Deep learning for time series classification: a review
Open accessAI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review empirically compares nine end-to-end deep learning architectures for time series classification across 97 univariate and multivariate datasets, training 8,730 models. It finds that a deep residual network (ResNet) is the strongest DNN, significantly outperforming most other deep models and reaching performance not significantly different from COTE/HIVE-COTE on the UCR/UEA archive.
Key findings
- ResNet significantly outperformed the other deep learning approaches on the 85 univariate UCR/UEA datasets, with an average rank of almost 2, winning on 50 out of 85 problems; FCN and Encoder followed as second and third.
- ResNet was not significantly different from COTE/HIVE-COTE in pairwise statistical tests, while NN-DTW-WW and EE showed the lowest average ranks among compared state-of-the-art methods.
- MCNN and t-LeNet, which use window slicing/subsequence extraction, yielded very low accuracies with only one win (Earthquakes); MCDCNN and Time-CNN performed similarly to MLP.
- ResNet was more stable across random initializations than FCN, with average standard deviation 1.48 versus 1.70; on DiatomSizeReduction, ResNet and FCN reached only 30% accuracy while Time-CNN reached 95%.
Methods
- The authors reimplemented nine discriminative end-to-end deep learning models (MLP, FCN, ResNet, Encoder, MCNN, t-LeNet, MCDCNN, Time-CNN, TWIESN) in a common Keras/TensorFlow framework and trained each with 10 random initializations on 97 datasets: 85 univariate UCR/UEA datasets and 12 multivariate datasets.
- In total, 8,730 experiments were run on a cluster of 60 GPUs; accuracy was averaged over the 10 runs, and comparisons with published state-of-the-art results used median test error.
- Statistical comparison used the Friedman test followed by pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm’s alpha correction (5%), visualized with critical difference diagrams.
Limitations
- The paper states that generative models and models using hand-engineered features were excluded, and that transfer learning, data augmentation, training/testing time, and normalization effects were not thoroughly studied.
- The paper acknowledges that non-deep state-of-the-art algorithms were not trained or tuned by the authors, so the comparison may favor DNNs; it also notes that the compared architectures may have been overfitted or empirically designed for the UCR/UEA archive.
- Evident from the text: the multivariate archive contains only 12 datasets, and the statistical test failed to find significant differences among the nine classifiers on that archive; ResNet’s hyperparameters were not tuned per dataset, and random initialization can significantly affect DNN accuracy.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 84 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 3
DNNs are able to achieve results that are not significantly different than COTE and HIVE-COTE using a deep residual network architecture.
“our experiments showed that not only DNNs are able to significantly outperform the NN-DTW, but are also able to achieve results that are not significantly different than COTE and HIVE-COTE using a deep residual network architecture (He et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites He et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wang et al., 2017b
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The UCR/UEA archive datasets are representative of TSC problems.
- Rests on an assumption: The deep learning implementations in the framework faithfully represent the original methods.
- Findingcitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 3
DNNs are able to significantly outperform NN-DTW on the evaluated TSC datasets.
“our experiments showed that not only DNNs are able to significantly outperform the NN-DTW, but are also able to achieve results that are not significantly different than COTE and HIVE-COTE using a deep residual network architecture (He et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites He et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wang et al., 2017b
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The UCR/UEA archive datasets are representative of TSC problems.
- Rests on an assumption: The deep learning implementations in the framework faithfully represent the original methods.
- Findingreasoning§ 3.2.2 Fully Convolutional Neural Network · p. 15
One of the advantages of FCNs is the invariance in the number of parameters for 4 layers (out of 5) across time series of different lengths.
“In addition, one of the advantages of FCNs is the invariance (denoted by # invar in Table 1) in the number of parameters for 4 layers (out of 5) across time series of different lengths.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 4.1.1 Univariate archive · p. 20
Twenty datasets contain a relatively small training set (50 or fewer instances) which surprisingly was not an impediment for obtaining high accuracy when applying a very deep architecture such as ResNet.
“We should note that twenty datasets contains a relatively small training set (50 or fewer instances) which surprisingly was not an impediment for obtaining high accuracy when applying a very deep architecture such as ResNet.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 2.3.2 Discriminative models · p. 12
CNN is the most widely applied architecture for the TSC problem.
“During our study, we found that CNN is the most widely applied architecture for the TSC problem”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 24
In the experiments comparing to state-of-the-art algorithms, the problem with ResNet > COTE > HIVE-COTE was encountered.
“In our experiments, when comparing to state-of-the-art algorithms, we have encountered this problem with (ResNet > COTE > HIVE- COTE).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5.3 Results for multivariate time series · p. 25
The statistical test failed to find any significant difference between the nine classifiers on the MTS archive.
“where the statistical test failed to find any significant difference between the nine classifiers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 22
ResNet significantly outperforms the FCN architecture on the univariate archive.
“and significantly outperforms the FCN architecture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 26
For electrocardiography (ECG) datasets (7 in total), ResNet was drastically beaten by the FCN model in 71.4% of ECG datasets.
“One exception is the electrocardiography (ECG) datasets (7 in total) where ResNet was drastically beaten by the FCN model in 71.4% of ECG datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 26
ResNet is the best performing approach across different domains.
“we can clearly see the dominance of ResNet as the best performing approach across different domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 23
Window Slicing based approaches yielded the lowest average ranks.
“this type of Window Slicing based approach yielded the lowest average ranks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 22
ResNet wins on 50 problems out of 85 on the univariate UCR/UEA archive.
“ResNet wins on 50 problems out of 85”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 23
The statistical test indicates a significant difference between Encoder, FCN and ResNet.
“The statistical test indicates a significant difference between Encoder, FCN and ResNet.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 24
HIVE-COTE and COTE are significantly different when performing the pairwise statistical test.
“Therefore we should emphasize that HIVE-COTE and COTE are significantly different when performing the pairwise statistical test.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 24
PF, ST, BOSS and ResNet showed similar performances according to the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
“PF, ST, BOSS and ResNet showed similar performances according to the Wilcoxon signed-rank test”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 23
MCDCNN did not manage to beat any of the classifiers except for the ECG5000 dataset.
“The MCDCNN did not manage to beat any of the classifiers except for the ECG5000 dataset”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 24
NN-DTW-WW and EE showed the lowest average rank.
“NN-DTW-WW and EE showed the lowest average rank”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 24
The statistical test failed to find any significant difference between COTE/HIVE-COTE and ResNet.
“The statistical test failed to find any significant difference between COTE/HIVE-COTE and ResNet”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 26
The time series length does not give information on deep learning approaches' performance.
“the time series length does not give information on deep learning approaches' performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5.3 Results for multivariate time series · p. 25
When adding the MTS datasets to the evaluation, the critical difference diagram in Figure 10 is not significantly different than the one in Figure 7, where only the univariate UCR/UEA archive was considered.
“when adding the MTS datasets to the evaluation, the critical difference diagram in Figure 10 is not significantly different than the one in Figure 7 (where only the univariate UCR/UEA archive was taken into consideration).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 23
Encoder shows relatively high accuracy.
“One approach that shows relatively high accuracy is Encoder (Serr` a et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 24
For the ten different random initializations of ResNet, the pairwise statistical test always failed to find any significance between ResNet and COTE/HIVE-COTE.
“Note that for the ten different random initializations of ResNet, the pairwise statistical test always failed to find any significance between ResNet and COTE/HIVE-COTE.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 25
HIVE-COTE is still the most accurate classifier when evaluated on the UCR/UEA archive.
“Although HIVE-COTE is still the most accurate classifier (when evaluated on the UCR/UEA archive)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.3 Results for multivariate time series · p. 25
Time-CNN and MCDCNN were outperformed by the three deep CNNs (ResNet, FCN and Encoder) on the 12 MTS classification datasets.
“they were outperformed by the three deep CNNs (ResNet, FCN and Encoder), which shows the superiority of these approaches on the MTS classification task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.5 Effect of random initializations · p. 29
FCN's performance is less stable compared to ResNet's.
“A deeper look into the minimum aggregation (red points in Figure 12) shows that FCN's performance is less stable compared to ResNet's.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 6.1.2 Meat dataset · p. 32
This non-discriminative subsequence is filtered out by the ResNet model, as seen by the blue color in the bottom right of Figure 14d and 14f.
“This subsequence is therefore filtered-out by the ResNet model which can be seen by the blue color in the bottom right of Figure 14d and 14f.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CAM visualizations faithfully indicate which time series regions contribute to class identification.
- Findingnone given§ 6.2 Multi-Dimensional Scaling · p. 34
ResNet and FCN reached the highest ranks when evaluated on the UCR/UEA archive.
“when evaluated on the UCR/UEA archive they reached the highest ranks”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.2 Multi-Dimensional Scaling · p. 35
When using raw input data and projecting it into a 2D space, the two classes of GunPoint are not linearly separable.
“We can easily observe in Figure 15a that when using the raw input data and projecting it into a 2D space, the two classes are not linearly separable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MDS plots with Euclidean distance on GAP vectors preserve class separability sufficiently to interpret model performance.
- Findingown data§ 6.1.2 Meat dataset · p. 32
ResNet's CAM highlights regions more firmly than FCN's CAM.
“We first observe that ResNet is much more firm when it comes to highlighting the regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.5 Effect of random initializations · p. 29
The average standard deviation of ResNet (1.48) is less than FCN's (1.70).
“This is also in agreement with the average standard deviation of ResNet (1.48) which is less than FCN's (1.70).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 27
The number of classes in a dataset did not show any significance when comparing the classifiers based on this characteristic.
