The DOI matches its Crossref record; 165 of the 170 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It has become one of the most prominent methods for solving MCDM problems59,60.”
From A decision-support framework for evaluating AI-enabled ESG strategies in the context of sustainable manufacturing systems (2025) · cites this paper as [59]
Citations
Cites
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484
An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output
Hirsch, J. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 · Cited by 11,669
How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process
Saaty, T. L. (1990) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-i · Cited by 9,605
Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
Chen, S.-J. J., Hwang, C. L., Beckmann, M. J., & Krelle, W. E. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,207
IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040
Ogurtsova, K., Fernandes, J. D. D. R., Huang, Y., Linnenkamp, U., Guariguata, L., Cho, N. H., Cavan, D. A., Shaw, J. E., & Makaroff, L. (2017) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024 · Cited by 7,138
The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used
Saaty, R. W. (1987) · Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8 · Cited by 5,380
Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS
Opricović, S., & Tzeng, G. (2003) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1 · Cited by 5,211
Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf · Cited by 5,039
Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035
Guariguata, L., Whiting, D. R., Hambleton, I., Beagley, J., Linnenkamp, U., & Shaw, J. E. (2014) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002 · Cited by 4,642
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys
Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., & Ehrogott, M. (2005) · International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science · doi:10.1007/b100605 · Cited by 4,594
IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030
Whiting, D. R., Guariguata, L., Weil, C., & Shaw, J. E. (2011) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2011.10.029 · Cited by 4,018
Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment
Chen, C. A. (2000) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(97)00377-1 · Cited by 3,983
Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications
Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2004) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028 · Cited by 3,828
A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications
Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056 · Cited by 2,733
Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making
Wang, J., Jing, Y., Zhang, C., & Zhao, J. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021 · Cited by 2,361
Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—A review
Pohekar, S. D., & Ramachandran, M. (2004) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007 · Cited by 1,938
PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications
Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2009) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021 · Cited by 1,706
Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods
Opricović, S., & Tzeng, G. (2006) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020 · Cited by 1,694
A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management
Chen, C. A., Lin, C., & Huang, S.-F. (2005) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.03.009 · Cited by 1,623
Boran, F. E., Genç, S., Kurt, M., & Akay, D. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.039 · Cited by 1,502
An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making
Shih, H.-S., Shyur, H., & Lee, E. S. (2006) · Mathematical and Computer Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023 · Cited by 1,455
Cheever, M. A., Allison, J. P., Ferris, A. S., Finn, O. J., Hastings, B. M., Hecht, T. T., Mellman, I., Prindiville, S. A., Viner, J. L., Weiner, L. M., et al. (2009) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-0737 · Cited by 1,388
(2013) · Cited by 1,331
Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends
Huang, I. B., Keisler, J. M., & Linkov, I. (2011) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022 · Cited by 1,293
Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach
Chan, F. T. S., & Kumar, N. (2005) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2005.08.004 · Cited by 1,250
The scientific impact of nations
King, D. A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/430311a · Cited by 1,245
Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process
Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143 · Cited by 1,241
Ghodsypour, S. H., & O'Brien, C. (1998) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/s0925-5273(97)00009-1 · Cited by 1,183
Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications – A literature review
Ho, W. (2007) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004 · Cited by 1,173
Application of the AHP in project management
