CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Watt's in it for you? Unpacking the role of renewable energy cooperatives in the Netherlands in energizing consumer engagement

Rupp, Rémy, Los, Alexander, Rozema, Jaap·2025·Energy Research & Social Science
DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103883
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between renewable energy cooperatives and consumer engagement in decentralized energy systems, focusing on how the structural components of the cooperatives shape members' attitudes and behaviors as both consumers and producers of renewable energy (“prosumers”). Using a mixed-methods approach, the study combines qualitative interviews with quantitative survey data from two Dutch renewable energy cooperatives, Blijstroom and Loenen Cooperative members. The findings highlight the critical roles of trust and awareness—two non-price-based socio-psychological mechanisms—in mediating the relationship between the cooperatives' structures and consumer engagement. While trust fosters interpersonal connections and a sense of ownership, awareness enhances members' understanding of renewable energy opportunities and challenges, with both mechanisms contributing to engagement in varying degrees depending on contextual differences between the cooperatives. Moreover, the results point out that renewable energy cooperatives, regardless of their structural characteristics, activate social norms, stimulate symbolic ownership, foster collective interests, and bridge cognitive gaps between energy generation and consumption. Together, these processes incentivize local stakeholders to actively engage with decentralized energy systems, demonstrating the multifaceted socializing roles of renewable energy cooperatives in fostering pro-environmental behaviors and…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103883

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Huybrechts, 2014, The relevance of the cooperative model in the field of renewable energy, Ann. Public Cooperative Econ., 85, 193, 10.1111/apce.12038 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Yildiz, 2015, Renewable energy cooperatives as gatekeepers or facilitators? Recent developments in Germany and a multidisciplinary research agenda, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 6, 59, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Luo, Y., Itaya, S., Nakamura, S., Davis, P., & 39th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks, LCN 2014 39 2014 09 08–2014 09 11. (2014). Autonomous cooperative energy trading between prosumers for microgrid systems. Proceedings - Conference on Local Computer Networks, Lcn, 2014-november(November), 693–696. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/LCNW.2014.6927722. · DOI
  4. Bauwens, 2013, What roles for energy cooperatives in the diffusion of distributed generation technologies?, SSRN Electron. J., 2013
  5. Huijts, 2012, Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: a review-based comprehensive framework, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 16, 525, 10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.018 · DOI
  6. Frederiks, 2015, Household energy use: applying behavioural economics to understand consumer decision-making and behaviour, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 41, 1385, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.026 · DOI
  7. Koirala, 2018, Trust, awareness, and independence: insights from a socio-psychological factor analysis of citizen knowledge and participation in community energy systems, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 38, 33, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.009 · DOI
  8. Wolsink, 2018, Social acceptance revisited: gaps, questionable trends, and an auspicious perspective, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 46, 287, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.034 · DOI
  9. Van Opstal, 2024, From trust to transition: residential customer acceptance of circular solar business models, Res. Soc. Sci., 115
  10. Lehtonen, 2019, Community energy and the virtues of mistrust and distrust: lessons from Brighton and Hove energy cooperatives, Ecol. Econ., 164, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106367 · DOI
  11. Otto, 2023, A synthetic review of the trust-participation nexus: towards a relational concept of trust in energy system transformations to net zero, Res. Soc. Sci., 101
  12. Kalkbrenner, 2016, Citizens’ willingness to participate in local renewable energy projects: the role of community and trust in Germany, Res. Soc. Sci., 13, 60
  13. Seyfang, 2013, A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK, Energy Policy, 61, 977, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.030 · DOI
  14. Tarhan, 2015, Renewable energy cooperatives: a review of demonstrated impacts and limitations, J. Entrep. Organ. Divers., 4, 104
  15. Klein, 2016, Building a sustainable energy future, one community at a time, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 60, 867, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.129 · DOI
