Cited by 91Ecosystem dynamics and resilienceEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesSustainability and Climate Change Governance

Social-ecological drivers and impacts of invasion-related regime shifts: consequences for ecosystem services and human wellbeing

Open access
Shackleton, Ross T., Biggs, Reinette, Richardson, David M., Larson, Brendon M.H.·2018·Environmental Science & Policy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.08.005

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many invasive alien plants modify ecosystems in ways that enhance their own persistence and suppress native species through reinforcing feedbacks, causing regime shifts.

    “Many invasive alien plants modify ecosystems in ways that enhance their own persistence and suppress native species through reinforcing feedbacks, causing regime shifts (altered states of ecosystem structure and function that are difficult or impossible to reverse).”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Shackleton et al., 2018

    The Introduction describes how an introduced species can alter self-reinforcing feedbacks and, if it becomes dominant, precipitate a regime shift. But section 6.1 directly contradicts the claim’s “many”: it says only a small proportion of invasive alien species are likely to cause regime shifts. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Invasive trees and shrubs in forests and herbaceous invaders in wetlands impact soil-nutrient cycling by modifying the composition of soil seed banks and changing fire regimes.

    “Examples include impacts on soil‐nutrient cycling caused by invasive trees and shrubs in forests and by herbaceous invaders in wetlands, through modifying the composition of soil seed banks and changed fire regimes (Gaertner et al., 2014; Gioria, Jarošík, & Pyšek, 2014; Shackleton et al., 2018)”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Shackleton et al., 2018

