A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques

Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484

An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output

Hirsch, J. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 · Cited by 11,669

How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process

Saaty, T. L. (1990) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-i · Cited by 9,605

Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications

Chen, S.-J. J., Hwang, C. L., Beckmann, M. J., & Krelle, W. E. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,207

IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040

Ogurtsova, K., Fernandes, J. D. D. R., Huang, Y., Linnenkamp, U., Guariguata, L., Cho, N. H., Cavan, D. A., Shaw, J. E., & Makaroff, L. (2017) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024 · Cited by 7,138

The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used

Saaty, R. W. (1987) · Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8 · Cited by 5,380

Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS

Opricović, S., & Tzeng, G. (2003) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1 · Cited by 5,211

Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses

Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf · Cited by 5,039

Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035

Guariguata, L., Whiting, D. R., Hambleton, I., Beagley, J., Linnenkamp, U., & Shaw, J. E. (2014) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002 · Cited by 4,642

Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys

Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., & Ehrogott, M. (2005) · International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science · doi:10.1007/b100605 · Cited by 4,594

Ingenious Solution for the Rank Reversal Problem of TOPSIS Method

Yang, W. (2020) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2020/9676518 · Cited by 32

Influencing Factors of Azerbaijan and China’s Sustainable Tourism Development Strategy under the One Belt One Road Initiative

Liu, Y., & Suk, S. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14010187 · Cited by 32

Customer Relationship Management (CRM): A Bibliometric Analysis

Guerola-Navarro, V., Oltra-Badenes, R., Gómez, H. G., & Gómez, J. A. G. (2020) · International Journal of Services Operations and Informatics · doi:10.1504/ijsoi.2020.108988 · Cited by 31

Multi-Criteria Analysis of Green Bonds: Hybrid Multi-Method Applications

Netto, A. L., Salomon, V. A. P., & Barrios, M. A. O. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su131910512 · Cited by 31

A decision-support framework for evaluating AI-enabled ESG strategies in the context of sustainable manufacturing systems

Aljohani, A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-09569-9 · Cited by 30

Multi-objective workflow scheduling scheme: a multi-criteria decision making approach

Kumar, M. S., Tomar, A., & Jana, P. K. (2021) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-020-02833-y · Cited by 30

Generating method of Pythagorean fuzzy sets from the negation of probability

Gao, X., & Deng, Y. (2021) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104403 · Cited by 30

Preference disaggregation on TOPSIS for sorting applied to an economic freedom assessment

Silva, D. F. D. L., Ferreira, L., & Filho, A. T. D. A. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119341 · Cited by 30

pyFDM: A Python library for uncertainty decision analysis methods

Więckowski, J., Kizielewicz, B., & Sałabun, W. (2022) · SoftwareX · doi:10.1016/j.softx.2022.101271 · Cited by 30

Multi-attribute decision making and geographic information systems: potential tools for evaluating forest ecosystem services

Tahri, M., Kašpar, J., Vacik, H., & Marušák, R. (2021) · Annals of Forest Science · doi:10.1007/s13595-021-01049-0 · Cited by 29

Revolutionising healthcare with artificial intelligence: A bibliometric analysis of 40 years of progress in health systems

Hussain, W., Mabrok, M. A., Gao, H., Rabhi, F., & Rashed, E. A. (2024) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076241258757 · Cited by 31

A goal programming approach to deriving interval weights in analytic form from interval Fuzzy preference relations based on multiplicative consistency

Wang, Z.-J. (2018) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2018.06.006 · Cited by 28

Assessment of risks associated with third-party logistics in restaurant supply chain

Shanker, S., Sharma, H., & Barve, A. (2021) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-06-2020-0343 · Cited by 28

Efficient Construction Waste Management: A Solution through Industrial Revolution (IR) 4.0 Evaluated by AHP

Musarat, M. A., Alaloul, W. S., Hameed, N., Dhinaharan, R., Qureshi, A. H., & Wahab, M. M. A. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15010274 · Cited by 28

Research trends in criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) method: a visual analysis of bibliographic data using the Tableau software

Krishnan, A. R. (2024) · Information Discovery and Delivery · doi:10.1108/idd-02-2024-0030 · Cited by 28

