A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques

Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484 · see citing works

An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output

Hirsch, J. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 · Cited by 11,669 · see citing works

How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process

Saaty, T. L. (1990) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-i · Cited by 9,605 · see citing works

Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications

Chen, S.-J. J., Hwang, C. L., Beckmann, M. J., & Krelle, W. E. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,207 · see citing works

IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040

Ogurtsova, K., Fernandes, J. D. D. R., Huang, Y., Linnenkamp, U., Guariguata, L., Cho, N. H., Cavan, D. A., Shaw, J. E., & Makaroff, L. (2017) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024 · Cited by 6,977 · see citing works

The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used

Saaty, R. W. (1987) · Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8 · Cited by 5,380 · see citing works

Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses

Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf · Cited by 5,039 · see citing works

Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS

Opricovic, S. C., & Tzeng, G. (2003) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1 · Cited by 5,006 · see citing works

Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035

Guariguata, L., Whiting, D. R., Hambleton, I., Beagley, J., Linnenkamp, U., & Shaw, J. E. (2014) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002 · Cited by 4,642 · see citing works

Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys

Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., & Ehrogott, M. (2005) · International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science · doi:10.1007/b100605 · Cited by 4,516 · see citing works

IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030

Whiting, D. R., Guariguata, L., Weil, C., & Shaw, J. E. (2011) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2011.10.029 · Cited by 3,994 · see citing works

Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment

Chen, C. A. (2000) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(97)00377-1 · Cited by 3,854 · see citing works

Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications

Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2004) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028 · Cited by 3,828 · see citing works

A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications

Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056 · Cited by 2,733 · see citing works

Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making

Wang, J., Jing, Y., Zhang, C., & Zhao, J. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021 · Cited by 2,361 · see citing works

Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—A review

Pohekar, S. D., & Ramachandran, M. (2004) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007 · Cited by 1,938 · see citing works

PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications

Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2009) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021 · Cited by 1,706 · see citing works

Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods

Opricovic, S. C., & Tzeng, G. (2006) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020 · Cited by 1,688 · see citing works

A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management

Chen, C. A., Lin, C., & Huang, S.-F. (2005) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.03.009 · Cited by 1,623 · see citing works

A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method

Boran, F. E., Genç, S., Kurt, M., & Akay, D. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.039 · Cited by 1,502 · see citing works

An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making

Shih, H.-S., Shyur, H., & Lee, E. S. (2006) · Mathematical and Computer Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023 · Cited by 1,455 · see citing works

The Prioritization of Cancer Antigens: A National Cancer Institute Pilot Project for the Acceleration of Translational Research

Cheever, M. A., Allison, J. P., Ferris, A. S., Finn, O. J., Hastings, B. M., Hecht, T. T., Mellman, I., Prindiville, S. A., Viner, J. L., Weiner, L. M., et al. (2009) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-0737 · Cited by 1,388 · see citing works

Untitled work

(2013) · Cited by 1,331 · see citing works

Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends

Huang, I. B., Keisler, J. M., & Linkov, I. (2011) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022 · Cited by 1,293 · see citing works

Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach

Chan, F. T. S., & Kumar, N. (2005) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2005.08.004 · Cited by 1,250 · see citing works

The scientific impact of nations

King, D. A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/430311a · Cited by 1,245 · see citing works

Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process

Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143 · Cited by 1,241 · see citing works

A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming

Ghodsypour, S. H., & O'Brien, C. (1998) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/s0925-5273(97)00009-1 · Cited by 1,183 · see citing works

Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications – A literature review

Ho, W. (2007) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004 · Cited by 1,173 · see citing works

Application of the AHP in project management

Al‐Harbi, K. M. A. (2001) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(99)00038-1 · Cited by 1,127 · see citing works

TOPSIS for MODM

Lai, Y.-J., Liu, T.-Y., & Hwang, C.-L. (1994) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(94)90282-8 · Cited by 1,092 · see citing works

An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications

Vargas, L. G. (1990) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-h · Cited by 1,069 · see citing works

The Analytic Hierarchy Process—An Exposition

Forman, E. H., & Gass, S. I. (2001) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.49.4.469.11231 · Cited by 1,069 · see citing works

Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process

Handfield, R., Walton, S. V., Sroufe, R. P., & Melnyk, S. A. (2002) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00261-2 · Cited by 1,058 · see citing works

Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights

Deng, H., Yeh, C., & Willis, R. J. (2000) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/s0305-0548(99)00069-6 · Cited by 1,028 · see citing works

Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods

Zanakis, S. H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N. A., & Dublish, S. (1998) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(97)00147-1 · Cited by 1,026 · see citing works

Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications – Two decades review from 1994 to 2014

Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003 · Cited by 951 · see citing works

Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities

Wallin, J. A. (2005) · Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology · doi:10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x · Cited by 913 · see citing works

Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment

Wang, Y.-M., & Elhag, T. (2005) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.040 · Cited by 896 · see citing works

The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM

Tsaur, S., Chang, T., & Yen, C. (2002) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/s0261-5177(01)00050-4 · Cited by 887 · see citing works

The Theory of Ratio Scale Estimation: Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process

Harker, P. T., & Vargas, L. G. (1987) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1383 · Cited by 869 · see citing works

Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey

Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ruan, D. (2003) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/s0925-5273(03)00099-9 · Cited by 825 · see citing works

Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals

Kulkarni, A. V. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1307 · Cited by 821 · see citing works

Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment

Dağdeviren, M., Yavuz, S., & Kılınç, N. (2008) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016 · Cited by 798 · see citing works

Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison

Deng, H. (1999) · International Journal of Approximate Reasoning · doi:10.1016/s0888-613x(99)00025-0 · Cited by 768 · see citing works

Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision making—an introduction: report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force

Thokala, P., Devlin, N., Marsh, K., Baltussen, R., Boysen, M., Kalo, Z., Longrenn, T., Mussen, F., Peacock, S., Watkins, J., et al. (2016) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.003 · Cited by 739 · see citing works

A cost-value approach for prioritizing requirements

Karlsson, J., & Ryan, K. T. (1997) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/52.605933 · Cited by 727 · see citing works

An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system

Tam, M. C. Y., & Tummala, V. M. R. (2001) · Omega · doi:10.1016/s0305-0483(00)00039-6 · Cited by 672 · see citing works

A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship

Rey‐Martí, A., Soriano, D. R., & Palacios‐Marqués, D. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.033 · Cited by 670 · see citing works

A review of applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process in operations management

Subramanian, N., & Ramanathan, R. (2012) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.036 · Cited by 650 · see citing works

Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data

Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfı, F. H., & Izadikhah, M. (2006) · Applied Mathematics and Computation · doi:10.1016/j.amc.2006.02.057 · Cited by 643 · see citing works

Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment

Wang, T.-C., & Chang, T.-H. (2006) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.07.003 · Cited by 637 · see citing works

A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach

Kahraman, C., Ertay, T., & Büyüközkan, G. (2004) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.09.016 · Cited by 628 · see citing works

Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation

Tzeng, G., Lin, C.-W., & Opricovic, S. C. (2004) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.014 · Cited by 624 · see citing works

Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and limitations

Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2009) · OR Insight · doi:10.1057/ori.2009.10 · Cited by 620 · see citing works

ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications

Govindan, K., & Jepsen, M. B. (2015) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.019 · Cited by 599 · see citing works

Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey

Şengül, Ü., Eren, M., Shiraz, S. E., Gezder, V., & Şengül, A. B. (2014) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.045 · Cited by 561 · see citing works

Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: A Literature Review

Kahraman, C., Onar, S. Ç., & Öztayşi, B. (2015) · International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems · doi:10.1080/18756891.2015.1046325 · Cited by 542 · see citing works

Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability

Mulliner, E., Malys, N., & Malienė, V. (2015) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.013 · Cited by 536 · see citing works

The analytic hierarchy process: applications and studies

(1993) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/0305-0548(93)90049-o · Cited by 504 · see citing works

Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection

Wang, J.-W., Cheng, C., & Huang, K.-C. (2008) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2008.04.014 · Cited by 504 · see citing works

Development of TOPSIS Method to Solve Complicated Decision-Making Problems — An Overview on Developments from 2000 to 2015

Zavadskas, E. K., Mardani, A., Turskis, Z., Jusoh, A., & Nor, K. M. (2016) · International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · doi:10.1142/s0219622016300019 · Cited by 493 · see citing works

05/02652 Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation

(2005) · Fuel and Energy Abstracts · doi:10.1016/s0140-6701(05)83150-9 · Cited by 465 · see citing works

Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries

Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2011) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21688 · Cited by 456 · see citing works

Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multiattribute decision-making methods

Triantaphyllou, E., & Lin, C.-T. (1996) · International Journal of Approximate Reasoning · doi:10.1016/0888-613x(95)00119-2 · Cited by 453 · see citing works

A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning

Ananda, J., & Herath, G. (2009) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.010 · Cited by 451 · see citing works

A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection

Shyur, H., & Shih, H.-S. (2006) · Mathematical and Computer Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2005.04.018 · Cited by 427 · see citing works

Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country

Chen, M., & Tzeng, G. (2004) · Mathematical and Computer Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2005.01.006 · Cited by 399 · see citing works

Citation counting, citation ranking, and h ‐index of human‐computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science

Meho, L. I., & Rogers, Y. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20874 · Cited by 383 · see citing works

Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis

Durbach, I. N., & Stewart, T. J. (2012) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.04.038 · Cited by 381 · see citing works

Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria: Methods and Applications

Hwang, C. L., & Lin, M.-J. (1986) · Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) · Cited by 378 · see citing works

An improvement of the h-index: the g-index

Egghe, L. (2006) · Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) · Cited by 363 · see citing works

A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS

Yue, Z. (2010) · Applied Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.apm.2010.11.001 · Cited by 360 · see citing works

A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the SAW, TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design

Wang, P., Zhu, Z., & Wang, Y. (2016) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.076 · Cited by 335 · see citing works

Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A logarithmic fuzzy preference programming methodology

Wang, Y., & Chin, K. (2010) · International Journal of Approximate Reasoning · doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2010.12.004 · Cited by 309 · see citing works

Decision making for the selection of cloud vendor: An improved approach under group decision-making with integrated weights and objective/subjective attributes

Liu, S., Chan, F. T. S., & Ran, W. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.01.059 · Cited by 301 · see citing works

For Your Citations Only? Hot Topics in Bibliometric Analysis

van Raan, A. F. J. (2005) · Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives · doi:10.1207/s15366359mea0301_7 · Cited by 295 · see citing works

Human health and safety risks management in underground coal mines using fuzzy TOPSIS

Mahdevari, S., Shahriar, K., & Esfahanipour, A. (2014) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.076 · Cited by 276 · see citing works

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Group Decision Making and its Optimization With an Allocation of Information Granularity

Pedrycz, W., & Song, M. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2011.2116029 · Cited by 276 · see citing works

A framework for water loss management in developing countries under fuzzy environment: Integration of Fuzzy AHP with Fuzzy TOPSIS

Zyoud, S. H., Kaufmann, L. G., Shaheen, H. Q., Samhan, S., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.05.016 · Cited by 268 · see citing works

Mapping of drinking water research: A bibliometric analysis of research output during 1992–2011

Fu, H., Wang, M.-H., & Ho, Y. (2012) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.061 · Cited by 248 · see citing works

Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A Comparative Analysis

Ossadnik, W., Schinke, S., & Kaspar, R. H. (2015) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-015-9448-4 · Cited by 223 · see citing works

Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model

Mir, M. A., Ghazvinei, P. T., Sulaiman, N. M. N., Basri, N. E. A., Saheri, S., Mahmood, N. Z., Jahan, A., Begum, R. A., & Aghamohammadi, N. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.028 · Cited by 221 · see citing works

Paradigms and Challenges

Roy, B. (2016) · International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_2 · Cited by 210 · see citing works

Multi-Criteria Clinical Decision Support

Dolan, J. G. (2010) · Patient · doi:10.2165/11539470-000000000-00000 · Cited by 193 · see citing works

Application of multicriteria decision analysis in health care: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis

Adunlin, G., Diaby, V., & Xiao, H. (2014) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12287 · Cited by 193 · see citing works

Multi-criteria analysis of electricity generation technologies in Lithuania

Štreimikienė, D., Šliogerienė, J., & Turskis, Z. (2015) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.032 · Cited by 191 · see citing works

Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in health care: A bibliometric analysis

Diaby, V., Campbell, K., & Goeree, R. A. (2013) · Operations Research for Health Care · doi:10.1016/j.orhc.2013.03.001 · Cited by 184 · see citing works

A spatial assessment framework for evaluating flood risk under extreme climates

Chen, Y., Liu, R., Barrett, D. J., Gao, L., Zhou, M., Renzullo, L. J., & Emelyanova, I. (2015) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.094 · Cited by 180 · see citing works

Pharmaceuticals and the environment (PiE): Evolution and impact of the published literature revealed by bibliometric analysis

Daughton, C. G. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.109 · Cited by 177 · see citing works

Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) application for reinforcement of hydropower strategy in Nepal

Singh, R. P., & Nachtnebel, H. P. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.138 · Cited by 176 · see citing works

Making Good Decisions in Healthcare with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: The Use, Current Research and Future Development of MCDA

Mühlbacher, A. C., & Kaczynski, A. (2015) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-015-0203-4 · Cited by 157 · see citing works

Coupling Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Life-Cycle Assessment, and Risk Assessment for Emerging Threats

Linkov, I., & Seager, T. P. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es100959q · Cited by 148 · see citing works

Evaluating Research and Impact: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research by the NIH/NIAID HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials Networks

Rosas, S. R., Kagan, J., Schouten, J. T., Slack, P. A., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017428 · Cited by 132 · see citing works

Global research trends in landslides during 1991–2014: a bibliometric analysis

Wu, X., Chen, X., Zhan, F. B., & Hong, S. (2015) · Landslides · doi:10.1007/s10346-015-0624-z · Cited by 131 · see citing works

Supplier selection for development of petroleum industry facilities, applying multi-criteria decision making techniques including fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS with flexible entropy weighting

Wood, D. A. (2015) · Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2015.12.021 · Cited by 127 · see citing works

A combined fuzzy approach to determine the best region for a nuclear power plant in Turkey

Erdoğan, M., & Kaya, İ. (2015) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.11.013 · Cited by 122 · see citing works

Evaluation of e-commerce websites using fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS based on E-S-QUAL

Kang, D., Jang, W., & Park, Y. (2016) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.01.017 · Cited by 114 · see citing works

Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP

Ishizaka, A., Balkenborg, D., & Kaplan, T. R. (2010) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.2010.23 · Cited by 112 · see citing works

A decision-directed approach for prioritizing research into the impact of nanomaterials on the environment and human health

Linkov, I., Bates, M., Canis, L., Seager, T. P., & Keisler, J. M. (2011) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.163 · Cited by 112 · see citing works

Prioritising data items for business analytics: Framework and application to human resources

Pape, T. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.01.052 · Cited by 106 · see citing works

Multicriterion Analysis in Engineering and Management

Raju, S. K., & Kumar, D. N. (2010) · NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) · Cited by 104 · see citing works

A bibliometric analysis of research on proteomics in Science Citation Index Expanded

Tan, J., Fu, H., & Ho, Y. (2013) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1125-2 · Cited by 98 · see citing works

Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Sustainable Energy and Transportation Systems

Ehrgott, M., Naujoks, B., Stewart, T. J., & Wallenius, J. (2009) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04045-0 · Cited by 97 · see citing works

Higher education in the united states (1985–2000)

Saaty, T. L., & Rogers, P. C. (1976) · Socio-Economic Planning Sciences · doi:10.1016/0038-0121(76)90012-4 · Cited by 95 · see citing works

A fuzzy approach to a multiple criteria and Geographical Information System for decision support on suitable locations for biogas plants

Franco, C. A., Bojesen, M., Hougaard, J. L., & Nielsen, K. (2014) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.060 · Cited by 95 · see citing works

Geospatial and AHP-multicriteria analyses to locate and rank suitable sites for groundwater recharge with reclaimed water

Gdoura, K., Anane, M., & Jellali, S. (2015) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.09.003 · Cited by 95 · see citing works

Robust analysis of bibliometric data

Battisti, F. D., & Salini, S. (2012) · Statistical Methods & Applications · doi:10.1007/s10260-012-0217-0 · Cited by 94 · see citing works

Analytic Hierarchy Process and Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Study

Tramarico, C. L., DanieleMizuno, Salomon, V. A. P., & Marins, F. A. S. (2015) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.005 · Cited by 91 · see citing works

Bibliometric Analysis of Multiple Criteria Decision Making/Multiattribute Utility Theory

Bragge, J., Korhonen, P., Wallenius, H., & Wallenius, J. (2009) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04045-0_22 · Cited by 89 · see citing works

A bibliometric analysis of 20 years of research on software product lines

Heradio, R., Perez-Morago, H., Fernández-Amorós, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., & Herrera‐Viedma, E. (2015) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2015.11.004 · Cited by 89 · see citing works

Combining Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS with Financial Ratios to Design a Novel Performance Evaluation Model

Shaverdi, M., Ramezani, I., Tahmasebi, R., & Rostamy, A. A. A. (2016) · International Journal of Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1007/s40815-016-0142-8 · Cited by 89 · see citing works

Multiple criteria decision making for engineering

Wiecek, M. M., Ehrgott, M., Fadel, G., & Figueira, J. R. (2007) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2006.10.001 · Cited by 88 · see citing works

Of Towers, Walls, and Fields: Perspectives on Language in Science

Montgomery, S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1095204 · Cited by 88 · see citing works

Way to accomplish low carbon development transformation: A bibliometric analysis during 1995–2014

Wang, L., Zhao, L., Mao, G., Zuo, J., & Du, H. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.021 · Cited by 87 · see citing works

Modified AHP for Gene Selection and Cancer Classification Using Type-2 Fuzzy Logic

Nguyen, T. T., & Nahavandi, S. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2015.2453153 · Cited by 84 · see citing works

A bibliometric analysis of industrial wastewater research: current trends and future prospects

Zheng, T., Wang, J., Wang, Q., Nie, C., Smale, N., Shi, Z., & Wang, X. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1736-x · Cited by 83 · see citing works

Comparison of first aggregation and last aggregation in fuzzy group TOPSIS

Roghanian, E., Rahimi, J., & Ansari, A. (2010) · Applied Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.apm.2010.02.039 · Cited by 83 · see citing works

Environmental risk analysis and prioritization of pharmaceuticals in a developing world context

Mansour, F., Al‐Hindi, M., Saad, W., & Salam, D. A. (2016) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.023 · Cited by 82 · see citing works

ELECTRE-III-H: An outranking-based decision aiding method for hierarchically structured criteria

Vasto-Terrientes, L. D., Valls, A., Słowiński, R., & Zielniewicz, P. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.016 · Cited by 81 · see citing works

A scientific approach with bibliometric analysis related to brick and tile drying: A review

Yataganbaba, A., & Kurtbaş, İ. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.357 · Cited by 80 · see citing works

Power quality techniques research worldwide: A review

Montoya, F. G., García-Cruz, A., Montoya, M. G., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. R. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.091 · Cited by 78 · see citing works

Vulnerability assessment of urban ecosystems driven by water resources, human health and atmospheric environment

Shen, J. S., Lu, H., Zhang, Y., Song, X., & He, L. (2016) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.004 · Cited by 74 · see citing works

