Cited by 76Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsEpilepsy research and treatmentCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders

Biopsychosocial predictors of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures

Elliott, John O., Charyton, Christine·2014·Epilepsy Research

Abstract

Background Previous studies have identified numerous biological, psychological and social characteristics of persons with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) however the strength of many of these factors have not been evaluated to determine which are predictive of the diagnosis compared to those that may only be stereotypes with limited clinical utility. Method A retrospective chart review of persons admitted to our epilepsy monitoring unit over a 6-year period was conducted to examine predictors of a video-EEG confirmed PNES diagnosis. Results A total of 689 patients had events leading to a diagnosis, 47% (n=324) with PNES only, 12% (n=84) with PNES & Epilepsy and 41% (n=281) with Epilepsy only. Five biological predictors of a PNES only diagnosis were found; number of years with events (OR=1.10), history of head injury (OR=1.91), asthma (OR=2.94), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (OR=1.72) and pain (OR=2.25). One psychological predictor; anxiety (OR=1.72) and two social predictors; being married (OR=1.81) and history of physical/sexual abuse (OR=3.35). Two significant biological predictors of a PNES & Epilepsy diagnosis were found; migraine (OR=1.83) and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (OR=2.17). Conclusions Our findings support the importance of considering the biopsychosocial model for the diagnosis and treatment of PNES or PNES with concomitant epilepsy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.09.003

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Common characteristics of psychogenic pseudosyncope include closed eyes, lack of pallor and diaphoresis, and usually little physical harm.

    “Some common characteristics include closed eyes, lack of pallor and diaphoresis, and usually little physical harm (526).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elliott, J. O., & Charyton, C.
Affiliations
  • Riverside Methodist Hospital (US)
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Elliott, John O.
Venue
Epilepsy Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
108
Issue
9
Pages
1543-1553
ISSN
0920-1211 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125739061
Cited by
76
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epilepsy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Keywords
psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, biopsychosocial model, diagnostic predictors, epilepsy monitoring unit, video-EEG monitoring, traumatic brain injury, asthma, gastroesophageal reflux disease, pain, anxiety, physical and sexual abuse, migraine, comorbid epilepsy
MeSH terms
Adult, Diagnosis, Differential, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Retrospective Studies, Seizures, Social Behavior, Video Recording, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review