., Liu, Y., & Dong, R. (2015) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.144 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Imam, S., Schäuble, S., Valenzuela, J., López García de Lomana, A., Carter, W., Price, N. D., & Baliga, N. S. (2015) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13059 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Soil NPK and Moisture analysis using Wireless Sensor Networks
Madhumathi, R., Arumuganathan, T., & Shruthi, R. B. V. (2020) · International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) · doi:10.1109/icccnt49239.2020.9225547 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Panahi, B., Frahadian, M., Dums, J. T., & Hejazi, M. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00752 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Integrated algal biorefineries from process systems engineering aspects: A review
Wu, W., & Chang, J. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121939 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Enhancement of cell biomass and cell activity of astaxanthin-rich Haematococcus pluvialis
Sun, H., Kong, Q., Geng, Z., Duan, L., Yang, M., & Guan, B. (2015) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.101 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Hossain, S. M. Z., Sultana, N., Razzak, S. A., & Hossain, M. M. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.112016 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Multi-Wavelength Based Optical Density Sensor for Autonomous Monitoring of Microalgae
Jia, F., Kacira, M., & Ogden, K. (2015) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s150922234 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Muthuraj, M., Palabhanvi, B., Misra, S., Kumar, V., Sivalingavasu, K., & Das, D. (2013) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/s11120-013-9943-x · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Machine learning for algal biofuels: a critical review and perspective for the future
Çoşgun, A., Günay, M. E., & Yıldırım, R. (2023) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d3gc00389b · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Zhao, Y., Wang, H.-P., Yu, C., Ding, W., Han, B., Geng, S., Ning, D., Ma, T., & Yu, X. (2021) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124150 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Salgado, E. M., Esteves, A. F., Gonçalves, A. L., & Pires, J. C. M. (2023) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2023.116076 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Yeh, Y.-C., Syed, T., Brinitzer, G., Frick, K., Schmid-Staiger, U., Haasdonk, B., Tovar, G. E. M., Krujatz, F., Mädler, J., & Urbas, L. (2023) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129882 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Tummawai, T., Rohitatisha Srinophakun, T., Padungthon, S., & Sukpancharoen, S. (2024) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.4c05971 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Yang, S., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Cheng, K., Liu, J., He, Y., Zhang, Y., Mou, H., & Sun, H. (2024) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104278 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Helmy, M., Elhalis, H., Liu, Y., Chow, Y., & Selvarajoo, K. (2023) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.advnut.2022.11.002 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Feng, X., Tang, K.-H., Blankenship, R. E., & Tang, Y. J. (2010) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m110.162958 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Hossain, S. M. Z., Sultana, N., Jassim, M. S., Coskuner, G., Hazin, L. M., Razzak, S. A., & Hossain, M. M. (2022) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102490 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Pires, J. C. M., Gonçalves, A. L., Martins, F. G., Alvim-Ferraz, M. C. M., & Simões, M. V. (2013) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-013-9463-1 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Wang, J., Wang, Y., Gu, Z., Mou, H., & Sun, H. (2023) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163061 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Realization process of microalgal biorefinery: The optional approach toward carbon net-zero emission
Wang, Y., Yang, S., Liu, J., Wang, J., Xiao, M., Liang, Q., Ren, X., Wang, Y., Mou, H., & Sun, H. (2023) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165546 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Upcycling food waste into biorefinery production by microalgae
Wang, J., Wang, Y., Xiao, M., Liang, Q., Yang, S., Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Mou, H., & Sun, H. (2024) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.149532 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Mohamed, M. S., Tan, J. S., Mohamad, R., Mokhtar, M. N., & Ariff, A. B. (2013) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2013/948940 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Li, P., Luo, Y., & Yuan, X. (2021) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126230 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Christian Barbosa, R., Soares, J., & Arêdes Martins, M. (2020) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105641 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Parichehreh, R., Gheshlaghi, R., Mahdavi, M. A., & Elkamel, A. (2019) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bej.2018.10.011 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Heidari Baladehi, M., Hekmatara, M., He, Y., Bhaskar, Y., Wang, Z., Liu, L., Ji, Y., & Xu, J. (2021) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01015 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Powerful tools for productivity improvements in microalgal production
Sun, H., Wu, T., Chen, S. H. Y., Ren, Y., Yang, S., Huang, J., Mou, H., & Chen, F. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111609 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
