Cited by 126Extractivism and Socioeconomic IssuesSocial Sciences and HumanitiesPolitical Economy and Marxism

The political ecologies of "green" extractivism(s): An introduction

Open access
Dunlap, Alexander, Verweijen, Judith, Tornel, Carlos·2024·Journal of Political Ecology

Abstract

What is so-called 'green' extractivism and where did it come from? The introduction to this Special Section examines the origins and implications of the concept, linking it to a long history of exploitation, dispossession and (neo)colonialism under the guise of green-washing notions such as 'sustainable development.' Conducting an in-depth literature review, we first revisit the concept of extractivism, exploring its origins, development and analytical purchase. We link extractivism to 'extra-action,' implying taking more than what is viable for ecosystems and argue for a supply-web oriented, rather than a point of extraction-focused understanding. Subsequently, we examine key theoretical frameworks in political ecology that paved the way to the study of 'green' extractivism, notably Ecological Distribution Conflicts (which we argue could better be labeled Ecological Destruction Conflicts) and green grabbing. Based on this, we discuss the core features of green extractivism, which are twofold: (1) the use of socioecological and climate crises to reinforce existing or generate new markets and profit-generation opportunities; and (2) the mobilization of claims of ecological sustainability and 'carbon neutrality' to legitimize and rationalize extraction. After outlining the Special Section contributions, we end by considering gaps in existing scholarship on green extractivism and suggest ways forward.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This introduction to a *Journal of Political Ecology* Special Section theorizes "green extractivism" as a system of extractive development that harnesses climate and socioecological crises as profit-generating and re-branding opportunities, legitimized through claims of sustainability and "carbon neutrality." The authors conduct an in-depth literature review to trace the concept's origins, link it to ecological distribution conflicts and green grabbing, and propose a supply-web-oriented understanding that distinguishes direct from indirect green extractivism.

Key findings

  • Green extractivism has two distinguishing features: (1) it uses socioecological, weather and climate crises to generate new or reinforce existing "green" markets and profit opportunities; and (2) it mobilizes claims of ecological sustainability, "carbon neutrality" and climate mitigation to legitimize and rationalize extraction.
  • The authors argue classic (Gudynas-style) definitions of extractivism are inadequate because they are nationalist and state-centered, ignoring the networked, multi-scalar nature of extraction; they propose a supply-web rather than point-of-extraction approach.
  • They argue Ecological Distribution Conflicts (EDCs) could better be labeled Ecological Destruction Conflicts, since EDCs implicitly accept the erasure of relations and alternative ways of being.
  • They distinguish direct green extractivism (extractive processes at sites justified as "green") from indirect green extractivism (mines, smelting, chemical production, digital technologies that enable it), citing examples such as wind velocity deficits of "10% or more" downstream and a "significant warming trend of up to 0.72c per decade" found in west-central Texas (2003–2011).

Methods

  • Design: conceptual/theoretical introduction to a Special Section, based on an in-depth literature review of extractivism, political ecology, EDCs and green grabbing.
  • The paper reviews and synthesizes existing scholarship and outlines the Special Section's contributions (case studies spanning the Arctic, India, Namibia, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, the UK and Germany).
  • Main analysis is conceptual: defining extractivism's core features (appropriation, breakdown of socioecological reciprocity, political-economic/ideational systems) and green extractivism's four features, plus the direct/indirect distinction.

Limitations

  • The paper is an introduction and literature review rather than an empirical study; it explicitly frames itself as identifying "gaps in existing scholarship" and suggesting "ways forward," including a call for multi-scalar, mixed-methods research on extractive supply-webs.
  • The authors note that "political-industrial ecology" as a companion approach is offered speculatively ("we speculate").
  • Evident from the text: the argument is explicitly normative/advocacy-oriented (e.g., calling for postcapitalist, post-extractivist futures and "extra-Activisms"), which shapes its framing rather than presenting neutral findings.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2458/jpe.6131

Cites

159 of 159 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

34 of 173 cited sources checked · 13 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Digital technologies are now central to agricultural production.

    “Digital technologies are now notoriously central to agricultural production (Rotz et al., 2019;).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rotz et al., 2019 source

      The Introduction (p. 1) treats digital technologies as increasingly important to farming, and the discussion on p. 6 describes current adoption by larger farms. But it also emphasizes uneven access and adoption, so it does not establish that digital technologies are already central to agricultural production generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction

    'Green' discourses work to expand capitalist relations, land control and extractivism to intensify modernist development and wealth accumulation.

    “Moreover it demonstrates how 'green' discourses work to expand capitalist relations, land control and extractivism to intensify modernist development and wealth accumulation (Banerjee, 2003; Kirsch, 2009; Sullivan, 2009; Fairhead et al., 2012; Corson et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Banerjee, 2003 source
    • cites Kirsch, 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Sullivan, 2009

      In “Loss” (page unavailable), Sullivan describes green capitalism as creating markets, new frontiers of accumulation, and enclosures. “The Ecosystem Marketplace” describes how these schemes can constrain livelihoods and shift control over landscapes, while “Serving nature?” critiques their appeal to ecological modernisation. The copy does not establish the claim that green discourses expand extractivism, so the full sentence is only partly supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § 3. Ecological Distribution (or Destruction) Conflicts (EDCs) and green grabbing

    There has been a renewed emphasis on land grabbing and land control emerging alongside or intertwined with EDCs.

    “Emerging alongside, or even intertwined, with EDCs has been a renewed emphasis on land grabbing and land control (Peluso & Lund 2011; White et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Peluso & Lund 2011 source

      The Introduction (page not provided) describes new frontiers in scholarship on land control and discusses contemporary land grabbing, supporting the claim of renewed emphasis on those topics. It does not establish that this emphasis emerged alongside or was intertwined with EDCs. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites White et al. 2012 source
  • Premisecitation
    § 3. Ecological Distribution (or Destruction) Conflicts (EDCs) and green grabbing

    Mainstream environmental justice scholars are moving away from state-centered developmentalism and materialist ontology.

    “Mainstream environmental justice scholars, however, are moving away from this position (Temper, 2019; Menton et al., 2020)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Temper, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Menton et al., 2020 source

      The ‘Environmental justice frameworks’ section describes a general shift in EJ scholarship, and the ‘Abolitionist and decolonial environmental justice’ section discusses approaches that move beyond reliance on the liberal state and the human–nature divide. But the paper distinguishes these approaches from mainstream EJ; it does not say that mainstream scholars specifically are moving away from state-centered developmentalism and materialist ontology. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Ecotourism is a manifestation of extractivism almost purely driven by value grabbing.

