The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
Chen, S.-J. J., Hwang, C. L., Beckmann, M. J., & Krelle, W. E. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,207
Fuzzy Set Theory—and Its Applications
Zimmermann, H.-J. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0646-0 · Cited by 7,526
Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1 · Cited by 4,988
Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment
Chen, C.-T. (2000) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(97)00377-1 · Cited by 3,844
Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications
Zwick, R., & Zimmermann, H.-J. (1993) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423177 · Cited by 2,921
Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic : theory and applications
Kaufmann, A., & Gupta, M. M. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,813
Lai, Y.-J., Liu, T.-Y., & Hwang, C.-L. (1994) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(94)90282-8 · Cited by 1,086
Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods
Zanakis, S. H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N. A., & Dublish, S. (1998) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(97)00147-1 · Cited by 1,026
Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights
Deng, H., Yeh, C.-H., & Willis, R. J. (2000) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/s0305-0548(99)00069-6 · Cited by 1,022
The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM
Tsaur, S.-H., Chang, T.-Y., & Yen, C.-H. (2002) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/s0261-5177(01)00050-4 · Cited by 884
Cited by
A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques
Zyoud, S. H., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.016 · Cited by 492
Measuring corporate environmental performance: a methodology for sustainable development
Escrig‐Olmedo, E., Muñoz‐Torres, M. J., Fernández‐Izquierdo, M. Á., & Rivera‐Lirio, J. M. (2017) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1904 · Cited by 159
Cyber security risk assessment in autonomous shipping
Tusher, H. M., Munim, Z. H., Notteboom, T. E., Kim, T.-E., & Nazir, S. (2022) · Maritime Economics & Logistics · doi:10.1057/s41278-022-00214-0 · Cited by 98
Ramkumar, M. (2016) · Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/so-12-2015-0030 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y.-M., & Elhag, T. M. S.
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 309-319
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136821145
- Cited by
- 895
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 17.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.040
- The paper
- Wang, Y.-M., & Elhag, T. M. S. (2006). Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
