Cited by 49Fish Ecology and Management StudiesConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementAquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity

Durable Freshwater Protection: A Framework for Establishing and Maintaining Long-Term Protection for Freshwater Ecosystems and the Values They Sustain

Open access
Higgins, Jonathan, Zablocki, John, Newsock, Amy, Krolopp, Andras, Tabas, Phillip, Salama, Michael·2021·Sustainability

Abstract

Long-term protection is needed to secure threatened freshwater ecosystems and the social and biodiversity values they provide. In the face of existing and future pressures, current approaches to freshwater protection are often inadequate for maintaining ecosystem values into the future. While terrestrial and marine ecosystem protection are well recognized and have area-based protection goals in global conventions, freshwater ecosystem characteristics have remained poorly represented in these goals. Freshwater ecosystems are commonly secondary or unaddressed components of area-based terrestrial protection. The design and management for terrestrial-based protection are generally inadequate for addressing freshwater ecosystem processes and attributes critical for maintaining their natural patterns and the values they provide to people and nature. Given that freshwater-dependent species are declining at a faster rate than marine and terrestrial species, and the reliance and use of freshwater ecosystems by people living around such areas, approaches to protect them must balance the needs of people and nature and accommodate these complexities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su13041950

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are several important types of protection of inland waters that are not specifically area based; examples include national decrees, or agreements based on environmental flow requirements.

    “There are several important types of protection of inland waters that are not specifically area based.Examples include national decrees, or agreements based on environmental flow requirements (for further examples see Higgins et al., 2021; Perry et al., 2021).”

    From Protecting and restoring habitats to benefit freshwater biodiversity (2024) · cites this paper as Higgins et al., 2021

    Section 3.4.2 describes a water-resources agreement that protects rivers and lakes without focusing on specific designated areas. Table 2 and the Mexico example also describe national legislation and protections based on environmental-flow requirements. The copy does not, however, say that the agreement itself is based on environmental-flow requirements. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Inland water systems have five key ecological attributes that sustain ecosystem functions: hydrologic regime, connectivity, water quality, habitat and biotic composition.

    “Inland water systems have five key ecological attributes that sustain ecosystem functions -hydrologic regime, connectivity, water quality, habitat and biotic composition.”

    From Protecting and restoring habitats to benefit freshwater biodiversity (2024) · cites this paper as Higgins et al. 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Figgis, P.; Mackey, B.; Fitzsimons, J.; Irving, J.; Clark, P. (Eds.) Valuing Nature: Protected Areas and Ecosystem Services; Australian Committee for IUCN: Sydney, Australia, 2015.
  2. Killingtveit, Å.; Borsányi, P. River basin management in Norway-A brief summary. In Proceedings of the 3rd Inter-Regional Conference on Environment-Water Conference on Water Resources Management in the 21st Century with Particular Reference to Europe, Budapest, Hungary, 1-2 June 2000.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Higgins, J., Zablocki, J., Newsock, A., Krolopp, A., Tabas, P., & Salama, M.
Affiliations
The Nature Conservancy (US)
Corresponding author
Higgins, Jonathan
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-02-11
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
1950
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3126384679
Cited by
49
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
Keywords
long-term preservation, area-based conservation, biodiversity values, ecosystem services, conservation planning, human-nature balance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review