“the number of classes in a dataset although it yielded some variability in the results for the recent TSC experimental study conducted by Bagnall et al. (2017) - did not show any significance when comparing the classifiers based on this characteristic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.2 Multi-Dimensional Scaling · p. 36
For the Wine dataset, all projections, even when using the learned representation, are not linearly separable.
“At first glimpse of Figure 16, the reader can conclude that all projections, even when using the learned representation, are not linearly separable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MDS plots with Euclidean distance on GAP vectors preserve class separability sufficiently to interpret model performance.
- Findingown data§ 6.1.2 Meat dataset · p. 32
On the Meat dataset, ResNet and FCN achieved significantly different accuracies of 97% and 83%, respectively.
“Finally, unlike for the GunPoint dataset, the two approaches ResNet and FCN reached significantly different results on Meat with respectively 97% and 83% accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 27
For the TwoPatterns dataset, ResNet's accuracy increases significantly when adding more training instances until it reaches 100% for 75% of the training data.
“Figure 11 shows the effect of the training size on ResNet's accuracy for the TwoPatterns dataset: the accuracy increases significantly when adding more training instances until it reaches 100% for 75% of the training data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.1.1 GunPoint dataset · p. 32
Both DNNs (FCN and ResNet) neglect the plateau non-discriminative regions of the time series when taking the classification decision on GunPoint.
“At first glance, we can clearly see how both DNNs are neglecting the plateau non-discriminative regions of the time series when taking the classification decision.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 6.1.1 GunPoint dataset · p. 32
For ResNet and FCN, the part where the actor lowers his/her arm seems to be also identified as potential discriminative regions for some time series.
“For ResNet and FCN, the part where the actor lowers his/her arm (bottom right of Figure 13) seems to be also identified as potential discriminative regions for some time series.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.5 Effect of random initializations · p. 29
ResNet has a better performance than FCN across most of the datasets regardless of the aggregation method (minimum, median, maximum).
“When first observing Figure 12 one can easily conclude that ResNet has a better performance than FCN across most of the datasets regardless of the aggregation method.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.2 Multi-Dimensional Scaling · p. 36
ResNet's learned hidden representation separates the Wine data from both classes in a much clearer way than FCN's.
“A thorough observation shows us that the learned hidden representation of ResNet (Figure 16c) separates the data from both classes in a much clearer way than the FCN (Figure 16b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MDS plots with Euclidean distance on GAP vectors preserve class separability sufficiently to interpret model performance.
- Findingown data§ 7 Conclusion · p. 37
End-to-end deep learning can achieve the current state-of-the-art performance for TSC with architectures such as Fully Convolutional Neural Networks and deep Residual Networks.
“Our results show that end-to-end deep learning can achieve the current state-of-the-art performance for TSC with architectures such as Fully Convolutional Neural Networks and deep Residual Networks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.1.1 GunPoint dataset · p. 32
The first most distinctive part of class-1 discovered by both classifiers is almost the same.
“Actually, the first most distinctive part of class-1 discovered by both classifiers is almost the same: the little red bump in the bottom left of Figure 13a and 13c.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.1.1 GunPoint dataset · p. 32
For highly discriminative regions, both models selected the same parts of the time series which correspond to the points with high derivatives.
“As for the highly discriminative regions (the red and yellow regions) both models were able to select the same parts of the time series which correspond to the points with high derivatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 6.1 Class Activation Map · p. 30
Only 2 out of the 9 approaches provided a method that explains the decision taken by a deep learning model.
“only 2 out of the 9 approaches provided a method that explains the decision taken by a deep learning model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.2 Multi-Dimensional Scaling · p. 35
By applying MDS on the latent representation learned by the network, one can easily separate the set of time series belonging to the two classes of GunPoint.
“On the other hand, in both Figures 15b and 15c, by applying MDS on the latent representation learned by the network, one can easily separate the set of time series belonging to the two classes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MDS plots with Euclidean distance on GAP vectors preserve class separability sufficiently to interpret model performance.
- Findingown data§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 28
MCNN and t-LeNet, where time series were cropped into subsequences, were the worst on average.
“MCNN and t-LeNet, where time series were cropped into subsequences, were the worst on average.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.1.2 Meat dataset · p. 32
The red subsequence highlighted by FCN's CAM for classes 2 and 3 at the bottom right of Figure 14c and 14e is non-discriminative because both classes exhibit this bump.
“By visually investigating this part of the time series, we clearly see that it is a non-discriminative part since the time series of both classes exhibit this bump.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CAM visualizations faithfully indicate which time series regions contribute to class identification.
- Interpretationown data§ Deep learning for time series classification: a review · p. 1
The paper's empirical study is the most exhaustive study of DNNs for TSC to date.
“By training 8,730 deep learning models on 97 time series datasets, we propose the most exhaustive study of DNNs for TSC to date.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 97 time series datasets used are sufficient to generalize about DNN performance for TSC.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 1 Introduction · p. 2
The nearest neighbor component of HIVE-COTE limits its deployment in a real-time setting.
“Therefore since the nearest neighbor constitutes an essential component of HIVE-COTE, its deployment in a real-time setting is still limited if not impractical.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 2
HIVE-COTE is currently considered the state-of-the-art algorithm for TSC when evaluated over the 85 datasets from the UCR/UEA archive.
“HIVE-COTE is currently considered the state-of-the-art algorithm for time series classification (Bagnall et al., 2017) when evaluated over the 85 datasets from the UCR/UEA archive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bagnall et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning§ 1 Introduction · p. 3
The paper used a common framework in Python, Keras and Tensorflow to train deep learning models on a cluster of more than 60 GPUs for fair comparison.
“Similarly to Bagnall et al. (2017), in order to have a fair comparison between the tested approaches, we developed a common framework in Python, Keras (Chollet, 2015) and Tensorflow (Abadi et al., 2015) to train the deep learning models on a cluster of more than 60 GPUs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bagnall et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chollet, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Abadi et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Deep learning for time series classification: a review · p. 1
Only a few TSC methods have considered Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to perform TSC.
“Among these methods, only a few have considered Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to perform this task.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 3 · plain
“Given that the latter questions have not been addressed by the TSC community, it is surprising how much recent papers have neglected the possibility that TSC problems could be solved using a pure feature learning algorithm (Neamtu et al., 2018; Bagnall et al., 2017; Lines et al., 2016).”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 3 · boosted
“In fact, a recent empirical study (Bagnall et al., 2017) evaluated 18 TSC algorithms on 85 time series datasets, none of which was a deep learning model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bagnall et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lines et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Neamtu et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 3 · plain
- Premisecitation§ 2.2.3 Echo State Networks · p. 8
RNNs typically suffer from the vanishing gradient problem due to training on long time series.
“(2) RNNs typically suffer from the vanishing gradient problem due to training on long time series (Pascanu et al., 2012);”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pascanu et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 3
The TSC community lacks an overview of the current performance of deep learning models for solving the TSC problem.
“This shows how much the community lacks of an overview of the current performance of deep learning models for solving the TSC problem (Lines et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lines et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.2.6 Time Le-Net · p. 18
t-LeNet is one of the approaches adopting a data augmentation technique to prevent overfitting especially for the relatively small time series datasets in the UCR/UEA archive.
“We should note that t-LeNet is one of the approaches adopting a data augmentation technique to prevent overfitting especially for the relatively small time series datasets in the UCR/UEA archive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Le Guennec et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2.3.2 Discriminative models · p. 12
CNNs are most useful for TSC by learning spatially invariant filters (or features) from raw input time series.
“This is where CNNs are most useful, by learning spatially invariant filters (or features) from raw input time series (Wang et al., 2017b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2017b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 3.2.2 Fully Convolutional Neural Network · p. 15
This invariance (due to using GAP) enables the use of a transfer learning approach where one can train a model on a certain source dataset and then fine-tune it on the target dataset.
“This invariance (due to using GAP) enables the use of a transfer learning approach where one can train a model on a certain source dataset and then fine-tune it on the target dataset (Ismail Fawaz et al., 2018c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ismail Fawaz et al., 2018c
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation§ 4.1.1 Univariate archive · p. 20
We tested each algorithm on the whole UCR/UEA archive which contains 85 univariate time series datasets.
“In order to have a thorough and fair experimental evaluation of all approaches, we tested each algorithm on the whole UCR/UEA archive (Chen et al., 2015b; Bagnall et al., 2017) which contains 85 univariate time series datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2015b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bagnall et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.1 Why discriminative end-to-end approaches ? · p. 13
The informal consensus in the literature is that generative models are usually less accurate than direct discriminative models.
“The informal consensus in the literature is that generative models are usually less accurate than direct discriminative models (Bagnall et al., 2017; Nguyen et al., 2017);”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bagnall et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nguyen et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3.1 Why discriminative end-to-end approaches ? · p. 13
If modifications for solving imbalanced TSC tasks were included, it would be much harder to determine if it is the choice of the deep learning classifier or the modification itself that improved the accuracy of the model.
“Therefore if we did include modifications for solving imbalanced TSC tasks, it would be much harder to determine if it is the choice of the deep learning classifier or the modification itself that improved the accuracy of the model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2.6 Time Le-Net · p. 17
The transferability of t-LeNet is limited to the first two convolutions whose number of parameters depends solely on the number and length of the chosen filters.
“Thus, the transferability of this network is limited to the first two convolutions whose number of parameters depends solely on the number and length of the chosen filters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.1.1 Univariate archive · p. 20
The time series in the UCR/UEA archive are already z-normalized.