    Section 2.1 reports that invasive wattles increase soil nitrogen, alter soil chemistry, and intensify fires; the Discussion also describes invasive shrubs changing forest soil properties and fire regimes. But the paper does not establish that these changes affect soil-nutrient cycling through altered soil seed-bank composition, or describe that mechanism for herbaceous wetland invaders. Its aquatic-plant case study (§5.1) concerns water chemistry and nutrients, not wetland soils. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Allsopp, N., Colville, J., Verboom, T. (Eds.), 2014. Fynbos: Ecology, Evolution and Conservation of a Megadiverse Region. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  2. Armitage, D.R., Plummer, R., Berkes, F., Arthur, R.I., Charles, A.T., Davidson-Hunt, I.J., Diduck, A.P., Doubleday, N.C., Johnson, D.S., Marschke, M., McConney, P., 2009. Adaptive co-management for social?ecological complexity. Fron. Ecol. Environ. 7 (2), 95-102.
  3. Berks, F., Colding, J., Folke, C., 2003. Navigating Social-ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  4. Biggs, R., Carpenter, S.R., Brock, W.A., 2009. Turning back from the brink: detecting an impending regime shift in time to avert it. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 826-831.
  5. Biggs, R., Blenckner, T., Folke, C., Gordon, L., Norström, A., Nyström, M., Peterson, G.D., 2012. Regime shifts. In: Hastings, A., Gross, L. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Theoretical Ecology. University of California Press, Ewing, NJ, USA, pp. 609-617.
  6. Biggs, R., Peterson, G.D., Rocha, J., 2018. The Regime Shifts Database: a framework for analysing regime shifts in social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 23 (3), 9. https://doi. org/10.5751/ES-10264-230309. · DOI
  7. Coetzee, J.A., Hill, M.P., Byrne, M.J., Browns, A., 2011a. A review of the biological control programmes on Eichhornia crassipes (C. Mart.) Solms (Pontederiaceae), Salvinia molesta D.S.MItch. (Salviniaceae), Pistia stratiotes L. (Araceae), Myriophyllum aquaticum (Vell.) Verdc. (Haloragaceae) and Azolla filiculoides Lam. (Azollaceae) in South Africa. Afr. Entomol. 19, 451-568.
  8. Crooks, J.A., Soulé, M.E., Sandlund, O.T., 1999. Lag times in population explosions of invasive species: causes and implications. In: Sandlund, O.T., Schei, P.J., Viken, A. (Eds.), Invasive Species and Biodiversity Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 103-125.
  9. Day, M.D., Bofeng, I., Nabo, I., 2013. Successful biological control of Chromolaena odorata (asteraceae) by the gall fly cecidochares connexa (diptera: tephritidae) in Papua New Guinea. Proceedings of the XIII International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds.
  10. de Chenon, R.D., Sipayung, A., Sudharto, P., 2002. A decade of biological control against Chromolaena odorata at the Indonesian oil Palm research institute in marihat. Proceedings of the 5 th International Workshop on Biological Control and Management of Chromolaena odorata..
  11. Drake, J.M., Lodge, D.M., 2004. Global hot spots of biological invasions: evaluating op- tions for ballast-water management. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 271, 575-580.
  12. Ellison, Aaron M., Michael, S. Bank, Clinton, Barton D., Colburn, Elizabeth A., Elliott, Katherine, Ford, Chelcy R., Foster, David R., et al., 2005. Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 3 (9), 479-486.
  13. Freinkel, S., 2007. American Chestnut: the Life, Death and Rebirth of a Perfect Tree. University of California Press.
  14. Gaertner, M., Holmes, P.M., Richardson, D.M., 2012. Biological invasions, resilience and restoration. In: van Andel, J., Aronson, J. (Eds.), Restoration Ecology -The New Frontier. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 265-280.
  15. Gaertner, M., Le Maitre, D.C., Esler, K.J., 2017. Alterations of disturbance regimes by plant and animal invaders. In: Vila, M., Hulme, P. (Eds.), Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services. Springer, Cham.
  16. Goeden, R., Fleschner, C., Ricker, D., 1967. Biological Control of Prickly Pear cacti on Santa Cruz Island 38. California Agriculture, California, pp. 579-606.
  17. Hammond, C., 2012. Impacts of Agriculturally-driven Regime Shifts on Ecosystem Services and Human Well-being. Master's Thesis. Stockholm Resilience Centre: Stockholm University.
  18. Henderson, L., Wilson, J.R.U., 2017. Changes in the composition and distribution of alien plants in South Africa: an update from the Southern African Plant Invaders Atlas. Bothalia 47, a2172. https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v47i2.2172. · DOI
  19. Hui, C., Richardson, D.M., 2017. Invasion Dynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  20. Julien, M.H., Orapa, W., 1999. Structure and management of a successful biological control project for water hyacinth. Proceedings of the 1 st IOBC Global Working Group Meeting for the Biological and Integrated Control of Water Hyacinth 123-134.
  21. Keller, R.P., Lodge, D.M., Finnoff, D.C., 2007. Risk assessment for invasive species pro- duces net bioeconomic benefits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 203-207.
  22. Kueffer, C., 2013. Integrating natural and social sciences for understanding and managing plant invasions. In: Larrue, S. (Ed.), Biodiversity and Societies in the Pacific Islands. Presses Universitaires De Provence, Collection "Confluent Des Sciences" & ANU Epress, pp. 71-96.
  23. Kueffer, C., Kull, C.A., 2017. Non-native species and the aesthetics of nature. In: Hulme, P., Vilà, M., Ruiz, G. (Eds.), Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services. Springer, Berlin, pp. 311-324.
  24. Kull, C.A., Kueffer, C., Richardson, D.M., Vaz, A.S., Vicente, J.R., Honrado, J.P., 2018. Using the 'regime shift' concept in addressing social-ecological change. Geogr. Res. 56, 26-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12267. · DOI
