Cited by 35Microgrid Control and OptimizationSmart Grid Energy ManagementPower Systems and Renewable Energy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Optimal grid-forming control of battery energy storage systems providing multiple services: Modeling and experimental validation

Open access

Abstract

This paper proposes and experimentally validates a joint control and scheduling framework for a grid-forming converter-interfaced Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESSs) providing multiple services to the electrical grid. The framework is designed to dispatch the operation of a distribution feeder hosting heterogeneous prosumers according to a dispatch plan and to provide frequency containment reserve and voltage control as additional services. The framework consists of three phases. In the day-ahead scheduling phase, a robust optimization problem is solved to compute the optimal dispatch plan and frequency droop coefficient, accounting for the uncertainty of the aggregated prosumption. In the intra-day phase, a model predictive control algorithm is used to compute the power set-point for the BESS to achieve the tracking of the dispatch plan. Finally, in a real-time stage, the power set-point originated by the dispatch tracking is converted into a feasible frequency set-point for the grid forming converter by means of a convex optimization problem accounting for the capability curve of the power converter. The proposed framework is experimentally validated by using a grid-scale 720 kVA/560 kWh BESS connected to a 20 kV distribution feeder in the EPFL campus hosting stochastic prosumption and PV generation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108567

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 35

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Dunn, 2011, Electrical energy storage for the grid: A battery of choices, Science, 334, 928, 10.1126/science.1212741 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Mercier, 2009, Optimizing a battery energy storage system for frequency control application in an isolated power system, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 24, 1469, 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2022997 · DOI
  3. Lian, 2017, Optimizing LiFePO4 battery energy storage systems for frequency response in the UK system, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 8, 385, 10.1109/TSTE.2016.2600274 · DOI
  4. Doenges, 2020, Improving AGC performance in power systems with regulation response accuracy margins using battery energy storage system (BESS), IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 35, 2816, 10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2960450 · DOI
  5. Giannitrapani, 2017, Optimal allocation of energy storage systems for voltage control in LV distribution networks, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 8, 2859, 10.1109/TSG.2016.2602480 · DOI
  6. Zhao, 2022, Distributed control of battery energy storage systems in distribution networks for voltage regulation at transmission–distribution network interconnection points, Control Eng. Pract., 119, 10.1016/j.conengprac.2021.104988 · DOI
  7. Gupta, 2020, Grid-aware distributed model predictive control of heterogeneous resources in a distribution network: Theory and experimental validation, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 36, 1392, 10.1109/TEC.2020.3015271 · DOI
  8. Mégel, 2015, Scheduling distributed energy storage units to provide multiple services under forecast error, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 72, 48, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.02.010 · DOI
  9. Namor, 2019, Control of battery storage systems for the simultaneous provision of multiple services, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 10, 10, 10.1109/TSG.2018.2810781 · DOI
  10. Sossan, 2016, Achieving the dispatchability of distribution feeders through prosumers data driven forecasting and model predictive control of electrochemical storage, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 10.1109/TSTE.2016.2600103 · DOI
  11. Zecchino, 2021, Optimal provision of concurrent primary frequency and local voltage control from a BESS considering variable capability curves: Modelling and experimental assessment, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 190, 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106643 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Zuo, 2021, Performance assessment of grid-forming and grid-following converter-interfaced battery energy storage systems on frequency regulation in low-inertia power grids, Sustain. Energy Grids Netw., 10.1016/j.segan.2021.100496 · DOI
  13. Reza Reisi, 2013, Classification and comparison of maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic system: A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 19, 433, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.052 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Baroudi, 2007, A review of power converter topologies for wind generators, Renew. Energy, 32, 2369, 10.1016/j.renene.2006.12.002 · DOI
  15. J. Beerten, O. Gomis-Bellmunt, X. Guillaud, J. Rimez, A. van der Meer, D. Van Hertem, Modeling and control of HVDC grids: A key challenge for the future power system, in: 2014 Power Systems Computation Conference, 2014, pp. 1–21. · DOI
  16. Matevosyan, 2019, Grid-forming inverters: Are they the key for high renewable penetration?, IEEE Power Energy Mag., 17, 89, 10.1109/MPE.2019.2933072 · DOI
  17. G. Denis, T. Prevost, P. Panciatici, X. Kestelyn, F. Colas, X. Guillaud, Review on potential strategies for transmission grid operations based on power electronics interfaced voltage sources, in: 2015 IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting, 2015, pp. 1–5. · DOI
  18. Zuo, 2020, Effect of voltage source converters with electrochemical storage systems on dynamics of reduced-inertia bulk power grids, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 189, 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106766 · DOI
  19. Liu, 2016, Comparison of dynamic characteristics between virtual synchronous generator and droop control in inverter-based distributed generators, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 31, 3600, 10.1109/TPEL.2015.2465852 · DOI
  20. Qoria, 2020, A PLL-free grid-forming control with decoupled functionalities for high-power transmission system applications, IEEE Access, 8, 197363, 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3034149 · DOI
  21. Rosso, 2019, Robust stability analysis of synchronverters operating in parallel, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 34, 11309, 10.1109/TPEL.2019.2896707 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kaushal, 2019, An overview of ancillary services and HVDC systems in European context, Energies, 12, 3481, 10.3390/en12183481 · DOI
  23. 2016, Commission regulation (EU) 2016/ 631 - of 14 April 2016 - establishing a network code on requirements for grid connection of generators, Off. J. Eur. Union, 68
  24. Dunn, 2011, Electrical energy storage for the grid: A battery of choices, Science, 334, 928, 10.1126/science.1212741 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Scolari, 2018, A comprehensive assessment of the short-term uncertainty of grid-connected PV systems, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 9, 1458, 10.1109/TSTE.2018.2789937 · DOI
  26. M. Bahramipanah, D. Torregrossa, R. Cherkaoui, M. Paolone, Enhanced electrical model of Lithium-based batteries accounting the charge redistribution effect, in: 2014 Power Systems Computation Conference, 2014, pp. 1–8. · DOI
  27. L. Zanni, A. Derviškadić, M. Pignati, C. Xu, P. Romano, R. Cherkaoui, A. Abur, M. Paolone, PMU-based linear state estimation of Lausanne Subtransmission Network: Experimental Validation, in: 21st PSCC, 2020. · DOI
  28. Chen, 2004, Load forecasting using support vector machines: A study on EUNITE competition 2001, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 19, 1821, 10.1109/TPWRS.2004.835679 · DOI
  29. Sossan, 2019, Solar irradiance estimations for modeling the variability of photovoltaic generation and assessing violations of grid constraints: A comparison between satellite and pyranometers measurements with load flow simulations, J. Renew. Sustain. Energy, 11, 10.1063/1.5109076 · DOI
  30. Pozzi, 2012, Exponential smoothing weighted correlations, Eur. Phys. J. B, 85, 175, 10.1140/epjb/e2012-20697-x · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Gerini, F., Zuo, Y., Gupta, R., Zecchino, A., Yuan, Z., Vagnoni, E., Cherkaoui, R., & Paolone, M.
Affiliations
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Gerini, Francesco
Venue
Electric Power Systems Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
212
Pages
108567
ISSN
0378-7796 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4287217368
Cited by
35
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Electric Power Systems Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
  • Horizon 2020 (773406, 857832)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Power Systems and Renewable Energy
Keywords
battery energy storage, grid-forming inverters, frequency containment reserve, voltage regulation, prosumers, day-ahead scheduling, robust optimization, model predictive control, frequency droop control, distribution feeders, photovoltaic uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review