The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Optimal grid-forming control of battery energy storage systems providing multiple services: Modeling and experimental validation
Open accessAbstract
This paper proposes and experimentally validates a joint control and scheduling framework for a grid-forming converter-interfaced Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESSs) providing multiple services to the electrical grid. The framework is designed to dispatch the operation of a distribution feeder hosting heterogeneous prosumers according to a dispatch plan and to provide frequency containment reserve and voltage control as additional services. The framework consists of three phases. In the day-ahead scheduling phase, a robust optimization problem is solved to compute the optimal dispatch plan and frequency droop coefficient, accounting for the uncertainty of the aggregated prosumption. In the intra-day phase, a model predictive control algorithm is used to compute the power set-point for the BESS to achieve the tracking of the dispatch plan. Finally, in a real-time stage, the power set-point originated by the dispatch tracking is converted into a feasible frequency set-point for the grid forming converter by means of a convex optimization problem accounting for the capability curve of the power converter. The proposed framework is experimentally validated by using a grid-scale 720 kVA/560 kWh BESS connected to a 20 kV distribution feeder in the EPFL campus hosting stochastic prosumption and PV generation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 35
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Dunn, 2011, Electrical energy storage for the grid: A battery of choices, Science, 334, 928, 10.1126/science.1212741 · DOI · Paper page
- Mercier, 2009, Optimizing a battery energy storage system for frequency control application in an isolated power system, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 24, 1469, 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2022997 · DOI
- Lian, 2017, Optimizing LiFePO4 battery energy storage systems for frequency response in the UK system, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 8, 385, 10.1109/TSTE.2016.2600274 · DOI
- Doenges, 2020, Improving AGC performance in power systems with regulation response accuracy margins using battery energy storage system (BESS), IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 35, 2816, 10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2960450 · DOI
- Giannitrapani, 2017, Optimal allocation of energy storage systems for voltage control in LV distribution networks, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 8, 2859, 10.1109/TSG.2016.2602480 · DOI
- Zhao, 2022, Distributed control of battery energy storage systems in distribution networks for voltage regulation at transmission–distribution network interconnection points, Control Eng. Pract., 119, 10.1016/j.conengprac.2021.104988 · DOI
- Gupta, 2020, Grid-aware distributed model predictive control of heterogeneous resources in a distribution network: Theory and experimental validation, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 36, 1392, 10.1109/TEC.2020.3015271 · DOI
- Mégel, 2015, Scheduling distributed energy storage units to provide multiple services under forecast error, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 72, 48, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.02.010 · DOI
- Namor, 2019, Control of battery storage systems for the simultaneous provision of multiple services, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 10, 10, 10.1109/TSG.2018.2810781 · DOI
- Sossan, 2016, Achieving the dispatchability of distribution feeders through prosumers data driven forecasting and model predictive control of electrochemical storage, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 10.1109/TSTE.2016.2600103 · DOI
- Zecchino, 2021, Optimal provision of concurrent primary frequency and local voltage control from a BESS considering variable capability curves: Modelling and experimental assessment, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 190, 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106643 · DOI · Paper page
- Zuo, 2021, Performance assessment of grid-forming and grid-following converter-interfaced battery energy storage systems on frequency regulation in low-inertia power grids, Sustain. Energy Grids Netw., 10.1016/j.segan.2021.100496 · DOI
- Reza Reisi, 2013, Classification and comparison of maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic system: A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 19, 433, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.052 · DOI · Paper page
- Baroudi, 2007, A review of power converter topologies for wind generators, Renew. Energy, 32, 2369, 10.1016/j.renene.2006.12.002 · DOI
- J. Beerten, O. Gomis-Bellmunt, X. Guillaud, J. Rimez, A. van der Meer, D. Van Hertem, Modeling and control of HVDC grids: A key challenge for the future power system, in: 2014 Power Systems Computation Conference, 2014, pp. 1–21. · DOI
- Matevosyan, 2019, Grid-forming inverters: Are they the key for high renewable penetration?, IEEE Power Energy Mag., 17, 89, 10.1109/MPE.2019.2933072 · DOI
- G. Denis, T. Prevost, P. Panciatici, X. Kestelyn, F. Colas, X. Guillaud, Review on potential strategies for transmission grid operations based on power electronics interfaced voltage sources, in: 2015 IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting, 2015, pp. 1–5. · DOI
- Zuo, 2020, Effect of voltage source converters with electrochemical storage systems on dynamics of reduced-inertia bulk power grids, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 189, 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106766 · DOI
- Liu, 2016, Comparison of dynamic characteristics between virtual synchronous generator and droop control in inverter-based distributed generators, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 31, 3600, 10.1109/TPEL.2015.2465852 · DOI
- Qoria, 2020, A PLL-free grid-forming control with decoupled functionalities for high-power transmission system applications, IEEE Access, 8, 197363, 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3034149 · DOI
- Rosso, 2019, Robust stability analysis of synchronverters operating in parallel, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 34, 11309, 10.1109/TPEL.2019.2896707 · DOI · Paper page
- Kaushal, 2019, An overview of ancillary services and HVDC systems in European context, Energies, 12, 3481, 10.3390/en12183481 · DOI
- 2016, Commission regulation (EU) 2016/ 631 - of 14 April 2016 - establishing a network code on requirements for grid connection of generators, Off. J. Eur. Union, 68
- Dunn, 2011, Electrical energy storage for the grid: A battery of choices, Science, 334, 928, 10.1126/science.1212741 · DOI · Paper page
- Scolari, 2018, A comprehensive assessment of the short-term uncertainty of grid-connected PV systems, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 9, 1458, 10.1109/TSTE.2018.2789937 · DOI
- M. Bahramipanah, D. Torregrossa, R. Cherkaoui, M. Paolone, Enhanced electrical model of Lithium-based batteries accounting the charge redistribution effect, in: 2014 Power Systems Computation Conference, 2014, pp. 1–8. · DOI
- L. Zanni, A. Derviškadić, M. Pignati, C. Xu, P. Romano, R. Cherkaoui, A. Abur, M. Paolone, PMU-based linear state estimation of Lausanne Subtransmission Network: Experimental Validation, in: 21st PSCC, 2020. · DOI
- Chen, 2004, Load forecasting using support vector machines: A study on EUNITE competition 2001, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 19, 1821, 10.1109/TPWRS.2004.835679 · DOI
- Sossan, 2019, Solar irradiance estimations for modeling the variability of photovoltaic generation and assessing violations of grid constraints: A comparison between satellite and pyranometers measurements with load flow simulations, J. Renew. Sustain. Energy, 11, 10.1063/1.5109076 · DOI
- Pozzi, 2012, Exponential smoothing weighted correlations, Eur. Phys. J. B, 85, 175, 10.1140/epjb/e2012-20697-x · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerini, F., Zuo, Y., Gupta, R., Zecchino, A., Yuan, Z., Vagnoni, E., Cherkaoui, R., & Paolone, M.
- Affiliations
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Gerini, Francesco
- ORCID
- Venue
- Electric Power Systems Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-11
- Volume
- 212
- Pages
- 108567
- ISSN
- 0378-7796 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4287217368
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 1.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Electric Power Systems Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
- Horizon 2020 (773406, 857832)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Power Systems and Renewable Energy
- Keywords
- battery energy storage, grid-forming inverters, frequency containment reserve, voltage regulation, prosumers, day-ahead scheduling, robust optimization, model predictive control, frequency droop control, distribution feeders, photovoltaic uncertainty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review