The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management
Open accessAbstract
Ecosystem service concepts can offer a valuable approach for linking human and nature, and arguments for the conservation and restoration of natural ecosystems. Despite an increasing interest in the topic, the application of these concepts for water resource management has been hampered by the lack of practical definitions and methodologies. In this study we review and analyse the current literature and propose an approach for assessing and valuing ecosystem services in the context of water management. In particular, to study the link between multiple pressures, ecological status and delivery of ecosystem services in aquatic ecosystems under different scenarios of measures or future changes. This is of interest for the development of River Basin Management Plans under the EU Water Framework Directive. We provide a list of proxies/indicators of natural capacity, actual flow and social benefit for the biophysical assessment of the ecosystem services. We advocate the use of indicators of sustainability, combining information on capacity and flow of services. We also suggest methods for economic valuation of aquatic ecosystem for each service and spatial scale of application. We argue that biophysical assessment and economic valuation should be conducted jointly to account for the different values of ecosystem services (ecologic, social and economic) and to strengthen the recognition of human dependency on nature. The proposed approach can be used for assessing the benefits of conservation and restoration of aquatic ecosystems in the implementation of the EU water policy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
Changes in the global value of ecosystem services
Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., & Turner, R. K. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002 · Cited by 6,322
Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines
Butchart, S. H. M., Walpole, M., Collen, B., van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J. P. W., Almond, R. E. A., Baillie, J. E. M., Bomhard, B., Brown, C., Bruno, J., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1187512 · Cited by 4,892
Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014 · Cited by 3,158
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
(2012) · Strategic Environmental Assessment · doi:10.4324/9781849772631-19 · Cited by 2,617
Convention on Biological Diversity
Cropper, A. (1993) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892900023614 · Cited by 2,471
Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets
Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., & Müller, F. (2012) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 · Cited by 2,160
Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning
Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Barton, D. N. (2013) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019 · Cited by 1,871
The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being
Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2010) · Ecosystem Ecology · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750458.007 · Cited by 1,514
The Nature and Value of Ecosystem Services: An Overview Highlighting Hydrologic Services
Brauman, K. A., Daily, G. C., Duarte, T. K., & Mooney, H. A. (2007) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.32.031306.102758 · Cited by 1,433
Cited by
van Rees, C. B., Waylen, K. A., Schmidt‐Kloiber, A., Thackeray, S. J., Kalinkat, G., Martens, K., Domisch, S., Lillebø, A. I., Hermoso, V., Grossart, H., et al. (2021) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12771 · Cited by 192
Hidden treasures: Human-made aquatic ecosystems harbour unexplored opportunities
Koschorreck, M., Downing, A. S., Hejzlar, J., Marcé, R., Laas, A., Arndt, W. G., Keller, P. S., Smolders, A. J. P., van Dijk, G., & Kosten, S. (2020) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-019-01199-6 · Cited by 57
Higgins, J., Zablocki, J., Newsock, A., Krolopp, A., Tabas, P., & Salama, M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13041950 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Grizzetti, B., Lanzanova, D., Liquete, C., Reynaud, A., & Cardoso, A. C.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 61
- Pages
- 194-203
- ISSN
- 1462-9011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2342998116
- Cited by
- 580
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 27.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.008
- The paper
- Grizzetti, B., Lanzanova, D., Liquete, C., Reynaud, A., & Cardoso, A. C. (2016). Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management. Environmental Science & Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.