The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fight sample degeneracy and impoverishment in particle filters: A review of intelligent approaches
Open accessAbstract
During the last two decades there has been a growing interest in Particle Filtering (PF). However, PF suffers from two long-standing problems that are referred to as sample degeneracy and impoverishment. We are investigating methods that are particularly efficient at Particle Distribution Optimization (PDO) to fight sample degeneracy and impoverishment, with an emphasis on intelligence choices. These methods benefit from such methods as Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, Mean-shift algorithms, artificial intelligence algorithms (e.g., Particle Swarm Optimization, Genetic Algorithm and Ant Colony Optimization), machine learning approaches (e.g., clustering, splitting and merging) and their hybrids, forming a coherent standpoint to enhance the particle filter. The working mechanism, interrelationship, pros and cons of these approaches are provided. In addition, approaches that are effective for dealing with high-dimensionality are reviewed. While improving the filter performance in terms of accuracy, robustness and convergence, it is noted that advanced techniques employed in PF often causes additional computational requirement that will in turn sacrifice improvement obtained in real life filtering. This fact, hidden in pure simulations, deserves the attention of the users and designers of new filters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking
Arulampalam, M. S., Maskell, S., Gordon, N., & Clapp, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.978374 · Cited by 11,502
Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice
(1995) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/b14835 · Cited by 7,757
Novel approach to nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation
Gordon, N. J., Salmond, D. J., & Smith, A. F. M. (1993) · IEE Proceedings F Radar and Signal Processing · doi:10.1049/ip-f-2.1993.0015 · Cited by 7,550
Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice
(2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3437-9 · Cited by 7,366
CONDENSATION—Conditional Density Propagation for Visual Tracking
Isard, M., & Blake, A. (1998) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1008078328650 · Cited by 4,886
On sequential Monte Carlo sampling methods for Bayesian filtering
Doucet, A., Godsill, S., & Andrieu, C. (2000) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1023/a:1008935410038 · Cited by 4,411
Arasaratnam, I., & Haykin, S. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2009.2019800 · Cited by 3,380
Beyond the Kalman filter particle filters for tracking applications
Ristić, B., Arulampalam, S., & Gordon, N. (2004) · Cited by 3,372
Filtering via Simulation: Auxiliary Particle Filters
Pitt, M. K., & Shephard, N. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10474153 · Cited by 2,438
Monte Carlo Filter and Smoother for Non-Gaussian Nonlinear State Space Models
Kitagawa, G. (1996) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.1996.10474692 · Cited by 2,404
Cited by
Structured Pruning of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Anwar, S., Hwang, K., & Sung, W. (2017) · ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3005348 · Cited by 698
Gesture recognition for human-robot collaboration: A review
Liu, H., & Wang, L. (2018) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2017.02.004 · Cited by 422
Wang, D., Yang, F., Tsui, K.-L., Zhou, Q., & Bae, S. J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2016.2534258 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, T., Sun, S., Sattar, T. P., & Corchado, J. M.
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3944-3954
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968669537
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 90
- FWCI
- 18.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fight sample degeneracy and impoverishment in particle filters: A review of intelligent approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.12.031
- The paper
- Li, T., Sun, S., Sattar, T. P., & Corchado, J. M. (2014). Fight sample degeneracy and impoverishment in particle filters: A review of intelligent approaches. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.12.031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.