Cited by 930Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsGait Recognition and AnalysisHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis

Deep learning algorithms for human activity recognition using mobile and wearable sensor networks: State of the art and research challenges

Nweke, Henry Friday, Teh, Ying Wah, Al-garadi, Mohammed Ali, Alo, Uzoma Rita·2018·Expert Systems with Applications

Abstract

Abstract Human activity recognition systems are developed as part of a framework to enable continuous monitoring of human behaviours in the area of ambient assisted living, sports injury detection, elderly care, rehabilitation, and entertainment and surveillance in smart home environments. The extraction of relevant features is the most challenging part of the mobile and wearable sensor-based human activity recognition pipeline. Feature extraction influences the algorithm performance and reduces computation time and complexity. However, current human activity recognition relies on handcrafted features that are incapable of handling complex activities especially with the current influx of multimodal and high dimensional sensor data. With the emergence of deep learning and increased computation powers, deep learning and artificial intelligence methods are being adopted for automatic feature learning in diverse areas like health, image classification, and recently, for feature extraction and classification of simple and complex human activity recognition in mobile and wearable sensors. Furthermore, the fusion of mobile or wearable sensors and deep learning methods for feature learning provide diversity, offers higher generalisation, and tackles challenging issues in human activity recognition. The focus of this review is to provide in-depth summaries of deep learning methods for mobile and wearable sensor-based human activity recognition. The review presents the methods, uniqueness, advantages and their limitations. We not only categorise the studies into generative, discriminative and hybrid methods but also highlight their important advantages. Furthermore, the review presents classification and evaluation procedures and discusses publicly available datasets for mobile sensor human activity recognition. Finally, we outline and explain some challenges to open research problems that require further research and improvements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.03.056

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A significant constraint of applying ML algorithms to wearable technology is the lack of standardization in data collection and analysis.

    “A significant constraint of applying ML algorithms to wearable technology is the lack of standardization in data collection and analysis.”
  • Comparing data across a wide range of wearable devices becomes challenging, compromising the efficacy of ML algorithms in classifying health conditions.

    “Comparing data across a wide range of wearable devices becomes challenging, compromising the efficacy of ML algorithms in classifying health conditions [20,194].”
  • The accuracy of deep learning methods in human activity recognition depends highly on the quality of the extracted features.

    “This has also been the consensus in the human activity recognition literature, where the accuracy of deep learning methods depends highly on the quality of the extracted features (Nweke et al., 2018).”

    From Deep learning for time series classification: a review (2019) · cites this paper as Nweke et al., 2018

  • End-to-end deep learning aims to incorporate the feature learning process while fine-tuning the discriminative classifier.

    “In contrast to feature engineering, end-to-end deep learning aims to incorporate the feature learning process while fine-tuning the discriminative classifier (Nweke et al., 2018).”

    From Deep learning for time series classification: a review (2019) · cites this paper as Nweke et al., 2018

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 270 · Cited by 930

Authors
Nweke, H. F., Teh, Y. W., Al-garadi, M. A., & Alo, U. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Malaya (MY)
  • Ebonyi State University (NG)
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
105
Pages
233-261
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2795342689
Cited by
930
References
270
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 107 · 2023: 132 · 2022: 154 · 2021: 164 · 2020: 130 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 12 · 2012: 1
FWCI
46.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Keywords
human activity recognition, wearable sensors, mobile sensors, deep learning, automatic feature learning, sensor fusion, ambient assisted living, elderly care, multimodal sensor data, activity recognition dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review