    “a manifestation of extractivism almost purely driven”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Andreucci et al., 2017 source

      The available indexed passages are bibliographic information, including the title and citation details, rather than discussion of ecotourism. Searches for ecotourism, extractivism, and tourism-related rent did not find a passage stating that ecotourism is driven almost purely by value grabbing. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 55
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 94
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 1. Introduction

    So-called sustainable development and climate change mitigation projects are leading to land grabbing, displacement, dispossession, ecological destruction, repression and elite profiteering.

    “So-called sustainable development and climate change mitigation projects are leading to land grabbing, displacement, dispossession, ecological destruction, repression and elite profiteering”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dunlap & Fairhead, 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hunsberger et al., 2017 source

      The available indexed passages contain the title and bibliographic metadata, but no substantive discussion of project outcomes. Searches for land grabbing, displacement, ecological destruction, repression and elite profiteering returned no passage establishing the claimed effects; the title alone does not establish them. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Franco & Borras, 2019 source

      The Introduction and section 3 (pages unavailable in our copy) link climate-framed conservation and land projects to land grabbing, villagers’ displacement or dispossession, and environmental damage. Section 3 also describes companies using biofuel claims to gain forest access for profit. The copy does not substantiate repression as an outcome of these projects or specifically establish elite profiteering across sustainable-development projects, so the full list overstates its account. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Researching extractivism extends to the subsoils, the deep sea and outer space, as well as to solar extractivism, wind extractivism, recycling lower-carbon technologies, hydrological extractivism, green hydrogen, the renewable energy-extraction nexus of battery storage technologies, green data extractivism complexes, and atmospheric geoengineering.

    “Researching extractivism extends to the subsoils (Hokkanen, 2024), the deep sea (Childs, 2022) and outer space (Klinger, 2017), as well as to “solar extractivism” (Hu, 2023) “wind extractivism” (Dunlap & Marin, 2022, 7), recycling lower-carbon technologies (Sovacool et al., 2020), and hydrological extractivism”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hokkanen, 2024 source
    • cites Childs, 2022 source
    • cites Klinger, 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Combined, the four features of extractivism lead to a high level of environmental degradation and deleterious labor opportunities and conditions, while also intensifying forms of (neo)colonialism.

    “Combined, these features lead to a high level of environmental degradation and deleterious labor opportunities and conditions, while also intensifying forms of (neo)colonialism (Gudynas 2009; Lang & Mokrani, 2013; Nygren et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gudynas 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Lang & Mokrani, 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Nygren et al., 2022 source

      The Introduction links extractivism to ecological degradation, limited local employment, and a proliferation of subcontracted, temporary, and piecemeal labour. It does not explicitly say that these features intensify (neo)colonialism, nor does it establish the claimed combined effect of four features. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 1. Introduction

    Green extractivism reproduces colonially shaped North-South relations or various forms of internal colonization, advancing intersecting processes of green and energy colonialism.

    “Green extractivism, moreover, reproduces colonially shaped North-South relations or various forms of internal colonization2 (Zografos & Robbins, 2020; Fjellheim, 2023; Vela-Almeida et al., 2023; Dunlap & Tornel, 2024), advancing the intersecting processes of green and energy colonialism (Lang et al., 2024; Lohmann, 2024; Müller, 2024).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Zografos & Robbins, 2020 source
    • cites Fjellheim, 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Vela-Almeida et al., 2023 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Green financialization involves carbon markets, payment for ecosystems services and green bond markets.

    “processes of 'green financialization,' involving carbon markets, payment for ecosystems services and green”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lohmann, 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Andreucci et al. 2017 source

      The indexed passages labeled Abstract contain bibliographic details and a link to an accepted manuscript, but no substantive discussion of green financialization. Searches for carbon markets, ecosystem services, green bonds, and financialization found no passage that addresses the claimed examples. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Bruna, 2022a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Extractivism can be described as a specific socioeconomic pattern and way of seeing and constituting the world, leading to the organization of nature based on a classification system that creates a hierarchy between humans and non-humans that objectifies 'nature' and denies 'the sacred'.

    “For us, then, extractivism can be described as a specific socioeconomic pattern (or structure of”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Chagnon et al., 2022 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Benally, 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4. The history and meaning of green extractivism

    Disaster green extractivism is the process of enlisting ecological catastrophes to advance extractivism ranging from ecotourism, data centers, deepsea mining, 'green' hydrogen, climate 'smart' agriculture and geoengineering to mineral mining to produce lower-carbon technologies.

    “Drawing inspiration from Klein (2007), Sullivan (2009) and Fletcher (2012), we interpret this as disaster green extractivism as the process of enlisting ecological catastrophes to advance extractivism ranging from ecotourism, data centers, deepsea mining, 'green' hydrogen, climate 'smart' agriculture and geoengineering to mineral mining to produce lower-carbon technologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Klein (2007)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Sullivan (2009)
    • cites Fletcher (2012)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Historical colonial ties mediated by fossil fuels are closely linked to the rise of green extractivism and climate colonialism in the Arctic region.

    “Ksenija Hanaček, Markus Kröger and Joan Martinez-Alier (2024, this Section) reveal how historical colonial ties mediated by fossil fuels are closely linked to the rise of green extractivism and climate colonialism in the region.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hanaček et al. (2024, this Section) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Elite access to 'recreational lands' for hunting exotic animals involves the dispossession of local people, alienating them from the land and creating 'securitized landscapes' to sustain this practice.

    “Sullivan further shows how elite access to 'recreational lands' for hunting exotic animals involves the dispossession of local people, alienating them from the land and creating 'securitized landscapes' to sustain this practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sullivan (2023, this Section) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    'Greenness' is utilized as part of a neocolonial project consisting of the extraction of wildlife in the form of hunting trophies.

    “Sian Sullivan (2023, this Section) illustrates how 'greenness' is utilized as part of a neocolonial project consisting of the extraction of wildlife in the form of hunting trophies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sian Sullivan (2023, this Section) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Mitigation strategies are employed to displace historically marginalized peoples from their land, disrupting diverse ways of life and knowledge systems.

    “Thus mitigation strategies are employed to displace historically marginalized peoples from their land, disrupting diverse ways of life and knowledge systems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hanaček et al. (2024, this Section) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Trophy hunting (re)produces violent land control relationships, while exhibiting classical extractive features in terms of animal corpse export.

