CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 413

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling

Krueger, Tobias, Page, Trevor, Hubacek, Klaus, Smith, Laurence, Hiscock, Kevin·2012·Environmental Modelling & Software
DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.011

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 156

  1. Acosta, 2010, Fuzzy experts on recreational vessels, a risk modelling approach for marine invasions, Ecological Modelling, 221, 850, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.11.025 · DOI
  2. Adriaenssens, 2004, Fuzzy rule-based models for decision support in ecosystem management, Science of the Total Environment, 319, 1, 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00433-9 · DOI
  3. Ahmadi-Nedushan, 2008, Instream flow determination using a multiple input fuzzy-based rule system: a case study, River Research and Applications, 24, 279, 10.1002/rra.1059 · DOI
  4. Arhonditsis, 2008, Addressing equifinality and uncertainty in eutrophication models, Water Resources Research, 44, W01420, 10.1029/2007WR005862 · DOI
  5. Arrignon, 2007, Modelling the overwintering strategy of a beneficial insect in a heterogeneous landscape using a multi-agent system, Ecological Modelling, 205, 423, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.03.006 · DOI
  6. Austin, 2009, Mapping wildlife: integrating stakeholder knowledge with modelled patterns of deer abundance by using participatory GIS, Wildlife Research, 36, 553, 10.1071/WR08153 · DOI
  7. Ayyub, 2010, On uncertainty in information and ignorance in knowledge, International Journal of General Systems, 39, 415, 10.1080/03081071003704381 · DOI
  8. Baerlund, 2009, Soil parameter variability affecting simulated field-scale water balance, erosion and phosphorus losses, Agricultural and Food Science, 18, 402, 10.23986/afsci.5949 · DOI
  9. Bashari, 2009, Developing decision support tools for rangeland management by combining state and transition models and Bayesian belief networks, Agricultural Systems, 99, 23, 10.1016/j.agsy.2008.09.003 · DOI
  10. Batchelor, 1999, Application of belief networks to water management studies, Agricultural Water Management, 40, 51, 10.1016/S0378-3774(98)00103-6 · DOI
  11. Bello-Pineda, 2006, Incorporating GIS and MCE for suitability assessment modelling of coral reef resources, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 114, 225, 10.1007/s10661-006-4628-y · DOI
  12. Bellocchi, 2009, Validation of biophysical models: issues and methodologies. A review, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 30, 109, 10.1051/agro/2009001 · DOI
  13. Benferhat, 2002, On the transformation between possibilistic logic bases and possibilistic causal networks, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 29, 135, 10.1016/S0888-613X(01)00061-5 · DOI
  14. Besaw, 2009, Stream classification using hierarchical artificial neural networks: a fluvial hazard management tool, Journal of Hydrology, 373, 34, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.007 · DOI
  15. Beulke, 2006, User subjectivity in Monte Carlo modeling of pesticide exposure, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 25, 2227, 10.1897/05-332R.1 · DOI
  16. Beven, 1989, Changing ideas in hydrology - the case of physically-based models, Journal of Hydrology, 105, 157, 10.1016/0022-1694(89)90101-7 · DOI
  17. Bijlsma, 2007, Uncertainty analysis at large scales: limitations and subjectivity of current practices – a water quality case study, Water Science and Technology, 56, 1, 10.2166/wst.2007.580 · DOI
  18. Boesten, 2000, Modeller subjectivity in estimating pesticide parameters for leaching models using the same laboratory data set, Agricultural Water Management, 44, 389, 10.1016/S0378-3774(99)00102-X · DOI
  19. Booker, 2004, Solving black box computation problems using expert knowledge theory and methods, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85, 331, 10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.021 · DOI
  20. Borsuk, 2004, Predictive assessment of fish health and fish kills in the Neuse River estuary using elicited expert judgment, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: an International Journal, 10, 415, 10.1080/10807030490438454 · DOI
  21. Borsuk, 2001, Stakeholder values and scientific modeling in the Neuse river watershed, Group Decision and Negotiation, 10, 355, 10.1023/A:1011231801266 · DOI
