Cited by 645Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesSustainable Development and Environmental Management

Examining equity: A multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services

McDermott, Melanie, Mahanty, Sango, Schreckenberg, Kate·2013·Environmental Science & Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The NPCC3 report recommended future tracking of social vulnerability through index-based methods like SoVI or SVI, through individual variables, and/or through a combination of approaches.

    “On the distributional dimension, the report recommended future tracking of social vulnerability through index-based methods like the social vulnerability index (SoVI 4 or SVI 5 ), through the use of individual variables, and/or through a combination of approaches.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDermott, M., Mahanty, S., & Schreckenberg, K.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
McDermott, Melanie
Venue
Environmental Science & Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
33
Pages
416-427
ISSN
1462-9011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089315562
Cited by
645
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
18.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Policy (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/I00341X/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
Keywords
payments for ecosystem services, social equity, REDD+, distributive fairness, procedural equity, deforestation, forest degradation, marginalized communities, inclusive decision-making, moral values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review