    “Sullivan demonstrates how trophy hunting (re)produces violent land control relationships, while exhibiting classical extractive features in terms of animal corpse export.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sullivan (2023, this Section) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 6. Conclusion

    The proliferation of ecological destruction conflicts reflects the shortcomings of state-led forms of environmental justice and the erasure of life-worlds and alternative ways of being, knowing, and doing in the world.

    “The proliferation of ecological destruction conflicts (Scheidel et al., 2020; Temper et al., 2020), moreover, not only reflects the shortcomings of state-led forms of environmental justice, but also the erasure of life-worlds and, consequently, alternative ways of being, knowing, and doing in the world.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Scheidel et al., 2020 source

      The Concluding discussion (page unavailable) says state procedures may be ineffective or unenforced and that bottom-up protest remains necessary, supporting the point about shortcomings in state responses. The Theoretical background (page unavailable) describes threats to livelihoods and cultural identities and conflicts between worldviews, but does not establish that proliferating conflicts reflect the erasure of life-worlds or alternative ways of being, knowing, and doing. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Temper et al., 2020 source

      Sections 3.2.3.2 and 4.3 link energy-project conflicts to inadequate consultation, exclusion from decision-making, and threats to communities’ lands and cultural practices. Section 3.3.1 also describes dispossession of Indigenous peoples. The paper does not clearly make the broader claim that the proliferation of these conflicts reflects an erasure of life-worlds and alternative ways of being, knowing, and doing. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    BHP has attempted and failed (until now) to benefit from rising demand for energy transition minerals.

    “the authors trace how BHP has attempted and failed (until now) to benefit from the rising demand for energy 'transition minerals' that underpins current technologies for decarbonization”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Barbesgaard and Whitmore (2024, this Section) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Mining companies are seizing opportunities created by climate crisis to widen and deepen their control over new mineral frontiers.

    “demonstrating that mining companies are seizing the 'opportunities' created by the climate crisis to 'widen' and 'deepen' their control over new mineral frontiers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Barbesgaard and Whitmore (2024, this Section) source

      The Introduction and “Expansion through commodity widening” describe mining companies pursuing transition-mineral opportunities, including BHP expanding nickel exploration and bringing new mines into production. But the Concluding remarks say BHP has sought to, yet generally failed to, accumulate significantly through expansion of the nickel frontier. The claim overstates that attempted expansion as companies successfully widening and deepening their control over mineral frontiers generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    There are still large research gaps and numerous ways to organize extractivism research.

    “There are still large research gaps and, as the subsection above suggests, numerous ways to organize extractivism research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Technologies of financialization have blurred the boundaries between manufacturing and extraction, rendering extractivism an increasingly central feature of contemporary capitalism.

    “technologies of financialization have blurred the boundaries between manufacturing and extraction, rendering extractivism an increasingly central feature of contemporary capitalism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Sando Mezzadra and Brett Neilson (2019)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Martín Arboleda (2020)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Limiting and separating extractivism from the dynamics of global capitalism leads to serious theoretical and methodological shortcomings.

    “leads to serious theoretical and methodological shortcomings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Facundo Martín (2017, 26) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Extractivism entails an organized and internally coherent feature of capitalism-increasingly global in scope-that enables it to exert control over flows to maintain value extraction.

    “extractivism entails an organized and internally coherent feature of capitalism—increasingly global in scope—that enables it to exert control over flows to maintain value extraction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jingzhong Ye and colleagues (2020)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    The relative importance of production processes in extractivism has been contested.

    “The relative importance of such production processes in extractivism has been contested.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gudynas (2021:8)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    An expanded interpretation of extractivism does not mean that the word becomes meaningless.

    “An expanded interpretation of extractivism does not mean that the word becomes meaningless.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    The result of abusing, killing and traumatizing people and other beings is fear, illness and erratic and harmful behavior, which can lead to hurting animals, forests, rivers, mountains, humans and other more-than-human entities.

    “The result is fear, illness and erratic and harmful behavior, which can lead to hurting animals, forests, rivers, mountains, humans and other more-than-human entities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    The concept of extractivism has wider applications.

    “The concept, however, has wider applications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Abstract

    Extractivism is linked to 'extra-action,' implying taking more than what is viable for ecosystems.

    “We link extractivism to 'extra-action,' implying taking more than what is viable for ecosystems”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    The concept of extractivism has been extended to denote not only physical processes of extraction, but also their embodied and gendered impacts.

    “The concept of extractivism was further developed to denote not only physical processes of extraction, but also their embodied and gendered impacts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    A focus on subjectivities implies looking at how people's mentalities, attitudes and conduct are shaped by and shape extractive activity.

    “Taking inspiration from Foucauldian notions of governmentality, a focus on subjectivities implies looking at how people's mentalities, attitudes and conduct are shaped by and shape extractive activity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    So-called green extractivism depends on multi-layered and networked extractivisms, meanwhile taking on new dimensions and literal depths and heights.

    “So-called green extractivism depends on multi-layered and networked extractivisms, meanwhile taking on new dimensions and literal depths and heights.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    While value grabbing has always been a central dynamic to extractivism, its importance has increased with the growing financialization of the world economy from the 1980s onwards.

    “While value grabbing has always been a central dynamic to extractivism, its importance has increased with the growing financialization of the world economy from the 1980s onwards.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The world economy has grown increasingly financialized from the 1980s onwards.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    The body, human or otherwise, is intimately connected to the territory they inhabit.

    “The body, human or otherwise, Latin American decolonial feminisms have shown (Ulloa, 2016; Cabnal, 2018; Caretta et al., 2020), is intimately connected to the territory they inhabit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ulloa, 2016 source
    • cites Cabnal, 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Caretta et al., 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1. Introduction

    As long as the so-called 'green economy' remains fundamentally driven by (liberal) capitalism, sustainability and green labels will remain fig leaves attempting to cover up ecocide.

    “We must remember that as long as the so-called 'green economy' remains fundamentally driven by (liberal) capitalism, sustainability and green labels will remain fig leaves attempting to cover up ecocide.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The so-called 'green economy' remains fundamentally driven by (liberal) capitalism.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    What the term 'extractivism' ultimately describes is a particular way of seeing and being in the world-it accurately captures how theft, looting and pillage remain constant in the political economy of capitalism, no matter its differing (statist) political and economic accumulation regimes.

    “Indeed, what the term 'extractivism' ultimately describes is a particular way of seeing and being in the world—it accurately captures how theft, looting and pillage remain constant in the political economy of capitalism, no matter its differing (statist) political and economic accumulation regimes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    A supply-web rather than point-of-extraction-centered understanding of extractivism(s) will extend accountability for ecosystem degradation and habitat loss.

