Cited by 143Seedling growth and survival studiesForest Insect Ecology and ManagementForest ecology and management

Toward development of silvical strategies for forest restoration of American chestnut (Castanea dentata) using blight-resistant hybrids

Jacobs, Douglass F.·2007·Biological Conservation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.03.013

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The introduction of Chinese chestnut and chestnut hybrids into eastern North American forests may alter tree species competition and forest ecosystem dynamics, shift the potential for exotic insects and pathogens to affect native species, and invade into areas outside the original native range of chestnuts.

    “The introduction of Chinese chestnut and chestnut hybrids into eastern North American forests may alter tree species competition and forest ecosystem dynamics, shift the potential for exotic insects and pathogens to affect native species, and invade into areas outside the original native range of chestnuts (Jacobs 2007).”
  • American chestnut is a fast-growing tree species with the ability to persist in shaded environments, variable soil conditions, and well-drained, dry upland sites.

    “American chestnut is a fast-growing tree species with the ability to persist in shaded environments, variable soil conditions, and well-drained, dry upland sites (Latham 1992; Jacobs 2007); yet it responds favorably to increases in sunlight, soil nutrients and moisture (Wang et al. 2006).”
  • Chinese and hybrid chestnuts, which are less affected by the blight, could spread into the forests of eastern North America following restoration efforts, potentially releasing foreign tree species with invasive qualities to North American forests.

    “Chinese and hybrid chestnuts, which are less affected by the blight, could spread into the forests of eastern North America following restoration efforts, potentially releasing foreign tree species with invasive qualities to North American forests (Jacobs 2007).”
  • Chinese chestnut as well as other chestnut hybrids that do not succumb to chestnut blight can become important sustainable tree species that supply some of the favorable features of American chestnut to forest ecosystems.

    “Chinese chestnut as well as other chestnut hybrids that do not succumb to chestnut blight (Jacobs 2007; Wang et al. 2013) can become important sustainable tree species that supply some of the favorable features of American chestnut to forest ecosystems.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobs, D. F.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Jacobs, Douglass F.
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
137
Issue
4
Pages
497-506
ISSN
0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148692338
Cited by
142
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Seedling growth and survival studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Forest Insect Ecology and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
Keywords
American chestnut, Castanea dentata, forest restoration, chestnut blight, backcrossing, reintroduction, invasive pathogens, genetic fitness, eastern North American forests, conservation policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review