Cited by 31Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceSmart Grid Energy ManagementRenewable Energy and Sustainability

When top-down meets bottom-up: Is there a collaborative business model for local energy storage?

Open access
Proka, Antonia, Hisschemöller, Matthijs, Loorbach, Derk·2020·Energy Research & Social Science

Abstract

As the energy transition progresses, energy storage becomes increasingly important for safeguarding a reliable energy provision. At the same time, energy storage systems are used to increase the self-consumption of decentralised generation and are expected to result in lower electricity bills for the energy prosumers. Drawing on sustainability transitions and management literature, this contribution focuses on a neighbourhood battery with the aim to explore to what extent a collaboration between a network operator and renewable energy initiatives on local energy storage could help increase the impact of the latter in the energy transition. The concept of a neighbourhood battery involves strategic decisions, and perhaps a strategic innovation, whose transformative potential depends to a large extent on the perceptions and actions of those involved. This paper explores the opportunities and constraints for a collaborative business model for the neighbourhood battery in the Netherlands, as well as the challenges and tensions that emerge for the main parties involved. The perspectives of the network operator were compared with those of renewable energy initiatives in the country, including the Energy Service Company involved in the pilot and, in parts, with the perspectives of the involved end-users. This contribution registers a misalignment of interests and expectations which complicates the deployment of the neighbourhood battery concept. Recognizing the critical role of network operators, the conditions that may enable the emergence of collaborative business models for local energy storage are also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101606

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The new regulatory context in the European Union and Switzerland states that the ownership and operation of energy storage is restricted for DSO, however, they could use tenders to engage market actors (like prosumers and aggregators) who own energy storage to provide grid services.

    “The new regulatory context in the European Union and Switzerland states that the ownership and operation of energy storage is restricted for DSO, however, they could use tenders to engage market actors (like prosumers and aggregators) who own energy storage to provide grid services [79].”

    From Spatial analysis of distribution grid capacity and costs to enable massive deployment of PV, electric mobility and electric heating (2021) · cites this paper as [79]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. D. Parra, M. Swierczynski, D.I. Stroe, S.A. Norman, A. Abdon, J. Worlitschek, T. O'Doherty, L. Rodrigues, M. Gillott, X. Zhang, C. Bauer, M.K. Patel, An inter- disciplinary review of energy storage for communities: challenges and perspectives, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 79 (2017) 730-749, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. rser.2017.05.003. · DOI · Paper page
  2. T. Blanchet, Struggle over energy transition in Berlin: how do grassroots initiatives affect local energy policy-making? Energy Policy. 78 (2015) 246-254, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.001. · DOI
  3. A. Proka, P.J. Beers, D. Loorbach, Transformative business models for sustainability transitions, in: L. Moratis, F. Melissen, S.O. Idowu (Eds.), Sustainable Business Models: Principles, Promise, and Practice, Springer International Publishing, 2018.
  4. S. Schaltegger, E.G. Hansen, F. Lüdeke-Freund, Business models for sustainability: origins, present research, and future avenues, Organ Environ. 29 (1) (2015) 3-10, https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615599806. · DOI
  5. A. Upward, P.H. Jones, An ontology for strongly sustainable business models: de- fining an enterprise framework compatible with natural and social science, Organ. Environ. 29 (1) (2016) 97e123, https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615592933. · DOI
  6. R. Bosman, D. Loorbach, N. Frantzeskaki, T. Pistorius, Discursive regime dynamics in the Dutch energy transition, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 13 (2014) 45-59.
  7. R.K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods. In: Applied Social Research Methods Series, second ed., vol. 5. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994.
  8. Paetz, A. G., Becker, B., Fichtner, W., & Schmeck, H. (2011, October). Shifting electricity demand with smart home technologies-an experimental study on user acceptance. In 30th USAEE/IAEE North American conference online proceedings (Vol. 19, p. 20).
  9. J.F. Peters, M. Baumann, B. Zimmermann, J. Braun, M. Weil, The environmental impact of Li-Ion batteries and the role of key parameters-a review, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 67 (2017) 491-506.
  10. P. Kivimaa, W. Boon, S. Hyysalo, L. Klerkx, Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: a systematic review and a research agenda, Res. Policy 48 (4) (2019) 1062-1075.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Proka, A., Hisschemöller, M., & Loorbach, D.
Affiliations
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Proka, Antonia
Venue
Energy Research & Social Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
69
Pages
101606
ISSN
2214-6296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036310791
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy Research & Social Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable Energy and Sustainability
Keywords
local energy storage, cooperative business models, network operators, energy service companies, energy prosumers, energy transition, strategic innovation, stakeholder misalignment, energy storage deployment, Netherlands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review