Al‐Harbi, K. M. A. (2001) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(99)00038-1 · Cited by 1,141
Lai, Y.-J., Liu, T.-Y., & Hwang, C.-L. (1994) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(94)90282-8 · Cited by 1,138
The Analytic Hierarchy Process—An Exposition
Forman, E. H., & Gass, S. I. (2001) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.49.4.469.11231 · Cited by 1,130
An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications
Vargas, L. G. (1990) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-h · Cited by 1,069
Handfield, R., Walton, S. V., Sroufe, R. P., & Melnyk, S. A. (2002) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00261-2 · Cited by 1,058
Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights
Deng, H., Yeh, C., & Willis, R. J. (2000) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/s0305-0548(99)00069-6 · Cited by 1,028
Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods
Zanakis, S. H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N. A., & Dublish, S. (1998) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(97)00147-1 · Cited by 1,026
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003 · Cited by 951
Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities
Wallin, J. A. (2005) · Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology · doi:10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x · Cited by 913
Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment
Wang, Y.-M., & Elhag, T. (2005) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.040 · Cited by 896
The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM
Tsaur, S., Chang, T., & Yen, C. (2002) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/s0261-5177(01)00050-4 · Cited by 891
The Theory of Ratio Scale Estimation: Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process
Harker, P. T., & Vargas, L. G. (1987) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1383 · Cited by 869
Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey
Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ruan, D. (2003) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/s0925-5273(03)00099-9 · Cited by 839
Kulkarni, A. V. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1307 · Cited by 821
Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment
Dağdeviren, M., Yavuz, S., & Kılınç, N. (2008) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016 · Cited by 798
Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison
Deng, H. (1999) · International Journal of Approximate Reasoning · doi:10.1016/s0888-613x(99)00025-0 · Cited by 768
Thokala, P., Devlin, N., Marsh, K., Baltussen, R., Boysen, M., Kalo, Z., Longrenn, T., Mussen, F., Peacock, S., Watkins, J., et al. (2016) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.003 · Cited by 739
A cost-value approach for prioritizing requirements
Karlsson, J., & Ryan, K. T. (1997) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/52.605933 · Cited by 727
An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system
Tam, M. C. Y., & Tummala, V. M. R. (2001) · Omega · doi:10.1016/s0305-0483(00)00039-6 · Cited by 672
A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship
Rey‐Martí, A., Soriano, D. R., & Palacios‐Marqués, D. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.033 · Cited by 670
A review of applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process in operations management
Subramanian, N., & Ramanathan, R. (2012) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.036 · Cited by 650
Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data
Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfı, F. H., & Izadikhah, M. (2006) · Applied Mathematics and Computation · doi:10.1016/j.amc.2006.02.057 · Cited by 643
Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment
Wang, T.-C., & Chang, T.-H. (2006) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.07.003 · Cited by 637
A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach
Kahraman, C., Ertay, T., & Büyüközkan, G. (2004) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.09.016 · Cited by 628
Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation
Tzeng, G., Lin, C.-W., & Opricovic, S. C. (2004) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.014 · Cited by 624
Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and limitations
Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2009) · OR Insight · doi:10.1057/ori.2009.10 · Cited by 620
ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications
Govindan, K., & Jepsen, M. B. (2015) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.019 · Cited by 599
Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey
Şengül, Ü., Eren, M., Shiraz, S. E., Gezder, V., & Şengül, A. B. (2014) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.045 · Cited by 561
Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: A Literature Review
Kahraman, C., Onar, S. Ç., & Öztayşi, B. (2015) · International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems · doi:10.1080/18756891.2015.1046325 · Cited by 542
Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability
Mulliner, E., Malys, N., & Malienė, V. (2015) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.013 · Cited by 536