    “Finally, a supply-web rather than point-of-extraction-centered understanding of extractivism(s) will extend accountability for ecosystem degradation and habitat loss.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Extractivism encompasses what Diego Andreucci and colleagues have labeled value grabbing.

    “While extractivism has often been described as a “mode of accumulation” (Acosta, 2013, 62; Perreault, 2013), it also encompasses what Diego Andreucci and colleagues (2017, 28) have labeled “value grabbing.””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Acosta, 2013, 62

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Perreault, 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Diego Andreucci and colleagues (2017, 28)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Extractivism is the result of a particular ontological assemblage which is animated by a mindset that shapes expressions, contestations, and logics for and/or against a singular worldview that sees human and nature as separate and (some) humans as more exploitable than others.

    “Extractivism, Judith Shapiro and John McNeish (2021) argue, is the result of a particular ontological assemblage which is animated by a mindset that shapes expressions, contestations, and logics for and/or against a singular worldview that sees human and nature as separate and (some) humans as more exploitable than others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shapiro and McNeish (2021)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Extractivism can only be accurately grasped when exploring multiple direct and indirect forms, and intersecting extractivism(s) and their planetary ramifications.

    “Therefore, extractivism can only be accurately grasped when exploring multiple direct and indirect forms (as described below), and intersecting extractivism(s) and their planetary ramifications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 1. Introduction

    The Tesla Gigafactory attack and communiqué illuminate the growing salience of what has been called 'green extractivism,' exemplifying increasing critique and resistance to extractive projects branded 'green'.

    “This action and communiqué illuminate—in theory and practice—the growing salience of what has been called 'green extractivism,' exemplifying the increasing critique and resistance to extractive projects branded 'green.'”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Anonymous, 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 1. Introduction

    Green extractivism constitutes a system of extractive development that harnesses climate change and other socioecological crises as profit-generating and re-branding opportunities.

    “As we further elaborate below, we consider green extractivism to constitute a system of extractive development that harnesses climate change and other socioecological crises as profit-generating and re-branding opportunities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Approaches to extractivism conceptualize it in terms of the appropriation of resources.

    “Approaches to extractivism do not limit this to drawing or pulling from the soil, but conceptualize it in terms of the appropriation of resources (Gudynas, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gudynas, 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Extractivism cannot be reduced to simply taking from the non-human world.

    “one of the key features of extractivism is that it cannot be reduced to simply taking from the non-human world.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jingzhong Ye and colleagues (2020)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    The concept of extractivism is far from 'mined-out.'

    “Gavin Bridge (2023) reminds us that the concept of extractivism is far from 'mined-out.'”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gavin Bridge (2023)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Extractivism remains the ideology of normalizing and executing violence against the body/territory that operates on multiple micro- and meso- scales as well as cumulatively on a planetary scale.

    “Extractivism, in short, remains the ideology of normalizing and executing violence against the body/territory that operates on multiple micro- and meso- scales as well as cumulatively on a planetary scale.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Foreign influence and ownership is not a determining factor for extractivism.

    “It also implies looking differently at foreign influence and ownership, which we do not consider a determining factor for extractivism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Classic approaches to extractivism lead to obscuring broader crises embedded in value chains of building materials like concrete or glass production and overlooking the relational politics of extractive activities.

    “Classic approaches therefore lead to obscuring broader crises embedded in value chains of, for example, building materials like concrete or glass production4 and overlooking the relational politics of extractive activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    The first wave of extractivism scholarship strongly emphasizes how extractivism is tied up with capitalism's unequal global divisions of production and consumption.

    “Stemming from its roots in dependency theory, this first wave of extractivism scholarship strongly emphasizes how extractivism is tied up with capitalism's unequal global divisions of production and consumption.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    These logics point to epistemic and ontological extractivism, relating to how one views and knows the world.

    “These logics point to what Grosfoguel calls 'epistemic' and 'ontological' extractivism, relating to how one views and knows the world.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Grosfoguel

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Extractivism, whether 'green,' 'black' or 'gray' begins with objectifying and denying the lifeways of mountains, rivers, trees, plants, soils and people.

    “Extractivism, whether”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    The importance of value grabbing within extractivism is only reinforced through the rise of green extractivism, which is importantly driven by processes of 'green financialization,' involving carbon markets, payment for ecosystems services and green.

    “The importance of value grabbing within extractivism is only reinforced through the rise of green extractivism, which is importantly driven by processes of 'green financialization,' involving carbon markets, payment for ecosystems services and green”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Extractivism is premised on the onto-epistemological devaluing of most of the web of life.

    “As Chagnon and colleagues argue,”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chagnon and colleagues (2022, 777)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    The first core feature of extractivism relates to the appropriation of resources and rendering them legible for value creation.

    “The first feature relates to the appropriation of resources (Gudynas, 2009) and rendering them legible, specifically for the purposes of value creation (Moore, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gudynas, 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Moore, 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4. The history and meaning of green extractivism

    Green extractivism differs from extractivism in that it uses socioecological, weather and climate crises to generate new or reinforce existing 'green' markets or profit-generating activities.

    “First, green extractivism differs from extractivism in that it uses socioecological, weather and climate crises to generate new or reinforce existing 'green' markets or profit-generating activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3. Ecological Distribution (or Destruction) Conflicts (EDCs) and green grabbing

    The EDC framework has opened up space for identifying and understanding processes of green extractivism.

    “As such, it has opened up space for identifying and understanding processes of green extractivism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3. Ecological Distribution (or Destruction) Conflicts (EDCs) and green grabbing

    A political ontology lens changes how we understand politics by critically assessing hegemonic modes of knowing that shape what is tolerated and allowed on the political menu in policy debates or mainstream media outlets.

    “A political ontology lens also changes how we understand politics, by critically assessing the hegemonic modes of knowing that shape what is tolerated and allowed on the 'political menu' in policy debates or mainstream media outlets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    This worldview, categorical imposition and ideology is normalized, institutionally reproduced and becomes hegemonic.

    “This worldview, categorical imposition and ideology is normalized, institutionally reproduced and, thus, becomes hegemonic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Green grabbing positions itself as green accumulation by dispossession.

    “Green grabbing, following Fairhead and colleagues (2012), positions itself as”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fairhead and colleagues (2012)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 3. Ecological Distribution (or Destruction) Conflicts (EDCs) and green grabbing

    Green extractivism always entails Ecological Distribution Conflicts (EDCs) and green grabbing, although it is not limited to it.

    “We posit that green extractivism always entails Ecological Distribution Conflicts (EDCs) and green”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisenone given
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Extractivism takes on various public and/or private forms to advance capital accumulation and 'grab' value.