  22. Borsuk, 2001, Modelling oxygen dynamics in an intermittently stratified estuary: estimation of process rates using field data, Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 52, 33, 10.1006/ecss.2000.0726 · DOI
  23. Borsuk, 2003, Integrated approach to total maximum daily load development for Neuse River Estuary using Bayesian probability network model (Neu-BERN), Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management-ASCE, 129, 271, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:4(271) · DOI
  24. Borsuk, 2004, A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis, Ecological Modelling, 173, 219, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.08.020 · DOI
  25. Borsuk, 2006, Assessing the decline of brown trout (Salmo trutta) in Swiss rivers using a Bayesian probability network, Ecological Modelling, 192, 224, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.07.006 · DOI
  26. Brouwer, 2008, Integrated modelling of risk and uncertainty underlying the cost and effectiveness of water quality measures, Environmental Modelling & Software, 23, 922, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.10.006 · DOI
  27. Brown, 2004, Knowledge, uncertainty and physical geography: towards the development of methodologies for questioning belief, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29, 367, 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00342.x · DOI
  28. Brown, 1996, Ring test with the models LEACHP, PRZM-2 and VARLEACH: variability between model users in prediction of pesticide leaching using a standard data set, Pesticide Science, 47, 249, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199607)47:3<249::AID-PS411>3.0.CO;2-W · DOI
  29. Brown Gaddis, 2010, Effectiveness of a participatory modeling effort to identify and advance community water resource goals in St. Albans, Vermont, Environmental Modelling & Software, 25, 1428, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.06.004 · DOI
  30. Burgman, 2010, Reconciling uncertain costs and benefits in Bayes Nets for invasive species management, Risk Analysis, 30, 277, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01273.x · DOI
  31. Cain, 1999, Belief networks: a framework for the participatory development of natural resource management strategies, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1, 123, 10.1023/A:1010033215125 · DOI
  32. Calder, 2009, An evaluation of the impacts of energy tree plantations on water resources in the United Kingdom under present and future UKCIP02 climate scenarios, Water Resources Research, 45, W00a17, 10.1029/2007WR006657 · DOI
  33. Clemen, 1999, Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis, Risk Analysis, 19, 187, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00399.x · DOI
  34. Cornelissen, 2003, Elicitation of expert knowledge for fuzzy evaluation of agricultural production systems, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 95, 1, 10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00174-3 · DOI
  35. Cozman, 2000, Credal networks, Artificial Intelligence, 120, 199, 10.1016/S0004-3702(00)00029-1 · DOI
  36. Cross, 2003, Drawing up guidelines for the collection and use of expert advice: the experience of the European Commission, Science and Public Policy, 30, 189, 10.3152/147154303781780560 · DOI
  37. de la Rosa, 1999, An expert system neural network model (ImpelERO) for evaluating agricultural soil erosion in Andalucia region, southern Spain, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 73, 211, 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00050-X · DOI
  38. DeGroot, 1988, A Bayesian view of assessing uncertainty and comparing expert opinion, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 20, 295, 10.1016/0378-3758(88)90094-8 · DOI
  39. Denham, 2007, Geographically assisted elicitation of expert opinion for regression models, Bayesian Analysis, 2, 99, 10.1214/07-BA205 · DOI
  40. Drescher, 2010, A network approach for evaluating and communicating forest change models, Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 57, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01754.x · DOI
  41. Eduljee, 2000, Trends in risk assessment and risk management, Science of the Total Environment, 249, 13, 10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00507-0 · DOI
  42. Eierdanz, 2008, Using fuzzy set theory to address the uncertainty of susceptibility to drought, Regional Environmental Change, 8, 197, 10.1007/s10113-008-0069-1 · DOI
