The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using Best Worst Method
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation
Grant, R. M. (1991) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41166664 · Cited by 9,699
Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
Rezaei, J. (2015) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009 · Cited by 4,333
Self-citationFactors affecting trust in market research relationships
Moorman, C., Deshpandé, R., & Zaltman, G. (1993) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299305700106 · Cited by 3,659
A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust1
Rotter, J. B. (1967) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x · Cited by 3,503
The resource‐based view within the conversation of strategic management
Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250130505 · Cited by 3,392
Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review
Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009 · Cited by 2,184
Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model
Rezaei, J. (2016) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.001 · Cited by 1,720
Self-citationA review of methods supporting supplier selection
de Boer, L., Labro, E., & Morlacchi, P. (2001) · European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management · doi:10.1016/s0969-7012(00)00028-9 · Cited by 1,510
Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B., & Tyler, B. B. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.007 · Cited by 1,191
Cited by
A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology
Kusi-Sarpong, S., Gupta, H., & Sarkis, J. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1518607 · Cited by 406
Ali, S. S., Kaur, R., & Khan, S. (2023) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04454-w · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Rezaei, J., Wang, J., & Tavasszy, L.
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 9152-9164
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1079710448
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 29.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using Best Worst Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.073
- The paper
- Rezaei, J., Wang, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2015). Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using Best Worst Method. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.073
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
