The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
How science makes environmental controversies worse
Sarewitz, D. (2004) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001 · Cited by 1,194
Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science
Jasanoff, S. (2003) · Minerva · doi:10.1023/a:1025557512320 · Cited by 1,004
Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health sciences
O'Fallon, L. R., & Dearry, A. (2002) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.02110s2155 · Cited by 604
Tribal Participatory Research: Mechanisms of a Collaborative Model
Fisher, P. A., & Ball, T. J. (2003) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1023/b:ajcp.0000004742.39858.c5 · Cited by 251 · cited 2×
“Examples include community-based initiatives (Brunner et al., 2002); Community Research (Stead et al., 2002);41 Deliberative Polling; Citizen Juries; Stakeholder Dialogues; Scenario Workshops; Consultative Panels (Smith and Kelly, 2003); Participatory Planning Processes (Forester, 1999); Participatory Development (Cam…”
Background
Cited by
An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation
Cowling, R. M., Egoh, B., Knight, A. T., O'Farrell, P. J., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Roux, D. J., Welz, A., & Wilhelm-Rechman, A. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0706559105 · Cited by 649
Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development
Termorshuizen, J. W., & Opdam, P. (2009) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-008-9314-8 · Cited by 632
Vogel, C., Moser, S. C., Kasperson, R. E., & Dabelko, G. D. (2007) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.002 · Cited by 587
Vaughan, C., & Dessai, S. (2014) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.290 · Cited by 526
Boundary spanning at the science–policy interface: the practitioners’ perspectives
Bednarek, A. T., Wyborn, C., Cvitanovic, C., Meyer, R., Colvin, R. M., Addison, P. F. E., Close, S. L., Curran, K., Farooque, M., Goldman, E., et al. (2018) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0550-9 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- McNie, E. C.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-38
- ISSN
- 1462-9011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101010898
- Cited by
- 881
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 40.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.004
- The paper
- McNie, E. C. (2007). Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environmental Science & Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.