    “Extractivism, said simply, takes on various”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    With the rise of global commodity prices, (neo)extractivism involves governments extracting more rents and accumulated value, which, in the case of rentierism, advances the collateralization of national assets through legal-technical instruments.

    “With the rise of global commodity prices, (neo)extractivism involves governments extracting more rents and accumulated value (see Bebbington, 2012; Perreault, 2013), which, in the case of rentierism, advances the “collateralization” of national assets through legal-technical instruments (Rosales 2019, 1317).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bebbington, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Perreault, 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Rosales 2019, 1317 source
    • Rests on an assumption: The world economy has grown increasingly financialized from the 1980s onwards.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 3. Ecological Distribution (or Destruction) Conflicts (EDCs) and green grabbing

    Political ecologists have been at the forefront of investigating green extractivism.

    “Said simply, political ecologists have been at the forefront of investigating green extractivism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    The result of ecotourism is the commodification of ecosystems and the reorganization of relationships in the service of value extraction.

    “The result is the commodification of ecosystems and the reorganization”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    The second core feature of extractivism is that appropriation and the related process of producing legibility always lead to the breakdown of socioecological reciprocity, implying the infliction of irreparable harm on socioecological systems.

    “A second core feature of extractivism is that appropriation and the related process of producing”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    This system inscribes the expansion of capitalist techno/industrial production and economic growth as 'progress' regardless of the deleterious social/cultural/knowledge effects and the ecological and climatic devastations it entails.

    “This system inscribes the expansion of capitalist techno/industrial production and economic growth as 'progress' regardless of the deleterious”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § 3. Ecological Distribution (or Destruction) Conflicts (EDCs) and green grabbing

    EDCs scholarship charts the asymmetrical distribution of costs and benefits, which also extends to center-periphery exchange dynamics.

    “The latter charts the asymmetrical distribution of costs and benefits, which also extends to center-periphery exchange dynamics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Making legible entails identifying, measuring, mapping, labeling and often quantifying phenomena in order to commodify them and render them governable and extractable.

    “entails identifying, measuring, mapping, labeling and often quantifying phenomena in order”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Scott, 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Li, 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Avila, et al., 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3. Ecological Distribution (or Destruction) Conflicts (EDCs) and green grabbing

    Green extractivism goes beyond EDCs by looking not only at processes and relations of extraction and distribution but also at the structures and broader conditions (material/political/ontological) that enable them.

    “Green extractivism, nevertheless, goes beyond this by looking not only at processes and relations of extraction and distribution but also at the structures and broader conditions (material/political/ontological) that enable them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 3. Ecological Distribution (or Destruction) Conflicts (EDCs) and green grabbing

    Much EDC research has insufficiently recognized the political/ontological dimensions of destruction conflicts, being implicitly inscribed in state-centered developmentalism and a related materialist ontology.

    “Despite this emphasis on socio/cultural values, much EDC research has insufficiently recognized the political/ontological dimensions of destruction conflicts, being implicitly inscribed in state-centered developmentalism and a related materialist ontology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3. Ecological Distribution (or Destruction) Conflicts (EDCs) and green grabbing

    Green grabbing is driven by and creates the conditions for green extractivism-it establishes and enables the complex supply-webs that sustain it, by promoting the successful commodification, marketization and extraction of humans, nonhumans and more-than-humans to propel the expansion of capitalist mentalities, development, and natures.

    “Green grabbing is driven by and creates the conditions for green extractivism—it establishes and enables the complex supply-webs that sustain it, by promoting the successful commodification, marketization and extraction of humans, nonhumans (flora, fauna, etc.) and more-than-humans (river spirits, mountains, etc.) to propel the expansion of capitalist mentalities, development, and natures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    The unequal distribution of harms combined with unequal, adverse or highly limited benefit sharing points to ecological distribution conflicts (EDCs).

    “The unequal distribution of harms combined with the unequal, adverse or highly limited benefit sharing, pointing to”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Because of the severing of reciprocity, extraction indicates extra-action that creates socioecological disharmony by appropriating extra or consuming more resources/existences than can sustain habitats and socioecological and epistemic vitality and diversity.

    “Because of the severing of”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Governmental 'de-risking' or favorable private-public partnerships (PPA) is another key dynamic of green financialization and is currently used to finance climate change mitigation and industry decarbonization projects.

    “Another key dynamic of green financialization is governmental 'de-risking,' or favorable private-public partnerships (PPA), which are currently being used to finance climate change mitigation and industry decarbonization projects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: De-risking seeks to reduce or eliminate investment risks by leveraging public funds.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    This entwined socioeconomic/political-ontological pattern is characterized by the appropriation of resources and existences and non-reciprocal relations with the planet, grounded in the objectification of rivers, trees, mountains, plants, soils and bodies.

    “This entwined socioeconomic/political-ontological pattern or system is characterized by the appropriation of resources and existences and non-reciprocal relations with the planet, which are ultimately grounded in the objectification”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    The third core feature of extractivism is that it is not limited to processes of appropriation that lead to irreparable socioecological harm, but also relates to the broader and entwined political-economic and ideational systems that enable these processes.

    “A third core feature of extractivism is that it is not limited to processes of appropriation that lead to”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    The harm inflicted by creating socioecological disbalance is generally externalized, implying extractive corporations do not account for it, but offload harms onto local ecosystems, existences and peoples, and the public sector.

    “The harm inflicted by creating socioecological disbalance is generally externalized, implying extractive corporations do not account for it, but they offload harms onto local ecosystems”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4. The history and meaning of green extractivism

    The current energy mix and the mining of 'critical' minerals continue to rely on hydrocarbons.

    “However, the current energy mix as well as the mining of 'critical' minerals continue to rely on hydrocarbons (see Dunlap, 2021b, 2023c; Dunlap & Marin, 2022)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dunlap, 2021b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Dunlap, 2023c

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Dunlap & Marin, 2022 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. The historical evolution of debates on extractivism

    Extractive or green extractive hegemony entails an 'extractive gaze' that is used to legitimize extraction by rendering certain beings, existences and lives of habitats invisible, meanwhile teaching people to think and see like an extractivist state or corporation.

    “Extractive, or green extractive, hegemony thus entails an”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gómez-Barris (2017, 4-5)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kröger, 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hokkanen, 2024 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3. Ecological Distribution (or Destruction) Conflicts (EDCs) and green grabbing

    Green extractivism scholarship emerges from but also goes beyond the EDC framework, redressing its limitations by centering the epistemological and ontological dimensions of extractivism.