NPK NMR Sensor: Online Monitoring of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium in Animal Slurry
Sørensen, M. K., Jensen, O., Bakharev, O. N., Nyord, T., & Nielsen, N. C. (2015) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01924 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Yang, S., Zhao, W., Mou, H., & Sun, H. (2021) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2021.102539 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationOptimization of CO2 Biofixation by Chlorella vulgaris Using a Tubular Photobioreactor
Hossain, S. M. Z., Hossain, M. M., & Razzak, S. A. (2018) · Chemical Engineering & Technology · doi:10.1002/ceat.201700210 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Technological readiness of commercial microalgae species for foods
Yang, S., Fan, Y., Cao, Y., Wang, Y., Mou, H., & Sun, H. (2024) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2023.2194423 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Synthetic biology in microalgae towards fucoxanthin production for pharmacy and nutraceuticals
Sun, H., Wang, J., Li, Y., Yang, S., Chen, D. D., Tu, Y., Liu, J., & Sun, Z. (2023) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2023.115958 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Talaei, M., Mahdavinejad, M., Azari, R., Haghighi, H. M., & Atashdast, A. (2022) · Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments · doi:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101894 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Sun, H., Ren, Y., Fan, Y., Lu, X., Zhao, W., & Chen, F. (2021) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125406 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationJanjua, M. Y., Azfar, A., Asghar, Z., & Shehzad Quraishi, K. (2024) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2024.130687 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
AI-Driven Algae Biorefineries: A New Era for Sustainable Bioeconomy
Abdullah, M., Malik, H. A., Ali, A., Boopathy, R., Vo, P. H. N., Danaee, S., Ralph, P., & Malik, S. (2025) · Current Pollution Reports · doi:10.1007/s40726-025-00352-y · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Lim, H. R., Khoo, K. S., Chew, K. W., Teo, M. Y. M., Ling, T. C., Alharthi, S., Alsanie, W. F., & Show, P. L. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3296525 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Smart Micro Farm: Sustainable Algae Spirulina Growth Monitoring System
Ariawan, E., & Stanley Makalew, A. (2018) · 2018 10th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE) · doi:10.1109/iciteed.2018.8534904 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Szeląg, B., González-Camejo, J., Eusebi, A. L., Barat, R., Kiczko, A., & Fatone, F. (2024) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.154202 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Gong, Q., Wang, J., Zhao, W., Liu, J., Yang, S., Gao, Y., Mou, H., Zhu, C., & Sun, H. (2025) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132245 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationDong, Q., Zhao, X., Ma, H., Xing, X., & Sun, N. (2006) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.200600060 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Keulen, D., Hagen, E. V. D., Geldhof, G., Le Bussy, O., Pabst, M., & Ottens, M. (2024) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.28454 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Yu, T., Fan, F., Huang, L., Wang, W., Wan, M., & Li, Y. (2024) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2023.130166 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Xu, K., Zhu, Z., Yu, H., & Zou, X. (2025) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2025.103985 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Makaranga, A., & Jutur, P. P. (2023) · Enzyme and Microbial Technology · doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2023.110291 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Lu, X., Yang, S., He, Y., Zhao, W., Nie, M., & Sun, H. (2024) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md22090386 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationFu, Y., Zhang, Q., Tan, Z., Yu, S., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2025.115406 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Huang, Y. Y., Zhang, B., Chen, K., Xia, A., Zhu, X., Zhu, X., & Liao, Q. (2022) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2022.114645 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Zhao, W., Wang, J., Yang, S., Liu, J., Zheng, J., Mou, H., & Sun, H. (2025) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132106 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationMohammady, N. G.-E., El-Khatib, K. M., El-Galad, M. I., Abo El-Enin, S. A., Attia, N. K., El-Araby, R., El Diwani, G., & Manning, S. R. (2022) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-020-00878-9 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Fernández Izquierdo, P., Patiño Coral, M., & Ortiz Benavides, F. (2024) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2023.103331 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Lindehoff, E., Mattsson, L., Olofsson, M., Svensson, F., Farnelid, H., & Legrand, C. (2024) · Bioresource Technology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101730 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
King, C. W. (2006) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.10879 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The potential footprint of alternative meat adoption on corn and soybean producers
Blaustein-Rejto, D., Merener, N., & Smith, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2024.1400515 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
(2016) · International Journal of Biotechnology and Food Sciences
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kovács, E. (2024). A Realistic Take on the Productivity and Sustainability of β-Carotene Biosynthesis in Microalgae and Yeast. [Bachelor’s Thesis, University of Groningen].