Twenty-six years of operations management research (1985–2010): authorship patterns and research constituents in eleven top rated journals

Shang, G., Saladin, B. A., Fry, T., & Donohue, J. M. (2015) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1037935 · Cited by 68 · see citing works

Global scientific production of robotic surgery in medicine: A 20-year survey of research activities

Fan, G., Zhou, Z., Zhang, H., Gu, X., Gu, G., Guan, X., Fan, Y., & He, S. (2016) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.048 · Cited by 64 · see citing works

Demystifying central government R&D spending in China

Sun, Y., & Cao, C. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1253479 · Cited by 63 · see citing works

Scientific publications from Arab world in leading journals of Integrative and Complementary Medicine: a bibliometric analysis

Zyoud, S. H., Al‐Jabi, S. W., & Sweileh, W. M. (2015) · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12906-015-0840-z · Cited by 62 · see citing works

Research Integrity in China

Yang, W. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1247700 · Cited by 60 · see citing works

Design and evaluation of railway corridors based on spatial ecological and geological criteria

Karlson, M., Karlsson, C., Mörtberg, U. M., Olofsson, B., & Balfors, B. (2016) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2016.03.012 · Cited by 60 · see citing works

Multi-level multi-criteria analysis of alternative fuels for waste collection vehicles in the United States

Maimoun, M. A., Madani, K. M., & Reinhart, D. R. (2016) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.154 · Cited by 60 · see citing works

The french and the american school in multi-criteria decision analysis

Lootsma, F. A. (1990) · RAIRO - Operations Research · doi:10.1051/ro/1990240302631 · Cited by 60 · see citing works

Assessing climate change vulnerability with group multi-criteria decision making approaches

Kim, Y., & Chung, ‪. (2013) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0879-0 · Cited by 57 · see citing works

Using the analytic hierarchy process in evaluating decision alternatives

Cabała, P. (2010) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 57 · see citing works

Which Data Base Should we Use for our Literature Analysis? Web of Science versus SCOPUS

de Granda‐Orive, J. I., Alonso‐Arroyo, A., & Roig-Vázquez, F. (2011) · Archivos de Bronconeumología · doi:10.1016/s1579-2129(11)70049-0 · Cited by 53 · see citing works

A bibliometric analysis of models measuring the concept of perceived quality inproviding internet service

Oliva, E. J. D., Cervera, A., & Romero, C. (2006) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 52 · see citing works

Selecting strategies for rice stem borer management using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Abdollahzadeh, G., Damalas, C. A., Sharifzadeh, M. S., & Ahmadi-Gorgi, H. (2016) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2016.02.004 · Cited by 50 · see citing works

Global research trends of geographical information system from 1961 to 2010: a bibliometric analysis

Liu, F., Lin, A., Wang, H., Peng, Y., & Hong, S. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1789-x · Cited by 49 · see citing works

Applying a linguistic multi-criteria decision-making model to the analysis of ICT suppliers’ offers

Cid-López, A., Hornos, M. J., Carrasco, R. A., & Herrera‐Viedma, E. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.03.025 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

A bibliometric-based evaluation on environmental research in the Arab world

Zyoud, S. H., Fuchs-Hanusch, D., Zyoud, S. H., Al-Rawajfeh, A. E., & Shaheen, H. Q. (2016) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-016-1180-3 · Cited by 42 · see citing works

Assessment of groundwater quality using DEA and AHP: a case study in the Sereflikochisar region in Turkey

Kavurmacı, M., & ÜSTÜN, A. K. (2016) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-016-5259-6 · Cited by 38 · see citing works

Analysis of insolation potential of Knjaževac Municipality (Serbia) using multi-criteria approach

Potić, I., Golić, R., & Joksimović, T. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.056 · Cited by 36 · see citing works

Analysis of Flood Risk Management Strategies Based on a Group Decision Making Process via Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers

Azarnivand, A., & Malekian, A. (2016) · Water Resources Management · doi:10.1007/s11269-016-1259-0 · Cited by 34 · see citing works

Application of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in multi-criteria decision in noise action plans: Prioritizing road stretches

Ruiz-Padillo, A., Torija, A. J., Ramos-Ridao, Á. F., & Ruiz, D. P. (2016) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.03.009 · Cited by 33 · see citing works

Contribution of Arab countries to pharmaceutical wastewater literature: a bibliometric and comparative analysis of research output

Zyoud, S. H., Zyoud, S. H., Al‐Jabi, S. W., Sweileh, W. M., & Awang, R. (2016) · Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1186/s40557-016-0117-0 · Cited by 33 · see citing works

Trends in research activity in toxicology and by toxicologists in seven European countries

Miró, Ò., Montori, E., Ramos, X., Galícia, M., & Nogué, S. (2009) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.04.029 · Cited by 32 · see citing works

A statistical approach to assessing interval scale preferences in discrete choice problems

Kainulainen, T., Leskinen, P., Korhonen, P., Haara, A., & Hujala, T. (2007) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602554 · Cited by 32 · see citing works

The rapid rise of a research nation

Zhou, Y. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/528s170a · Cited by 32 · see citing works

Theoretical estimation of the probability of weight rank reversal in pairwise comparisons

Δέδε, Γ., Kamalakis, T., & Sphicopoulos, T. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.01.059 · Cited by 32 · see citing works

Use of bibliometric modelling for policy making

Smith, K. E., & Marinova, D. V. (2005) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2005.02.027 · Cited by 31 · see citing works

Estudio bibliométrico de los modelos de medición del concepto de calidad percibida del servicio en Internet

Oliva, E. J. D., Cervera, A., & Romero, C. A. R. (2006) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 29 · see citing works

Are Multi-criteria Decision Making Techniques Useful for Solving Corporate Finance Problems?: A Bibliometric Analysis

Guerrero-Baena, M. D., Gómez-Limón, J. A., & Cardozo, J. V. F. (2014) · Econstor (Econstor) · Cited by 28 · see citing works

Identifying and Revealing the Importance of Decision-Making Criteria for Health Technology Assessment: A Retrospective Analysis of Reimbursement Recommendations in Ireland

Schmitz, S., McCullagh, L., Adams, R., Barry, M. G., & Walsh, C. (2016) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0406-z · Cited by 26 · see citing works

Benchmarking the scientific output of industrial wastewater research in Arab world by utilizing bibliometric techniques

Zyoud, S. H., Al‐Rawajfeh, A. E., Shaheen, H. Q., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2016) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-016-6434-6 · Cited by 25 · see citing works

The analytic hierarchy and network processes: Applications to the US presidential election and to the market share of ski equipment in Italy