The analytic hierarchy process: applications and studies
(1993) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/0305-0548(93)90049-o · Cited by 504
Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection
Wang, J.-W., Cheng, C., & Huang, K.-C. (2008) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2008.04.014 · Cited by 504
Zavadskas, E. K., Mardani, A., Turskis, Z., Jusoh, A., & Nor, K. M. (2016) · International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · doi:10.1142/s0219622016300019 · Cited by 493
05/02652 Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation
(2005) · Fuel and Energy Abstracts · doi:10.1016/s0140-6701(05)83150-9 · Cited by 465
Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries
Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2011) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21688 · Cited by 456
Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multiattribute decision-making methods
Triantaphyllou, E., & Lin, C.-T. (1996) · International Journal of Approximate Reasoning · doi:10.1016/0888-613x(95)00119-2 · Cited by 453
Ananda, J., & Herath, G. (2009) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.010 · Cited by 451
A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection
Shyur, H., & Shih, H.-S. (2006) · Mathematical and Computer Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2005.04.018 · Cited by 427
Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country
Chen, M., & Tzeng, G. (2004) · Mathematical and Computer Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2005.01.006 · Cited by 399
Meho, L. I., & Rogers, Y. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20874 · Cited by 383
Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria: Methods and Applications
Hwang, C. L., & Lin, M.-J. (1986) · Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) · Cited by 378
Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis
Durbach, I. N., & Stewart, T. J. (2012) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.04.038 · Cited by 378
An improvement of the h-index: the g-index
Egghe, L. (2006) · Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) · Cited by 363
A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS
Yue, Z. (2010) · Applied Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.apm.2010.11.001 · Cited by 360
A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the SAW, TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design
Wang, P., Zhu, Z., & Wang, Y. (2016) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.076 · Cited by 335
Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A logarithmic fuzzy preference programming methodology
Wang, Y., & Chin, K. (2010) · International Journal of Approximate Reasoning · doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2010.12.004 · Cited by 309
Liu, S., Chan, F. T. S., & Ran, W. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.01.059 · Cited by 301
For Your Citations Only? Hot Topics in Bibliometric Analysis
van Raan, A. F. J. (2005) · Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives · doi:10.1207/s15366359mea0301_7 · Cited by 295
Human health and safety risks management in underground coal mines using fuzzy TOPSIS
Mahdevari, S., Shahriar, K., & Esfahanipour, A. (2014) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.076 · Cited by 276
Pedrycz, W., & Song, M. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2011.2116029 · Cited by 276
Zyoud, S. H., Kaufmann, L. G., Shaheen, H. Q., Samhan, S., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.05.016 · Cited by 268
Self-citationMapping of drinking water research: A bibliometric analysis of research output during 1992–2011
Fu, H., Wang, M.-H., & Ho, Y. (2012) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.061 · Cited by 256
Ossadnik, W., Schinke, S., & Kaspar, R. H. (2015) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-015-9448-4 · Cited by 223
Mir, M. A., Ghazvinei, P. T., Sulaiman, N. M. N., Basri, N. E. A., Saheri, S., Mahmood, N. Z., Jahan, A., Begum, R. A., & Aghamohammadi, N. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.028 · Cited by 221
Roy, B. (2016) · International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_2 · Cited by 210
Multi-Criteria Clinical Decision Support
Dolan, J. G. (2010) · Patient · doi:10.2165/11539470-000000000-00000 · Cited by 193
Adunlin, G., Diaby, V., & Xiao, H. (2014) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12287 · Cited by 193
Multi-criteria analysis of electricity generation technologies in Lithuania
Štreimikienė, D., Šliogerienė, J., & Turskis, Z. (2015) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.032 · Cited by 191
Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in health care: A bibliometric analysis
Diaby, V., Campbell, K., & Goeree, R. A. (2013) · Operations Research for Health Care · doi:10.1016/j.orhc.2013.03.001 · Cited by 184
A spatial assessment framework for evaluating flood risk under extreme climates
Chen, Y., Liu, R., Barrett, D. J., Gao, L., Zhou, M., Renzullo, L. J., & Emelyanova, I. (2015) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.094 · Cited by 180
