CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Renewable energy cooperatives as gatekeepers or facilitators? Recent developments in Germany and a multidisciplinary research agenda

Yildiz, Özgür, Rommel, Jens, Debor, Sarah, Holstenkamp, Lars, Mey, Franziska, Müller, Jakob R., Radtke, Jörg, Rognli, Judith·2015·Energy Research & Social Science
DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.001

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 80

  1. Balta-Ozkan, 2014, European smart home market development: public views on technical and economic aspects across the United Kingdom, Germany and Italy, Energy Res Soc Sci, 3, 65, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.007 · DOI
  2. Araújo, 2014, The emerging field of energy transitions: progress, challenges, and opportunities, Energy Res Soc Sci, 1, 112, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.002 · DOI
  3. Di Lucia, 2014, Low-carbon district heating in Sweden: examining a successful energy transition, Energy Res Soc Sci, 4, 10, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.08.005 · DOI
  4. Pepermans, 2005, Distributed gene-ration: definition, benefits and issues, Energy Policy, 33, 787, 10.1016/j.enpol.2003.10.004 · DOI
  5. Bohn, 2005, Decentralised energy systems: state of the art and potentials, Int J Energy Technol Policy, 3, 1, 10.1504/IJETP.2005.006736 · DOI
  6. Goldthau, 2014, Rethinking the governance of energy infrastructure: scale, decentralization and polycentrism, Energy Res Soc Sci, 1, 134, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.009 · DOI
  7. Parag, 2014, More than filler: middle actors and socio-technical change in the energy system from the “middle-out”, Energy Res Soc Sci, 3, 102, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.011 · DOI
  8. Sovacool, 2014, What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda, Energy Res Soc Sci, 1, 1, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.003 · DOI
  9. Hirsh, 2014, History's contributions to energy research and policy, Energy Res Soc Sci, 1, 106, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.010 · DOI
  10. Spreng, 2014, Transdisciplinary energy research: reflecting the context, Energy Res Soc Sci, 1, 65, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.005 · DOI
  11. Yildiz, 2014, Financing renewable energy infrastructures via financial citizen participation: the case of Germany, Renew Energy, 68, 677, 10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.038 · DOI
  12. Viardot, 2013, The role of cooperatives in overcoming the barriers to adoption of renewable energy, Energy Policy, 63, 756, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.034 · DOI
  13. Walker, 2008, Community renewable energy: what should it mean?, Energy Policy, 36, 497, 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019 · DOI
  14. Musall, 2011, Local acceptance of renewable energy: a case study from southeast Germany, Energy Policy, 39, 3252, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.017 · DOI
  15. Warren, 2010, Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland, Land Use Policy, 27, 204, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.010 · DOI
  16. Walker, 2008, What are the barriers and incentives for community-owned means of energy production and use?, Energy Policy, 36, 4401, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.032 · DOI
  17. Enzensberger, 2003, Financing renewable energy projects via closed-end funds: a German case study, Renew Energy, 28, 2023, 10.1016/S0960-1481(03)00080-6 · DOI
  18. Breukers, 2007, Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: an international comparison, Energy Policy, 35, 2737, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.004 · DOI
  19. Spear, 2000, The co-operative advantage, Ann Public Coop Econ, 71, 507, 10.1111/1467-8292.00151 · DOI
  20. Yadoo, 2010, The value of cooperatives in rural electrification, Energy Policy, 38, 2941, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.031 · DOI
  21. Doty, 1994, Typologies as a unique form of theory building: toward improved understanding and modeling, Acad Manage Rev, 19, 230, 10.2307/258704 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Chaddad, 2004, Understanding new cooperative models: an ownership-control rights typology, Rev Agric Econ, 26, 348, 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2004.00184.x · DOI
  23. Flieger, 2008, Eine andere Energiewirtschaft ist möglich: Pionierfunktion neuer Energiegenossenschaften, Constraste, 25, 7
  24. Klemisch, 2010, Genossenschaftliche Lösungsansätze zur Sicherung der kommunalen Daseinsvorsorge, Z Gesamte Genossenschaftswesen (ZfgG), 60, 3
  25. Seyfang, 2013, A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK, Energy Policy, 61, 977, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.030 · DOI
