Cited by 4Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesIntegrated Energy Systems Optimization

Simulation‐based analysis of country‐specific mitigation strategies to decarbonize the passenger car fleet: A comparison between Germany, Poland, and Norway

Open access
Ginster, Raphael, Kieckhäfer, Karsten, Thies, Christian, Runde, Christoph, Wansart, Jörg, Spengler, Thomas S.·2025·Journal of Industrial Ecology

Abstract

This paper investigates and compares transformation pathways to decarbonize the passenger car fleets of Germany, Poland, and Norway, considering the unique market characteristics of these countries. We develop a dynamic stock and flow model to simulate the evolution of the passenger car fleet in conjunction with the energy sector at a country level and calculate tailpipe and life cycle‐oriented greenhouse gas emissions. Using Monte Carlo simulation, we analyze country‐specific levers to meet tailpipe emissions targets and their impact on life cycle emissions and the energy system. The results reveal that meeting the European tailpipe emission targets is challenging for Germany and Poland, and much easier for Norway. The main drivers are the level and speed of deployment of electric vehicles and renewable electricity, as well as the rate of the fleet renewal. For countries with a high share of conventional vehicles, synthetic fuels could be promising, but with a significant impact on the energy system. Moreover, an exclusive focus on tailpipe emissions does not imply low life cycle emissions and could even lead to burden shifting. Hence, our results further support the idea that mitigation measures need to be orchestrated and harmonized with country‐specific characteristics in order to reduce tailpipe and life cycle emissions as much as possible.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jiec.70089

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ginster, R., Kieckhäfer, K., Thies, C., Runde, C., Wansart, J., & Spengler, T. S.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
  • FernUniversität in Hagen (DE)
  • Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Corresponding author
Ginster, Raphael
Venue
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2025-08-24
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
1867-1881
ISSN
  • 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9290
OpenAlex
W4413492333
Cited by
4
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Industrial Ecology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • TUHH Open Research (cc-by)
Funders
Volkswagen Foundation (ZN3678)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Keywords
vehicle emissions, life cycle greenhouse gas emissions, electric vehicle deployment, renewable electricity, synthetic fuels, fleet renewal, energy system impacts, burden shifting, Germany, Poland, Norway

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review