Zammori, F. (2009) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2009.07.013 · Cited by 23 · see citing works

Estimates of Arab world research productivity associated with groundwater: a bibliometric analysis

Zyoud, S., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2017) · Applied Water Science · doi:10.1007/s13201-016-0520-2 · Cited by 23 · see citing works

Development of the theory and methodology of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications in China

Liu, B., & Xu, S. (1987) · Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/0270-0255(87)90474-x · Cited by 19 · see citing works

Estimates of Arab world research productivity associated with desalination: a bibliometric analysis

Zyoud, S. H., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2015) · IDA Journal of Desalination and Water Reuse · doi:10.1179/2051645215y.0000000001 · Cited by 17 · see citing works

A decision-analytic approach to predict state regulation of hydraulic fracturing

Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., Jin, D., Mazurczak, M., & Schreurs, M. A. (2014) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-014-0020-7 · Cited by 16 · see citing works

Are Multi-criteria Decision Making Techniques Useful for Solving Corporate Finance Problems? A Bibliometric Analysis // ¿Son adecuadas las técnicas de decisión multicriterio para resolver los problemas financieros corporativos? Un análisis bibliométrico

Guerrero-Baena, M. D., Gómez-Limón, J. A., & Cardozo, J. V. F. (2014) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 12 · see citing works

Total ordering defined on the set of all intuitionistic fuzzy numbers

Nayagam, V. L. G., Jeevaraj, S., & Sivaraman, G. (2016) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/ifs-151915 · Cited by 12 · see citing works

Radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging: a bibliometric study in Iran

Zeraatkar, N. (2013) · Iranian Journal of Nuclear Medicine · Cited by 9 · see citing works

A Multiple Attribute Evaluation of Bayesian Availability Estimators

McCahon, C. S., Hwang, C. L., & Tillman, F. A. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Reliability · doi:10.1109/tr.1983.5221741 · Cited by 7 · see citing works

Administrative Process and Criteria Ranking for Drug Entering Health Insurance List in Iran-TOPSIS-Based Consensus Model.

Viyanchi, A., Ghatari, A. R., Rasekh, H. R., & Safikhani, H. (2016) · PubMed Central · Cited by 6 · see citing works

Research and Practice Communications Between Oral Health Providers and Prenatal Health Providers: A Bibliometric Analysis

Skvoretz, J. V., Dyer, K. E., Daley, E. M., DeBate, R. D., Vamos, C. A., Kline, N., & Thompson, E. L. (2016) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-016-1960-x · Cited by 6 · see citing works

O redukcji liczby parametrow wieloczesciowych ukladow transportowych wystepujacych w systemach gospodarki zasobami

Liana, M. (2003) · Badania Operacyjne i Decyzje/Operations Research and Decisions · Cited by 4 · see citing works

Effects of the entropy weight on TOPSIS

Chen, P. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114186 · Cited by 591 · see citing works

Effects of normalization on the entropy-based TOPSIS method

Chen, P. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.06.035 · Cited by 415 · see citing works

An in-depth review of theory of the TOPSIS method: An experimental analysis

Çelikbilek, Y., & Tüysüz, F. (2020) · Journal of Management Analytics · doi:10.1080/23270012.2020.1748528 · Cited by 367 · see citing works

Revealing customers’ satisfaction and preferences through online review analysis: The case of Canary Islands hotels

Ahani, A., Nilashi, M., Yadegaridehkordi, E., Sanzogni, L., Rashid, T. A., Knox, K., Samad, S., & Ibrahim, O. (2019) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.06.014 · Cited by 265 · see citing works

A comprehensive analysis of weighting and multicriteria methods in the context of sustainable energy

Şahin, M. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-020-02922-7 · Cited by 240 · see citing works

A Systematic Review of the Applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Aid Methods (1977–2022)

Basílio, M. P., Pereira, V., Costa, H. G., dos Santos, M., & Ghosh, A. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11111720 · Cited by 238 · see citing works

Multi-criteria decision making for the choice problem in mining and mineral processing: Applications and trends

Sitorus, F., Cilliers, J. J., & Brito‐Parada, P. R. (2018) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.001 · Cited by 228 · see citing works

Sustainable Decision-Making in Civil Engineering, Construction and Building Technology

Zavadskas, E. K., Antuchevičienė, J., Vilutienė, T., & Adeli, H. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10010014 · Cited by 222 · see citing works

Analysis of Collaboration Evolution in AHP Research: 1982–2018

Yu, D., Kou, G., Xu, Z., & Shi, S. (2020) · International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · doi:10.1142/s0219622020500406 · Cited by 208 · see citing works

MFS-MCDM: Multi-label feature selection using multi-criteria decision making

Hashemi, A., Dowlatshahi, M. B., & Nezamabadi–pour, H. (2020) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106365 · Cited by 194 · see citing works

Mapping the field of behavioural biases: a literature review using bibliometric analysis

Jain, J., Walia, N., Singh, S., & Jain, E. (2021) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-021-00215-y · Cited by 177 · see citing works

Development of social sustainability index for freight transportation system

Kumar, A., & Anbanandam, R. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.353 · Cited by 175 · see citing works

A survey on adaptive protection of microgrids and distribution systems with distributed generators

Barra, P. H. A., Coury, D. V., & Fernandes, R. A. S. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109524 · Cited by 163 · see citing works

A novel decision-making model for sustainable supply chain finance under uncertainty environment

Abdel‐Basset, M., Mohamed, R. A., Sallam, K. M., & Elhoseny, M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122324 · Cited by 144 · see citing works

A Comprehensive Review of MCDM Methods, Applications, and Emerging Trends

Kumar, R. (2024) · Decision Making Advances · doi:10.31181/dma31202569 · Cited by 144 · see citing works

An integrated plithogenic MCDM approach for financial performance evaluation of manufacturing industries

Abdel‐Basset, M., Ding, W., Mohamed, R. A., & Metawa, N. (2020) · Risk Management · doi:10.1057/s41283-020-00061-4 · Cited by 141 · see citing works

Game on! A state-of-the-art overview of doing business with gamification

Sharma, W., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., Verma, A., & Kumra, R. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122988 · Cited by 134 · see citing works

Analytic network process: Academic insights and perspectives analysis

Chen, Y., Jin, Q., Fang, H., Lei, H., Hu, J., Wu, Y., Chen, J., Wang, C., & Wan, Y. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.016 · Cited by 127 · see citing works

Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: An updated review

de Medeiros, J. F., Garlet, T. B., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & Cortimiglia, M. N. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131039 · Cited by 124 · see citing works