“Note that the time series in this archive are already z-normalized (Bagnall et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bagnall et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.1 Why discriminative end-to-end approaches ? · p. 13
Imbalanced TSC problems can be solved using several techniques such as data augmentation and modifying the class weights.
“we emphasize that imbalanced TSC problems can be solved using several techniques such as data augmentation (Ismail Fawaz et al., 2018a) and modifying the class weights (Geng and Luo, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ismail Fawaz et al., 2018a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Geng and Luo, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.1 Why discriminative end-to-end approaches ? · p. 13
The accuracy of generative models depends highly on the chosen off-the-shelf classifier which is sometimes not even a neural network classifier.
“The accuracy of these models depends highly on the chosen off-the-shelf classifier which is sometimes not even a neural network classifier (Rajan and Thiagarajan, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rajan and Thiagarajan, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 23
The high accuracies of deep CNNs on time series data are due to their success in other sequential data such as speech recognition and sentence classification.
“The other more direct reason behind the high accuracies of deep CNNs on time series data is its success in other sequential data such as speech recognition (Hinton et al., 2012) and sentence classification (Kim, 2014)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hinton et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kim, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 26
Given the small sample size of only 7 ECG datasets, one cannot conclude that FCN will almost always outperform the ResNet model for ECG datasets.
“However, given the small sample size (only 7 datasets), we cannot conclude that FCN will almost always outperform the ResNet model for ECG datasets (Bagnall et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bagnall et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 22
In the original paper's results, FCN was found to outperform ResNet on 18 out of 44 datasets.
“This is in contrast to the original paper's results where FCN was found to outperform ResNet on 18 out of 44 datasets”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 22
Validating on a larger archive is important in order to have robust statistical significance.
“which shows the importance of validating on a larger archive in order to have a robust statistical significance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 23
MCDCNN's low performance is probably due to the non-linear FC layer that replaces the GAP pooling of the best performing algorithms FCN and ResNet.
“This low performance is probably due to the non-linear FC layer that replaces the GAP pooling of the best performing algorithms (FCN and ResNet).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 25
DNNs offer scalability evidenced by their revolution in computer vision when applied to images, which are thousand times larger than time series data.
“On the other hand, DNNs offer this type of scalability evidenced by its revolution in the field of computer vision when applied to images, which are thousand times larger than time series data (Russakovsky et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Russakovsky et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 25
Bostrom and Bagnall (2015) showed that it is possible to use a random sampling approach to decrease significantly the running time of ST without any loss of accuracy.
“the recent work of Bostrom and Bagnall (2015) showed that it is possible to use a random sampling approach to decrease significantly the running time of ST (HIVECOTE's choke-point) without any loss of accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bostrom and Bagnall (2015)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ 5.3 Results for multivariate time series · p. 25
The three deep CNNs (ResNet, FCN and Encoder) show superiority on the MTS classification task.
“which shows the superiority of these approaches on the MTS classification task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 24
ResNet is the only TSC algorithm that was able to reach similar performance to COTE.
“which is the only TSC algorithm that was able to reach similar performance to COTE.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 27
The simple architecture of Time-CNN renders overfitting the dataset much harder.
“This simple architecture of Time-CNN renders overfitting the dataset much harder.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 23
The poor performances of MCNN and t-LeNet suggest that slicing time series into subsequences does not guarantee that the discriminative information of a time series has not been lost.
“The poor performances (worst average ranks) for these two approaches suggest that this ad-hoc method of slicing the time series does not guarantee that the discriminative information of a time series has not been lost.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 24
The ranking of the compared classifiers is stable for the ten different random initializations of ResNet.
“we generated the ten different average ranks for each iteration of ResNet and observed that the ranking of the compared classifiers is stable for the ten different random initializations of ResNet.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 27
Time-CNN's shallow architecture is unable to capture the variability in larger time series datasets which is modeled efficiently by the FCN and ResNet architectures.
“however this shallow architecture is unable to capture the variability in larger time series datasets which is modeled efficiently by the FCN and ResNet architectures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 25
HIVE-COTE's use in a real data mining application is limited due to its huge training time complexity O(N^2 · T^4), corresponding to the training time of one of its individual classifiers ST.
“its use in a real data mining application is limited due to its huge training time complexity which is O ( N 2 · T 4 ) corresponding to the training time of one of its individual classifiers ST.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning§ 4.1.2 Multivariate archive · p. 21
Because the data is pre-processed using the same technique for all nine classifiers, the accuracy improvement of certain models can be attributed to the model itself, to some extent.
“Since the data is pre-processed using the same technique for all nine classifiers, we can safely say, to some extent, that the accuracy improvement of certain models can be solely attributed to the model itself.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 23
The fact that FCN wins on more datasets than Encoder suggests the superiority of the GAP layer compared to Encoder's attention mechanism.
“which suggests the superiority of the GAP layer compared to Encoder's attention mechanism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 27
The small number of filters in Time-CNN is the main reason behind its success on small datasets.
“Therefore, we conclude that the small number of filters in Time-CNN is the main reason behind its success on small datasets”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 26
This suggests that ESNs can solve the vanishing gradient problem especially when learning from long time series.
“This would suggest that ESNs can solve the vanishing gradient problem especially when learning from long time series.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.3 Results for multivariate time series · p. 25
The similarity between Figure 10 and Figure 7 is probably due to the fact that the algorithms' performance over the 12 MTS datasets is negligible to a certain degree when compared to the performance over the 85 univariate datasets.
“This is probably due to the fact that the algorithms' performance over the 12 MTS datasets is negligible to a certain degree when compared to the performance over the 85 univariate datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.3 Results for multivariate time series · p. 25
The failure to find significant difference between the nine classifiers on MTS is mainly due to the small number of datasets compared to their univariate counterpart.
“which is mainly due to the small number of datasets compared to their univariate counterpart.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 22
Deep architectures generally need a huge amount of data in order to generalize well on unseen examples.
“These types of deep architectures generally need a huge amount of data in order to generalize well on unseen examples (He et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites He et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 6.1.2 Meat dataset · p. 32
ResNet can filter out non-discriminative and discriminative regions with higher confidence than FCN.
“showing that ResNet can filter out non-discriminative and discriminative regions with a higher confidence than FCN”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CAM visualizations faithfully indicate which time series regions contribute to class identification.
- Premisenone given§ 6.1.1 GunPoint dataset · p. 32
Hills et al. (2014) introduced a shapelet transformation based approach that discovered shapelets similar to the ones identified by Ye and Keogh (2011).
“Hills et al. (2014) introduced a shapelet transformation based approach that discovered shapelets that are similar to the ones identified by Ye and Keogh (2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning§ 6.1.2 Meat dataset · p. 32
ResNet's superiority over FCN is mainly due to ResNet's ability to filter out non-distinctive regions of the time series.
“These results suggest that ResNet's superiority over FCN is mainly due to the former's ability to filter-out non-distinctive regions of the time series.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CAM visualizations faithfully indicate which time series regions contribute to class identification.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 6.2 Multi-Dimensional Scaling · p. 35
The linearly separable projection of GunPoint data by both models explains why both models performed equally very well on this dataset with almost 100% accuracy.
“which explains why both models performed equally very well on this dataset with almost 100% accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MDS plots with Euclidean distance on GAP vectors preserve class separability sufficiently to interpret model performance.
- Premisecitation§ 6.1.1 GunPoint dataset · p. 32
Cui et al. (2016) provided a mathematical proof that learned filters in a CNN can be considered a generic form of shapelets extracted by the learning shapelets algorithm.
“This observation would also be backed up by the mathematical proof provided by Cui et al. (2016), that showed how the learned filters in a CNN can be considered a generic form of shapelets extracted by the learning shapelets algorithm (Grabocka et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cui et al. (2016)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Grabocka et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 6.1.1 GunPoint dataset · p. 32
Ye and Keogh (2011) identified that the most important shapelet for the Gun/NoGun classification occurs when the actor's arm is lowered.
“Ye and Keogh (2011) identified that the most important shapelet for the Gun/NoGun classification occurs when the actor's arm is lowered (about 120 on the horizontal axis in Figure 13).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ye and Keogh (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ 7 Conclusion · p. 37
The blackbox effect of deep models, which renders them uninterpretable, can be mitigated with a Class Activation Map visualization that highlights which parts of the input time series contributed the most to a certain class identification.
“Finally, we showed how the blackbox effect of deep models which renders them uninterpretable, can be mitigated with a Class Activation Map visualization that highlights which parts of the input time series, contributed the most to a certain class identification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CAM visualizations faithfully indicate which time series regions contribute to class identification.
- Premisecitation§ 7 Conclusion · p. 37
Deep learning for time series classification, unlike for computer vision and NLP tasks, still lacks a thorough study of data augmentation and transfer learning.
“deep learning for time series classification, unlike for computer vision and NLP tasks, still lacks a thorough study of data augmentation (Ismail Fawaz et al., 2018a; Forestier et al., 2017) and transfer learning (Ismail Fawaz et al., 2018c; Serr` a et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ismail Fawaz et al., 2018a; Forestier et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ismail Fawaz et al., 2018c; Serr` a et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 6.2 Multi-Dimensional Scaling · p. 34
Euclidean Distance is usually not able to strongly separate raw time series, as evident by the low accuracy of nearest neighbor when coupled with ED.
“This straightforward approach supposes that the ED is able to strongly separate the raw time series, which is usually not the case evident by the low accuracy of the nearest neighbor when coupled with ED (Bagnall et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bagnall et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 6.1 Class Activation Map · p. 30
Wang et al. (2017b) was the only paper to propose an interpretable analysis of TSC with a DNN.