  43. Esser, 1998, Alive and well after 25 years: a review of groupthink research, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 116, 10.1006/obhd.1998.2758 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Fazey, 2006, The nature and role of experiential knowledge for environmental conservation, Environmental Conservation, 33, 1, 10.1017/S037689290600275X · DOI
  45. Ferraro, 2009, Fuzzy knowledge-based model for soil condition assessment in Argentinean cropping systems, Environmental Modelling & Software, 24, 359, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.07.006 · DOI
  46. Fish, 2009, Unruly pathogens: eliciting values for environmental risk in the context of heterogeneous expert knowledge, Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 281, 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.02.002 · DOI
  47. Folke, 2005, Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441, 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Funtowicz, 1992, Risk management as a postnormal science, Risk Analysis, 12, 95, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb01311.x · DOI
  49. Funtowicz, 1993, Science for the post-normal age, Futures, 25, 739, 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L · DOI
  50. Garthwaite, 2005, Statistical methods for eliciting probability distributions, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100, 680, 10.1198/016214505000000105 · DOI
  51. Ghabayen, 2006, Ionic and isotopic ratios for identification of salinity sources and missing data in the Gaza aquifer, Journal of Hydrology, 318, 360, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.041 · DOI
  52. Giordano, 2012, A fuzzy GIS-based system to integrate local and technical knowledge for soil salinity monitoring, Environmental Modelling & Software, 36, 49, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.004 · DOI
  53. Girard, 1999, Modelling expert knowledge with knowledge-based systems to design decision aids – the example of a knowledge-based model on grazing management, Agricultural Systems, 59, 123, 10.1016/S0308-521X(98)00085-7 · DOI
  54. Gonzales, 2007, Testing assumptions of cost surface analysis – a tool for invasive species management, Landscape Ecology, 22, 1155, 10.1007/s10980-007-9106-6 · DOI
  55. Griffiths, 2007, Estimating abundance of pelagic fishes using gillnet catch data in data-limited fisheries: a Bayesian approach, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 64, 1019, 10.1139/f07-073 · DOI
  56. Gupta, 2008, Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation, Hydrological Processes, 22, 3802, 10.1002/hyp.6989 · DOI
  57. Haag, 2001, Parameters, prediction, post-normal science and the precautionary principle – a roadmap for modelling for decision-making, Ecological Modelling, 144, 45, 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00361-1 · DOI
  58. Habermas, 1984, vol. 1
  59. Hall, 2003, Handling uncertainty in the hydroinformatic process, Journal of Hydroinformatics, 5, 215, 10.2166/hydro.2003.0019 · DOI
  60. Hamilton, 2007, Investigating the use of a Bayesian network to model the risk of Lyngbya majuscula bloom initiation in deception bay, Queensland, Australia, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 13, 1271, 10.1080/10807030701655616 · DOI
  61. Hargreaves, 2010, Skill and uncertainty in climate models, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1, 556, 10.1002/wcc.58 · DOI
  62. Harvey, 2002, The relevance of Open Source to hydroinformatics, Journal of Hydroinformatics, 4, 219, 10.2166/hydro.2002.0022 · DOI
  63. Healy, 1997, Changing science and ensuring our future, Futures, 29, 505, 10.1016/S0016-3287(97)00025-6 · DOI
  64. Henriksen, 2007, Environmental benefits and social cost – an example of combining Bayesian networks and economic models for analysing pesticide management instruments, Nordic Hydrology, 38, 351, 10.2166/nh.2007.017 · DOI
  65. Huesemann, 2002, The inherent biases in environmental research and their effects on public policy, Futures, 34, 621, 10.1016/S0016-3287(02)00004-6 · DOI
  66. Jakeman, 2006, Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models, Environmental Modelling & Software, 21, 602, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.01.004 · DOI
  67. James, 2010, Elicitator: an expert elicitation tool for regression in ecology, Environmental Modelling & Software, 25, 129, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.07.003 · DOI
  68. Janis, 1971, Groupthink, Psychology Today, 5, 43
  69. Jasanoff, 2003, (No?) Accounting for expertise, Science and Public Policy, 30, 157, 10.3152/147154303781780542 · DOI
