The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A review of Bayesian belief networks in ecosystem service modelling
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Soil “ecosystem” services and natural capital: critical appraisal of research on uncertain ground
Baveye, P. C., Baveye, J., & Gowdy, J. (2016) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2016.00041 · Cited by 446
Advances in Bayesian network modelling: Integration of modelling technologies
Marcot, B. G., & Penman, T. D. (2019) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.09.016 · Cited by 429
An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services
Mouchet, M. A., Lamarque, P., Martín-López, B., Crouzat, E., Gos, P., Byczek, C., & Lavorel, S. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.012 · Cited by 425
‘The Matrix Reloaded’: A review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services
Jacobs, S., Burkhard, B., Van Daele, T., Staes, J., & Schneiders, A. (2015) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.024 · Cited by 338
Bayesian Networks in Environmental Risk Assessment: A Review
Kaikkonen, L., Parviainen, T., Rahikainen, M., Uusitalo, L., & Lehikoinen, A. (2020) · Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management · doi:10.1002/ieam.4332 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Landuyt, D., Broekx, S., D'hondt, R., Engelen, G., Aertsens, J., & Goethals, P. L. M.
- Venue
- Environmental Modelling & Software
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 46
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 1364-8152 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047581137
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of Bayesian belief networks in ecosystem service modelling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.03.011
- The paper
- Landuyt, D., Broekx, S., D'hondt, R., Engelen, G., Aertsens, J., & Goethals, P. L. M. (2013). A review of Bayesian belief networks in ecosystem service modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.03.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