“Note that Wang et al. (2017b) was the only paper to propose an interpretable analysis of TSC with a DNN.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al. (2017b)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 6.1.2 Meat dataset · p. 32
ResNet's ability to filter out non-distinctive regions is attributed to its residual connections between convolutional blocks, which enable the model to learn to skip unnecessary convolutions via shortcut links.
“We attribute this ability to the main characteristic of ResNet which is composed of the residual connections between the convolutional blocks that enable the model to learn to skip unnecessary convolutions by dint of its shortcut links (He et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites He et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 6.2 Multi-Dimensional Scaling · p. 34
The last latent representation of a DNN (directly before the softmax classifier) is known to be a class specific layer.
“which is known to be a class specific layer (Yosinski et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yosinski et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ 6.2 Multi-Dimensional Scaling · p. 36
This observation could explain why ResNet achieves a better performance than FCN on the Wine dataset.
“This observation could explain why ResNet achieves a better performance than FCN on the Wine dataset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MDS plots with Euclidean distance on GAP vectors preserve class separability sufficiently to interpret model performance.
- Premisecitation§ 6.1 Class Activation Map · p. 30
Employing the CAM is only possible for approaches with a GAP layer preceding the softmax classifier.
“Note that employing the CAM is only possible for the approaches with a GAP layer preceding the softmax classifier (Zhou et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhou et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 47
- May combine two claims. 52
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 1 Introduction · p. 3Poor random initializations can have a significant effect on a DNN's performance.
“Finally, we analyze how poor random initializations can have a significant effect on a DNN's performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 3.2.2 Fully Convolutional Neural Network · p. 15FCN does not hold any pooling nor a regularization operation.
“We can see that FCN does not hold any pooling nor a regularization operation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 3.2.3 Residual Network · p. 15Similarly to the FCN model, the layers (except the final one) in the ResNet architecture have an invariant number of parameters across different datasets.
“Similarly to the FCN model, the layers (except the final one) in the ResNet architecture have an invariant number of parameters across different datasets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 22ResNet significantly outperforms the other approaches on the 85 univariate UCR/UEA datasets with an average rank of almost 2.
“The ResNet significantly outperforms the other approaches with an average rank of almost 2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 27Time-CNN is the smallest model: it contains a very small number of parameters by design with only 18 filters compared to the 512 filters of FCN.
“This suggestion is also supported by the fact that Time-CNN is the smallest model: it contains a very small number of parameters by design with only 18 filters compared to the 512 filters of FCN.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 27ResNet and FCN dominate with not much of a difference when grouped by training set size.
“Again, ResNet and FCN still dominate with not much of a difference.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 23ResNet is the most accurate DNN of the study with similar runtime to FCN, the second most accurate DNN.
“our empirical study strongly suggests to use ResNet instead of any other deep learning algorithm - it is the most accurate one with similar runtime to FCN (the second most accurate DNN).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 22Although the datasets used in the experiments are relatively small compared to billions of labeled images, the deepest networks reached competitive accuracies on the UCR/UEA archive benchmark.
“Although the datasets used in our experiments are relatively small compared to the billions of labeled images (such as ImageNet (Russakovsky et al., 2015) and OpenImages (Krasin et al., 2017) challenges), the deepest networks did reach competitive accuracies on the UCR/UEA archive benchmark.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 23MCNN and t-LeNet architectures yielded very low accuracies with only one win for the Earthquakes dataset.
“The MCNN and t-LeNet architectures yielded very low accuracies with only one win for the Earthquakes dataset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 23FCN wins on 36 datasets whereas Encoder wins only on 17.
“FCN wins on 36 datasets whereases Encoder wins only on 17”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 27On DiatomSizeReduction, ResNet and FCN achieved the worst accuracy (30%) while Time-CNN reached the best accuracy (95%).
“ResNet and FCN achieved the worst accuracy (30%) on this dataset while Time-CNN reached the best accuracy (95%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 26TWIESN did reach competitive accuracies on several long time series datasets, such as reaching a 96.8% accuracy on Meat whose time series length is equal to 448.
“However, TWIESN did reach competitive accuracies on several long time series datasets such as reaching a 96.8% accuracy on Meat whose time series length is equal to 448.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 28Overall, on average, ResNet is the best architecture with FCN and Encoder following as second and third respectively.
“Overall, our results show that, on average, ResNet is the best architecture with FCN and Encoder following as second and third respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 6.2 Multi-Dimensional Scaling · p. 36FCN's learned representation has too many data points close to the decision boundary, whereas ResNet's hidden features enable projecting data points further away from the decision boundary.
“In other words, FCN's learned representation has too many data points close to the decision boundary whereas ResNet's hidden features enables projecting data points further away from the decision boundary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MDS plots with Euclidean distance on GAP vectors preserve class separability sufficiently to interpret model performance.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 6.2 Multi-Dimensional Scaling · p. 36FCN and ResNet accuracy on Wine are 58.7% and 74.4% respectively.
“which is evident by the relatively low accuracy of both models FCN and ResNet which is equal respectively to 58.7% and 74.4%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 6.1.2 Meat dataset · p. 32FCN's CAM contains smoother regions with cyan, green and yellow, whereas ResNet's CAM contains more dark red and blue subsequences.
“In other words, FCN's CAM contains much more smoother regions with cyan, green and yellow regions, whereas ResNet's CAM contains more dark red and blue subsequences”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 28ResNet performed very well in general except for the ECG datasets where it was outperformed by FCN.
“ResNet performed very well in general except for the ECG datasets where it was outperformed by FCN.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.5 Effect of random initializations · p. 29The weight's initial value can easily decrease the accuracy of FCN whereas ResNet maintained a relatively high accuracy when taking the worst initial weight values.
“In other words, the weight's initial value can easily decrease the accuracy of FCN whereas ResNet maintained a relatively high accuracy when taking the worst initial weight values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 28There is small variance between the approaches that replace the GAP layer with an FC dense layer (MCDCNN, CNN), which also showed similar performance to TWIESN and MLP.
“We found small variance between the approaches that replace the GAP layer with an FC dense layer (MCDCNN, CNN) which also showed similar performance to TWIESN and MLP.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 6.2 Multi-Dimensional Scaling · p. 35Both FCN and ResNet managed to project the GunPoint data into a linearly separable space.
“We note that both deep learning models (FCN and ResNet) managed to project the data from GunPoint into a linearly separable space”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MDS plots with Euclidean distance on GAP vectors preserve class separability sufficiently to interpret model performance.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.5 Effect of random initializations · p. 28DNNs for TSC suffer from a significant decrease (increase) in accuracy when initialized with bad (good) random weights.
“we observed in our experiments, that DNNs for TSC suffer from a significant decrease (increase) in accuracy when initialized with bad (good) random weights.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Deep learning for time series classification: a review · p. 1DNNs have revolutionized computer vision, especially with deeper architectures such as Residual and Convolutional Neural Networks.
“DNNs have indeed revolutionized the field of computer vision especially with the advent of novel deeper architectures such as Residual and Convolutional Neural Networks.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have revolutionized the field of computer vision (Krizhevsky et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Krizhevsky et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 2HIVE-COTE is hugely computationally intensive and impractical to run on a real big data mining problem.
“To achieve its high accuracy, HIVE-COTE becomes hugely computationally intensive and impractical to run on a real big data mining problem (Bagnall et al., 2017).”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · hedged
“The approach requires training 37 classifiers as well as cross-validating each hyperparameter of these algorithms, which makes the approach infeasible to train in some situations (Lucas et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bagnall et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lucas et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · hedged
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Deep learning for time series classification: a review · p. 1Sequential data such as text and audio can be processed with DNNs to reach state-of-the-art performance for document classification and speech recognition.
“Apart from images, sequential data such as text and audio can also be processed with DNNs to reach state-of-the-art performance for document classification and speech recognition.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Following the success of deep neural networks (DNNs) in computer vision, a huge amount of research proposed several DNN architectures to solve natural language processing (NLP) tasks such as machine translation (Sutskever et al., 2014; Bahdanau et al., 2015), learning word embeddings (Mikolov et al., 2013; Mikolov et al., 2013) and document classification (Le and Mikolov, 2014; Goldberg, 2016). DN”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Sutskever et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hinton et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Le and Mikolov, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 3The paper used a Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Holm's alpha correction for pairwise post-hoc analysis.
“Once we have established that a statistical difference exists within the classifiers' performance, we followed the pairwise post-hoc analysis recommended by Benavoli et al. (2016) where the average rank comparison is replaced by a Wilcoxon signed-rank test (Wilcoxon, 1945) with Holm's alpha correction (Holm, 1979; Garcia and Herrera, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Benavoli et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wilcoxon, 1945 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Holm, 1979
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 3Deep learning models can handle the curse of dimensionality by leveraging different degrees of smoothness in compositional function and parallel computations of GPUs.
“The multivariate evaluation shows another benefit of deep learning models, which is the ability to handle the curse of dimensionality (Bellman, 2010; Keogh and Mueen, 2017) by leveraging different degrees of smoothness in compositional function (Poggio et al., 2017) as well as the parallel computations of the GPUs (Lu et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bellman, 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Poggio et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lu et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The UCR/UEA archive datasets are representative of TSC problems.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.2.3 Echo State Networks · p. 8RNNs were rarely applied for time series classification because they are designed mainly to predict an output for each time stamp.