Daughton, C. G. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.109 · Cited by 177
Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) application for reinforcement of hydropower strategy in Nepal
Singh, R. P., & Nachtnebel, H. P. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.138 · Cited by 176
Mühlbacher, A. C., & Kaczynski, A. (2015) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-015-0203-4 · Cited by 157
Linkov, I., & Seager, T. P. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es100959q · Cited by 156
Rosas, S. R., Kagan, J., Schouten, J. T., Slack, P. A., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017428 · Cited by 132
Global research trends in landslides during 1991–2014: a bibliometric analysis
Wu, X., Chen, X., Zhan, F. B., & Hong, S. (2015) · Landslides · doi:10.1007/s10346-015-0624-z · Cited by 131
Wood, D. A. (2015) · Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2015.12.021 · Cited by 127
A combined fuzzy approach to determine the best region for a nuclear power plant in Turkey
Erdoğan, M., & Kaya, İ. (2015) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.11.013 · Cited by 122
Evaluation of e-commerce websites using fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS based on E-S-QUAL
Kang, D., Jang, W., & Park, Y. (2016) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.01.017 · Cited by 114
Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP
Ishizaka, A., Balkenborg, D., & Kaplan, T. R. (2010) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.2010.23 · Cited by 112
Linkov, I., Bates, M., Canis, L., Seager, T. P., & Keisler, J. M. (2011) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.163 · Cited by 112
Prioritising data items for business analytics: Framework and application to human resources
Pape, T. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.01.052 · Cited by 106
Multicriterion Analysis in Engineering and Management
Raju, S. K., & Kumar, D. N. (2010) · NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) · Cited by 104
A bibliometric analysis of research on proteomics in Science Citation Index Expanded
Tan, J., Fu, H., & Ho, Y. (2013) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1125-2 · Cited by 100
Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Sustainable Energy and Transportation Systems
Ehrgott, M., Naujoks, B., Stewart, T. J., & Wallenius, J. (2009) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04045-0 · Cited by 97
Higher education in the united states (1985–2000)
Saaty, T. L., & Rogers, P. C. (1976) · Socio-Economic Planning Sciences · doi:10.1016/0038-0121(76)90012-4 · Cited by 95
Franco, C. A., Bojesen, M., Hougaard, J. L., & Nielsen, K. (2014) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.060 · Cited by 95
Gdoura, K., Anane, M., & Jellali, S. (2015) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.09.003 · Cited by 95
Robust analysis of bibliometric data
Battisti, F. D., & Salini, S. (2012) · Statistical Methods & Applications · doi:10.1007/s10260-012-0217-0 · Cited by 94
Analytic Hierarchy Process and Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Study
Tramarico, C. L., DanieleMizuno, Salomon, V. A. P., & Marins, F. A. S. (2015) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.005 · Cited by 91
Bibliometric Analysis of Multiple Criteria Decision Making/Multiattribute Utility Theory
Bragge, J., Korhonen, P., Wallenius, H., & Wallenius, J. (2009) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04045-0_22 · Cited by 89
A bibliometric analysis of 20 years of research on software product lines
Heradio, R., Perez-Morago, H., Fernández-Amorós, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., & Herrera‐Viedma, E. (2015) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2015.11.004 · Cited by 89
Shaverdi, M., Ramezani, I., Tahmasebi, R., & Rostamy, A. A. A. (2016) · International Journal of Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1007/s40815-016-0142-8 · Cited by 89
Multiple criteria decision making for engineering
Wiecek, M. M., Ehrgott, M., Fadel, G., & Figueira, J. R. (2007) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2006.10.001 · Cited by 88
Of Towers, Walls, and Fields: Perspectives on Language in Science
Montgomery, S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1095204 · Cited by 88
Way to accomplish low carbon development transformation: A bibliometric analysis during 1995–2014
Wang, L., Zhao, L., Mao, G., Zuo, J., & Du, H. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.021 · Cited by 87
Modified AHP for Gene Selection and Cancer Classification Using Type-2 Fuzzy Logic
Nguyen, T. T., & Nahavandi, S. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2015.2453153 · Cited by 85
A bibliometric analysis of industrial wastewater research: current trends and future prospects
Zheng, T., Wang, J., Wang, Q., Nie, C., Smale, N., Shi, Z., & Wang, X. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1736-x · Cited by 83
Comparison of first aggregation and last aggregation in fuzzy group TOPSIS
Roghanian, E., Rahimi, J., & Ansari, A. (2010) · Applied Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.apm.2010.02.039 · Cited by 83
