Cited by 653Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesSoil erosion and sediment transportConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

Land in balance: The scientific conceptual framework for Land Degradation Neutrality

Open access
Cowie, Annette L., Orr, Barron J., Castillo Sanchez, Victor M., Chasek, Pamela, Crossman, Neville D., Erlewein, Alexander, Louwagie, Geertrui, Maron, Martine +5 more·2018·Environmental Science & Policy

Abstract

The health and productivity of global land resources are declining, while demand for those resources is increasing. The aim of land degradation neutrality (LDN) is to maintain or enhance land-based natural capital and its associated ecosystem services. The Scientific Conceptual Framework for Land Degradation Neutrality has been developed to provide a scientific approach to planning, implementing and monitoring LDN. The Science-Policy Interface of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) led the development of the conceptual framework, drawing in expertise from a diverse range of disciplines. The LDN conceptual framework focuses on the supporting processes required to deliver LDN, including biophysical and socio-economic aspects, and their interactions. Neutrality implies no net loss of the land-based natural capital relative to a reference state, or baseline. Planning for neutrality involves projecting the likely cumulative impacts of land use and land management decisions, then counterbalancing anticipated losses with measures to achieve equivalent gains. Counterbalancing should occur only within individual land types, distinguished by land potential , to ensure “like for like” exchanges. Actions to achieve LDN include sustainable land management (SLM) practices that avoid or reduce degradation, coupled with efforts to reverse degradation through restoration or rehabilitation of degraded land. The response hierarchy of Avoid > Reduce > Reverse land degradation articulates the priorities in planning LDN interventions. The implementation of LDN is managed at the landscape level through integrated land use planning, while achievement is assessed at national level. Monitoring LDN status involves quantifying the balance between the area of gains (significant positive changes in LDN indicators) and area of losses (significant negative changes in LDN indicators), within each land type across the landscape. The LDN indicators (and associated metrics) are land cover (physical land cover class), land productivity (net primary productivity, NPP) and carbon stocks (soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks). The LDN conceptual framework comprises five modules: A: Vision of LDN describes the intended outcome of LDN; B: Frame of Reference clarifies the LDN baseline; C: Mechanism for Neutrality explains the counterbalancing mechanism; D: Achieving Neutrality presents the theory of change (logic model) articulating the impact pathway; and E: Monitoring Neutrality presents the LDN indicators. Principles that govern application of the framework provide flexibility while reducing risk of unintended outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.011

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Land degradation neutrality, target 15.3 of the SDGs, provides an incentive and framework that encourages strategic actions to restore and rehabilitate degraded land, within the context of integrated landscape planning and management, aimed at delivering multiple environmental and development objectives.

    “Land degradation neutrality, 1 target 15.3 of the SDGs, provides an incentive and framework that encourages strategic actions to restore and rehabilitate degraded land, within the context of integrated landscape planning and management, aimed at delivering multiple environmental and development objectives (136).”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [136]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Herrick, J.E., Beh, A., Barrios, E., Bouvier, I., Coetzee, M., Dent, D., Elias, E., Hengl, T., Karl, J.W., Liniger, H., 2016. The land-potential knowledge system (LandPKS): mo- bile apps and collaboration for optimizing climate change investments. Ecosyst. Health Sustain. 2. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA), 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  2. McDonald, T., Gann, G.D., Jonson, J., Dixon, K.W., 2016. International Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration-Including Principles and Key Concepts, first edition. Society for Ecological Restoration (SER), Washington, D.C.
  3. McKenney, B.A., Kiesecker, J.M., 2010. Policy development for biodiversity offsets: a review of offset frameworks. Environ. Manage. 45, 165-176.
  4. Stafford Smith, D.M., Abel, N., Walker, B., Chapin III, F.S., 2009. Drylands: coping with uncertainty, thresholds, and changes in state. Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship. Springer pp. 171-195.
  5. UNCCD, 2013. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its eleventh session, held in Windhoek from 16 to 27 September 2013. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its eleventh session. ICCD/COP(11)/23/Add.1. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Bonn.
  6. UNCCD, 2016. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twelfth session, held in Ankara from 12 to 23 October 2015. Part two: Actions. ICCD/COP(12)/20/Add.
  7. UNCCD-AGTE, 2013. Refinement of the set of impact indicators on strategic objectives 1, 2 and 3. Recommendations of the ad hoc advisory group of technical experts ICCD/ COP(11)/CST/2 and Corr.1. 10 July 2013. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD).
  8. UNEP, 2016. In: Herrick, J.E., Arnalds, O., Bestelmeyer, B., Bringezu, S., Han, G., Johnson, M.V., Kimiti, D., Lu, Yihe, Montanarella, L., Pengue, W., Toth, G., Tukahirwa, J., Velayutham, M., Zhang, G. (Eds.), Unlocking the Sustainable Potential of Land Resources: Evaluation Systems, Strategies and Tools. A Report of the Working Group on Land and Soils of the International Resource Panel. United Nations Environment Programme (UN Environment), Nairobi Available at: http:// resourcepanel.org/reports/unlocking-sustainable-potential-land-resources.
  9. Weiss, C.H., 1995. Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts 1. pp. 65-92.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cowie, A. L., Orr, B. J., Castillo Sanchez, V. M., Chasek, P., Crossman, N. D., Erlewein, A., Louwagie, G., Maron, M., Metternicht, G. I., Minelli, S., Tengberg, A. E., Walter, S., & Welton, S.
Affiliations
  • New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU)
  • University of Alicante (ES)
  • Manhattan University (US)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (PH)
  • European Environment Agency (DK)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (DE)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Cowie, Annette L.
Venue
Environmental Science & Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
79
Pages
25-35
ISSN
1462-9011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765368320
Cited by
653
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 4
FWCI
35.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
UNCCD
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
land degradation neutrality, ecosystem services, sustainable land management, land restoration, land use planning, land degradation indicators, soil organic carbon, net primary productivity, land cover, science-policy interface, UNCCD, land potential, logic model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review