Cited by 40Disaster Management and ResilienceFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementSustainability and Climate Change Governance

Overcoming barriers to knowledge integration for urban resilience: A knowledge systems analysis of two-flood prone communities in San Juan, Puerto Rico

Open access
Ramsey, Molly M., Muñoz-Erickson, Tischa A., Mélendez-Ackerman, Elvia, Nytch, Christopher J., Branoff, Benjamin L., Carrasquillo-Medrano, David·2019·Environmental Science & Policy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Municipal staff in San Juan, Puerto Rico do not currently use citizen calls to monitor urban flooding but would be willing to if a phone application was available that would include time-stamped photos of issues.

    “(Ramsey et al. 2019) note that municipal staff in San Juan, Puerto Rico do not currently use citizen calls to monitor urban flooding but would be willing to if a phone application was available that would include time-stamped photos of issues”

    From Phase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities (2022) · cites this paper as Ramsey et al. 2019

    The Conclusion says municipal staff would be willing to integrate citizen flood knowledge if an app recorded photographs and time stamps. It also says hotline reports are already used as indicators of suspected infrastructure problems or flood-vulnerable areas, though not as official data. Thus, the claim overstates the extent to which staff do not currently use citizen calls. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Baud I.S.A., Hordijk M.A, 2009. Dealing with risks in urban governance: what can we learn from "resilience thinking." The 4 th International Conference of the International Forum on Urbanism. Amsterdam/Delft.
  2. Bergsma, E, 2016. Changed knowledge requirements for spatial flood governance. Ecology and Society 21(4), 40.
  3. Coles A.R., Quintero-Angel, M., 2017. From silence to resilience: prospects and limitations for incorporating non-expert knowledge into hazard management. Environmental Hazards 17(2), 1 -18.
  4. de Jesús-Crespo, R., Ramírez, A, 2011. Effects of urbanization on stream physicochemistry and macroinvertebrate assemblages in a tropical urban watershed in Puerto Rico. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30(3), 739-750.
  5. Desportes, I., Waddell, J., Hordijk, M., 2016. Improving flood risk governance through multi- stakeholder collaboration: a case study of Sweet Home informal settlement, Cape Town. South African Geographical Journal 98(1), 61-83.
  6. Fan Mei-Fang, 2015. Disaster governance and community resilience: reflections on Typhoon Morakot in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58(1), 24- 38.
  7. Field, C.B., Barros, V., Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Dokken, D.J., Ebi, K.L., Mastrandrea, M.D., Mach, K.J., Plattner, G.-K., Allen, S.K., Tignor, M., Midgley, P.M. 2012. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaption. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  8. Haasnoot, M., Kwakkel, J. H., Walker, W. E., & ter Maat, J. 2013. Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, 23(2), 485-498.
  9. Jasanoff S., 2004. Ordering Knowledge, Ordering Society. Chapter 2 in: States of Knowledge: the Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Routledge, London and New York. pgs. 13 -45
  10. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  11. Lane S.N., Odoni N., Landström C., Whatmore S.J., Ward N., Bradley, S., 2011. Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method. Transactions Institute British Geographers 36,15-36.
  12. Lawrence, J., Quade, D., Becker, J., 2014. Integrating the effects of flood experience on risk perception with responses to changing climate risk. Nat Hazards 74(3): 1773-94.
  13. Liao, K., 2012. A theory on urban resilience to floods-a basis for alternative planning practices. Ecology and Society 17(4), 48.
  14. Lugo A., Nytch C., Ramsey, M.M., 2014. An analysis of US Army Corps of Engineers documents supporting the channelization of the Rio Piedras River. Acta Científica 27(1-3), 1.
  15. Luke, A., Sanders, B.F., Goodrich, K.A., Feldman, D.L., Boudreau, D., Eguiarte, A., Serrano, K., Reyes, A., Schubert, J.E., AghaKouchak, A., Basolo, V., Matthew, R.A., 2018. Going beyond the flood insurance rate map: insights from flood hazard map co-production. Nat Hazard Earth Sys 18, 1097-1120. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1097-2018 · DOI
  16. Merling L. 2018. Puerto Rico's Peculiar Case: Bankruptcy of an Unincorporated Territory. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, September 2018. Center for Economic and Policy Research. http://cepr.net/publications/briefings/testimony/puerto-rico-s-peculiar-case- bankruptcy-of-an-unincorporated-territory
  17. Milly, P.C.D., Wetherald, Rt., Dunne, K.A., Delworth, T.L. 2002. Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate. Nature, 415 (6871), 514-517.
  18. Miller, C., Wyborn, C., 2018. Co-production in global sustainability: Histories and theories. Environmental Science and Policy. In press https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901117306366?via%3Dihub Municipio de San Juan, 2015. Actualización del Plan de Mitigación Multi-Riesgo: Municipio Autónomo de San Juan. http://sanjuanciudadpatria.com/en/services/town-planning/.
  19. Muñoz-Erickson T.A., Miller C.A., Miller, T.R., 2017. How cities think: knowledge co- production for urban sustainability and resilience. Forests 8(6), 203.
  20. Quay R., 2010. Anticipatory Governance: A Tool for Climate Change Adaptation. Journal of the American Planning Association 76(4), 496 -511.
  21. Ramos-Santiago, L. E., L. Villanueva-Cubero, L. E. Santiago-Acevedo, and Y. N. Rodriguez- Melendez. 2014. Green area loss in San Juan's inner-ring suburban neighborhoods: a multidisciplinary approach to analyzing green/gray area dynamics. Ecology and Society 19(2): 4.
  22. Raymond, C. M., Fazey, I., Reed, M.S., Stringer, L.C., Robinson, G.M., Evely, A.C., 2010. Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 91, 1766-1777.
  23. Rosenzweig, B.R., McPhillips, L., Chang, H., Cheng, C., Welty, C., Matsler, M., Iwaniec, D., Davidson, C.I., 2018. Pluvial flood risk and opportunities for resilience. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 5, e1302. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1302 · DOI
  24. Seto, K.C., Fragkias, M., Güneralp, B., Reilly, M.K. 2011. A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PloS One, 6 (8), e23777.
  25. Tschakert, P., Dietrich, K. A., 2010. Anticipatory learning for climate change adaptation and resilience. Ecology and Society 15(2), 11.
  26. Watt E., Marsalek, J., 2013. Critical review of the evolution of the design storm event concept. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 40, 105-113.
  27. Muñoz-Erickson T.A., Miller C.A., Miller, T.R., 2017. How cities think: knowledge co- 94 production for urban sustainability and resilience. Forests 8(6), 203. 95

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramsey, M. M., Muñoz-Erickson, T. A., Mélendez-Ackerman, E., Nytch, C. J., Branoff, B. L., & Carrasquillo-Medrano, D.
Affiliations
US Forest Service (US)
Corresponding author
Ramsey, Molly M.
Venue
Environmental Science & Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
99
Pages
48-57
ISSN
1462-9011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947921171
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
9.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Environmental Science & Policy (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (2015-00062)
  • National Science Foundation (0948507, 00801577, 1444755, 1737626)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Keywords
knowledge integration, urban resilience, flood management, civic knowledge, stormwater management, river flooding, knowledge co-production, citizen science, climate resilience, Hurricane Maria, San Juan, Puerto Rico, knowledge infrastructure, anticipatory governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review