The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Core principles for successfully implementing and upscaling Nature-based Solutions
Open accessAbstract
Despite substantial increases in the scope and magnitude of biodiversity conservation and ecological restoration, there remains ongoing degradation of natural resources that adversely affects both biodiversity and human well-being. Nature-based Solutions (NbS) can be an effective framework for reversing this trend, by increasing the alignment between conservation and sustainable development objectives. However, unless there is clarity on its evolution, definition and principles, and relationship with related approaches, it will not be possible to develop evidence-based standards and guidelines, or to implement, assess, improve and upscale NbS interventions globally. In order to address this gap, we present the definition and principles underpinning the NbS framework, recently adopted by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, and compare it to (1) the Ecosystem Approach that was the foundation for developing the NbS definitional framework, and (2) four specific ecosystem-based approaches (Forest Landscape Restoration, Ecosystem-based Adaptation, Ecological Restoration and Protected Areas) that can be considered as falling under the NbS framework. Although we found substantial alignment between NbS principles and the principles of the other frameworks, three of the eight NbS principles stand out from other approaches: NbS can be implemented alone or in an integrated manner with other solutions; NbS should be applied at a landscape scale; and, NbS are integral to the overall design of policies, measures and actions, to address societal challenges. Reversely, concepts such as adaptive management/governance, effectiveness, uncertainty, multi-stakeholder participation, and temporal scale are present in other frameworks but not captured at all or detailed enough in the NbS principles. This critical analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the NbS principles can inform the review and revision of principles supporting specific types of NbS (such as the approaches reviewed here), as well as serve as the foundation for the development of standards for the successful implementation of NbS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A safe operating space for humanity
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/461472a · Cited by 13,333
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
Davis, K. (2008) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700108086364 · Cited by 2,539
The performance and potential of protected areas
Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B., & Hockings, M. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13947 · Cited by 2,397
Self-citationMace, G. M. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1254704 · Cited by 1,047
Cited by
Harnessing the potential of nature-based solutions for mitigating and adapting to climate change
Seddon, N. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abn9668 · Cited by 445
Principles for urban nature-based solutions
Kabisch, N., Frantzeskaki, N., & Hansen, R. (2022) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-021-01685-w · Cited by 272
Community forest governance and synergies among carbon, biodiversity and livelihoods
Fischer, H. W., Chhatre, A., Duddu, A., Pradhan, N., & Agrawal, A. (2023) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-023-01863-6 · Cited by 105
Sun, J., Wang, Y., Lee, T. M., Nie, X., Wang, T., Liang, E., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, J., Piao, S., et al. (2024) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-024-01330-w · Cited by 104
Mapping the Research Landscape of Nature-Based Solutions in Urbanism
Li, L., Cheshmehzangi, A., Chan, F. K. S., & Ives, C. D. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13073876 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen-Shacham, E., Andrade, A., Dalton, J., Dudley, N., Jones, M., Kumar, C., Maginnis, S., Maynard, S., Nelson, C. R., Renaud, F. G., Welling, R., & Walters, G.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 98
- Pages
- 20-29
- ISSN
- 1462-9011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2946103919
- Cited by
- 943
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 41.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Core principles for successfully implementing and upscaling Nature-based Solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.014
- The paper
- Cohen-Shacham, E., Andrade, A., Dalton, J., Dudley, N., Jones, M., Kumar, C., Maginnis, S., Maynard, S., Nelson, C. R., Renaud, F. G., Welling, R., & Walters, G. (2019). Core principles for successfully implementing and upscaling Nature-based Solutions. Environmental Science & Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.