CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Narrating expectations for the circular economy: Towards a common and contested European transition

Lazarevic, David, Valve, Helena·2017·Energy Research & Social Science
DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.006

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Hobson, 2016, Closing the loop or squaring the circle? Locating generative spaces for the circular economy, Prog. Hum. Geogr., 40, 88, 10.1177/0309132514566342 · DOI
  2. Ehrenfeld, 1997, Industrial ecology: a framework for product and process design, J. Clean. Prod., 5, 87, 10.1016/S0959-6526(97)00015-2 · DOI
  3. Brown, 2003, A sociology of expectations: retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 15, 3, 10.1080/0953732032000046024 · DOI
  4. Schlaufer, 2016, The narrative uses of evidence, Policy Stud. J.
  5. Boulding, 1966, The economics of the coming spaceship earth, Environmental Quality Issues in a Growing Economy, 1
  6. Ayres, 1981, Eco-thermodynamics: economics and the second law, Ecol. Econ., 26, 189, 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00101-8 · DOI
  7. Andersen, 2007, An introductory note on the environmental economics of the circular economy, Sustain. Sci., 2, 133, 10.1007/s11625-006-0013-6 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Erkman, 1997, Industrial ecology: an historical view, J. Clean. Prod., 5, 1, 10.1016/S0959-6526(97)00003-6 · DOI
  9. Frosch, 1989, Strategies for manufacturing, Sci. Am., 261, 144, 10.1038/scientificamerican0989-144 · DOI
  10. 2009, vol. 2
  11. Murray, 2015, The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context, J. Bus. Ethics., 140, 369, 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Janda, 2015, Telling tales: using stories to remake energy policy, Build. Res. Inf., 43, 516, 10.1080/09613218.2015.1020217 · DOI
  13. Eames, 2006, Negotiating contested visions and place-specific expectations of the hydrogen economy, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 18, 361, 10.1080/09537320600777127 · DOI
  14. Bakker, 2012, Technological hype and disappointment: lessons from the hydrogen and fuel cell case, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 24, 549, 10.1080/09537325.2012.693662 · DOI
  15. van Lente, 2012, Navigating foresight in a sea of expectations: lessons from the sociology of expectations, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 24, 769, 10.1080/09537325.2012.715478 · DOI
  16. Borup, 2006, The sociology of expectations in science and technology, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 18, 285, 10.1080/09537320600777002 · DOI
  17. Berkhout, 2006, Normative expectations in systems innovation, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 18, 299, 10.1080/09537320600777010 · DOI
  18. Konrad, 2006, The social dynamics of expectations: the interaction of collective and actor-specific expectations on electronic commerce and interactive television, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 18, 429, 10.1080/09537320600777192 · DOI
  19. Fine, 2010, Policy legends and folklists: traditional beliefs in the public sphere, J. Am. Folk, 123, 150, 10.5406/jamerfolk.123.488.0150 · DOI
  20. Brown, 2003, Hope against hype—accountability in biopasts, presents and futures, Sci. Stud. (St. Bonaventure), 16, 3
  21. Bakker, 2011, Arenas of expectations for hydrogen technologies, Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change, 78, 152, 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.09.001 · DOI
  22. Lopez, 2008, Nanotechnology: legitimacy, narrative and emergent technologies, Sociol. Compass, 2, 1266, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00121.x · DOI
  23. Hermwille, 2016, The role of narratives in socio-technical transitions—Fukushima and the energy regimes of Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 11, 237, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.001 · DOI
  24. Smith, 2012, What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability, Res. Policy, 41, 1025, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Martin, 2016, The sharing economy: a pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism?, Ecol. Econ., 121, 149, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.027 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Franceschini, 2015, Beyond unsustainable eco-innovation: the role of narratives in the evolution of the lighting sector, Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change, 92, 69, 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.007 · DOI
  27. Kautto, 2009, Nokia as an environmental policy actor: evolution of collaborative corporate political activity in a multinational company, J. Common Mark. Stud., 47, 103, 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.01834.x · DOI
  28. Lazarevic, 2012, The application of life cycle thinking in the context of European waste policy, J. Clean. Prod., 29–30, 199, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.030 · DOI
  29. Gille, 2010, Actor networks, modes of production, and waste regimes: reassembling the macro-social, Environ. Plann. A, 42, 1049, 10.1068/a42122 · DOI
  30. Charonis, 2013, Degrowth, steady state economics and the circular economy: three distinct yet increasingly converging alternative discourses to economic growth for achieving environmental sustainability and social equity, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 53, 1689
  31. Fournier, 2008, Escaping from the economy: the politics of degrowth, Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy, 28, 528, 10.1108/01443330810915233 · DOI
  32. Cooper, 2005, Slower consumption: reflections on product life spans and the throwaway society, J. Ind. Ecol., 9, 51, 10.1162/1088198054084671 · DOI
  33. Hobson, 2013, Weak or strong sustainable consumption? Efficiency, degrowth, and the 10 year framework of programmes, Environ. Plann. C Gov. Policy, 31, 1082, 10.1068/c12279 · DOI
  34. Swyngedouw, 2010, Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change, Theory Cult. Soc., 27, 213, 10.1177/0263276409358728 · DOI
  35. Kenis, 2014, Searching for the “political” in environmental politics, Environ. Polit., 23, 531, 10.1080/09644016.2013.870067 · DOI
  36. Hisschemöller, 2006, What governs the transition to a sustainable hydrogen economy? Articulating the relationship between technologies and political institutions, Energy Policy, 34, 1227, 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.12.005 · DOI
  37. Buclet, 2015, Principles for sustainability: the need to shift to a sustainable conventional regime, Environ. Dev. Sustain., 17, 83, 10.1007/s10668-014-9539-4 · DOI
  38. Lazarevic, 2010, The influence of the waste hierarchy in shaping European waste management: the case of plastic waste, Reg. Dev. Dialogue, 31, 124
  39. Lazarevic, 2015, The legitimacy of life cycle assessment in the waste management sector, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.
  40. Valve, 2012, Articulating scientific practice with PROTEE:STS, loyalties and the limits of reflexivity, Sci. Technol. Hum. Values, 38, 470, 10.1177/0162243912451340 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
Lazarevic, D., & Valve, H.
Venue
Energy Research & Social Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
31
Pages
60-69
ISSN
2214-6296
DOI
10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.006
Cited by
291
References
6
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review