  25. Linder, H.P., Lehmann, C.E.R., Archibald, S., Osborne, C., Richardson, D.M., 2018. Global grass (Poaceae) success underpinned by traits facilitating colonization, persistence and habitat transformation. Biol. Rev. 93, 1125-1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv. 12388. · DOI
  26. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA), 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: a Framework for Assessment. Island Press, Washington DC.
  27. Nsikani, M.M., Novoa, A., van Wilgen, B.W., Keet, J.H., Gaertner, M., 2017. Acacia sal- igna's soil legacy effects persist up to 10 years after clearing: implications for ecolo- gical restoration. Austral. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12515. · DOI
  28. Potgieter, L., Kueffer, C., Larson, B., Livingston, S., O'Farrell, P., Gaertner, M., Richardson, D.M., 2017. Alien plants as mediators of ecosystem services and disservices in urban systems: A global review. Biol. Invasions 19, 3571-3588. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10530-017-1589-8. · DOI
  29. Potgieter, L., Gaertner, M., Irlich, U.M., O'Farrell, P.J., Stafford, L., Vogt, H., Richardson, D.M., 2018. Managing urban plant invasions: a multi-scale prioritization framework. Environ. Manage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1088-4. (in press). · DOI
  30. Richardson, D.M., Cowling, R.M., 1992. Why is mountain fynbos invasible and which species invade? In: Van Wilgen, B.W., Richardson, D.M., Kruger, F.J., van Hensbergen, H.J. (Eds.), Fire in South African Mountain Fynbos. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 161-181.
  31. Richardson, D.M., Pyšek, P., Carlton, J.T., 2011. A compendium of essential concepts and terminology in invasion ecology. In: Richardson, D.M. (Ed.), Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology. The Legacy of Charles Elton. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 409-420.
  32. Rocha, J., Yletyinen, J., Biggs, R., Blenckner, T., Peterson, G., 2015. Marine regime shifts: drivers and impacts on ecosystems services. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 370 20130273.
  33. Shackleton, R.T., Le Maitre, D.C., van Wilgen, B.W., Richardson, D.M., 2017b. Towards a national strategy to optimise the management of a widespread invasive tree (Prosopis species; mesquite) in South Africa. Ecosyst. Serv. 27, 242-252. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.022. · DOI
  34. Shackleton, R.T., Shackleton, C.M., Kull, C.A., 2018a. The role of invasive alien species in shaping local livelihoods and human well-being. J. Environ. Manage. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.007. · DOI
  35. Shackleton, R.T., Adriaens, T., Brundu, G., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Estevez, R., Fried, J., Larson, B.M.H., Lui, S., Marchante, E., Merchante, H., Moshobane, M., Novoa, A., Reed, M., Richardson, D.M., 2018b. Stakeholder engagement in the study and man- agement of invasive alien species: a review. J. Environ. Manage. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.044. (in press). · DOI
  36. Souza-Alonso, P., Rodríguez, J., González, L., Lorenzo, P., 2017. Here to stay. Recent advances and perspectives about Acacia invasion in Mediterranean areas. Ann. For. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-017-0651-0. · DOI
  37. te Beest, M., Howison, O., Howinson, R., Dew, L.A., Poswa, M.M., Dumalisile, L., Janse van Rensburg, S., Terblanche, C., 2017. Successful control of the invasive shrub Chromolaena odorata in hluhluwe-iMfolozi park. In: Cromsight, J.P.G.M., Archibald, S., Owen-Smith, N. (Eds.), Conserving Africa'S Megadiversity in the Anthropocene. University Press, Cambridge, Cambridge, pp. 358-382.
  38. Thomas, P.A., Room, P.M., 1985. Towards biological control of salvinia in Papua New Guinea. Proceedings of the VI Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds.
  39. Wilson, J.R., Ivey, P., Manyama, P., Nanni, I., 2013. A new national unit for invasive species detection, assessment and eradication planning. South Afr. J. Sci. 109 (5/6). https://doi.org/10.1590/sajs.2013/20120111. · DOI
  40. Zachariades, C., Day, M., Muniappan, R., Reddy, G.V.P., 2009. Chromolaena odorata (L.) King and robinson (asteraceae). In: Muniappan, R., Reddy, G.V.P., Raman, A. (Eds.), Biological Control of Tropical Weeds Using Arthropods. University Press, Cambridge, Cambridge, pp. 130-162.
  41. Zengeya, T., Ivey, P., Woodford, D.J., Weyl, O., Novoa, A., Shackleton, R., Richardson, D., van Wilgen, B., 2017. Managing conflict-generating invasive species in South Africa: Challenges and trade-offs. Bothalia-Afr. Biodivers. Conserv. 47 (2), 1-11.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shackleton, R. T., Biggs, R., Richardson, D. M., & Larson, B. M. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Shackleton, Ross T.
Venue
Environmental Science & Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
89
Pages
300-314
ISSN
1462-9011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889096625
Cited by
91
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Policy (publishedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • DST-NRF Centre for Invasion Biology
  • National Research Foundation of South Africa (85417)
  • Research, Innovation and Postgraduate Studies at Stellenbosch University
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)
  • South African Research Chairs Initiative (SARChI) of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation of South Africa (98766)
  • Swedish International Development Agency (Sida)
  • Young Researchers
  • Vetenskapsrådet in Sweden (621-2014-5137)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Keywords
biological invasions, tipping points, ecosystem services, human well-being, social-ecological systems, ecological thresholds, causal loop diagrams, adaptive governance, invasive species management, Acacia, fynbos, Nile perch, Lake Victoria, chestnut blight, Salvinia molesta, water hyacinth, floating macrophytes, social-ecological resilience, global change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review