Cited by 8Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorHealth and Lifestyle Studies

Eating disorder prevention on college campuses: Recruitment challenges

Rodgers, R.F., Franko, D.L.·2015·European Review of Applied Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.erap.2015.03.003

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodgers, R. F., & Franko, D. L.
Affiliations
Northeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Rodgers, R.F.
Venue
European Review of Applied Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
125-131
ISSN
1162-9088 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054623130
Cited by
8
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Review of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
Keywords
eating disorder prevention, university students, participant recruitment, disordered eating, prevention program implementation, psychology students, efficacy versus effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review