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design
Schneider, A. T., Machado, R. L. S., Dutra, D. A., Machado, E. F., Dias, R. R., Deprá, M. C., Zepka, L. Q., & Jacob-Lopes, E. (2025) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2025.1716473 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Microalgae as an Eco-Friendly and Functional Ingredient for Sustainable Aquafeed
Balasubramaniam, V. R. M. T., Rathi, D.-N. G., Mustar, S., & Lee, J. C. (2025) · Aquaculture Journal · doi:10.3390/aquacj5030014 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Zheng, J., Geng, J., Li, J., Li, D., Yang, S., Lu, X., Liu, J., Zhang, C., & Sun, H. (2025) · Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100776 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationRecent Advances in the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Microalgal Cultivation
Rayamajhi, V., Hussain, M., Shin, H., & Jung, S.-M. (2025) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr13123764 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Microalgae Cultivation Systems: Toward Autonomous Architecture
Sangregorio‐Soto, V., Mayorga, E. Y., & Perafán, R. D. L. H. (2026) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation12030147 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Venkatrayalu, G., Choudhary, S., & Poluri, K. M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-5378-5_9 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
González-Delgado, Á. D., Rojas-Flores, S., & Alviz-Meza, A. (2025) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr13103134 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Nutrient Recycling in Microalgae Cultivation as a Sustainable Process for Biomass Production
Morocho‐Jácome, A. L., Mejia-da-Silva, L. D. C., Bresaola, M. D., Matsudo, M. C., Bezerra, R. P., & de Carvalho, J. C. M. (2025) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation12010001 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
The Advancement of Microalgal Cultivation Technology: Current Trends and Future Prospectives
Molla, A., & Abebe, G. M. (2025) · International Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.11648/j.ijmb.20251003.13 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Kolachalama, D., & Krishnamoorthy, S. (2025) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2025.120214 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Singh, R. P., Singh, P. K., Kumar, I., Kumar, M., Gaur, V. K., Kaushik, A., Arya, A., Saikia, M., Santos‐Villalobos, S. D. L., Kumar, A., et al. (2026) · Energy Strategy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2026.102050 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Energy-efficient machine learning approaches for enhanced biofuel (Biodiesel) production: A review
Song, M.-K., Kim, D.-W., Mohanty, S., Son, M., Lee, S. S., Salama, E., Li, X., Kumar, R., & Jeon, B. (2026) · Energy and AI · doi:10.1016/j.egyai.2026.100696 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Prabhu, N., & Kadry, S. (2026) · Cleaner Waste Systems · doi:10.1016/j.clwas.2026.100509 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Bhatnagar, P., Choudhary, S., Dey, A., & Poluri, K. M. (2025) · CleanMat. · doi:10.1002/clem.70017 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Akter, F., Songsomboon, K., Ralph, P. J., & Kuzhiumparambil, U. (2025) · Bioresource Technology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.biteb.2025.102280 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Harnessing microalgae for bioproducts: innovations in synthetic biology
Li, Z., Cheng, Y., Li, C., Wu, Q., & Xin, Y. (2025) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-025-04727-7 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Thajuddin, F., Rasheed, A. S., Rajendran, P. J., Palanivel, P., Nooruddin, T., & Dharumadurai, D. (2026) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2026.117105 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Translating research into reality: The journey of Nannochloropsis from laboratory to industry
Ji, X., Dart, P. J., Thomas‐Hall, S. R., & Sagulenko, E. (2025) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2025.104381 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Woźniak, A., Szramowiat-Sala, K., & Hirose, T. (2025) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/3107/1/012027 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Obidi, P. O., & Bayless, D. J. (2025) · Environmental Technology Reviews · doi:10.1080/21622515.2025.2581330 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Recent advances in omics-driven research of photosynthetic microorganisms in green biotechnology