  70. Joss, 2008, Fuzzy-logic modeling of land suitability for hybrid poplar across the Prairie Provinces of Canada, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 141, 79, 10.1007/s10661-007-9880-2 · DOI
  71. Kampichler, 2010, Indicators of environmentally sound land use in the humid tropics: the potential roles of expert opinion, knowledge engineering and knowledge discovery, Ecological Indicators, 10, 320, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.06.010 · DOI
  72. Kangas, 2005, Modelling ecological expertise for forest planning calculations - rationale, examples, and pitfalls, Journal of Environmental Management, 76, 125, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.01.011 · DOI
  73. Kavetski, 2006, Calibration of conceptual hydrological models revisited: 1. overcoming numerical artefacts, Journal of Hydrology, 320, 173, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.012 · DOI
  74. Kawano, 2005, A context-dependent knowledge model for evaluation of regional environment, Environmental Modelling & Software, 20, 343, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.12.012 · DOI
  75. Kloprogge, 2011, A method for the analysis of assumptions in model-based environmental assessments, Environmental Modelling & Software, 26, 289, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.06.009 · DOI
  76. Knol, 2010, The use of expert elicitation in environmental health impact assessment: a seven step procedure, Environmental Health, 9
  77. Krueger, 2009, Uncertainties in data and models to describe event dynamics of agricultural sediment and phosphorus transfer, Journal of Environmental Quality, 38, 1137, 10.2134/jeq2008.0179 · DOI
  78. Krueger, 2010, Ensemble evaluation of hydrological model hypotheses, Water Resources Research, 46, W07516, 10.1029/2009WR007845 · DOI
  79. Kuhnert, 2010, A guide to eliciting and using expert knowledge in Bayesian ecological models, Ecology Letters, 13, 900, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01477.x · DOI
  80. Landeta, 2006, Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 467, 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
  81. Lane, 2006, Surveillant science: challenges for the management of rural environments emerging from the new generation diffuse pollution models, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57, 239, 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00050.x · DOI
  82. Lane, 2011, Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, 15, 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00410.x · DOI
  83. Lele, 2006, On using expert opinion in ecological analyses: a frequentist approach, Environmetrics, 17, 683, 10.1002/env.786 · DOI
  84. Liberatore, 2003, Democratising expertise, expertising democracy: what does this mean, and why bother?, Science and Public Policy, 30, 146, 10.3152/147154303781780551 · DOI
  85. Low Choy, 2009, Elicitation by design in ecology: using expert opinion to inform priors for Bayesian statistical models, Ecology, 90, 265, 10.1890/07-1886.1 · DOI
  86. Mahmoud, 2009, A formal framework for scenario development in support of environmental decision-making, Environmental Modelling & Software, 24, 798, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.11.010 · DOI
  87. Marcot, 2006, Characterizing species at risk I: modeling rare species under the Northwest Forest Plan, Ecology and Society, 11, 10, 10.5751/ES-01839-110210 · DOI
  88. Marcot, 2001, Using Bayesian belief networks to evaluate fish and wildlife population viability under land management alternatives from an environmental impact statement, Forest Ecology and Management, 153, 29, 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00452-2 · DOI
  89. Marcot, 2006, Characterizing species at risk II: using Bayesian belief networks as decision support tools to determine species conservation categories under the Northwest Forest Plan, Ecology and Society, 11, 12, 10.5751/ES-01781-110212 · DOI
  90. Marcot, 2006, Guidelines for developing and updating Bayesian belief networks applied to ecological modeling and conservation, Canadian Journal of Forest Research - Revue Canadienne de Recherche Forestiere, 36, 3063, 10.1139/x06-135 · DOI
  91. Martin, 2005, The power of expert opinion in ecological models using Bayesian methods: impact of grazing on birds, Ecological Applications, 15, 266, 10.1890/03-5400 · DOI
  92. Mathon, 2010, Dempster–Shafer theory applied to uncertainty surrounding permeability, Mathematical Geosciences, 42, 293, 10.1007/s11004-009-9246-0 · DOI