  16. Aiken, 2018, One-way street? Spatiality of communities in low carbon transitions in Scotland, Energy Res, Sociol. Sci., 36, 129
  17. Brown, 2020, What is prosumerism for? Exploring the normative dimensions of decentralised energy transitions, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 66, 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101475 · DOI
  18. Wu, 2022, Harnessing citizen investment in community-based energy initiatives: a discrete choice experiment across ten European countries, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 89, 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102552 · DOI
  19. Walker, 2008, What are the barriers and incentives for community-owned means of energy production and use?, Energy Policy, 36, 4401, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.032 · DOI
  20. Piterou, 2020, A review of business models for decentralized renewable energy projects, Bus. Strateg. Environ., 30, 1468, 10.1002/bse.2709 · DOI
  21. Hicks, 2018, An exploration of the boundaries of ‘community’ in community renewable energy projects: navigating between motivations and context, Energy Policy, 113, 523, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.031 · DOI
  22. Van der Schoor, 2015, Power to the people: local community initiatives and the transition to sustainable energy, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 43, 666, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.089 · DOI
  23. Gui, 2018, Typology of future clean energy communities: an exploratory structure, opportunities, and challenges, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 35, 94, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.019 · DOI
  24. Hentschel, 2018, Renewable energy cooperatives: facilitating the energy transition at the port of Rotterdam, Energy Policy, 121, 61, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.014 · DOI
  25. Fischer, 2021, Who wants to get involved? Determining citizen willingness to participate in German renewable energy cooperatives, Res. Soc. Sci., 76
  26. Walker, 2011, The role for ‘community’ in carbon governance, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang., 2, 777, 10.1002/wcc.137 · DOI
  27. Sauter, 2007, Strategies for the deployment of micro-generation: implications for social acceptance, Energy Policy, 35, 2770, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.006 · DOI
  28. Stedmon, 2013, Micro-generation schemes: user behaviours and attitudes towards energy consumption, Ergonomics, 56, 440, 10.1080/00140139.2012.723140 · DOI
  29. Walker, 2008, Community renewable energy: what should it mean?, Energy Policy, 36, 497, 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019 · DOI
  30. Gangale, 2013, Consumer engagement: an insight from smart grid projects in Europe, Energy Policy, 60, 621, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.031 · DOI
  31. Bauwens, 2016, Explaining the diversity of motivations behind community renewable energy, Energy Policy, 93, 278, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Bauwens, 2019, Analyzing the determinants of the size of investments by community renewable energy members: findings and policy implications from Flanders, Energy Policy, 129, 841, 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.067 · DOI
  33. Hoppe, 2019, Renewable energy cooperatives as a stimulating factor in household energy savings, Energies, 12, 10.3390/en12071188 · DOI
  34. Maruyama, 2007, The rise of community wind power in Japan: enhanced acceptance through social innovation, Energy Policy, 35, 2761, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.010 · DOI
  35. Warren, 2010, Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland, Land Use Policy, 27, 204, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.010 · DOI
  36. Kubli, 2018, The flexible prosumer: measuring the willingness to co-create distributed flexibility, Energy Policy, 114, 540, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.044 · DOI
  37. Keirstead, 2007, Behavioural responses to photovoltaic systems in the UK domestic sector, Energy Policy, 35, 4128, 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.02.019 · DOI
  38. Hope, 2018, Consumer engagement in low-carbon home energy in the United Kingdom: implications for future energy system decentralization, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 44, 362, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.032 · DOI
  39. Van Summeren, 2020, Community energy meets smart grids: reviewing goals, structure, and roles in virtual power plants in Ireland, Belgium and The Netherlands, Res. Soc. Sci., 63
  40. Philip H. Ramsey (1989). Critical values for Spearman's rank order correlation, Journal of Educational Statistics, 14, 245–253, American Educational Research Association and American Statistical Association, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1165017. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Rupp, R., Los, A., & Rozema, J.
Venue
Energy Research & Social Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-02
Volume
120
Pages
103883
ISSN
2214-6296
DOI
10.1016/j.erss.2024.103883
Cited by
4
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review