Sorokin, B., Gusev, E., Namsaraev, Z. B., Buzdin, A. A., Osmakova, A., & Kuzmin, D. (2026) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.1080/1040841x.2026.2655676 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Liang, M., Li, C., Zhang, W.-P., & Wang, D. (2026) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2026.134833 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
AlSalal, A. M., Alkanaimsh, S., & AlMomani, F. A. (2026) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2026.123142 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Garg, S., Kaur, P., Joshi, K., Gangola, S., Punetha, H., Devi, A., Dwibedi, V., & Vyas, A. (2026) · Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/10826068.2026.2669845 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Liyanaarachchi, V. C., Nimarshana, P. H. V., Oliveira, R., & Ariyadasa, T. U. (2026) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2026.124514 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Darma, A. S., Lestari, W. A., Maulida, S. F., Rahmadani, K., Hussain, S., & Shalihin, M. I. (2026) · Biomass Futures · doi:10.1016/j.bmf.2026.100023 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Microalgae: A novel potential resource for medicine and food homology
Yuqing, H., Liu, M., Tuo, Z., ChunXia, M., Xiuteng, Z., & Pei, H.-Y. (2026) · Journal of Agriculture and Food Research · doi:10.1016/j.jafr.2026.102822 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Cosenza, B., Pomaré, M., Concas, A., Cravotto, G., Cosenza, A., Peroni, C. V., Usai, L., & Lutzu, G. A. (2026) · Biomass · doi:10.3390/biomass6030041 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Lee, S. H., Ku, K., Cho, J. B., & Cho, W. S. (2026) · Horticultural Science and Technology · doi:10.7235/hort.20250081 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Lora, E. E. S., Garcı̀a-Pèrez, M., Monroy, É. F. C., Errera, M. R., Venturini, O. J., Adeoye, O. O., Nogueira, L. A. H., Andrade, R. V., Maya, D. M. Y., de Oliveira, D. C., et al. (2026) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en19133162 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Algal Industry 5.0 for sustainable aquafeeds: integrating digital technologies and bioprocessing
Soon, C. F., Sunar, N. M., Adris, N. A., Paiman, N. A., Arifin, S. N. H., Lixandru, L.-M., Yaakob, M., Jamia’an, M., Tee, K. S., & Heng, C. (2026) · Aquaculture International · doi:10.1007/s10499-026-02604-0 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Zaman, H. B., Yu, K. L., Mohamed, H., Ker, P. J., & Salehmin, M. N. I. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-3808-9_35
Algal and bee-derived compounds: Bioactives for cosmetics and therapeutic applications
Mahran, G. M., Eldiehy, K. S. H., Mohamed, A. K. S. H., & Atta, O. M. (2026) · New Horizons Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences · doi:10.62184/nhjbas.jnh10020255
Fawaz, S., Sepulcre, F., Cunill, M. P., de Morais, E. G., & Haddarah, A. (2026) · Next research. · doi:10.1016/j.nexres.2026.101844
Pourtalebi, B., Hajizadeh, F., Alizadeh, R., & Maghsoudi, H. (2026) · International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2026.111534
Mishra, S., Srivastava, A., Koshe, P., Mahata, C., Vishvakarma, R., & Pandey, A. (2026) · Interdisciplinary biotechnological advances · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-8431-4_8
Circular Economy Meets Artificial Intelligence: Unlocking Algal Bio Refinery Potential
Snehlata, Kothari, R., Azam, R., Singh, D. V., & Nagappan, S. (2026) · Interdisciplinary biotechnological advances · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-8431-4_20
Wang, B., & Dong, W. (2026) · Synthetic biology and engineering · doi:10.70322/sbe.2026.10008
Shah, M., Kumar, A., Chaturvedi, A., & Diab, M. A. (2026) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.156203
Prajapati, S., Tripathi, A., Singh, R., Prajapati, A., Rajput, M. S., Rajput, R. S., Pareek, N., Saratale, G. D., & Vivekanand, V. (2026) · Chemical Engineering Journal Green and Sustainable · doi:10.1016/j.cejgas.2026.100093
Tripathi, G. (2026) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.70305