  93. McDowell, 2009, Approaches for quantifying and managing diffuse phosphorus exports at the farm/small catchment scale, Journal of Environmental Quality, 38, 1968, 10.2134/jeq2007.0651 · DOI
  94. Metternicht, 2001, Assessing temporal and spatial changes of salinity using fuzzy logic, remote sensing and GIS. Foundations of an expert system, Ecological Modelling, 144, 163, 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00371-4 · DOI
  95. Milheiro-Oliveira, 2007, Bayesian statistical methods for modeling and predication of major landslides in coastal cliffs, Coastal Engineering Journal, 49, 45, 10.1142/S0578563407001502 · DOI
  96. Montangero, 2007, Assessing nutrient flows in septic tanks by eliciting expert judgement: a promising method in the context of developing countries, Water Research, 41, 1052, 10.1016/j.watres.2006.10.036 · DOI
  97. Morris, 1974, Decision analysis expert use, Management Science Series A – Theory, 20, 1233, 10.1287/mnsc.20.9.1233 · DOI
  98. Mouton, 2007, Fish habitat modelling as a tool for river management, Ecological Engineering, 29, 305, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.11.002 · DOI
  99. Murray, 2009, How useful is expert opinion for predicting the distribution of a species within and beyond the region of expertise? A case study using brush-tailed rock-wallabies Petrogale penicillata, Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 842, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01671.x · DOI
  100. Naivinit, 2010, Participatory agent-based modeling and simulation of rice production and labor migrations in Northeast Thailand, Environmental Modelling & Software, 25, 1345, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.01.012 · DOI
  101. Newig, 2009, Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level – and effective?, Environmental Policy and Governance, 19, 197, 10.1002/eet.509 · DOI
  102. Newton, 2007, Bayesian Belief Networks as a tool for evidence-based conservation management, Journal for Nature Conservation, 15, 144, 10.1016/j.jnc.2007.03.001 · DOI
  103. Nguyen, 2007, A new approach to testing an integrated water systems model using qualitative scenarios, Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 1557, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.08.005 · DOI
  104. Norton, 2012, Using models to bridge the gap between land use and algal blooms: an example from the Loweswater catchment, UK, Environmental Modelling & Software, 36, 64, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.011 · DOI
  105. Nowotny, 2003, Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge, Science and Public Policy, 30, 151, 10.3152/147154303781780461 · DOI
  106. Nyberg, 2006, Using Bayesian belief networks in adaptive management, Canadian Journal of Forest Research - Revue Canadienne de Recherche Forestiere, 36, 3104, 10.1139/x06-108 · DOI
  107. O'Hagan, 2012, Probabilistic uncertainty specification: expert judgement of input uncertainties in a mechanistic model of carbon flux, Environmental Modelling & Software, 36, 35, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.03.003 · DOI
  108. O'Leary, 2009, Comparison of three expert elicitation methods for logistic regression on predicting the presence of the threatened brush-tailed rock-wallaby Petrogale penicillata, Environmetrics, 20, 379, 10.1002/env.935 · DOI
  109. Oliver, 2012, Valuing local knowledge as a source of expert data: farmer engagement and the design of decision support systems, Environmental Modelling & Software, 36, 76, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.013 · DOI
  110. Oliver, 2010, Development and testing of a risk indexing framework to determine field-scale critical source areas of faecal bacteria on grassland, Environmental Modelling & Software, 25, 503, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.10.003 · DOI
  111. Olsson, 2004, Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems, Environmental Management, 34, 75, 10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7 · DOI · Paper page
  112. Page, 2012, Eliciting fuzzy distributions from experts for ranking conceptual risk model components, Environmental Modelling & Software, 36, 19, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.03.001 · DOI
  113. Pahl-Wostl, 2007, The implications of complexity for integrated resources management, Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 561, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.024 · DOI