A Multi-Criteria Method Integrating Distances to Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points

Roszkowska, E., & Filipowicz-Chomko, M. (2024) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym16081025 · Cited by 27

Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: A review of the literature

Peykani, P., Emrouznejad, A., & Nouri, M. (2025) · Socio-Economic Planning Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.seps.2025.102345 · Cited by 27

Mineral processing plant site selection using integrated fuzzy cognitive map and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process approach: A case study of gilsonite mines in Iran

Kazemi, F., Bahrami, A., & Sharif, J. A. (2019) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2019.106143 · Cited by 27

A new two-stage emergency material distribution framework for urban rainstorm and flood disasters to promote the SDGs

Li, W., Jiang, R., Wu, H., Xie, J., Zhao, Y., Li, F., & Lu, X. (2024) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2024.105645 · Cited by 26

A Pearson-like correlation-based TOPSIS method with interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy uncertainty and its application to multiple criteria decision analysis of stroke rehabilitation treatments

Ho, L., Lin, Y., & Chen, T. (2019) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-019-04304-8 · Cited by 26

An improved bi-level programming model for water resources allocation under multiple uncertainties

Ren, C., Wang, Y., Yu, L., Zhang, H., & Xie, Z. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118882 · Cited by 26

Analyzing the barriers to green supply chain management implementation: a case study of the Vietnamese agriculture sector

Do, M., Huang, Y., & Phan, V.-D.-V. (2023) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-10-2021-0459 · Cited by 26

Potential evaluation and implementation strategy for pocket park construction in high-density urban areas: A case study in Dalian, China

Dong, J., Guo, R., Guo, F., & Cai, J. (2024) · Frontiers of Architectural Research · doi:10.1016/j.foar.2023.12.007 · Cited by 26

A VIKOR-based approach for the ranking of mathematical instructional videos

Soto, C. M. A., Liern, V., & Pérez‐Gladish, B. (2018) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-03-2018-0242 · Cited by 26

A STATE-OF-THE-ART REVIEW OF THE BWM METHOD AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA

Ecer, F. (2024) · Technological and Economic Development of Economy · doi:10.3846/tede.2024.20761 · Cited by 25

A systematic review of nuclear energy and public acceptance—A detailed analysis of evolution, emerging trends, and future research potentials

Agyekum, E. B., Tarawneh, B., Rashid, F. L., Kumar, P., Odoi-Yorke, F., Togun, H., Mbasso, W. F., & Velkin, V. I. (2025) · Energy Exploration & Exploitation · doi:10.1177/01445987251339845 · Cited by 25

An integrated approach for healthcare services risk assessment and quality enhancement

Pourmadadkar, M., Beheshtinia, M. A., & Ghods, K. (2019) · International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management · doi:10.1108/ijqrm-11-2018-0314 · Cited by 25

Corporate social responsibility performance evaluation from the perspective of stakeholder heterogeneity based on fuzzy analytical hierarchy process integrated TOPSIS

Yi, L., Li, T., Wang, X., Ge, G., & Zhang, T. (2022) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.2245 · Cited by 25

Bibliometric analysis of the papers on urban education

Chen, J., Ye, X., Chen, M., & Liang, Y. (2019) · Library Hi Tech · doi:10.1108/lht-01-2019-0009 · Cited by 25

Decision making for promising quinoline‐based anticancer agents through combined methodology

Özcan, E., Ökten, S., & Eren, T. (2020) · Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology · doi:10.1002/jbt.22522 · Cited by 25

Two-Stage Fuzzy Logic Model for Cloud Service Supplier Selection and Evaluation

Paunović, M., Ralević, N., Gajović, V., Vojinović, B. M., & Milutinović, O. (2018) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2018/7283127 · Cited by 24

A survey on analytical models for dynamic resource management in wireless body area networks

Kim, B.-S., Shah, B., He, T., & Kim, K. (2022) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2022.102936 · Cited by 24

A web-based software for group decision with analytic hierarchy process

Françozo, R. V., Urquiza, L. S. V., Carrapateira, E. S., Pacheco, B. C. S., Oliveira, M. T., Torsoni, G. B., & Yari, J. (2023) · MethodsX · doi:10.1016/j.mex.2023.102277 · Cited by 24

