Cited by 13AI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Artificial intelligence for cancer screening and surveillance

Open access
Gentile, F., Malara, N.·2024·ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology

Abstract

Investing in cancer prevention can be cost-effective. However, this requires significant changes both inside and outside the health care system. The core of the preventive strategy is the assignment of an individual risk level of developing cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI), which has emerged as a tool to reduce errors and confusion in data collection and analysis, has helped accelerate recent advances in identifying circulating markers to generate predictive methods. With predictive models applied to increasingly less invasive and repeatable analytic tests, the risk is no longer assigned but profiled directly on the individual over time. On this basis, the probability of early cancer diagnosis is increased and at the same time, proactive preventive medicine transits from offering lifestyle recommendations to guiding specific treatments to reduce the risk. Despite these promises, AI-based predictive models also present challenges in clinical implementation. Addressing these challenges is crucial to minimizing the future burdens associated with fighting cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.esmorw.2024.100046

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Models that may perform well during development can degrade in real-world settings due to dataset drift across diverse sites, devices, and populations.

    “Models that may perform well during development can degrade in real-world settings due to dataset drift across diverse sites, devices, and populations15–18.”

    From What the AI era doctor should know: a scoping review of proposed artificial intelligence competencies for medical education (2026) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Secondary and tertiary cancer prevention section (page unavailable) says that applying retrospective findings in clinical practice depends on representative data and recommends validation using datasets from multiple sites. This supports the concern about real-world performance, but the paper does not specifically attribute performance degradation to dataset drift across devices and populations. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gentile, F., & Malara, N.
Affiliations
Magna Graecia University (IT)
Corresponding author
Malara, N.
Venue
ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-09
Volume
5
Pages
100046
ISSN
2949-8201 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400494189
Cited by
13
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
artificial intelligence, cancer screening, cancer surveillance, cancer prevention, prediction model, circulating biomarkers, early cancer detection, clinical implementation barriers, cost-effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review