Design a personalized e-learning system based on item response theory and artificial neural network approach
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Despite being limited in domain, ITS have proven to be effective in providing relevant content to students, interacting with students, and improving students' academic performance.
“Despite being limited in terms of the domain that a particular intelligent tutoring system addresses, they have proven to be effective in providing relevant content to students, interacting with students [6] and improving students’ academic performance [18, 41].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd): a high-level academic and industry note 2021 (2022) · cites this paper as [6]
It is not necessary that ITS would work in every context and facilitate every teacher.
“It is not necessary that ITS would work in every context and facilitate every teacher [7, 13, 46, 48].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd): a high-level academic and industry note 2021 (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
Cites
Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm
Hagan, M., & Menhaj, M. B. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.329697 · Cited by 7,709 · see citing works
Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application
Basheer, I. A., & Hajmeer, M. N. (2000) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/s0167-7012(00)00201-3 · Cited by 3,234 · see citing works
Practical neural network recipes in C
Masters, T. D. (1993) · Cited by 1,650 · see citing works
The basics of item response theory
Baker, F. B. (1985) · Cited by 1,362 · see citing works
Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer
Wainer, H., Dorans, N. J., Flaugher, R. L., Green, B. F., & Mislevy, R. J. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,169 · see citing works
Personalized e-learning system using Item Response Theory
Chen, C., Lee, H.-M., & Chen, Y. (2004) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.01.006 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
HUANG, M., HUANG, H., & CHEN, M. (2006) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.05.019 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Intelligent agent supported personalization for virtual learning environments
Dongming Xu, A., & Wang, H. (2005) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.033 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Personalized curriculum sequencing utilizing modified item response theory for web-based instruction
Chen, C., LIU, C., & Chang, J. M. (2005) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2005.07.029 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Hamdi, M. S. (2006) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2006.02.001 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Personalised adult e-training on computer use based on multiple attribute decision making
Kabassi, K., & Virvou, M. K. (2003) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2003.11.006 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
An agent enabling personalized learning in e-learning environments
Shi, H., Revithis, S., & Chen, S. (2002) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · doi:10.1145/544862.544941 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
A model of virtual university - some problems during its development
Georgieva, G., Todorov, G., & Smrikarov, A. (2003) · doi:10.1145/973620.973739 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Application of Componential IRT Model for Diagnostic Test in a Standard-Conformant eLearning System
Wang, F.-H. (2006) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt.2006.1652414 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Cognitive Scaffolding for a Web-Based Adaptive Learning Environment
Fernandez, G. (2003) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-45200-3_2 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Rachev, B., Rachev, B., Smrikarov, A., et al. (2003) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Multi-Agents Designed for Web-based Cooperative Tutoring
Zhou, X., Wu, D., & Zhang, J. (2006) · International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering (NLPKE) · doi:10.1109/nlpke.2005.1598784 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd): a high-level academic and industry note 2021
Chaudhry, M. A., & Kazim, E. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00074-z · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Power to the Teachers: An Exploratory Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education
Lameras, P., & Arnab, S. (2021) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13010014 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
- Authors
- Baylari, A., & Montazer, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Tarbiat Modares University (IR)
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 8013-8021
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034543389
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 10.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Iran Telecommunication Research Center
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Keywords
- personalized e-learning, item response theory, artificial neural networks, adaptive testing, adaptive tests, personalized recommendation, multi-agent systems, web-based educational systems, interactivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review