Comparing coal and ‘transition materials’? Overlooking complexity, flattening reality and ignoring capitalism
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The current energy mix and the mining of 'critical' minerals continue to rely on hydrocarbons.
“However, the current energy mix as well as the mining of 'critical' minerals continue to rely on hydrocarbons (see Dunlap, 2021b, 2023c; Dunlap & Marin, 2022)”
From The political ecologies of "green" extractivism(s): An introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Dunlap & Marin, 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The political ecologies of "green" extractivism(s): An introduction
Dunlap, A., Verweijen, J., & Tornel, C. (2024) · Journal of Political Ecology · doi:10.2458/jpe.6131 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
“…plantations and soil extractivism exemplify these concerns (Kröger, 2022; Hokkanen, 2024), but so does hydrological, solar and wind extractivism (Kelly, 2021; Hu, 2023; Dunlap & Marin, 2022), the impacts of which are often difficult to observe, happen slowly and progressively over time.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationRelational resources: Moving from plural to entangled extractivisms
Artiga-Purcell, J. A. (2024) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103076 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dunlap, A., & Marin, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Dunlap, Alexander
- Venue
- Energy Research & Social Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 89
- Pages
- 102531
- ISSN
- 2214-6296 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4210566859
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 12.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Energy Research & Social Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Global Energy and Sustainability Research
- Keywords
- critical minerals, renewable energy, green extractivism, capitalism, energy policy, environmental crisis, greenwashing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