Ensemble of feature selection algorithms: a multi-criteria decision-making approach

Hashemi, A., Dowlatshahi, M. B., & Nezamabadi–pour, H. (2021) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-021-01347-z · Cited by 122 · see citing works

Two-stage DEA in banks: Terminological controversies and future directions

Henriques, I. C., Sobreiro, V. A., Kimura, H., & Mariano, E. B. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113632 · Cited by 119 · see citing works

Water security sustainability evaluation: Applying a multistage decision support framework in industrial region

Nie, R., Tian, Z., Wang, J., Zhang, H., & Wang, T. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.144 · Cited by 115 · see citing works

Multi-criteria decision making methods: Application in the aviation industry

Dozic, S. Z. (2019) · Journal of Air Transport Management · doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101683 · Cited by 114 · see citing works

A Robust q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Information Aggregation Using Einstein Operations with Application to Sustainable Energy Planning Decision Management

Riaz, M., Sałabun, W., Farid, H. M. A., Ali, N., & Wątróbski, J. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13092155 · Cited by 113 · see citing works

Tracing knowledge diffusion of TOPSIS: A historical perspective from citation network

Yu, D., & Pan, T. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114238 · Cited by 113 · see citing works

Research contribution of bibliometric studies related to sustainable development goals and sustainability

Raghu Raman, R., Lathabai, H. H., Pattnaik, D., Kumar, C., & Nedungadi, P. (2024) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-024-00182-w · Cited by 112 · see citing works

Neuro-fuzzy resource forecast in site suitability assessment for wind and solar energy: A mini review

Adedeji, P. A., Akinlabi, S. A., Madushele, N., & Olatunji, O. O. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122104 · Cited by 106 · see citing works

Non-technical losses: A systematic contemporary article review

Savian, F. D. S., Siluk, J. C. M., Garlet, T. B., do Nascimento, F. M., Pinheiro, J. R., & Vale, Z. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111205 · Cited by 105 · see citing works

Estimating priorities from relative deviations in pairwise comparison matrices

Zhang, J., Kou, G., Peng, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2020.12.008 · Cited by 103 · see citing works

Green Supplier Selection Using Improved TOPSIS and Best-Worst Method Under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment

Tian, Z., Zhang, H., Wang, J., & Wang, T. (2018) · Informatica · doi:10.15388/informatica.2018.192 · Cited by 98 · see citing works

A novel two stage approach for electric taxis charging station site selection

Kaya, Ö., Alemdar, K. D., & Çodur, M. Y. (2020) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102396 · Cited by 94 · see citing works

A systematic literature review on requirement prioritization techniques and their empirical evaluation

Bukhsh, F. A., Bukhsh, Z. A., & Daneva, M. (2019) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.csi.2019.103389 · Cited by 91 · see citing works

VMFS: A VIKOR-based multi-target feature selection

Hashemi, A., Dowlatshahi, M. B., & Nezamabadi–pour, H. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115224 · Cited by 91 · see citing works

Mapping the literature on financial well‐being: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis

Kaur, G., Singh, M., & Singh, S. (2021) · International Social Science Journal · doi:10.1111/issj.12278 · Cited by 86 · see citing works

Integration and comparison of multi-criteria decision making methods in safe route planner

Sarraf, R., & McGuire, M. P. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113399 · Cited by 80 · see citing works

An innovative TOPSIS approach based on hesitant fuzzy correlation coefficient and its applications

Sun, G., Guan, X., Xiao, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2018) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2018.04.004 · Cited by 79 · see citing works

The spatial analysis of the livability of 22 districts of Tehran Metropolis using multi-criteria decision making approaches

Ghasemi, K., Hamzenejad, M., & Meshkini, A. (2018) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.018 · Cited by 77 · see citing works

Green maritime: a routing and speed multi-objective optimization strategy

Ma, W., Ma, D., Ma, Y.-J., Zhang, J., & Wang, D. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127179 · Cited by 77 · see citing works

Integrating Multi-Criteria Techniques in Life-Cycle Tools for the Circular Bioeconomy Transition of Agri-Food Waste Biomass: A Systematic Review

Perdomo, F. A., & González‐Curbelo, M. Á. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15065026 · Cited by 77 · see citing works

Social Vulnerability, Gender and Disasters. The Case of Haiti in 2010

Llorente‐Marrón, M., Fernández, M. M. D., Méndez‐Rodríguez, P., & Arias, R. G. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12093574 · Cited by 74 · see citing works

A generalised fuzzy TOPSIS with improved closeness coefficient

Dwivedi, G., Srivastava, R. K., & Srivastava, S. K. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.11.051 · Cited by 71 · see citing works

A new approach to determine maintenance periods of the most critical hydroelectric power plant equipment

Bulut, M., & Özcan, E. (2020) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2020.107238 · Cited by 71 · see citing works

The Research Topics on E-Grocery: Trends and Existing Gaps

Martı́n, J. C., Pagliara, F., & Román, C. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11020321 · Cited by 70 · see citing works

Integrated data envelopment analysis, multi-criteria decision making, and cluster analysis methods: Trends and perspectives

de Oliveira, M. S., Steffen, V., de Francisco, A. C., & Trojan, F. (2023) · Decision Analytics Journal · doi:10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100271 · Cited by 69 · see citing works

A decision support system for supplier quality evaluation based on MCDM-aggregation and machine learning

Ma, Q., & Li, H. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122746 · Cited by 64 · see citing works

Probabilistic multi-criteria assessment of renewable micro-generation technologies in households

Zhang, C., Wang, Q., Zeng, S., Baležentis, T., Štreimikienė, D., Ališauskaitė-Šeškienė, I., & Chen, X. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.051 · Cited by 64 · see citing works

Complex sensitivity analysis in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: An application to the selection of an electric car

Więckowski, J., Wątróbski, J., Kizielewicz, B., & Sałabun, W. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136051 · Cited by 61 · see citing works

A cross-disciplinary comparison of multimodal data fusion approaches and applications: Accelerating learning through trans-disciplinary information sharing

Bokade, R., Navato, A. P., Ouyang, R., Jin, X., Chou, C.-A., Ostadabbas, S., & Mueller, A. V. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113885 · Cited by 59 · see citing works

A Novel Coordinated TOPSIS Based on Coefficient of Variation

Chen, P. (2019) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math7070614 · Cited by 59 · see citing works

Location selection by multi-criteria decision-making methods based on objective and subjective weightings

Şahin, M. (2021) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-021-01588-y · Cited by 58 · see citing works

Empowerment of women in India as different perspectives based on the AHP-TOPSIS inspired multi-criterion decision making method