  114. Paini, 2010, Using a self-organizing map to predict invasive species: sensitivity to data errors and a comparison with expert opinion, Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 290, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01782.x · DOI
  115. Pearce, 2001, Incorporating expert opinion and fine-scale vegetation mapping into statistical models of faunal distribution, Journal of Applied Ecology, 38, 412, 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00608.x · DOI
  116. Pike, 2004, Modeling drinking water quality violations with Bayesian networks, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 40, 1563, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01606.x · DOI
  117. Pollino, 2007, Examination of conflicts and improved strategies for the management of an endangered Eucalypt species using Bayesian networks, Ecological Modelling, 201, 37, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.032 · DOI
  118. Pollino, 2007, Parameterisation and evaluation of a Bayesian network for use in an ecological risk assessment, Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 1140, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.03.006 · DOI
  119. Prell, 2007, If you have a hammer everything looks like a nail: traditional versus participatory model building, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32, 263, 10.1179/030801807X211720 · DOI
  120. Ravetz, 2006, Post-normal science and the complexity of transitions towards sustainability, Ecological Complexity, 3, 275, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.001 · DOI
  121. Raymond, 2010, Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management, Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1766, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023 · DOI · Paper page
  122. Reed, 2009, Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management, Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1933, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001 · DOI
  123. Reed, 2010, What is social learning?, Ecology and Society, 15, r1, 10.5751/ES-03564-1504r01 · DOI
  124. Refsgaard, 2007, Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process – a framework and guidance, Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 1543, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.02.004 · DOI
  125. Rinderknecht, 2012, Bridging uncertain and ambiguous knowledge with imprecise probabilities, Environmental Modelling & Software, 36, 122, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.022 · DOI
  126. Risbey, 1996, Assessing integrated assessments, Climatic Change, 34, 369, 10.1007/BF00139298 · DOI
  127. Rochette, 2009, Dealing with uncertainty in qualitative models with a semi-quantitative approach based on simulations. Application to the Gironde estuarine food web (France), Ecological Modelling, 220, 122, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.09.017 · DOI
  128. Ross, 2008, Kalman filter updating of possibilistic hydraulic conductivity, Journal of Hydrology, 354, 149, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.03.005 · DOI
  129. Ross, 2009, Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in groundwater flow and transport simulation, Water Resources Research, 45, W00b15, 10.1029/2007WR006799 · DOI
  130. Rowan, 2012, Development of a classification and decision-support tool for assessing lake hydromorphology, Environmental Modelling & Software, 36, 86, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.006 · DOI
  131. Rykiel, 1989, Artificial intelligence and expert systems in ecology and natural resources management, Ecological Modelling, 46, 3, 10.1016/0304-3800(89)90066-5 · DOI
  132. Schneider, 1997, Integrated assessment modeling of global climate change: transparent rational tool for policy making or opaque screen hiding value-laden assumptions?, Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 2, 229, 10.1023/A:1019090117643 · DOI
  133. Seoane, 2005, Effect of expert opinion on the predictive ability of environmental models of bird distribution, Conservation Biology, 19, 512, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00364.x · DOI
  134. Seppelt, 2005, It was an artefact not the result: a note on systems dynamic model development tools, Environmental Modelling & Software, 20, 1543, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.12.004 · DOI
  135. Sikder, 2006, Knowledge-based risk assessment under uncertainty for species invasion, Risk Analysis, 26, 239, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00714.x · DOI