Physics-informed neural networks (P INNs): application categories, trends and impact

Ghalambaz, M., Sheremet, M. А., Khan, M. A., Raizah, Z. A. S., & Shafi, J. (2024) · International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow · doi:10.1108/hff-09-2023-0568 · Cited by 24

Evaluation of traffic congestion degree: An integrated approach

Hao, N., Feng, Y., Zhang, K., Tian, G., Zhang, L., & Jia, H. (2017) · International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks · doi:10.1177/1550147717723163 · Cited by 24

Variation-Aware Cloud Service Selection via Collaborative QoS Prediction

Ma, H., Hu, Z., Li, K., & Zhu, H. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/tsc.2019.2895784 · Cited by 24

An extension approach of TOPSIS method with OWAD operator for multiple criteria decision-making

Liu, X., & Wang, L. (2018) · Granular Computing · doi:10.1007/s41066-018-0131-4 · Cited by 23

Classifying the integrated public safety areas (IPSAs): a multi-criteria based approach

Basílio, M. P., Pereira, V., & Costa, H. G. (2018) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/jm2-01-2018-0001 · Cited by 23

Algorithm for the comprehensive thermal retrofit of housing stock aided by renewable energy supply: A sustainable case for Krakow

Barnaś, K., Jeleński, T., Nowak-Ocłoń, M., Racoń-Leja, K., Radziszewska–Zielina, E., Szewczyk, B., Śladowski, G., Toś, C., & Varbanov, P. S. (2022) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.125774 · Cited by 23

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods in the Mobile Cloud Offloading Paradigm

Bangui, H., Ge, M., Bühnová, B., Rakrak, S., Raghay, S., & Pitner, T. (2017) · Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks · doi:10.3390/jsan6040025 · Cited by 23

A Hybrid Neutrosophic-Grey Analytic Hierarchy Process Method: Decision-Making Modelling in Uncertain Environments

Vafadarnikjoo, A., & Scherz, M. (2021) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2021/1239505 · Cited by 23

Research on multiscale OpenStreetMap in China: data quality assessment with EWM-TOPSIS and GDP modeling

Han, C., Lu, B., Zheng, J., Yu, D., & Zheng, S. (2024) · Geo-spatial Information Science · doi:10.1080/10095020.2024.2356238 · Cited by 22

Similarity of TOPSIS results based on criterion variability: Case study on public economic

Vavrek, R., & Bečica, J. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0271951 · Cited by 22

Optimization of the integrated green–gray–blue system to deal with urban flood under multi-objective decision-making

Chen, J., Wang, S., & Wu, R. J. (2023) · Water Science & Technology · doi:10.2166/wst.2023.411 · Cited by 22

Consistency and optimized priority weight analytical solutions of interval multiplicative preference relations

Wang, Z.-J., & Lin, J. (2019) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.01.007 · Cited by 22

Comprehensive evaluation of voltage stability based on EW-AHP and Fuzzy-TOPSIS

Wu, J., Wang, H., Yao, L. J., Zhi, K., & Zhang, Q. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02410 · Cited by 21

Ranking policing strategies as a function of criminal complaints: application of the PROMETHEE II method in the Brazilian context

Basílio, M. P., Pereira, V., de Oliveira, M. W. C., & Neto, A. F. D. C. (2020) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/jm2-05-2020-0122 · Cited by 21

A multi-criteria decision tool for FMEA in the context of product development and industry 4.0

de Andrade, J. M. M., Leite, A. F. C. S. D. M., Canciglieri, M. B., Szejka, A. L., Loures, E. D. F. R., & Canciglieri, O. (2021) · International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing · doi:10.1080/0951192x.2021.1992664 · Cited by 21

Critical Success Factors Evaluation by Multi-Criteria Decision-Making: A Strategic Information System Planning and Strategy-As-Practice Perspective

Kim, S. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13060270 · Cited by 21

Oil extraction desulfurization based on ionic liquid: Back-extractant screening, experiment and process simulation

Zhang, Y., Pan, Y., Wang, W., Li, X., Xie, Q., & Zhang, T. (2024) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2024.120110 · Cited by 21

An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy projection-based approach and application to evaluating knowledge transfer effectiveness