“Apart from time series forecasting, we found that these neural networks were rarely applied for time series classification which is mainly due to three factors: (1) the type of this architecture is designed mainly to predict an output for each element (time stamp) in the time series (L¨ angkvist et al., 2014);”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites L¨ angkvist et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.2.3 Echo State Networks · p. 8RNNs are considered hard to train and parallelize.
“(3) RNNs are considered hard to train and parallelize which led the researchers to avoid using them for computational reasons (Pascanu et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pascanu et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.2.3 Echo State Networks · p. 9ESNs were designed to mitigate the challenges of RNNs by eliminating the need to compute the gradient for hidden layers, reducing training time and avoiding the vanishing gradient problem.
“They were designed to mitigate the challenges of RNNs by eliminating the need to compute the gradient for the hidden layers which reduces the training time of these neural networks thus avoiding the vanishing gradient problem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gallicchio and Micheli, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Deep learning for time series classification: a review · p. 1Deep learning has seen very successful applications in the last years.
“This is surprising as deep learning has seen very successful applications in the last years.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“After having established the current state-of-the-art of non deep classifiers for TSC (Bagnall et al., 2017), we discuss the success of Deep Learning (LeCun et al., 2015) in various classification tasks which motivated the recent utilization of deep learning models for TSC (Wang et al., 2017b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites LeCun et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wang et al., 2017b
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2.3 Generative or discriminative approaches · p. 10Deep learning approaches for TSC can be separated into two main categories: generative and discriminative models.
“Deep learning approaches for TSC can be separated into two main categories: the generative and the discriminative models (as proposed in L¨ angkvist et al. (2014)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites L¨ angkvist et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 3The paper used the Friedman test to reject the null hypothesis when comparing classifiers over multiple datasets.
“As for comparing the classifiers over multiple datasets, we followed the recommendations in Demˇ sar (2006) and used the Friedman test (Friedman, 1940) to reject the null hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Demˇ sar, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Friedman, 1940 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2.3.1 Generative models · p. 10Generative models usually exhibit an unsupervised training step that precedes the learning phase of the classifier.
“Generative models usually exhibit an unsupervised training step that precedes the learning phase of the classifier (L¨ angkvist et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites L¨ angkvist et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 1 Introduction · p. 2The decision taken by HIVE-COTE's 37 classifiers cannot be interpreted easily by domain experts.
“Finally, adding to the huge runtime of HIVE-COTE, the decision taken by 37 classifiers cannot be interpreted easily by domain experts, since researchers already struggle with understanding the decisions taken by an individual classifier.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2.1 Multi Layer Perceptron · p. 14MLP does not have any layer whose number of parameters is invariant across time series of different lengths, which means that the transferability of the network is not trivial: the number of parameters (weights) of the network depends directly on the length of the input time series.
“MLP does not have any layer whose number of parameters is invariant across time series of different lengths (denoted by # invar in Table 1) which means that the transferability of the network is not trivial: the number of parameters (weights) of the network depends directly on the length of the input time series.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.2.4 Encoder · p. 16The careful design of Encoder's attention mechanism enabled the invariance across all layers which encouraged the authors to implement a transfer learning approach.
“One final note is that the careful design of Encoder's attention mechanism enabled the invariance across all layers which encouraged the authors to implement a transfer learning approach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Serr` a et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.3.2 Discriminative models · p. 12Residual Networks (ResNets) add linear shortcut connections for the convolutional layers, potentially enhancing the model's accuracy.
“Residual Networks (ResNets) (Wang et al., 2017b; Geng and Luo, 2018) which add linear shortcut connections for the convolutional layers potentially enhancing the model's accuracy (He et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites He et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitation§ 2.2 Deep learning for time series classification · p. 5The paper adopted accuracy to measure model performance on test data.
“To measure the performance of the model on the test data (generalization), we adopted the accuracy measure (similarly to Bagnall et al. (2017)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bagnall et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.2.9 Time Warping Invariant Echo State Network · p. 19ESNs were originally proposed for time series forecasting, but Tanisaro and Heidemann (2016) proposed a variant of ESNs that uses directly the raw input time series and predicts a probability distribution over the class variables.
“Although ESNs were originally proposed for time series forecasting, Tanisaro and Heidemann (2016) proposed a variant of ESNs that uses directly the raw input time series and predicts a probability distribution over the class variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tanisaro and Heidemann, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.2.2 Fully Convolutional Neural Network · p. 14The replacement of the traditional final FC layer with a Global Average Pooling (GAP) layer reduces drastically the number of parameters in a neural network while enabling the use of the CAM that highlights which parts of the input time series contributed the most to a certain classification.
“In addition, one of the main characteristics of this architecture is the replacement of the traditional final FC layer with a Global Average Pooling (GAP) layer which reduces drastically the number of parameters in a neural network while enabling the use of the CAM (Zhou et al., 2016) that highlights which parts of the input time series contributed the most to a certain classification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhou et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.2.4 Encoder · p. 15The latter approach (pre-train then fine-tune) reached higher accuracy thus benefiting from the transfer learning technique.
“The latter approach reached higher accuracy thus benefiting from the transfer learning technique.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Serr` a et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2.3.2 Discriminative models · p. 12End-to-end deep learning aims to incorporate the feature learning process while fine-tuning the discriminative classifier.
“In contrast to feature engineering, end-to-end deep learning aims to incorporate the feature learning process while fine-tuning the discriminative classifier (Nweke et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nweke et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.2 Discriminative models · p. 12The popularity of CNNs for TSC is probably due to their robustness and the relatively small amount of training time compared to complex architectures such as RNNs or MLPs.
“which is probably due to their robustness and the relatively small amount of training time compared to complex architectures such as RNNs or MLPs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoning§ 4.1.2 Multivariate archive · p. 21For memory usage limitations over a single GPU, we left the MTS dataset Performance Measurement System (PeMS) out of our experimentations.
“For memory usage limitations over a single GPU, we left the MTS dataset Performance Measurement System (PeMS) out of our experimentations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2.6 Time Le-Net · p. 17Unlike ResNet and FCN, t-LeNet does not have much invariant layers (2 out of 4) due to the use of an FC layer instead of a GAP layer, thus increasing drastically the number of parameters needed to be trained which also depends on the length of the input time series.
“Unlike ResNet and FCN, this approach does not have much invariant layers (2 out of 4) due to the use of an FC layer instead of a GAP layer, thus increasing drastically the number of parameters needed to be trained which also depends on the length of the input time series.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 3.1 Why discriminative end-to-end approaches ? · p. 13The accuracy of deep learning methods in human activity recognition depends highly on the quality of the extracted features.
“This has also been the consensus in the human activity recognition literature, where the accuracy of deep learning methods depends highly on the quality of the extracted features (Nweke et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nweke et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitation§ 4.1.2 Multivariate archive · p. 21We also evaluated all deep learning models on Baydogan's archive that contains 13 MTS classification datasets.
“We also evaluated all deep learning models on Baydogan's archive (Baydogan, 2015) that contains 13 MTS classification datasets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baydogan, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 3.1 Why discriminative end-to-end approaches ? · p. 13Any deep learning algorithm can benefit from modifications for solving imbalanced TSC tasks.
“However, any deep learning algorithm can benefit from this type of modification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2.3 Residual Network · p. 15We can easily pre-train a model on a source dataset, then transfer and fine-tune it on a target dataset without having to modify the hidden layers of the network.
“That being said, we can easily pre-train a model on a source dataset, then transfer and fine-tune it on a target dataset without having to modify the hidden layers of the network.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.1.2 Multivariate archive · p. 21This archive also exhibits datasets with different characteristics such as the length of the time series which, unlike the UCR/UEA archive, varies among the same dataset. This is due to the fact that the datasets in the UCR/UEA archive are already re-scaled to have an equal length among one dataset.
“This archive also exhibits datasets with different characteristics such as the length of the time series which, unlike the UCR/UEA archive, varies among the same dataset. This is due to the fact that the datasets in the UCR/UEA archive are already re-scaled to have an equal length among one dataset (Bagnall et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bagnall et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2.2 Fully Convolutional Neural Network · p. 14FCNs are mainly convolutional networks that do not contain any local pooling layers, which means that the length of a time series is kept unchanged throughout the convolutions.
“FCNs are mainly convolutional networks that do not contain any local pooling layers which means that the length of a time series is kept unchanged throughout the convolutions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.2.5 Multi-scale Convolutional Neural Network · p. 16Cui et al. (2016) were the first to introduce the Window Slicing (WS) method as a data augmentation technique.
“Cui et al. (2016) were the first to introduce the Window Slicing (WS) method as a data augmentation technique.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cui et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.2.3 Residual Network · p. 15A linear shortcut is added to link the output of a residual block to its input thus enabling the flow of the gradient directly through these connections, which makes training a DNN much easier by reducing the vanishing gradient effect.
“Actually, the difference with the usual convolutions (such as in FCNs) is that a linear shortcut is added to link the output of a residual block to its input thus enabling the flow of the gradient directly through these connections, which makes training a DNN much easier by reducing the vanishing gradient effect (He et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites He et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 2.3.2 Discriminative models · p. 12The problem with an MLP approach is that temporal information is lost and the features learned are no longer time-invariant.
“The problem with an MLP approach is that temporal information is lost and the features learned are no longer time-invariant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.1 Why discriminative end-to-end approaches ? · p. 13The main goal of deep learning approaches is to remove the bias due to manually designed features, thus enabling the network to learn the most discriminant useful features for the classification task.
“We made this choice because we believe that the main goal of deep learning approaches is to remove the bias due to manually designed features (Ord´ o¨ nez and Roggen, 2016), thus enabling the network to learn the most discriminant useful features for the classification task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ord´ o¨ nez and Roggen, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 4.1.2 Multivariate archive · p. 21The length of a time series is not an issue for time series classification problems.