  136. Smith, 2007, Using a Bayesian belief network to predict suitable habitat of an endangered mammal – the Julia Creek dunnart (Sminthopsis douglasi), Biological Conservation, 139, 333, 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.06.025 · DOI
  137. Sonneveld, 1999, Water erosion assessment based on expert knowledge and limited information using an ordered logit model, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 54, 592
  138. Stiber, 1999, Expert system methodology for evaluating reductive dechlorination at TCE sites, Environmental Science & Technology, 33, 3012, 10.1021/es981216s · DOI
  139. Stiber, 2004, Site-specific updating and aggregation of Bayesian belief network models for multiple experts, Risk Analysis, 24, 1529, 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00547.x · DOI
  140. Stringer, 2006, Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social–ecological systems: a critical review, Ecology and Society, 11, 39, 10.5751/ES-01896-110239 · DOI
  141. Taheriyoun, 2010, Development of an entropy-based fuzzy eutrophication index for reservoir water quality evaluation, Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering, 7, 1
  142. Ticehurst, 2007, A Bayesian network approach for assessing the sustainability of coastal lakes in New South Wales, Australia, Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 1129, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.03.003 · DOI
  143. Tsouvalis, 2012, Building ‘participation’ upon critique: The Loweswater Care Project, Cumbria, UK. Environmental Modelling & Software, 36, 111, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.018 · DOI
  144. Uricchio, 2004, A fuzzy knowledge-based decision support system for groundwater pollution risk evaluation, Journal of Environmental Management, 73, 189, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.06.011 · DOI
  145. Uusitalo, 2007, Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling, Ecological Modelling, 203, 312, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.11.033 · DOI · Paper page
  146. van Asselt, 1996, Uncertainty in perspective, Global Environmental Change - Human and Policy Dimensions, 6, 121, 10.1016/0959-3780(96)00015-5 · DOI
  147. van der Sluijs, 2002, A way out of the credibility crisis of models used in integrated environmental assessment, Futures, 34, 133, 10.1016/S0016-3287(01)00051-9 · DOI
  148. van der Werf, 1998, An indicator of pesticide environmental impact based on a fuzzy expert system, Chemosphere, 36, 2225, 10.1016/S0045-6535(97)10194-1 · DOI
  149. van Lanen, 1992, Computer-captured expert knowledge to evaluate possibilities for injection of slurry from animal manure in the Netherlands, Geoderma, 54, 107, 10.1016/0016-7061(92)90100-L · DOI
  150. Varis, 1999, Learning Bayesian decision analysis by doing: lessons from environmental and natural resources management, Ecological Modelling, 119, 177, 10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00061-7 · DOI
  151. Vrana, 2012, A group agreement-based approach for decision making in environmental issues, Environmental Modelling & Software, 36, 99, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.12.007 · DOI
  152. Walley, 1996, Measures of uncertainty in expert systems, Artificial Intelligence, 83, 1, 10.1016/0004-3702(95)00009-7 · DOI
  153. Wandahwa, 1996, Qualitative land suitability assessment for pyrethrum cultivation in west Kenya based upon computer-captured expert knowledge and GIS, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 56, 187, 10.1016/0167-8809(95)00641-9 · DOI
  154. Wooldridge, 2005, Precursors for resilience in coral communities in a warming climate: a belief network approach, Marine Ecology Progress Series, 295, 157, 10.3354/meps295157 · DOI
  155. Yamada, 2003, Eliciting and integrating expert knowledge for wildlife habitat modelling, Ecological Modelling, 165, 251, 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00077-2 · DOI
  156. Zadeh, 1983, The role of fuzzy logic in the management of uncertainty in expert systems, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 199, 10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80081-5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Krueger, T., Page, T., Hubacek, K., Smith, L., & Hiscock, K.
Venue
Environmental Modelling & Software
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
36
Pages
4-18
ISSN
1364-8152
DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.011
Cited by
413
References
4
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review