Yue, C. (2018) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-018-3571-5 · Cited by 21

The way forward confronting eco-environmental challenges during land-use practices: a bibliometric analysis

Wu, Q., Hao, J., Yan-hua, Y., Liu, J., Li, P., Shi, Z., & Zheng, T. (2018) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-018-2866-5 · Cited by 21

New look at the inconsistency analysis in the pairwise-comparisons-based prioritization problems

Grzybowski, A. Z., & Starczewski, T. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113549 · Cited by 21

A New Index for TOPSIS based on Relative Distance to Best and Worst Points

Sadabadi, S. A., Hadi‐Vencheh, A., Jamshidi, A., & Jalali, M. (2020) · International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · doi:10.1142/s0219622020500145 · Cited by 21

Risk based initial cost assessment while planning a hydropower project

Agarwal, S. S., & Kansal, M. L. (2020) · Energy Strategy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2020.100517 · Cited by 21

A multiple criteria decision-making approach for increasing the preparedness level of sales departments against COVID-19 and future pandemics: A real-world case

Barrios, M. A. O., Borrego-Areyanes, A. A., Gómez-Villar, I. D., Felice, F. D., Petrillo, A., Gül, M., & Yücesan, M. (2021) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102411 · Cited by 21

A review of the development of surface burnishing process technique based on bibliometric analysis and visualization

Zhen-yu, Z., Qiu-yang, Z., Cong, D., Ju-yu, Y., & Piao, Z. (2021) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-021-06967-x · Cited by 20

Optimization and decision making of guide vane closing law for pumped storage hydropower system to improve adaptability under complex conditions

Lei, L., Chen, D., Ma, C., Chen, Y., Wang, H., Chen, H., Zhao, Z., Zhou, Y., Mahmud, A., & Patelli, E. (2023) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2023.109038 · Cited by 20

Understanding ethical products: Definitions and attributes to consider throughout the product lifecycle

Garlet, T. B., de Medeiros, J. F., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & Perin, M. G. (2024) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2024.01.010 · Cited by 20

Operational research applied in the field of public security

Basílio, M. P., & Pereira, V. (2020) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/jm2-02-2019-0034 · Cited by 20

Integrating economics, environment, social, and governance (EESG): A more comprehensive sustainable framework

Ma, Y., Loh, L., & Yin, Z. (2024) · Innovation and Green Development · doi:10.1016/j.igd.2024.100199 · Cited by 19

Bibliometric Method for Manufacturing Servitization: A Review and Future Research Directions

Chen, Y., Wu, Z., Yi, W., Wang, B., Yao, J., Pei, Z., & Chen, J. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14148743 · Cited by 19

Understanding the dynamics and conceptualization of environmental citizenship and energy citizenship: Evidence from the existing literature

Biresselioğlu, M. E., Demir, M. H., Solak, B., & Угур, Т. (2022) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2022.1018035 · Cited by 19

FAQT-2: A customer-oriented method for MCDM with statistical verification applied to industrial robot selection

Soltan, H., Janada, K., & Omar, M. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120106 · Cited by 19

Substation technology selection for environment efficient power distribution system in India: an integrated AHP-TOPSIS-based approach

Trivedi, A., Tyagi, A. K., Chichi, O., Kumar, S., & Trivedi, V. (2023) · International Journal of Energy Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijesm-09-2022-0002 · Cited by 19

Dynamic Charging Scheduling and Path Planning Scheme for Multiple MC-enabled On-demand Wireless Rechargeable Sensor Networks

Goyal, R., & Tomar, A. (2024) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2024.103943 · Cited by 19

Comparison of tools for the sustainability assessment of nanomaterials

Windsor, R., Cinelli, M., & Coles, S. R. (2018) · Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.06.010 · Cited by 19

The Research Trends of Text Classification Studies (2000–2020): A Bibliometric Analysis

Zhu, H., & Lei, L. (2022) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440221089963 · Cited by 19

Ranking firms based on their financial and diversity performance using multiple‐stage unweighted TOPSIS

Bouslah, K., Liern, V., Ouenniche, J., & Pérez‐Gladish, B. (2022) · International Transactions in Operational Research · doi:10.1111/itor.13143 · Cited by 18

Multi-criteria decision-making methods: application in humanitarian operations

Nain, A., Jain, D., & Trivedi, A. (2023) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-11-2022-0673 · Cited by 18

Analytic hierarchy process for urban transportation: a bibliometric and social network analysis

Kenger, Z. D., Kenger, Ö. N., & Özceylan, E. (2023) · Central European Journal of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10100-023-00869-x · Cited by 18

What network roles affect the decline of the embodied carbon emission reduction pressure in China's manufacturing sector foreign trade?