Adhikari, D., Gazi, K. H., Giri, B. C., Azizzadeh, F., & Mondal, S. P. (2023) · Results in Control and Optimization · doi:10.1016/j.rico.2023.100271 · Cited by 58 · see citing works

An evolutionary strategic weight manipulation approach for multi-attribute decision making: TOPSIS method

Dutta, B., Dao, S. D., Martínez, L. M., & Goh, M. (2020) · International Journal of Approximate Reasoning · doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2020.11.004 · Cited by 57 · see citing works

Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS) Method: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis

Demir, G., Chatterjee, P., Kadry, S., Abdelhadi, A., & Pamucar, D. S. (2024) · Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering · doi:10.31181/dmame7220241137 · Cited by 56 · see citing works

A multi-criteria decision support system to rank sustainable desalination plant location criteria

Dweiri, F. T., Khan, S. A., & Almulla, A. A. (2018) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2018.07.007 · Cited by 56 · see citing works

Normalization in TOPSIS-based approaches with data of different nature: application to the ranking of mathematical videos

Soto, C. M. A., Liern, V., & Pérez‐Gladish, B. (2018) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-018-2945-5 · Cited by 55 · see citing works

Mapping of climate change research in the Arab world: a bibliometric analysis

Zyoud, S. H., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2019) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-019-07100-y · Cited by 55 · see citing works

Bibliometric Analysis of the MCDM Methods in the Last Decade: WASPAS, MABAC, EDAS, CODAS, COCOSO, and MARCOS

Ayan, B., & ABACIOĞLU, S. (2022) · International Journal of Business and Economic Studies · doi:10.54821/uiecd.1183443 · Cited by 54 · see citing works

Four decades of fuzzy sets theory in operations management: application of life-cycle, bibliometrics and content analysis

Zanjirchi, S. M., Rezaeian, M., & Jalilian, N. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03077-0 · Cited by 54 · see citing works

Evaluation of circular economy business models for SMEs using spherical fuzzy TOPSIS: an application from a developing countries’ perspective

Toker, K., & Görener, A. (2022) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-022-02119-7 · Cited by 54 · see citing works

Developing Hospital Emergency and Disaster Management Index Using TOPSIS Method

Mojtahedi, M., Sunindijo, R. Y., Lestari, F., Suparni, S., & Wijaya, O. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13095213 · Cited by 51 · see citing works

An evaluating system for scientific mining of China's coal resources

Li, C.-M., & Nie, R. (2017) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.07.012 · Cited by 51 · see citing works

The optimal dam site selection using a group decision-making method through fuzzy TOPSIS model

Noori, A., Bonakdari, H., Morovati, K., & Gharabaghi, B. (2018) · Environment Systems & Decisions · doi:10.1007/s10669-018-9673-x · Cited by 51 · see citing works

An artificial neural network model supported with multi criteria decision making approaches for maintenance planning in hydroelectric power plants

Özcan, E., DANIŞAN, T., YUMUŞAK, R., & Eren, T. (2020) · Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability · doi:10.17531/ein.2020.3.3 · Cited by 51 · see citing works

Service Selection Using Multi-criteria Decision Making: A Comprehensive Overview

Hosseinzadeh, M., Hama, H. K., Ghafour, M. Y., Masdari, M., Ahmed, O. H., & Khezri, H. (2020) · Journal of Network and Systems Management · doi:10.1007/s10922-020-09553-w · Cited by 51 · see citing works

A consensus model for heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision making with several attribute sets

Gao, Y. J., & Li, D. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.072 · Cited by 50 · see citing works

Service selection using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: a comprehensive review

Masdari, M., & Khezri, H. (2020) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-020-02441-w · Cited by 49 · see citing works

Two decades on the MACBETH approach: a bibliometric analysis

Ferreira, F. A. F., & Santos, S. P. (2018) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-018-3083-9 · Cited by 48 · see citing works

Teaching Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in undergraduate chemical engineering courses

Promentilla, M. A. B., Aviso, K. B., Lucas, R. I. G., Razón, L. F., & Tan, R. R. (2018) · Education for Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.ece.2018.05.002 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

An Efficient Design Support System based on Automatic Rule Checking and Case-based Reasoning

Lee, P., Lo, T., Tian, M.-Y., & Long, D. (2019) · KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12205-019-1750-2 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

Multiple criteria ranking method based on functional proximity index: un-weighted TOPSIS

Liern, V., & Pérez‐Gladish, B. (2020) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-020-03718-1 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

An efficient partial charging scheme using multiple mobile chargers in wireless rechargeable sensor networks

Priyadarshani, S., Tomar, A., & Jana, P. K. (2020) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2020.102407 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

A multi-criteria decision-making analysis for the selection of fibres aimed at reinforcing asphalt concrete mixtures

Slebi-Acevedo, C. J., Pascual-Muñoz, P., Lastra-González, P., & Castro‐Fresno, D. (2019) · International Journal of Pavement Engineering · doi:10.1080/10298436.2019.1645848 · Cited by 46 · see citing works

Bibliometric Study of the Comorbidity of Pain and Depression Research

Wang, X., Peng, M., Weng, L., Zheng, Y.-L., Zhang, Z., & Chen, P. (2019) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2019/1657498 · Cited by 46 · see citing works

Value chain in distributed generation of photovoltaic energy and factors for competitiveness: A systematic review

Garlet, T. B., Ribeiro, J. L. D., Savian, F. D. S., & Siluk, J. C. M. (2020) · Solar Energy · doi:10.1016/j.solener.2020.09.040 · Cited by 46 · see citing works

Post factum analysis in TOPSIS based decision making method

Dutta, B., Singha, T., Goh, M., Lamata, M. T., & Verdegay, J. L. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.07.023 · Cited by 45 · see citing works

Sustainability funding in higher education: a literature-based review

de Lima, C. R. M., Soares, T. C., de Lima, M. A., Veras, M. D. O., & Guerra, J. B. S. O. D. A. (2020) · International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/ijshe-07-2019-0229 · Cited by 45 · see citing works

Sustainable supplier selection in a construction company: a new MCDM method based on dominance-based rough set analysis

Singh, A., Kumar, V., & Verma, P. (2023) · Construction Innovation · doi:10.1108/ci-12-2022-0324 · Cited by 42 · see citing works

Towards sustainable last-mile logistics: A decision-making model for complex urban contexts

Silva, V., Amaral, A., & Fontes, T. (2023) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2023.104665 · Cited by 42 · see citing works

Deciphering Urban Heat Island Mitigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Application Categories and Research Trends