Miniaturized Bioreactors: Advancement in Microalgae Screening Process
Bi, N., Rawat, K., & Joshi, M. C. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22332-6_1
Anbu, E., & Odukkathil, G. (2026) · Bioresource Technology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.biteb.2026.102958
Artificial intelligence in diatom science: methods, progress and applications
Parikh, H. S., Dave, G., Verma, J., & Tiwari, A. (2026) · Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00027-026-01349-5
Data-Driven Ensemble Machine Learning for Multi-Horizon Microalgal Bioprocess Forecasting
Cosenza, B., Minardi, R., Usai, L., Allodi, R., Concas, A., Sofia, D., Cravotto, G., Denaro, G., Messineo, A., Volpe, M., et al. (2026) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr14162536
Qi, Z. H. O. U., Cheng, D. A. N., ZHANG, Y., ZHANG, J., Yun-Lu, J. I. A., & Li-Rong, S. O. N. G. (2026) · Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/1000-3207.2026.2026.0002
Biohydrogen production from biophotolysis
Zheng, Y., Huang, Y., & Liu, S. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-27686-6.00007-4
Rocha, R. K., Dario, L. N., Barnabé, A. C. D. S., Ignácio, P. S. D. A., Bastos, R. G., & Luchessi, A. D. (2026) · Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.70204
Devarajan, Y., Raja, T., Saxena, D. N., Devakki, B., Jena, S. P., Yadav, N. K., Kalidhas, A. M., Jayabal, R., & Mehar, K. (2026) · Digital Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.dche.2026.100339
Chauhan, R., Sarfi, Z., Soni, E., Gaur, V. K., & Zuhairi, M. F. (2026) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2026.1906898
Srinuanpan, S. (2026) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1017558
Methodologies for AI-Driven Renewable Energy Optimization
Boopathy, G., Chandru, J., Kumar, M., & Mohit, H. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7549-6.ch006
Biswas, S., Rai, K. A., Iyer, S. R., & Moorthy, I. G. (2026) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2026.1980036
Zafar, M., Salti, S. I. A. A., Khan, T. A., Araimi, S. H. A., Mahanty, B., & Behera, S. K. (2026) · Bioresource Technology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.biteb.2026.103140
Kumar, P., Kumar, S., Prabhakar, P., Verma, D. K., Utama, G. L., González, M. L. C., & Aguilar, C. N. (2026) · World sustainability series · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-26142-7_4
Marine Algae-Derived Materials for Environmental Applications
Malak, S., Ceballos, M. W. G., Ramesh, S. K., Rasgo, J. R. F., & Ajala, S. O. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-0347-5_3
Suparmaniam, U., Lam, M. K., Yeek-Chia, H., Tan, I. S., Foo, H. C. Y., Tan, J. P., & Nootong, K. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-40457-3.00006-8
Mahrous, T., Elsamahy, T., Abdelkarim, E. A., Mohamad, O. A. A., & Fodah, A. E. M. (2026) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394362967.ch19
Microalgae-derived bioplastics: Sustainable innovations for a greener future
Elumalai, M., Sampath, S., Rameswaran, S., & Ravindran, B. (2026) · Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Parts A/B/C · doi:10.1016/j.pce.2026.104950
- Authors
- Wu, Y., Shan, L., Zhao, W., & Lu, X.
- Affiliations
- Lianyungang Technical College (CN)
- Beijing Academy of Science and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Lu, Xue
- Venue
- Marine Drugs
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2025-04-25
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 184
- ISSN
- 1660-3397 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12113173
- OpenAlex
- W4409801510
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 15
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Marine Drugs (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Financial Program of BJAST (25CB011-01, 25CB011-02)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
- Keywords
- microalgal biotechnology, artificial intelligence, machine learning, microalgae cultivation optimization, CO2 capture, biofuels, value-added chemicals, biomass production, lipid yield, carbon neutrality, climate change mitigation
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Biotechnology, Carbon, Carbon Dioxide, Biomass, Biofuels, Microalgae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-06.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review