Cited by 111Educational Technology and AssessmentEdcuational Technology SystemsFuzzy Logic and Control Systems

Using Gaussian membership functions for improving the reliability and robustness of students’ evaluation systems

Hameed, Ibrahim A.·2011·Expert Systems with Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.048

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hameed, I. A.
Affiliations
Menoufia University (EG)
Corresponding author
Hameed, Ibrahim A.
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
7135-7142
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985947439
Cited by
111
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Edcuational Technology Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Keywords
student assessment, Gaussian membership function, fuzzy inference, test scoring, question difficulty, question complexity, reliability statistics, robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review