Environmental risk analysis and prioritization of pharmaceuticals in a developing world context
Mansour, F., Al‐Hindi, M., Saad, W., & Salam, D. A. (2016) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.023 · Cited by 82
ELECTRE-III-H: An outranking-based decision aiding method for hierarchically structured criteria
Vasto-Terrientes, L. D., Valls, A., Słowiński, R., & Zielniewicz, P. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.016 · Cited by 81
A scientific approach with bibliometric analysis related to brick and tile drying: A review
Yataganbaba, A., & Kurtbaş, İ. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.357 · Cited by 80
Power quality techniques research worldwide: A review
Montoya, F. G., García-Cruz, A., Montoya, M. G., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. R. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.091 · Cited by 78
Shen, J. S., Lu, H., Zhang, Y., Song, X., & He, L. (2016) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.004 · Cited by 74
Shang, G., Saladin, B. A., Fry, T., & Donohue, J. M. (2015) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1037935 · Cited by 68
The french and the american school in multi-criteria decision analysis
Lootsma, F. A. (1990) · RAIRO - Operations Research · doi:10.1051/ro/1990240302631 · Cited by 64
Global scientific production of robotic surgery in medicine: A 20-year survey of research activities
Fan, G., Zhou, Z., Zhang, H., Gu, X., Gu, G., Guan, X., Fan, Y., & He, S. (2016) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.048 · Cited by 64
Demystifying central government R&D spending in China
Sun, Y., & Cao, C. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1253479 · Cited by 63
Zyoud, S. H., Al‐Jabi, S. W., & Sweileh, W. M. (2015) · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12906-015-0840-z · Cited by 62
Self-citationDesign and evaluation of railway corridors based on spatial ecological and geological criteria
Karlson, M., Karlsson, C., Mörtberg, U. M., Olofsson, B., & Balfors, B. (2016) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2016.03.012 · Cited by 62
Yang, W. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1247700 · Cited by 60
Maimoun, M. A., Madani, K. M., & Reinhart, D. R. (2016) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.154 · Cited by 60
Assessing climate change vulnerability with group multi-criteria decision making approaches
Kim, Y., & Chung, . (2013) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0879-0 · Cited by 57
Using the analytic hierarchy process in evaluating decision alternatives
Cabała, P. (2010) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 57
Which Data Base Should we Use for our Literature Analysis? Web of Science versus SCOPUS
de Granda‐Orive, J. I., Alonso‐Arroyo, A., & Roig-Vázquez, F. (2011) · Archivos de Bronconeumología · doi:10.1016/s1579-2129(11)70049-0 · Cited by 53
Oliva, E. J. D., Cervera, A., & Romero, C. (2006) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 52
Selecting strategies for rice stem borer management using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Abdollahzadeh, G., Damalas, C. A., Sharifzadeh, M. S., & Ahmadi-Gorgi, H. (2016) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2016.02.004 · Cited by 50
Global research trends of geographical information system from 1961 to 2010: a bibliometric analysis
Liu, F., Lin, A., Wang, H., Peng, Y., & Hong, S. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1789-x · Cited by 49
Applying a linguistic multi-criteria decision-making model to the analysis of ICT suppliers’ offers
Cid-López, A., Hornos, M. J., Carrasco, R. A., & Herrera‐Viedma, E. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.03.025 · Cited by 47
A bibliometric-based evaluation on environmental research in the Arab world
Zyoud, S. H., Fuchs-Hanusch, D., Zyoud, S. H., Al-Rawajfeh, A. E., & Shaheen, H. Q. (2016) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-016-1180-3 · Cited by 44
Self-citationKavurmacı, M., & ÜSTÜN, A. K. (2016) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-016-5259-6 · Cited by 38
Analysis of insolation potential of Knjaževac Municipality (Serbia) using multi-criteria approach
Potić, I., Golić, R., & Joksimović, T. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.056 · Cited by 36
Azarnivand, A., & Malekian, A. (2016) · Water Resources Management · doi:10.1007/s11269-016-1259-0 · Cited by 34
Ruiz-Padillo, A., Torija, A. J., Ramos-Ridao, Á. F., & Ruiz, D. P. (2016) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.03.009 · Cited by 33
Zyoud, S. H., Zyoud, S. H., Al‐Jabi, S. W., Sweileh, W. M., & Awang, R. (2016) · Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1186/s40557-016-0117-0 · Cited by 33
Self-citationTrends in research activity in toxicology and by toxicologists in seven European countries
Miró, Ò., Montori, E., Ramos, X., Galícia, M., & Nogué, S. (2009) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.04.029 · Cited by 32
A statistical approach to assessing interval scale preferences in discrete choice problems
Kainulainen, T., Leskinen, P., Korhonen, P., Haara, A., & Hujala, T. (2007) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602554 · Cited by 32