“This form of pre-processing has also been used by Ratanamahatana and Keogh (2005) to show that the length of a time series is not an issue for TSC problems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ratanamahatana and Keogh (2005)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 3.2.7 Multi Channel Deep Convolutional Neural Network · p. 18By using an FC layer before the softmax classifier, the transferability of MCDCNN is limited to the first and second convolutional layers.
“By using an FC layer before the softmax classifier, the transferability of this network is limited to the first and second convolutional layers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2.8 Time Convolutional Neural Network · p. 18Time-CNN uses mean squared error (MSE) instead of the traditional categorical cross-entropy loss function, and the final layer is a traditional FC layer with sigmoid as the activation function, which does not guarantee a sum of probabilities equal to 1.
“The first characteristic of Time-CNN is the use of the mean squared error (MSE) instead of the traditional categorical cross-entropy loss function, which has been used by all the deep learning approaches we have mentioned so far. Hence, instead of a softmax classifier, the final layer is a traditional FC layer with sigmoid as the activation function, which does not guarantee a sum of probabilities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2.6 Time Le-Net · p. 17Unlike GAP, local pooling introduces invariance to small perturbations in the activation map by taking the maximum value in a local pooling window.
“Unlike GAP, local pooling introduces invariance to small perturbations in the activation map (the result of a convolution) by taking the maximum value in a local pooling window.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoning§ 5.2.1 The need of a fair comparison · p. 25Since the authors did not train nor test any of the state-of-the-art non-deep learning algorithms, it is possible that they allowed much more training time for the described DNNs.
“Since we did not train nor test any of the state-of-the-art non deep learning algorithms, it is possible that we allowed much more training time for the described DNNs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 22Deeper neural networks are much more successful than shallower architectures in computer vision.
“our findings are in agreement with the deep learning for computer vision literature where deeper neural networks are much more successful than shallower architectures (He et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites He et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 27DiatomSizeReduction is the smallest dataset in the UCR/UEA archive with 16 training instances, which suggests that ResNet and FCN are easily overfitting this dataset.
“Interestingly, DiatomSizeReduction is the smallest datasets in the UCR/UEA archive (with 16 training instances), which suggests that ResNet and FCN are easily overfitting this dataset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1.2 Multivariate archive · p. 21Linear interpolation preprocessing is very important for deep learning models whose architecture depends on input time series length, such as MLP, and for parallel computation over GPUs.
“This step is very important for deep learning models whose architecture depends on the length of the input time series (such as a MLP) and for parallel computation over the GPUs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The MTS archive contains time series of unequal length.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 25HIVE-COTE's classification time is bounded by a linear scan of the training set due to employing a nearest neighbor classifier, whereas the trivial GPU parallelization of DNNs provides instant classification.
“In addition to the huge training time, HIVE-COTE's classification time is bounded by a linear scan of the training set due to employing a nearest neighbor classifier, whereas the trivial GPU parallelization of DNNs provides instant classification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 26Because increasing the number of convolutional layers increases the path length viewed by the CNN model, ResNet and FCN managed to outperform other approaches whose filter length is longer, such as Encoder.
“since increasing the number of convolutional layers will increase the path length viewed by the CNN model (Vaswani et al., 2017), ResNet and FCN managed to outperform other approaches whose filter length is longer (21) such as Encoder.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vaswani et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 23The FC layer reduces the effect of learning time invariant features, which explains why MLP, Time-CNN and MCDCNN exhibit very similar performance.
“This FC layer reduces the effect of learning time invariant features which explains why MLP, Time-CNN and MCDCNN exhibit very similar performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 5.2.1 The need of a fair comparison · p. 25Allowing a much more thorough search of DTW's warping window would lead to a fairer comparison between deep learning approaches and other state-of-the-art TSC algorithms.
“Therefore, we believe that allowing a much more thorough search of DTW's warping window would lead to a fairer comparison between deep learning approaches and other state-of-the-art TSC algorithms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 25ResNet's hyperparameters were not tuned for each dataset; rather, the same architecture was used for the whole benchmark.
“unlike HIVE-COTE, ResNet's hyperparameters were not tuned for each dataset but rather the same architecture was used for the whole benchmark”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 27In order to achieve high accuracies while training a DNN, a large training set is needed.
“One final observation that is in agreement with the deep learning literature is that in order to achieve high accuracies while training a DNN, a large training set is needed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 24NN-DTW-WW and EE are no longer competitive with current state-of-the-art algorithms for TSC.
“suggesting that these methods are no longer competitive with current state-of-the-art algorithms for TSC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 25Further investigation of ResNet's hyperparameters should improve DNNs' accuracy for TSC.
“suggesting further investigation of these hyperparameters should improve DNNs' accuracy for TSC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 23Discovering patterns in a one-dimensional space (time) should be an easier task for CNNs than in two-dimensional space, thus requiring less data to learn from.
“it is only natural to think that discovering patterns in a one dimensional space (time) should be an easier task for CNNs thus requiring less data to learn from.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone given§ 4.2 Experiments · p. 21Taking the mean accuracy over 10 runs with different random weight initializations reduces the bias due to the weights' initial values.
“which enables us to take the mean accuracy over the 10 runs in order to reduce the bias due to the weights' initial values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 5.2.1 The need of a fair comparison · p. 25For a lazy machine learning algorithm such as NN-DTW, training time is zero when allowing maximum warping, whereas judicially setting the warping window can lead to a significant increase in accuracy.
“for a lazy machine learning algorithm such as NN-DTW, training time is zero when allowing maximum warping whereas it has been shown that judicially setting the warping window Dau et al. (2017) can lead to a significant increase in accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dau et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 5.3 Results for multivariate time series · p. 25There is a need to have an equally large MTS classification archive in order to evaluate hybrid univariate/multivariate time series classifiers.
“These observations reinforces the need to have an equally large MTS classification archive in order to evaluate hybrid univariate/multivariate time series classifiers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 24The fact that ResNet is not significantly different than COTE suggests that more datasets would give a better insight into these performances.
“but the fact that ResNet is not significantly different than COTE suggests that more datasets would give a better insight into these performances (Demˇ sar, 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Demˇ sar, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 24Cliques formed by the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test with Holm's alpha correction do not necessarily reflect the rank order.
“It is worthwhile noting that cliques formed by the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test with Holm's alpha correction do not necessary reflect the rank order (Lines et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lines et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 5.3 Results for multivariate time series · p. 25Time-CNN and MCDCNN are the only architectures originally proposed for MTS data.
“Although Time-CNN and MCDCNN are the only architectures originally proposed for MTS data”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 22The success of ResNet is highly due to its deep flexible architecture.
“We believe that the success of ResNet is highly due to its deep flexible architecture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.1.2 Multivariate archive · p. 21Normalization is known to have a huge effect on DNNs' learning capabilities.
“especially since normalization is known to have a huge effect on DNNs' learning capabilities (Zhang et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 6.1.2 Meat dataset · p. 32The difference in accuracy between ResNet and FCN on Meat is probably explained by ResNet's ability to filter out non-discriminative and discriminative regions with higher confidence.
“which probably explains why FCN is less accurate than ResNet on this dataset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CAM visualizations faithfully indicate which time series regions contribute to class identification.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 27Most DNN architectures, with categorical cross-entropy as their cost function, employ mainly the same classifier: softmax, which is basically designed for multi-class classification.
“In fact, most DNNs architectures, with the categorical cross-entropy as their cost function, employ mainly the same classifier: softmax which is basically designed for multi-class classification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 6.1.1 GunPoint dataset · p. 32The shapelet transformation classifier (Hills et al., 2014) is an ensemble approach, which makes unclear how the shapelets affect the decision taken by the individual classifiers, whereas for an end-to-end deep learning model the classification can be directly explained by using the Class Activation Map.
“we stress that the shapelet transformation classifier (Hills et al., 2014) is an ensemble approach, which makes unclear how the shapelets affect the decision taken by the individual classifiers whereas for an end-to-end deep learning model we can directly explain the classification by using the Class Activation Map.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hills et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 6.1.1 GunPoint dataset · p. 32The part where the actor raises his/her arm seems to be also a discriminative part of the data, which suggests that the deep learning algorithms are identifying more 'shapelets'.
“On the other hand, the part where the actor raises his/her arm seems to be also a discriminative part of the data which suggests that the deep learning algorithms are identifying more 'shapelets'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 6.1.1 GunPoint dataset · p. 32CNNs have the ability to localize a given discriminative shape regardless where it appears in the time series, which is evidence for CNNs' capability of learning time-invariant warped features.
“Finally, another interesting observation is the ability of CNNs to localize a given discriminative shape regardless where it appears in the time series, which is evidence for CNNs' capability of learning time-invariant warped features.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 6.1.1 GunPoint dataset · p. 32This observation cannot confirm which classifier extracted the most discriminative subsequences especially because all algorithms achieved similar accuracy on the GunPoint dataset.
“We should note that this observation cannot confirm which classifier extracted the most discriminative subsequences especially because all algorithms achieved similar accuracy on GunPoint dataset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The UCR/UEA archive datasets are representative of TSC problems.
“we tested the approaches on 12 Multivariate Time Series (MTS) datasets (Baydogan, 2015).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 97 time series datasets used are sufficient to generalize about DNN performance for TSC.
“By training 8,730 deep learning models on 97 time series datasets, we propose the most exhaustive study of DNNs for TSC to date.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The deep learning implementations in the framework faithfully represent the original methods.
