The dark side of the energy transition: Extractivist violence, energy (in)justice and lithium mining in Portugal
Open accessAbstract
Focusing on a case study in Northern Portugal, this research mobilizes an energy justice lens to unpack multiple forms of violence reproduced by lithium mining projects, advanced as urgent and necessary for the energy transition. Framed under ‘green transition’ discourses, a ‘corporate energy transition’ follows a mineral-intensive pathway which increases demand for critical raw materials and expands extractivism to new commodities and marginal territories. Lithium (Li) is central to this transition, with an estimated 1500 % rise in the global demand of this rare earth mineral by 2050. Yet, the socio-ecological impacts of Li-mining remain largely overlooked, despite driving significant environmental conflicts in Portugal and elsewhere. Based on empirical research, this article examines how Li-mining projects in Portugal reproduce distributive, recognition and procedural (in)justices which assist the ‘green grabbing’ and infrastructural colonization of peripheral territories, turned into new ‘green sacrifice zones’. By attending to the voices and experiences of those resisting Li-mining projects, the results present the energy transition as a ‘trojan horse’ for extractivism, with Li-mining driving multiple energy injustice(s), reproducing violence against local communities and disrupting wider multispecies relationalities in traditionally sustainable rural territories. The research contributes to: (1) unravel the empirical contradictions of a corporate energy transition, problematizing hegemonic socio-technical responses to address the climate crisis, which expand extractivism through depletion, segregation and exclusion; and (2) reveal links between energy (in)justices and the constitution of ‘green sacrifice zones’, highlighting how territorial struggles embed a clash between different relational ontologies in more-than-human territories.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Grassroots and indigenous movements have highlighted the increasing environmental costs of lithium extraction and denounced mining companies for turning sites into sacrifice zones.
“Grassroots and indigenous movements have highlighted the increasing environmental costs of lithium extraction and denounced mining companies for turning sites into “sacrifice zones” [109,110].”
From The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats (2025) · cites this paper as [110]
Cites
Forget, M., & Bos, V. (2022) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102477 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Material footprint and import dependency in EU27: Past trends and future challenges
Distefano, T., Lodi, L., & Biggeri, M. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143384 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Díaz Paz, W. F., Seghezzo, L., Salas Barboza, A. G., Escosteguy, M., Arias-Alvarado, P. V., Kruse, E., Hufty, M., & Iribarnegaray, M. A. (2025) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42523 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Canelas, J., & Carvalho, A.
- Affiliations
- Centro de Estudos Sociais (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Canelas, Joana
- Venue
- Energy Research & Social Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-06
- Volume
- 100
- Pages
- 103096
- ISSN
- 2214-6296 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4376891012
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 37.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Energy Research & Social Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- ERDF (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-028362)
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-028362, 028362)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Policies
- Keywords
- lithium mining, energy justice, extractivism, energy transition, green grabbing, critical raw materials, environmental conflicts, territorial struggles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review