  26. Fehr, 1999, A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation, Q J Econ, 114, 817, 10.1162/003355399556151 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Bonus, 1986, The cooperative association as a business enterprise: a study in the economics of transactions, J Inst Theor Econ, 142, 310
  28. Ménard, 2004, The economics of hybrid organizations, J Inst Theor Econ, 160, 345, 10.1628/0932456041960605 · DOI
  29. Cook, 1995, The future of U.S. agricultural cooperatives: a neo-institutional approach, Am J Agric Econ, 77, 1153, 10.2307/1243338 · DOI
  30. Sykuta, 2001, A new institutional economics approach to contracts and cooperatives, Am J Agric Econ, 83, 1273, 10.1111/0002-9092.00278 · DOI
  31. Yildiz, 2013, Energiegenossenschaften in Deutschland: Bestandsentwicklung und institutionenökonomische Analyse, Z Gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, 63, 173
  32. Fehr, 2011, Neuroeconomic foundations of economic choice: recent advances, J Econ Perspect, 25, 3, 10.1257/jep.25.4.3 · DOI
  33. Dal Bó, 2010, Institutions and behavior: experimental evidence on the effects of democracy, Am Econ Rev, 100, 2205, 10.1257/aer.100.5.2205 · DOI
  34. Fehr, 2008, Fairness and the optimal allocation of ownership rights, Econ J, 118, 1262, 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02169.x · DOI
  35. Ben-Ner, 2013, The contributions of behavioural economics to understanding and advancing the sustainability of worker cooperatives, J Entrep Organ Divers, 2, 75
  36. Montmarquette, 2004, Redesigning teams and incentives in a merger: an experiment with managers and students, Manage Sci, 50, 1379, 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0280 · DOI
  37. Harrison, 2004, Field experiments, J Econ Lit, 42, 1009, 10.1257/0022051043004577 · DOI
  38. Valentinov, 2007, Why are cooperatives important in agriculture? An organizational economics perspective, J Inst Econ, 3, 55
  39. Sexton, 1986, Cooperatives and the forces shaping agricultural marketing, Am J Agric Econ, 68, 1167, 10.2307/1241869 · DOI
  40. LeVay, 1983, Agricultural cooperative theory: a review, J Agric Econ, 34, 1, 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1983.tb00973.x · DOI
  41. Milford, 2012, The pro-competitive effect of coffee cooperatives in Chiapas, Mexico, J Agric Food Ind Organ, 10, 1
  42. Hanisch, 2013, The cooperative yardstick revisited: panel evidence from the European dairy sectors, J Agric Food Ind Organ, 11, 151
  43. Pennerstorfer, 2013, Product quality in the agri-food chain: do cooperatives offer high-quality wine?, Eur Rev Agric Econ, 40, 143, 10.1093/erae/jbs008 · DOI
  44. Schiffer, 2011, Wettbewerb und Preise auf dem Strommarkt, Wirtschaftsdienst, 91, 284, 10.1007/s10273-011-1219-5 · DOI
  45. Mattes, 2012, “Nur wenige wechseln den Stromanbieter”: Sechs Fragen an Anselm Mattes, DIW Wochenber, 79, 10
  46. Achtnicht, 2011, Do environmental benefits matter? Evidence from a choice experiment among house owners in Germany, Ecol Econ, 70, 2191, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.026 · DOI
  47. Borchers, 2007, Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source?, Energy Policy, 35, 3327, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.009 · DOI
  48. Rommel, 2009, Empirische Analyse des Wechselverhaltens von Stromkunden: Was hält Stromkunden davon ab, zu Ökostromanbietern zu wechseln?, Z Energiewirtschaft, 33, 74, 10.1007/s12398-009-0008-y · DOI
  49. Sagebiel, 2014, Are consumers willing to pay more for electricity from cooperatives? Results from an online choice experiment in Germany, Energy Res Soc Sci, 2, 90, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.04.003 · DOI
  50. Walker, 2011, The role for “community” in carbon governance, Wiley Interdiscip Rev Climate Change, 2, 777, 10.1002/wcc.137 · DOI
  51. Walker, 2007, Carbon reduction, “the public” and renewable energy: engaging with socio-technical configurations, Area, 39, 458, 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00772.x · DOI
  52. Cass, 2010, Good neighbours, public relations and bribes: the politics and perceptions of community benefit provision in renewable energy development in the UK, J Environ Policy Plan, 12, 255, 10.1080/1523908X.2010.509558 · DOI
  53. Park, 2012, Fostering community energy and equal opportunities between communities, Local Environ: Int J Justice Sustain, 17, 387, 10.1080/13549839.2012.678321 · DOI
  54. Webler, 1995, Public participation in impact assessment: a social learning perspective, Environ Impact Assess, 15, 443, 10.1016/0195-9255(95)00043-E · DOI
  55. Stirling, 2014, Transforming power: social science and the politics of energy choices, Energy Res Soc Sci, 1, 83, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.001 · DOI
  56. Fast, 2013, A Habermasian analysis of local renewable energy deliberations, J Rural Stud, 30, 86, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.12.004 · DOI
  57. Collins, 2009, Jumping off Arnstein's ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation, Environ Policy Gov, 19, 358, 10.1002/eet.523 · DOI