    “As further elaborated below, green extractivism scholarship emerges from, but also goes beyond the EDC framework, redressing its limitations by centering the epistemological and ontological dimensions of extractivism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3. Ecological Distribution (or Destruction) Conflicts (EDCs) and green grabbing

    Green grabbing is the logistical preparation, act or 'event' that encloses land.

    “Green grabbing is the logistical preparation, act or 'event' that encloses land;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4. The history and meaning of green extractivism

    Agricultural plantations and soil extractivism exemplify concerns about degradation, but so does hydrological, solar and wind extractivism, the impacts of which are often difficult to observe, happen slowly and progressively over time.

    “As mentioned above, agricultural plantations and soil extractivism exemplify these concerns (Kröger, 2022; Hokkanen, 2024), but so does hydrological, solar and wind extractivism (Kelly, 2021; Hu, 2023; Dunlap & Marin, 2022), the impacts of which are often difficult to observe, happen slowly and progressively over time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kröger, 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hokkanen, 2024 source
    • cites Kelly, 2021 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Jaguars conservation enacts green extractivist practices while justifying conventional extractivism.

    “In short, jaguars conservation enacts green extractivist practices while justifying conventional extractivism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Jaguar conservation regiments environments, integrates market relationships, further justifying the so-called 'Tren Maya' megaproject-a 1,500-kilometer train in southeast of Mexico.

    “The authors reveal how jaguar conservation regiments environments, integrates market relationships, further justifying the so-called 'Tren Maya' megaproject—a 1,500-kilometer train in southeast of Mexico.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ruelas and Dunlap (2023, this Section)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    The putative energy transition reproduces the same territorial, environmental, and sociocultural impacts as conventional forms of extraction, yet it makes dispossession fashionable, rendering it invisible, legitimate, and even agreeable.

    “As Astrid Ulloa (2023, this Section) shows, the putative energy transition reproduces the same territorial, environmental, and sociocultural impacts as conventional forms of extraction, yet it makes dispossession fashionable, rendering it invisible, legitimate, and even agreeable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ulloa (2023, this Section) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4. The history and meaning of green extractivism

    The dominant gaze of climate masculinities to intervene at a planetary scale combines with the ontological and physical invisibilization inflicted by 'sustainable development' projects built on notions such as terra nullius, which entail deploying a matrix of physical and symbolic violence to render certain people and places visible for extraction and exploitation thereby rendering others invisibl

    “The dominant gaze of climate masculinities to intervene at a planetary scale (e.g. earth system science and geoengineering) combines with the ontological and physical invisibilization inflicted by 'sustainable development' projects built on notions such as terra nullius, which entail deploying a matrix of physical and symbolic violence to render certain people and places visible for extraction and”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Scott, 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Li, 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Vidalou, 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4. The history and meaning of green extractivism

    Green extractivism leverages socioecological, weather and climate crises as investment and profit-generation opportunities.

    “To sum up, green extractivism leverages socioecological, weather and climate crises as investment and profit-generation opportunities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Pressures to decarbonize have led to a proliferation of proposals seeking to incorporate wind and solar energy into La Guajira, Colombia, thereby depoliticizing territorial demands by the Wayúu people.

    “Examining one of Latin America's coal mining regions, La Guajira, Colombia, Ulloa argues that pressures to decarbonize have led to a proliferation of proposals seeking to incorporate wind and solar energy into the region, thereby depoliticizing territorial demands by the Wayúu people.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ulloa (2023, this Section) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Jaguar conservation advances green extractivism, while greenwashing conventional extractive and infrastructural development schemes.

    “The authors argue that jaguar conservation advances green extractivism, while greenwashing conventional extractive and infrastructural development schemes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ruelas and Dunlap (2023, this Section)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4. The history and meaning of green extractivism

    The high-modernist eye-and materialist ontologies it is grounded in-fails to, refuses, and simply cannot acknowledge or experience these progressive ecological degradations and changes.

    “The high-modernist eye—and materialist ontologies it is grounded in—fails to, refuses, and simply cannot acknowledge or experience these progressive ecological degradations and changes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Extraction of minerals to combat climate change exacerbates climate-related risks for marginalized populations in the Peruvian highlands by degrading sensitive ecosystems and undermining local livelihoods.

    “This has led to the paradoxical situation that the extraction of minerals to combat climate change exacerbates climate-related risks for marginalized populations in the Peruvian highlands by degrading sensitive ecosystems and undermining local livelihoods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Heikkinen (2024, this Section) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    The HS2 project sought to cut through habitats and towns from London heading north.

    “The HS2 project sought to cut through habitats and towns from London heading north.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brock (2024, this Section)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4. The history and meaning of green extractivism

    Much of the capital invested in 'green' projects is derived from conventional extractivist projects, whereas the profits of green extractivisms are reinvested in conventional extractive activities.

    “Therefore, much of the capital invested in 'green' projects is derived from conventional extractivist projects, whereas the profits of green extractivisms are reinvested in conventional extractive activities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Energy justice has roots in colonial objectives, capitalist imperatives, and modernist developmental thinking.

    “The author challenges the notion of energy justice, revealing its roots in colonial objectives, capitalist imperatives and modernist developmental thinking.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Colombia's reliance on the 'greenness' of large-scale infrastructure projects diverts attention from their extractive socioecological realities, which coincide with violent tactics to suppress dissent from local communities and environmental defenders.

    “Feeney illustrates how Colombia's reliance on the 'greenness' of large-scale infrastructure projects, in this case a dam, diverts attention from their extractive socioecological realities, which coincide with violent tactics to suppress dissent from local communities and environmental defenders.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Feeney (2024, this Section) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Peruvian mining policies, actions, and discourses are intertwined with the global extractive apparatus and its power dynamics, perpetuating contradictions inherent in green extractivism.

    “Employing the concept of indirect green extractivism, the article further demonstrates how Peruvian mining policies, actions, and discourses are intertwined with the global extractive apparatus and its power dynamics, perpetuating the contradictions inherent in green extractivism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Heikkinen (2024, this Section) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Zinc and other transition minerals are crucial raw materials for wind turbines, solar panels, lithium-ion batteries, electric cars, and other technologies positioned as central for mitigating climate crisis.

    “Heikkinen underscores how zinc, alongside other 'transition minerals,' are crucial raw materials for wind turbines, solar panels, lithium-ion batteries, electric cars and other technologies positioned as central for mitigating the ongoing climate crisis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Heikkinen (2024, this Section) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    The complex interplay of voluntary carbon markets, NGOs, corporate financing, environmental policies, and blockchain technologies are used to further integrate ecosystems into the circuits of capitalist control and accumulation.

