Cited by 400Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesPregnancy and Medication ImpactEpilepsy research and treatment

Pregnancy outcomes in women with epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published pregnancy registries and cohorts

Open access
Meador, Kimford, Reynolds, Matthew W., Crean, Sheila, Fahrbach, Kyle, Probst, Corey·2008·Epilepsy Research

Abstract

Purpose To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the incidence of congenital malformations (CMs) and other pregnancy outcomes as a function of in utero anti-epileptic drug (AED) exposure.Methods We performed a systematic literature review to identify all published registries and cohort studies of births from pregnant women with epilepsy (WWE) that reported incidence of CMs. Overall incidences were calculated using a random effects model.Results The review included 59 studies that met inclusion/exclusion criteria, involving 65,533 pregnancies in WWE and 1,817,024 in healthy women. The calculated incidence of births with CM in WWE [7.08%; 95% CIs 5.62, 8.54] was higher than healthy women [2.28%; CIs 1.46, 3.10]. Incidence was highest for AED polytherapy [16.78%; CIs 0.51, 33.05]. The AED with the highest CM incidence was valproate, which was 10.73% [CIs 8.16, 13.29] for valproate monotherapy.Conclusions Results of this systematic literature review suggest that the overall incidence of CMs in children born of WWE is approximately threefold that of healthy women. The risk is elevated for all AED monotherapy and further elevated for AED polytherapy compared to women without epilepsy. The risk was significantly higher for children exposed to valproate monotherapy and to polytherapy of 2 or more drugs when the polytherapy combination included phenobarital, phenytoin, or valproate. Further research is needed to delineate the specific risk for each individual AED and to determine underlying mechanisms including genetic risk factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2008.04.022

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Alderson P, Green S, Higgins JPT, editors. The Cochrane Library. Issue 1. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2004. Cochrane Collaboration Handbook 4.2.1. (updated December 2003) [Google Scholar]
  2. Mullers-Kuppers VM. Embryopathy during pregnancy caused by taking anticonvulsants. Acta Paedopsychiatr. 1963;30:401–405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Samren EB, van Duijn CM, Christiaens GC, Hofman A, Lindhout D. Antiepileptic drug regimens and major congenital abnormalities in the offspring. Ann. Neurol. 1999;46:739–746. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Yerby MS. Fetal death, malformations and infant mortality in infants of mothers with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1996;37:98. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meador, K., Reynolds, M. W., Crean, S., Fahrbach, K., & Probst, C.
Affiliations
University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
Meador, Kimford
Venue
Epilepsy Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
81
Issue
1
Pages
1-13
ISSN
0920-1211 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076472832
Cited by
400
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 28
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epilepsy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS038455)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
Keywords
pregnancy outcomes, women with epilepsy, congenital malformations, antiepileptic drugs, valproic acid, prenatal drug exposure, phenobarbital, phenytoin, birth defects risk
MeSH terms
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced, Adult, Anticonvulsants, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Drug Therapy, Combination, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Registries, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Databases, Factual, MEDLINE

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review