Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Spherical Cubature Particle Filter

Wang, Dong, Yang, Fangfang, Tsui, Kwok-Leung, Zhou, Qiang, Bae, Suk Joo·2016·IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

Abstract

Lithium-ion batteries are critical components to provide power sources for commercial products. To ensure a high reliability of lithium-ion batteries, prognostic actions for lithium-ion batteries should be prepared. In this paper, a prognostic method is proposed to predict the remaining useful life (RUL) of lithium-ion batteries. A state-space model for the lithium-ion battery capacity is first constructed to assess capacity degradation. Then, a spherical cubature particle filter (SCPF) is introduced to solve the state-space model. The major idea of the SCPF is to adapt a spherical cubature integration-based Kalman filter to provide an importance function of a standard particle filter (PF). Once the state-space model is determined, the extrapolations of the state-space model to a specified failure threshold are performed to infer the RUL of the lithium-ion batteries. Degradation data of 26 lithium-ion battery capacities were analyzed to validate the effectiveness of the proposed prognostic method. The analytical results show that the proposed prognostic method is more effective in the prediction of RUL of lithium-ion batteries, compared with an existing PF-based prognostic method.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tim.2016.2534258

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1109/TSMCC.2009.2014642 · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2009.2014642

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Wang, D., Yang, F., Tsui, K.-L., Zhou, Q., & Bae, S. J.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2016-06
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
1282-1291
ISSN
  • 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9662
OpenAlex
W2333401465
Cited by
287
References
45
FWCI
20.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
  • General Research Fund of City University of Hong Kong (11216014)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (11471275, 51505307)
  • Research Grants Council Theme-Based Research Scheme (T32-101/15-R)
  • Human Resources Program in Energy Technology of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning within the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, South Korea (20154030200900)
  • Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (201500000002571)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Spherical Cubature Particle Filter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tim.2016.2534258
The paper
Wang, D., Yang, F., Tsui, K.-L., Zhou, Q., & Bae, S. J. (2016). Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Spherical Cubature Particle Filter. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2016.2534258

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.