Cheng, Y., Zhao, L., Yi, H., Wang, C., Wang, K., & Zhen, J. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141771 · Cited by 18

Smart Cities and Resident Well-Being: Using the BTOPSIS Method to Assess Citizen Life Satisfaction in European Cities

Roszkowska, E., & Wachowicz, T. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app142311051 · Cited by 18

A Mathematical Model Proposal for Maintenance Strategies Optimization of the Most Critical Electrical Equipment Groups of Hydroelectric Power Plants

Özcan, E., DANIŞAN, T., & Eren, T. (2019) · Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences · doi:10.5505/pajes.2018.38455 · Cited by 18

The Development Strategy of Home-Based Exercise in China Based on the SWOT-AHP Model

Hanming, L., Chen, X., & Fang, Y. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18031224 · Cited by 18

Review of the Literature on Multicriteria Methods Applied in the Field of Public Security

Basílio, M. P., Pereira, V., & Costa, H. G. (2017) · Universal Journal of Management · doi:10.13189/ujm.2017.051202 · Cited by 18

Comparison of Several Decision-Making Techniques: A Case of Water Losses Management in Developing Countries

Zyoud, S. H., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2019) · International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · doi:10.1142/s0219622019500275 · Cited by 18

China's overcapacity industry evaluation based on TOPSIS grey relational projection method with mixed attributes

Hao, X., Li, M., & Chen, Y. (2020) · Grey Systems Theory and Application · doi:10.1108/gs-03-2020-0033 · Cited by 18

Bottled water quality ranking via the multiple-criteria decision-making process: a case study of two-stage fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS

Nabizadeh, R., Yousefzadeh, S., Yaghmaeian, K., Alimohammadi, M., & Mokhtari, Z. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-16931-7 · Cited by 17

Multiple criteria performance evaluation of YouTube mathematical educational videos by IS-TOPSIS

Soto, C. M. A., Liern, V., & Pérez‐Gladish, B. (2018) · Operational Research · doi:10.1007/s12351-018-0405-2 · Cited by 17

Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MADM method based on TOPSIS and grey correlation analysis

Bu, F., He, J., Li, H. R., Fu, Q., & 6:6699-6701, C. O. M. B. A. E. (2020) · Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering · doi:10.3934/mbe.2020300 · Cited by 17

Multi Criteria Method for Determining the Failure Resistance of Information System Components

Boranbayev, A., Boranbayev, S. N., Nurusheva, A., Seitkulov, Y. N., & Nurbekov, A. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32523-7_22 · Cited by 16

Assessment of Land Suitability for Sugarcane Cultivation Using TOPSIS and Parametric Methods in Southwestern Iran

Azadi, A., Jalali, S., & Navidi, M. N. (2023) · Eurasian Soil Science · doi:10.1134/s1064229322602268 · Cited by 16

Z-Numbers-Based MCDM Approach for Personnel Selection at Institutions of Higher Education for Transportation

Gottwald, D., Chocholáč, J., Çodur, M. K., Čubranić-Dobrodolac, M., & Yazır, K. (2024) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math12040523 · Cited by 16

Uncovering the academic evolution of VIKOR method: a comprehensive main path analysis

Yu, D., & Ye, T. (2024) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1080/01605682.2024.2359726 · Cited by 16

Determining the optimal degradation rate of biodegradable films in a maize farmland based on the EWM-TOPSIS model

Zhang, W., Wang, W., Zhang, Y., Wang, F., & Sun, S. (2025) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109359 · Cited by 16

Multi-attribute ranking method for identifying key nodes in complex networks based on GRA

Yang, P., Xu, G., & Chen, H. (2018) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979218503630 · Cited by 16