    “Ruelas and Dunlap describe how the complex interplay of voluntary carbon markets, NGOs, corporate financing, environmental policies, and blockchain technologies are used to further integrate ecosystems into the circuits of capitalist control and accumulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ruelas and Dunlap (2023, this Section)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4. The history and meaning of green extractivism

    It is green extractivism, not 'green energy,' 'sustainable,' renewable,' 'clean' or 'decarbonized'.

    “It is green extractivism, not 'green energy,' 'sustainable,' renewable,' 'clean' or 'decarbonized'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    By portraying HS2 as sustainable, green, and necessary, the government benefits the British construction industry, political and economic elites, affluent commuters, and the City of London, while leveraging zero carbon imaginaries to disregard devastating socioecological consequences.

    “Brock contends that by portraying the project as 'sustainable,' 'green,' and 'necessary,' the government is benefiting the British construction industry, political and economic elites, affluent commuters, and the City of London, all while leveraging 'zero carbon imaginaries' to disregard the devastating socioecological consequences the project was due to have.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brock (2024, this Section)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 4. The history and meaning of green extractivism

    There are entire equipment factories, mining operations, chemical processing facilities, smelting and manufacturing facilities that produce wind, solar, hydrological and tidal wave extraction technologies.

    “There are entire equipment factories, mining operations, chemical processing facilities, smelting and manufacturing facilities that produce wind, solar, hydrological and tidal wave extraction technologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4. The history and meaning of green extractivism

    So-called renewability involves degradation, irreparable damage, and exhaustion.

    “So-called renewability involves degradation, irreparable damage, and exhaustion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    The green transition not only conceals its extractive nature but also becomes entangled with forms of spatial reconfiguration, in this case, around nationalist projects.

    “Similarly, David Singh (2023, this Section) demonstrates how the green transition not only conceals its extractive nature but also becomes entangled with forms of spatial reconfiguration, in this case, around nationalist projects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites David Singh (2023, this Section) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    The 'greenness' of infrastructural extractivism serves as a tool to legitimize and rationalize the same injustices, violence, and social and ecological harms as other forms of industrial development.

    “In this context, the 'greenness' of infrastructural extractivism serves as a tool to legitimize and rationalize the same injustices, violence, and social and ecological harms as other forms of industrial development.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brock (2024, this Section)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Expansion of zinc mining in the Peruvian highlands exacerbates climate vulnerabilities.

    “Anna Heikkinen (2024, this Section) contends that the expansion of zinc mining in the Peruvian highlands exacerbates climate vulnerabilities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Heikkinen (2024, this Section) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    It is paradoxical to speak of energy justice as long as the concept, its formulations, and manifestations remain tethered to a Westernized conception of modernity.

    “Tornel argues that it seems paradoxical to speak of energy justice as long as the concept, its formulations, and manifestations remain tethered to a Westernized conception of modernity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4. The history and meaning of green extractivism

    Green projects extract-directly or indirectly-from ecosystems, and are often enabled by capital from or tools and infrastructure produced by conventional hydrocarbon extractive projects.

    “Green projects also extract—directly or indirectly—from ecosystems, and are often enabled by capital from or tools and infrastructure produced by conventional hydrocarbon extractive projects (Dunlap, 2021b; Andreucci et al., 2023; Marin et al., 2023; Deberdt & Le Billion, 2024).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dunlap, 2021b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Andreucci et al., 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Marin et al., 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4. The history and meaning of green extractivism

    These claims obscure the fundamental entanglements between conventional and 'green' extractivism, making deception a central feature of the latter.

    “As further explained below, these claims obscure the fundamental entanglements between conventional and 'green' extractivism, making deception a central feature of the latter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    The implementation of neoliberal conservation tools (e.g., environmental offsets) by government and private sector leads to the creation of carbon and biodiversity sacrifice zones necessary to secure access to natural resources as compensation mechanisms.

    “Here, Feeney reveals how the implementation of neoliberal conservation tools by the government and private sector, such as environmental offsets, leads to the creation of both 'carbon' and biodiversity sacrifice zones necessary to secure access to natural resources as compensation mechanisms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Feeney (2024, this Section) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Wind power infrastructures become key sites for the expansion of extractive development and the assertion of state sovereignty aligning with the ethno-nationalist political project of reshaping land and space along religious and caste lines.

    “He further argues that wind power infrastructures become key sites for the expansion of extractive development and the assertion of state sovereignty aligning with the ethno-nationalist political project of reshaping land and space along religious and caste lines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Singh (2023, this Section) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Trophy hunting emerges as an unsuspecting form of green extractivism, perpetuating extractive patterns historically established through colonialism.

    “Consequently, trophy hunting emerges as an unsuspecting form of green extractivism, perpetuating extractive patterns historically established through colonialism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    State-building and state legitimacy require extractive infrastructures as a means of accumulation, political pacification, and domestication of subjects.

    “Drawing on the colonial history of the British railways, Brock argues that state-building and state legitimacy require extractive infrastructures as a means of accumulation, political pacification, and the domestication of subjects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brock (2024, this Section)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    In India, an almost ready-made justification for the expulsion of Muslims from land is articulated in the emerging demand for so-called renewable energy, leading 'green' energy production to converge with Narendra Modi's ethno-nationalist project.

    “Focusing on India, Singh illustrates how an almost ready-made justification for the expulsion of Muslims from land is articulated in the emerging demand for so-called renewable energy, leading 'green' energy production to converge with Narendra Modi's ethno-nationalist project.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Singh (2023, this Section) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4. The history and meaning of green extractivism

    Green extractivism is done by branding extractivist projects 'green' or ecologically sustainable that, in reality, are just extracting more from the earth and its inhabitants to advance industry, technology, and elite control, thereby enabling and disabling different possibilities for people and the planet.

    “This is done by branding extractivist projects 'green' or ecologically sustainable that, when in reality, they are just extracting more from the earth and its inhabitants to advance industry, technology, and elite control, thereby enabling and disabling different possibilities for people and the planet.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Energy justice risks reproducing injustices instead of resolving them.

    “Energy justice, Tornel shows, risks reproducing injustices instead of resolving them.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Environmentalists' enthusiastic endorsement of railway development was exploited by the UK government to justify the HS2 megaproject.

    “Andrea Brock (2024, this Section) reveals how environmentalists' enthusiastic endorsement of railway development was exploited by the UK government to justify the controversial High-Speed Two (HS2) trainline megaproject”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brock (2024, this Section)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Exploring green extractivism: Special Section contributors

    Discourses presenting humans, and peasants in particular, as invaders, further entrench (neo)colonial conservation policies that enable rather than hinder green grabbing and extractivism.

