The DOI matches its Crossref record.
1707161 digital twin technology in resolving polycystic ovary syndrome and improving metabolic health: A comprehensive case study
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A case study demonstrated significant improvement in a patient with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) following a 360-day intervention with digital twin (DT) technology, including substantial changes in ovarian morphology and improvement in metabolic and radiological parameters.
“A case study demonstrated significant improvement in a patient with Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) following a 360-day intervention program with DT technology, showing substantial changes in ovarian morphology and improvement in metabolic milieu and radiological parameters (28).”
From Personalized nutrition in type 2 diabetes remission: application of digital twin technology for predictive glycemic control (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
DT technology showed promise in managing PCOS, suggesting broader applicability beyond T2D.
“Lastly, the DT technology showed promise in managing PCOS. A case study demonstrated significant improvements in ovarian morphology and metabolic parameters after a 360-day intervention with the DT, suggesting the technology’s broader applicability beyond T2D (28).”
From Personalized nutrition in type 2 diabetes remission: application of digital twin technology for predictive glycemic control (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shamanna, P., Joshi, S., Thajudeen, M., Shah, L., Poon, T., Mohamed, M., & Mohammed, J. (2024) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2024.1485464 · Cited by 56
Self-citationShamanna, P., Maheshwari, A., Keshavamurthy, A., Bhat, S., Kulkarni, A., R, S., K, K., Gupta, M., Thajudeen, M., Kulkarni, R., et al. (2025) · AACE Clinical Case Reports · doi:10.1016/j.aace.2024.11.004 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shamanna, P., Shamanna, P., Maheshwari, A., Keshavamurthy, A., Bhat, S., Kulkarni, A., R, S., K, K., Gupta, M., Thajudeen, M., Kulkarni, R., Patil, S., & Joshi, S.
- Affiliations
- Bangalore Diabetes Centre (IN)
- Lilavati Hospital & Research Centre (IN)
- Venue
- Endocrine Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- S130
- ISSN
- 1530-891X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4396744661
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Endocrine Practice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
- Keywords
- polycystic ovary syndrome, digital twin, metabolic health, insulin resistance, hyperandrogenism, anovulation, hypertension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
