Cited by 41Risk Perception and ManagementSocial Acceptance of Renewable EnergyRadioactive contamination and transfer

Living with nuclear energy: A systematic review of the psychological consequences of nuclear power

Open access
Edwards, Michael W., Schweitzer, Robert D., Shakespeare-Finch, Jane, Byrne, Aidan, Gordon-King, Keely·2019·Energy Research & Social Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.016

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edwards, M. W., Schweitzer, R. D., Shakespeare-Finch, J., Byrne, A., & Gordon-King, K.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Schweitzer, Robert D.
Venue
Energy Research & Social Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
47
Pages
1-15
ISSN
2214-6296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891943959
Cited by
41
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy Research & Social Science (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Radioactive contamination and transfer
Keywords
nuclear energy, nuclear accidents, trust in authorities, sense of place, familiarity, nuclear war, atomic bomb

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review