    “In the same vein, the author shows how discourses presenting humans, and peasants in particular, as invaders, further entrench (neo)colonial conservation policies —like offsets— that enable rather than hinder green grabbing and extractivism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Feeney (2024, this Section) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4. The history and meaning of green extractivism

    The claims to 'sustainability', 'climate friendliness' and 'green-ness' harnessed by green extractivism are deeply inscribed in specific ontologies and epistemologies, further underscoring how extractivism inevitably entails political/ontological conflict.

    “The claims to 'sustainability', 'climate friendliness' and 'green-ness' harnessed by green extractivism are deeply inscribed in specific ontologies and epistemologies, further underscoring how extractivism inevitably entails political/ontological conflict.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4. The history and meaning of green extractivism

    So-called green projects extract-directly or indirectly-from ecosystems, and are often dependent on conventional hydrocarbon extractive projects.

    “So-called green projects extract— directly or indirectly—from ecosystems, and are often dependent on conventional hydrocarbon extractive projects (Dunlap, 2021b; Andreucci et al., 2023; Marin et al., 2023; Deberdt & Le Billion, 2024).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dunlap, 2021b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Andreucci et al., 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Marin et al., 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6. Conclusion

    Ignoring the extractivist reality of lower-carbon energy production stifles and prevents people from adequately assessing the harms of modernity and working towards creating sociopolitical systems based on genuine socioecological sustainability and renewability.

    “Ignoring the extractivist reality of lower-carbon energy production stifles and prevents people from adequately assessing the harms of modernity and, consequently, working towards creating sociopolitical systems based on genuine socioecological sustainability and renewability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6. Conclusion

    Extractivist activities entail slow and progressive forms of socioecological degradation related to quality and vitality of wind, wave, river and solar flows.

    “This, as mentioned above, extends to charting how extractivist activities entail slow and progressive forms of socioecological degradation, related to the quality and vitality of wind, wave, river and solar flows.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6. Conclusion

    Green extractivism is a farce-it is just extractivism.

    “While green extractivism is a farce—it is just extractivism— we argue that it deserves greater analytical specificity and it remains a useful tool for conceptualizing capitalism's techno/industrial growth.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6. Conclusion

    There is a remarkable expansion of 'extra-actions' accompanying the spread of extractivism into less developed or previously inaccessible areas.

    “We are witnessing a remarkable expansion of 'extra-actions' accompanying the relentless, often brutal, and intensifying spread of extractivism into 'less developed' or previously inaccessible areas ranging from material sources at the bottom of the ocean, to the Moon, or even Mars, and mineral deposits at greater depths.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6. Conclusion

    Such research is a precondition for holding conventional and green extractive industries accountable.

    “Such research is a precondition for holding conventional and green extractive industries accountable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6. Conclusion

    The proliferation of extra-actions can only be countered by an intensification of extra-Activisms.

    “This proliferation of extra-actions can only be countered by an intensification of extra-Activisms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6. Conclusion

    The expansion of extra-actions includes indirect and immaterial forms of extractivism such as global value-chains, logistics, financialization, and data-extraction algorithms.

    “This expansion includes indirect and so-called 'immaterial' forms of extractivism, such as global value-chains, logistics, financialization, and data-extraction algorithms required to sustain green extractivism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
121 of 121
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Green extractivism has mostly been studied in a compartmentalized manner, divided by sector and often in the form of individual case studies.

    “Because of its diverse manifestations—as well as the diverse understandings of extractivism—green extractivism has mostly been studied in a compartmentalized manner, divided by sector (e.g., minerals, agriculture, infrastructures, etc.) and often in the form of individual case studies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The so-called 'green economy' remains fundamentally driven by (liberal) capitalism.

    “as long as the so-called 'green economy' remains fundamentally driven by (liberal) capitalism”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Capitalist growth imperatives must be stopped for sustainability and to prevent extractivism.

    “all conversations about lower-carbon technologies and greening are pointless until capitalist growth imperatives are stopped.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The different manifestations of 'green' extractivism can be placed under a single analytical umbrella.

    “This Special Section aims to place the different manifestations of 'green' extractivism under a single analytical umbrella and develops a comprehensive theoretical approach”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The project of capital accumulation retains little-to-no respect for boundaries, whether of economic sectors or nation states.

    “The project of capital accumulation retains little-to-no respect for boundaries, whether of economic sectors or nation states.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The world economy has grown increasingly financialized from the 1980s onwards.

    “with the growing financialization of the world economy from the 1980s onwards.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    De-risking seeks to reduce or eliminate investment risks by leveraging public funds.

    “De-risking seeks to reduce, or eliminate, investment risks by leveraging public funds.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Ecotourism aims for the preservation of biodiversity and ecosystems, rather than their depletion.

    “While ecotourism aims for the preservation of biodiversity and”
8 of 8

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Barbesgaard and Whitmore citation year differs from the reference

    Minor

    The contribution is cited as published in 2024, whereas its bibliography entry gives 2023.

  • Bruna page citation falls outside the listed article

    Minor

    The text cites page 839 of Bruna (2022a), but the reference lists that article as pages 138-160. Page 839 falls within the separately listed Bruna (2022b) article.

  • Brock contribution is assigned two publication years

    Minor

    The same Special Section contribution is cited as Brock (2023) in one section and Brock (2024) in another.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Journal of Political Ecology Vol. 31, 2024 455
  2. Batel, S. & Rudolph, D. (2021). A critical approach to the social acceptance of renewable energy infrastructures: Going beyond green growth and sustainability. Palgrave.
  3. Bridge, G. (2023). Conclusion. Extractive orientations. In S. Postar, N. Elodie Behzadi, & N. Doering (eds.),
  4. Journal of Political Ecology Vol. 31, 2024 456
  5. Journal of Political Ecology Vol. 31, 2024 457
  6. Dunlap, A., Ruelas, A. & Hammelbo, L. (eds.) (2023). Debates in post-development and degrowth: Volume

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunlap, A., Verweijen, J., & Tornel, C.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación (MX)
Corresponding author
Dunlap, Alexander
Venue
Journal of Political Ecology
Published
2024-07-23
Volume
31
Issue
1
ISSN
1073-0451 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400924818
Cited by
126
References
155
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 9
FWCI
89.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Political Ecology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
Keywords
green extractivism, extractivism, political ecology, greenwashing, sustainable development, green grabbing, climate change, carbon neutrality, neocolonialism, dispossession

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-27.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-27.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review