  58. Huybrechts, 2014, The relevance of the cooperative model in the field of renewable energy, Ann Public Coop Econ, 85, 193, 10.1111/apce.12038 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Pondy, 1967, Organizational conflict: concepts and models, Adm Sci Q, 12, 296, 10.2307/2391553 · DOI
  60. Coser, 1957, Social conflict and the theory of social change, Br J Sociol, 8, 197, 10.2307/586859 · DOI
  61. Zarankin, 2008, A new look at conflict styles: goal orientation and outcome preferences, Int J Confl Manage, 19, 167, 10.1108/10444060810856094 · DOI
  62. Balnave, 2012, Rochdale consumer co-operatives in Australia: decline and survival, Bus Hist, 54, 986, 10.1080/00076791.2012.706899 · DOI
  63. Ekberg, 2012, Confronting three revolutions: western European consumer co-operatives and their divergent development, 1950–2008, Bus Hist, 54, 1004, 10.1080/00076791.2012.706894 · DOI
  64. Ayub, 2014, When diversity helps performance: effects of diversity on conflict and performance in workgroups, Int J Confl Manage, 25, 189, 10.1108/IJCMA-04-2013-0023 · DOI
  65. Daudi, 1986, European cooperations in transition: the metamorphosis of Homo Cooperativus, Scand J Manage Stud, 3, 65, 10.1016/0281-7527(86)90011-3 · DOI
  66. Stumberger, 2003, Zwischen Mitarbeiterdemokratie und Markt: Die Industriekooperative Mondragon, Z Gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, 53, 221
  67. Hernandez, 2006, Striving for control: democracy and oligarchy at a Mexican cooperative, Econ Ind Democr, 27, 105, 10.1177/0143831X06060593 · DOI
  68. Hoffmann, 2005, Dispute resolution in a worker cooperative: formal procedures and procedural justice, Law Soc Rev, 39, 51, 10.1111/j.0023-9216.2005.00077.x · DOI
  69. Mojtahed, 2007, Conflict management of cooperative organizations in contemporary Iran: a review analysis, Publ Organ Rev, 7, 163, 10.1007/s11115-006-0028-6 · DOI
  70. Darr, 1999, Conflict and conflict resolution in a cooperative: the case of the Nir taxi station, Hum Relat, 52, 279, 10.1177/001872679905200301 · DOI
  71. Darr, 2001, Democratic justice regimes in work organizations: the case of Israeli taxi cooperatives, Econ Ind Democr, 22, 383, 10.1177/0143831X01223004 · DOI
  72. Davis, 2001, The governance of co-operatives under competitive conditions: issues, processes and culture, Corp Gov, 1, 28, 10.1108/EUM0000000005975 · DOI
  73. Greenberg, 2014, Energy policy and research: the underappreciation of trust, Energy Res Soc Sci, 1, 152, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.004 · DOI
  74. Hansen, 2002, The impact of trust on cooperative membership retention, performance, and satisfaction: an exploratory study, Int Food Agribus Manage Rev, 5, 41
  75. Cornforth, 2004, The governance of cooperatives and mutual associations: a paradox perspective, Ann Public Coop Econ, 75, 11, 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2004.00241.x · DOI
  76. Österberg, 2009, Members’ perception of their participation in the governance of cooperatives: the key to trust and commitment in agricultural cooperatives, Agribus, 25, 181, 10.1002/agr.20200 · DOI
  77. Coleman, 1988, Social capital in the creation of human capital, Am J Sociol, 94, 95, 10.1086/228943 · DOI · Paper page
  78. Walker, 2009, Trust and community: exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy, Energy Policy, 38, 2655, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.055 · DOI
  79. Borgen, 2001, Identification as a trust-generating mechanism in cooperatives, Ann Public Coop Econ, 72, 209, 10.1111/1467-8292.00165 · DOI
  80. Nilsson, 2001, Organisational principles for co-operative firms, Scand J Man, 17, 329, 10.1016/S0956-5221(01)00010-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 366

Metadata

Authors
Yildiz, Ö., Rommel, J., Debor, S., Holstenkamp, L., Mey, F., Müller, J. R., Radtke, J., & Rognli, J.
ORCID
Venue
Energy Research & Social Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
6
Pages
59-73
ISSN
2214-6296
DOI
10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.001
Cited by
366
References
4
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Volkswagen Foundation
  • DZ Bank-Stiftung
  • Heinrich Böll Stiftung
  • European Regional Development Fund
  • Federal State of Lower Saxony
  • Kellner & Stoll – Stiftung für Klima
  • Umwelt and Stiftung der Universität Bremen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Renewable energy cooperatives as gatekeepers or facilitators? Recent developments in Germany and a multidisciplinary research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.001
The paper
Yildiz, Ö., Rommel, J., Debor, S., Holstenkamp, L., Mey, F., Müller, J. R., Radtke, J., & Rognli, J. (2015). Renewable energy cooperatives as gatekeepers or facilitators? Recent developments in Germany and a multidisciplinary research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.001