Qin, Y., Ghalambaz, S., Sheremet, M., Sheremet, M. А., & Ghalambaz, M. (2023) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2023.105081 · Cited by 42 · see citing works

Mapping the Evolution of Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison Method: A Bibliometric Analysis

Demir, G., Chatterjee, P., Zakeri, S., & Pamucar, D. S. (2023) · Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering · doi:10.31181/dmame7120241037 · Cited by 42 · see citing works

Towards explainable TOPSIS: Visual insights into the effects of weights and aggregations on rankings

Susmaga, R., Szczęch, I., & Brzeziński, D. (2024) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111279 · Cited by 42 · see citing works

A Decision Support Model for Prioritization of Regulated Safety Inspections Using Integrated Delphi, AHP and Double-Hierarchical TOPSIS Approach

Zytoon, M. A.-M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2991179 · Cited by 42 · see citing works

Taguchi-TOPSIS based HOG parameter selection for complex background sign language recognition

Joshi, G., Singh, S., & Vig, R. (2020) · Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation · doi:10.1016/j.jvcir.2020.102834 · Cited by 42 · see citing works

A trasilient decision making tool for vendor selection: a hybrid-MCDM algorithm

Mohammed, A., Harris, I., & Dukyil, A. (2018) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-04-2018-0478 · Cited by 40 · see citing works

Global scientific research on social participation of older people from 2000 to 2019: A bibliometric analysis

Fu, J., Jiang, Z., Hong, Y. A., Liu, S., Kong, D., Zhong, Z., & Luo, Y. (2020) · International Journal of Older People Nursing · doi:10.1111/opn.12349 · Cited by 39 · see citing works

Evaluating Labour Market Flexibility Using the TOPSIS Method: Sustainable Industrial Relations

Galik, A., Bąk, M., Bałandynowicz-Panfil, K., & Cirella, G. T. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14010526 · Cited by 39 · see citing works

A theme evolution and knowledge trajectory study in AHP using science mapping and main path analysis

Yu, D., & Hong, X. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117675 · Cited by 39 · see citing works

Optimal Selection of Clustering Algorithm via Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for Load Profiling Applications

Panapakidis, I. P., & Christoforidis, G. C. (2018) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app8020237 · Cited by 37 · see citing works

A multi-attribute decision making approach for on-demand charging scheduling in wireless rechargeable sensor networks

Tomar, A., & Jana, P. K. (2020) · Computing · doi:10.1007/s00607-020-00875-w · Cited by 37 · see citing works

A multicriteria decision-making method for additive manufacturing process selection

Ren, D., Choi, J., & Schneider, K. (2022) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/rpj-11-2021-0302 · Cited by 35 · see citing works

Development of an Innovative Land Valuation Model (iLVM) for Mass Appraisal Application in Sub-Urban Areas Using AHP: An Integration of Theoretical and Practical Approaches

Bencure, J. C., Tripathi, N. K., Miyazaki, H., Ninsawat, S., & Kim, S. M. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11133731 · Cited by 35 · see citing works

And-like-uninorm-based transitivity and analytic hierarchy process with interval-valued fuzzy preference relations

Wang, Z.-J., Yang, X., & Jin, X.-T. (2020) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2020.05.052 · Cited by 35 · see citing works

Assessment of groundwater vulnerability using analytical hierarchy process and evidential belief function with DRASTIC parameters, Cuddalore, India

Saranya, T., & Saravanan, S. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-022-03944-z · Cited by 35 · see citing works

An integrated approach for spatio-temporal assessment and attribution of water resources carrying capacity: Incorporating AHP, TOPSIS, and lorenz asymmetry coefficient methods

Zhou, T., Teng, L., Cheng, R., Wang, G., & Jiang, B. (2024) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132536 · Cited by 34 · see citing works

Role of Information and Communication Technology in Green Supply Chain Implementation and Companies’ Performance

Mendoza-Fong, J. R., García-Alcaráz, J. L., Macías, E. J., Hernández, N. L. I., Díaz-Reza, J. R., & Blanco‐Fernández, J. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10061793 · Cited by 34 · see citing works

Axiomatic property based consistency analysis and decision making with interval multiplicative reciprocal preference relations

Wang, Z.-J., Lin, J., & Liu, F. (2019) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.04.002 · Cited by 34 · see citing works

Multicriteria decision‐making techniques for avoiding similar task scheduling conflict in cloud computing

Nayak, S. C., Parida, S., Tripathy, C., Pati, B., & Panigrahi, C. R. (2019) · International Journal of Communication Systems · doi:10.1002/dac.4126 · Cited by 34 · see citing works

A multicriteria assessment model for countries’ degree of preparedness for successful impact investing

León, T., Liern, V., & Pérez‐Gladish, B. (2019) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-09-2019-1138 · Cited by 34 · see citing works

An analysis of the spatial distribution pattern of social-cultural services and their equitable physical organization using the TOPSIS technique: The case-study of Tehran, Iran

Ghasemi, K., Hamzenejad, M., & Meshkini, A. (2019) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101708 · Cited by 33 · see citing works

Three-way decisions in generalized intuitionistic fuzzy environments: survey and challenges

Ding, J., Zhang, C., Li, D., Zhan, J., Li, W., & Yao, Y. Y. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10647-5 · Cited by 32 · see citing works

A systematic bibliometric analysis of the analytic hierarchy process from 1980 to 2020

Hassan, A. (2022) · International Journal of Bibliometrics in Business and Management · doi:10.1504/ijbbm.2022.10051031 · Cited by 5 · see citing works

Analytic hierarchy process and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution: a bibliometric analysis 'from' past, present and future of AHP and TOPSIS

Mukherjee, K. (2014) · International Journal of Intelligent Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1504/ijiei.2014.066210 · Cited by 22 · see citing works

Bibliometric Analysis of the MCDM Methods in the Last Decade: WASPAS, MABAC, EDAS, CODAS, COCOSO, and MARCOS

Ayan, B., & ABACIOĞLU, S. (2022) · International Journal of Business and Economic Studies · doi:10.54821/uiecd.1183443 · Cited by 54 · see citing works

Using Of The Two Tools Analytic Hierarchy Process "AHP" And Technique For Order Performance By Similarity To Ideal Solution "TOPSIS" In Multi-Criteria Decision Making

الخانقيني, ع. د. س., & العشاري, ع. م. ن. (2024) · مجلة ميسان للدراسات الأكاديمية · doi:10.54633/2333-023-051-001

MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS (MCDM): A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS (1974-2024)

Kaya, N. (2024) · Pressacademia · doi:10.17261/pressacademia.2024.1940 · Cited by 9 · see citing works