Cited by 3,503Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust1

Rotter, Julian B.·1967·Journal of Personality

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rotter, J. B.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Rotter, Julian B.
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1967-12
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
651-665
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W2004845716
Cited by
3,503
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 135 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 144 · 2021: 142 · 2020: 156 · 2019: 154 · 2018: 120 · 2017: 144 · 2016: 126 · 2015: 158 · 2014: 154 · 2013: 146 · 2012: 153
FWCI
15.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
interpersonal trust, trust measurement, scale development, psychometric scale
MeSH terms
Birth Order, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Learning, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Personality, Psychometrics, Religion, Social Desirability, Socioeconomic Factors, Sociometric Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review