Bioeconomy triple factor nexus through indicator analysis

Žihare, L., Kubule, A., Vamža, I., Muižniece, I., & Blumberga, D. (2020) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2020.11.008 · Cited by 16

Evaluating and ranking the digital content generation components for marketing the libraries and information centres’ goods and services using fuzzy TOPSIS technique

Naseri, Z., چاکلی, ع. ن., & Malekolkalami, M. (2021) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551521998045 · Cited by 16

Visualization and Mapping of Knowledge and Science Landscapes in Expert Systems With Applications Journal: A 30 Years’ Bibliometric Analysis

Zyoud, S. H., & Zyoud, A. H. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211027574 · Cited by 16

A Financial Ratio Analysis on BIST Information and Technology Index (XUTEK) Using AHP-weighted Grey Relational Analysis

Turhan, T., & Aydemır, E. (2021) · Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi · doi:10.29130/dubited.1011252 · Cited by 15

A two-stage model of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and the fuzzy synthetic evaluation technique to prioritize sustainable sanitation services under uncertainty

Zyoud, S. H., Omair, S. M., & Jarrad, S. A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-88236-5 · Cited by 16

Bibliometric Analysis of Research on the Comorbidity of Cancer and Pain

Wu, C.-C., Wang, Y.-Z., Hu, H., & Wang, X. (2021) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s291741 · Cited by 16

Road of the least developed countries to sustainable development: Assessing trade participation in the context of the sustainable development goals

Fojtíková, L., Vavrek, R., & Doleželová, P. (2023) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.2524 · Cited by 15

An interval efficiency evaluation model for air pollution management based on indicators integration and different perspectives

Ye, F.-F., Yang, L.-H., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118945 · Cited by 15

Adequacy Indicators Based on Pre-established Goals: An Implementation in a Colombian University

Rico, S. E. P., Blasco-Blasco, O., & Liern, V. (2018) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-018-1979-z · Cited by 14

Priorities Determination of Using Bioresources. Case Study of Heracleum sosnowskyi

Žihare, L., Gušča, J., Spalviņš, K., & Blumberga, D. (2019) · Environmental and Climate Technologies · doi:10.2478/rtuect-2019-0016 · Cited by 14

Threat evaluation method of warships formation air defense based on AR(p)-DITOPSIS#br#

Haiwen, S., & Xiaofang, X. I. E. (2019) · Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics · doi:10.21629/jsee.2019.02.09 · Cited by 14

A Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model to Evaluate the Overall Performance of Public Emergency Departments: A Case Study

Barrios, M. A. O., & Alfaro-Saíz, J.-J. (2020) · International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · doi:10.1142/s0219622020500364 · Cited by 14

A Bibliometric Analysis of Published Literature in Postoperative Pain in Elderly Patients in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Garcia, J. B. S., de Moraes, É. B., & Neto, J. O. B. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10112334 · Cited by 14

A systematic bibliometric analysis of the analytic hierarchy process from 1980 to 2020

Hassan, A. (2022) · International Journal of Bibliometrics in Business and Management · doi:10.1504/ijbbm.2022.10051031 · Cited by 5

Analytic hierarchy process and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution: a bibliometric analysis 'from' past, present and future of AHP and TOPSIS

Mukherjee, K. (2014) · International Journal of Intelligent Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1504/ijiei.2014.066210 · Cited by 22

Bibliometric Analysis of the MCDM Methods in the Last Decade: WASPAS, MABAC, EDAS, CODAS, COCOSO, and MARCOS

Ayan, B., & ABACIOĞLU, S. (2022) · International Journal of Business and Economic Studies · doi:10.54821/uiecd.1183443 · Cited by 54

Using Of The Two Tools Analytic Hierarchy Process "AHP" And Technique For Order Performance By Similarity To Ideal Solution "TOPSIS" In Multi-Criteria Decision Making

الخانقيني, ع. د. س., & العشاري, ع. م. ن. (2024) · مجلة ميسان للدراسات الأكاديمية · doi:10.54633/2333-023-051-001

MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS (MCDM): A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS (1974-2024)

Kaya, N. (2024) · Pressacademia · doi:10.17261/pressacademia.2024.1940 · Cited by 9