The rapid rise of a research nation
Zhou, Y. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/528s170a · Cited by 32
Theoretical estimation of the probability of weight rank reversal in pairwise comparisons
Δέδε, Γ., Kamalakis, T., & Sphicopoulos, T. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.01.059 · Cited by 32
Use of bibliometric modelling for policy making
Smith, K. E., & Marinova, D. V. (2005) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2005.02.027 · Cited by 31
Oliva, E. J. D., Cervera, A., & Romero, C. A. R. (2006) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 29
Guerrero-Baena, M. D., Gómez-Limón, J. A., & Cardozo, J. V. F. (2014) · Econstor (Econstor) · Cited by 28
Schmitz, S., McCullagh, L., Adams, R., Barry, M. G., & Walsh, C. (2016) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0406-z · Cited by 26
Zyoud, S. H., Al‐Rawajfeh, A. E., Shaheen, H. Q., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2016) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-016-6434-6 · Cited by 25
Self-citationZammori, F. (2009) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2009.07.013 · Cited by 23
Estimates of Arab world research productivity associated with groundwater: a bibliometric analysis
Zyoud, S., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2017) · Applied Water Science · doi:10.1007/s13201-016-0520-2 · Cited by 23
Self-citationLiu, B., & Xu, S. (1987) · Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/0270-0255(87)90474-x · Cited by 19
Estimates of Arab world research productivity associated with desalination: a bibliometric analysis
Zyoud, S. H., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2015) · IDA Journal of Desalination and Water Reuse · doi:10.1179/2051645215y.0000000001 · Cited by 17
Self-citationA decision-analytic approach to predict state regulation of hydraulic fracturing
Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., Jin, D., Mazurczak, M., & Schreurs, M. A. (2014) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-014-0020-7 · Cited by 16
Guerrero-Baena, M. D., Gómez-Limón, J. A., & Cardozo, J. V. F. (2014) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 12
Total ordering defined on the set of all intuitionistic fuzzy numbers
Nayagam, V. L. G., Jeevaraj, S., & Sivaraman, G. (2016) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/ifs-151915 · Cited by 12
Radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging: a bibliometric study in Iran
Zeraatkar, N. (2013) · Iranian Journal of Nuclear Medicine · Cited by 9
A Multiple Attribute Evaluation of Bayesian Availability Estimators
McCahon, C. S., Hwang, C. L., & Tillman, F. A. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Reliability · doi:10.1109/tr.1983.5221741 · Cited by 7
Viyanchi, A., Ghatari, A. R., Rasekh, H. R., & Safikhani, H. (2016) · PubMed Central · Cited by 6
Skvoretz, J. V., Dyer, K. E., Daley, E. M., DeBate, R. D., Vamos, C. A., Kline, N., & Thompson, E. L. (2016) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-016-1960-x · Cited by 6
Liana, M. (2003) · Badania Operacyjne i Decyzje/Operations Research and Decisions · Cited by 4
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 170 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Chen, 1992, Vol. 375
- Elsevier, 2016
- Hwang, 2012, Vol. 281
- Yoon, 1995, Vol. 104
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effects of the entropy weight on TOPSIS
Chen, P. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114186 · Cited by 591
Effects of normalization on the entropy-based TOPSIS method
Chen, P. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.06.035 · Cited by 415
An in-depth review of theory of the TOPSIS method: An experimental analysis
Çelikbilek, Y., & Tüysüz, F. (2020) · Journal of Management Analytics · doi:10.1080/23270012.2020.1748528 · Cited by 367
Ahani, A., Nilashi, M., Yadegaridehkordi, E., Sanzogni, L., Rashid, T. A., Knox, K., Samad, S., & Ibrahim, O. (2019) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.06.014 · Cited by 276
A comprehensive analysis of weighting and multicriteria methods in the context of sustainable energy
Şahin, M. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-020-02922-7 · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- Zyoud, S. H., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D.
- Affiliations
- Graz University of Technology (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Zyoud, Shaher H.
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 78
- Pages
- 158-181
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2586123156
- Cited by
- 492
- References
- 170
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 9
- FWCI
- 44.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Decision Support System Applications
- Keywords
- analytic hierarchy process, TOPSIS, multi-criteria decision making, research trends, research collaboration, geographic information systems, supply chain management, sustainability, risk modeling, expert systems, bibliometric visualization, h-index, research hotspots, decision support system, China research output
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review