The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A simple and efficient method for global sensitivity analysis based on cumulative distribution functions
Open accessAbstract
Variance-based approaches are widely used for Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) of environmental models. However, methods that consider the entire Probability Density Function (PDF) of the model output, rather than its variance only, are preferable in cases where variance is not an adequate proxy of uncertainty, e.g. when the output distribution is highly-skewed or when it is multi-modal. Still, the adoption of density-based methods has been limited so far, possibly because they are relatively more difficult to implement. Here we present a novel GSA method, called PAWN, to efficiently compute density-based sensitivity indices. The key idea is to characterise output distributions by their Cumulative Distribution Functions (CDF), which are easier to derive than PDFs . We discuss and demonstrate the advantages of PAWN through applications to numerical and environmental modelling examples. We expect PAWN to increase the application of density-based approaches and to be a complementary approach to variance-based GSA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Sensitivity Analysis. The Primer
Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M., & Tarantola, S. (2007) · doi:10.1002/9780470725184 · Cited by 6,430
Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices
Saltelli, A. (2002) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(02)00280-1 · Cited by 2,228
Cited by
Jaxa-Rozen, M., & Kwakkel, J. (2018) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.06.011 · Cited by 91
Zaffaroni, M., Zamberletti, P., Creed, I. F., Accatino, F., De Michele, C., & DeVries, B. (2019) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/1752-1688.12751 · Cited by 9
Ginster, R., Kieckhäfer, K., Thies, C., Runde, C., Wansart, J., & Spengler, T. S. (2025) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.70089 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Pianosi, F., & Wagener, T.
- Venue
- Environmental Modelling & Software
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 67
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 1364-8152 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073344030
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A simple and efficient method for global sensitivity analysis based on cumulative distribution functions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.004
- The paper
- Pianosi, F., & Wagener, T. (2015). A simple and efficient method for global sensitivity analysis based on cumulative distribution functions. Environmental Modelling & Software. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.