“We also provide an open source deep learning framework to the TSC community where we implemented each of the compared approaches and evaluated them on a univariate TSC benchmark (the UCR/UEA archive) and 12 multivariate time series datasets.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The MTS archive contains time series of unequal length.
“In order to solve the problem of unequal length time series in the MTS archive”
The paper relies on this without support.
CAM visualizations faithfully indicate which time series regions contribute to class identification.
“Highlighting with the Class Activation Map the contribution of each time series region for the three classes in Meat when using the FCN and ResNet classifiers.”
The paper relies on this without support.
MDS plots with Euclidean distance on GAP vectors preserve class separability sufficiently to interpret model performance.
“Figure 15 shows three MDS plots for the GunPoint dataset using: (1) the raw input time series (Figure 15a); (2) the learned latent features from the GAP layer for FCN (Figure 15b); and (3)”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These approaches, categorized as temporal representation, divide the entire framework into two stages: "temporal representation" and "temporal prediction."
“These approaches, categorized as temporal representation[105,106], divide the entire framework into two stages: “temporal representation” and “temporal prediction.””
From Advancements in the estimation of the state of charge of lithium-ion battery: a comprehensive review of traditional and deep learning approaches (2025) · cites this paper as [105]
Section 2.3.1 (p. 10) describes generative approaches that learn a time-series representation before training a classifier, supporting a two-stage account for those approaches. The paper categorizes them as generative models, however, and describes the second stage as classification—not a general framework called “temporal representation” followed by “temporal prediction.” (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMultiple-instance configurations incur high computational cost from running multiple instances.
“These include the high computational cost incurred by running multiple instances [18,19]”
From TVGeAN: Tensor Visibility Graph-Enhanced Attention Network for Versatile Multivariant Time Series Learning Tasks (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
WalkVsRun's new length exceeds its stated maximum
MinorThe paper says interpolation makes each series as long as the longest original series. For WalkVsRun, the table gives an original maximum length of 1918 but a new length of 1919.
“| WalkVsRun | 128-1918 | 1919 | 2 | 62 | 28 | 16 |”
“thus each time series will have a length equal to the longest time series' length.”
MLP is said to have no length-invariant layers
MinorThe first fully connected layer depends on input length, but the subsequent 500-to-500 hidden layers have parameter counts independent of that length. This conflicts with the claim that no MLP layer is invariant.
“MLP does not have any layer whose number of parameters is invariant across time series of different lengths”
“All three hidden FC layers are composed of 500 neurons with ReLU as the activation function.”
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · cited 12× · see citing works
“First of all, our findings are in agreement with the deep learning for computer vision literature where deeper 1 The implementations are available on https://github.com/hfawaz/dl-4-tsc neural networks are much more successful than shallower architectures (He et al., 2016).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialVaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The MLP, which is the most traditional form of DNNs, was proposed in Wang et al. (2017b) as a baseline architecture for TSC.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · cited 7× · see citing works
“Since AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al. 2012) won the ImageNet competition in 2012, deep CNNs have seen a lot of successful applications in many different domains (LeCun et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialAdam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · cited 1× · see citing works
“All models were optimized using a variant of Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) such as Adam (Kingma and Ba, 2015) and AdaDelta (Zeiler, 2012).”
MethodLeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126 · see citing works
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805 · see citing works
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562 · see citing works
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380 · see citing works
(2014) · Cited by 33,419 · see citing works
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818 · see citing works
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…proposed several DNN architectures to solve natural language processing (NLP) tasks such as machine translation (Sutskever et al., 2014; Bahdanau et al., 2015), learning word embeddings (Mikolov et al., 2013; Mikolov et al., 2013) and document classification (Le and Mikolov, 2014; Goldberg, 2016).”
BackgroundDistributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…proposed several DNN architectures to solve natural language processing (NLP) tasks such as machine translation (Sutskever et al., 2014; Bahdanau et al., 2015), learning word embeddings (Mikolov et al., 2013; Mikolov et al., 2013) and document classification (Le and Mikolov, 2014; Goldberg, 2016).”
BackgroundPan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387 · see citing works
A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure
(1979) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.2307/4615733 · Cited by 21,526 · cited 4× · see citing works
“(2016) where the average rank comparison is replaced by a Wilcoxon signed-rank test (Wilcoxon, 1945) with Holm’s alpha correction (Holm, 1979; Garcia and Herrera, 2008).”
MethodInfluentialDelving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Each convolution is followed by an instance normalization operation (Ulyanov et al., 2016) whose output is fed to the Parametric Rectified Linear Unit (PReLU) (He et al., 2015) activation function.”
MethodSequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks
Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.3215 · Cited by 17,766 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…deep CNNs have seen a lot of successful applications in many different domains (LeCun et al., 2015) such as reaching human level performance in image recognition problems (Szegedy et al., 2015) as well as different natural language processing tasks (Sutskever et al., 2014; Bahdanau et al., 2015).”
BackgroundNeural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate
Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.0473 · Cited by 16,213 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…of research proposed several DNN architectures to solve natural language processing (NLP) tasks such as machine translation (Sutskever et al., 2014; Bahdanau et al., 2015), learning word embeddings (Mikolov et al., 2013; Mikolov et al., 2013) and document classification (Le and Mikolov, 2014;…”
BackgroundInfluentialIndividual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354 · see citing works
Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification
Kim, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1181 · Cited by 14,831 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 2012) and sentence classification (Kim, 2014) where text and audio, similarly to time series data, exhibit a natural temporal ordering.”
BackgroundBellman, R. E. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400835386 · Cited by 14,588 · see citing works
(2010) · Cited by 14,134 · see citing works
Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets
Demšar, J. (2006) · doi:10.5555/1248547.1248548 · Cited by 11,966 · see citing works
Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization
Zhou, B., Khosla, A., Lapedriza, A., Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.319 · Cited by 11,428 · cited 6× · see citing works
“In addition, one of the main characteristics of this architecture is the replacement of the traditional final FC layer with a Global Average Pooling (GAP) layer which reduces drastically the number of parameters in a neural network while enabling the use of the CAM (Zhou et al., 2016) that highlights which parts of th…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDistributed Representations of Sentences and DocumentsPreprint
Le, Q. V., & Mikolov, T. (2014) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1405.4053 · Cited by 10,307 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…proposed several DNN architectures to solve natural language processing (NLP) tasks such as machine translation (Sutskever et al., 2014; Bahdanau et al., 2015), learning word embeddings (Mikolov et al., 2013; Mikolov et al., 2013) and document classification (Le and Mikolov, 2014; Goldberg, 2016).”
BackgroundHinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., et al. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2205597 · Cited by 10,260 · see citing works
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
(2006) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-45528-0 · Cited by 9,824 · see citing works
How transferable are features in deep neural networks?
Yosinski, J., Clune, J., Bengio, Y., & Lipson, H. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.1792 · Cited by 6,061 · cited 1× · see citing works
“But since we are aiming at visualizing the class specific latent space, we chose to use the last latent representation of a DNN (the one directly before the softmax classifier), which is known to be a class specific layer (Yosinski et al., 2014).”
MethodADADELTA: An Adaptive Learning Rate Method
Zeiler, M. D. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1212.5701 · Cited by 5,322 · see citing works
On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks
Pascanu, R., Mikolov, T., & Bengio, Y. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1211.5063 · Cited by 4,310 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 2012); (3) RNNs are considered hard to train and parallelize which led the researchers to avoid using them for computational reasons (Pascanu et al., 2013).”
BackgroundInstance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast StylizationPreprint
Ulyanov, D., Vedaldi, A., & Lempitsky, V. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.08022 · Cited by 4,239 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Each convolution is followed by an instance normalization operation (Ulyanov et al., 2016) whose output is fed to the Parametric Rectified Linear Unit (PReLU) (He et al., 2015) activation function.”
MethodHarnessing Nonlinearity: Predicting Chaotic Systems and Saving Energy in Wireless Communication
Jaeger, H., & Haas, H. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091277 · Cited by 3,811 · see citing works
Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412985130 · Cited by 3,786 · see citing works
Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization
Zhang, C., Bengio, S., Hardt, M., Recht, B., & Vinyals, O. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.03530 · Cited by 2,838 · cited 3× · see citing works
“, 2017) should be further studied for univariate as well as multivariate data, especially since normalization is known to have a huge effect on DNNs’ learning capabilities (Zhang et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialA Comparison of Alternative Tests of Significance for the Problem of $m$ Rankings
Friedman, M. (1940) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177731944 · Cited by 2,785 · cited 4× · see citing works
“As for comparing the classifiers over multiple datasets, we followed the recommendations in Demšar (2006) and used the Friedman test (Friedman, 1940) to reject the null hypothesis.”
MethodInfluentialRidge Regression: Applications to Nonorthogonal Problems
Hoerl, A. E., & Kennard, R. (1970) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1970.10488635 · Cited by 2,762 · see citing works
Deep Convolutional and LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks for Multimodal Wearable Activity Recognition
Ordóñez, F., & Roggen, D. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s16010115 · Cited by 2,761 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We think that our choice makes sense in a way that the goal of deep learning approaches is to remove the bias due to manually designed features (Ordón̈ez and Roggen, 2016), thus enabling the network to learn the most discriminant useful features for the classification task.”
BackgroundScalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records
Rajkomar, A., Oren, E., Chen, K., Dai, A. M., Hajaj, N., Hardt, M., Liu, P. J., Liu, X., Marcus, J., Sun, M., et al. (2018) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0029-1 · Cited by 2,648 · see citing works
Understanding deep learning (still) requires rethinking generalization
Zhang, C., Bengio, S., Hardt, M., Recht, B., & Vinyals, O. (2021) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3446776 · Cited by 2,400 · see citing works
Time series classification from scratch with deep neural networks: A strong baseline
Wang, Z., Yan, W., & Oates, T. (2017) · 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2017.7966039 · Cited by 2,299 · cited 18× · see citing works
“In Wang et al. (2017b); Geng and Luo (2018), an MLP was designed to learn from scratch a discriminative time series classifier.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialScalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records.
Rajkomar, A., Oren, E., Chen, K., Dai, A. M., Hajaj, N., Hardt, M., Liu, P. J., Liu, X., Marcus, J., Sun, M., et al. (2018) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 2,242 · see citing works
Deep learning for sensor-based activity recognition: A survey
Wang, J., Chen, Y., Hao, S., Peng, X., & Hu, L. (2019) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2018.02.010 · Cited by 2,014 · cited 2× · see citing works
“More recently in Wang et al. (2018), the architectures proposed in Wang et al. (2017b) were modified to leverage a filter initialization technique based on the Daubechies 4 Wavelet values (Rowe and Abbott, 1995).”
BackgroundMethodBagnall, A., Lines, J., Bostrom, A., Large, J., & Keogh, E. (2017) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-016-0483-9 · Cited by 1,377 · cited 46× · see citing works
“However, given the small sample size (only 7 datasets), we cannot conclude that FCN will almost always outperform the ResNet model for ECG datasets (Bagnall et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialLeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Orr, G., & Müller, K. (1998) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 1,333 · see citing works
García, S., & Herrera, F. (2008) · Cited by 1,277 · see citing works
A Primer on Neural Network Models for Natural Language Processing
Goldberg, Y. (2016) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.4992 · Cited by 1,259 · see citing works
A review of unsupervised feature learning and deep learning for time-series modeling
Längkvist, M., Karlsson, L., & Loutfi, A. (2014) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2014.01.008 · Cited by 1,234 · see citing works
Dau, H. A., Bagnall, A., Kamgar, K., Yeh, C.-C. M., Zhu, Y., Gharghabi, S., Ratanamahatana, C. A., & Keogh, E. (2019) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2019.1911747 · Cited by 1,128 · see citing works
Deep convolutional neural networks for LVCSR
Sainath, T. N., Mohamed, A., Kingsbury, B. E. D., & Ramabhadran, B. (2013) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6639347 · Cited by 1,066 · cited 1× · see citing works
“DNNs also had a huge impact on the speech recognition community (Hinton et al., 2012; Sainath et al., 2013).”
BackgroundDeep learning for healthcare applications based on physiological signals: A review
Faust, O., Hagiwara, Y., Hong, T. J., Lih, O. S., & Acharya, U. R. (2018) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.04.005 · Cited by 1,042 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Finally, a recent review of deep learning for physiological signals classification revealed that CNNs were the most popular architecture (Faust et al., 2018) for the considered task.”
BackgroundEsling, P., & Agón, C. (2012) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2379776.2379788 · Cited by 1,006 · see citing works
10 CHALLENGING PROBLEMS IN DATA MINING RESEARCH
Yang, Q., & Wu, X. (2006) · International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · doi:10.1142/s0219622006002258 · Cited by 939 · see citing works
Nweke, H. F., Teh, Y. W., Al-garadi, M. A., & Alo, U. R. (2018) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.03.056 · Cited by 930 · see citing works
LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Orr, G., & Müller, K. R. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-49430-8_2 · Cited by 920 · see citing works
Convolutional neural networks for time series classification
College of Electronic Science and Engineering, N. U. O. D. T., Zhao, B., Lu, H., College of Electronic Science and Engineering, N. U. O. D. T., Chen, S., College of Electronic Science and Engineering, N. U. O. D. T., Liu, J., College of Electronic Science and Engineering, N. U. O. D. T., Wu, D., & College of Electronic Science and Engineering, N. U. O. D. T. (2017) · Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics · doi:10.21629/jsee.2017.01.18 · Cited by 888 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In Le Guennec et al. (2016); Cui et al. (2016); Wang et al. (2017b); Zhao et al. (2017), traditional CNNs were also validated on the UCR/UEA archive.”
MethodReal-time human activity recognition from accelerometer data using Convolutional Neural Networks
Ignatov, A. (2017) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2017.09.027 · Cited by 817 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In fact, most of the deep learning approaches for TSC with some hand engineered features are present in human activity recognition tasks (Ignatov, 2018).”
BackgroundImaging Time-Series to Improve Classification and ImputationPreprint
Wang, Z., & Oates, T. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.00327 · Cited by 715 · see citing works
Time Series Classification Using Multi-Channels Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Zheng, Y., Liu, Q., Chen, E., Ge, Y., & Zhao, J. L. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08010-9_33 · Cited by 689 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Multi Channel Deep Convolutional Neural Network (MCDCNN) was originally proposed and validated on two multivariate time series datasets (Zheng et al., 2014, 2016).”
MethodMulti-Scale Convolutional Neural Networks for Time Series ClassificationPreprint
Cui, Z.-C., Chen, W.-L., & Chen, Y. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.06995 · Cited by 637 · see citing works
Book Review: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Nasrabadi, N. M. (2007) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.2819119 · Cited by 636 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Regularization methods such as l2-norm weight decay (Bishop, 2006) or Dropout (Srivastava et al.”
MethodA time series forest for classification and feature extraction
Deng, H., Runger, G. C., Tuv, E., & Vladimir, M. (2013) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2013.02.030 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
The BOSS is concerned with time series classification in the presence of noise
Schäfer, P. (2014) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-014-0377-7 · Cited by 564 · cited 12× · see citing works
“Despite the fact that a huge number of parameters risks overfitting (Zhang et al., 2017) the relatively small train set in the UCR/UEA archive, our experiments showed that not only DNNs are able to significantly outperform the NN-DTW, but are also able to achieve results that are not significantly different than COTE…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWhy and when can deep-but not shallow-networks avoid the curse of dimensionality: A review
Poggio, T., Mhaskar, H., Rosasco, L., Miranda, B., & Liao, Q. (2017) · International Journal of Automation and Computing · doi:10.1007/s11633-017-1054-2 · Cited by 559 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…benefit of deep learning models, which is the ability to handle the curse of dimensionality (Bellman, 2010; Keogh and Mueen, 2017) by leveraging different degrees of smoothness in compositional function (Poggio et al., 2017) as well as the parallel computations of the GPUs (Lu et al., 2015).”
BackgroundClassification of time series by shapelet transformation
Hills, J., Lines, J., Baranauskas, E., Mapp, J., & Bagnall, A. (2014) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-013-0322-1 · Cited by 538 · cited 16× · see citing works
“Hence, recent contributions have focused on developing ensemblingmethods that significantly outperforms the NN coupled with DTW (NN-DTW) (Bagnall et al. 2016; Hills et al. 2014; Bostrom and Bagnall 2015; Lines et al. 2016; Schäfer 2015; Kate 2016; Deng et al. 2013; Baydogan et al. 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTime series classification with ensembles of elastic distance measures
Lines, J., & Bagnall, A. J. (2014) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-014-0361-2 · Cited by 513 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Lines and Bagnall (2015) compared several distance measures and showed that there is no single distance measure that significantly outperforms DTW.”
BackgroundMethodLearning time-series shapelets
Grabocka, J., Schilling, N., Wistuba, M., & Schmidt-Thieme, L. (2014) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623613 · Cited by 489 · cited 3× · see citing works
“This observation would also be backed up by the mathematical proof provided by Cui et al. (2016), that showed how the learned filters in a CNN can be considered a generic form of shapelets extracted by the learning shapelets algorithm (Grabocka et al., 2014).”
BackgroundMethodTransfer learning for short-term wind speed prediction with deep neural networks
Hu, Q., Zhang, R., & Zhou, Y. (2015) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.034 · Cited by 469 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Usually, to model the time series, classifiers are preceded by an unsupervised pre-training phase such as stacked denoising auto-encoders (SDAEs) (Bengio et al., 2013; Hu et al., 2016).”
BackgroundDeep k-Nearest Neighbors: Towards Confident, Interpretable and Robust Deep LearningPreprint
Papernot, N., & McDaniel, P. D. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.04765 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Time-Series Classification with COTE: The Collective of Transformation-Based Ensembles
Bagnall, A. J., Lines, J., Hills, J., & Bostrom, A. G. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2015.2416723 · Cited by 420 · cited 14× · see citing works
“Despite the fact that a huge number of parameters risks overfitting (Zhang et al., 2017) the relatively small train set in the UCR/UEA archive, our experiments showed that not only DNNs are able to significantly outperform the NN-DTW, but are also able to achieve results that are not significantly different than COTE…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUnderstanding the exploding gradient problemPreprint
Pascanu, R., Mikolov, T., & Bengio, Y. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Time series shapelets: a novel technique that allows accurate, interpretable and fast classification
Ye, L., & Keogh, E. (2011) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-010-0179-5 · Cited by 406 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Ye and Keogh (2011) identified that the most important shapelet for the Gun/NoGun classification occurs when the actor’s arm is lowered (about 120 on the horizontal axis in Figure 13).”
BackgroundMethodThree Myths about Dynamic Time Warping Data Mining
Ratanamahatana, C. A., & Keogh, E. (2005) · SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611972757.50 · Cited by 402 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This form of pre-processing has also been used by Ratanamahatana and Keogh (2005) to show that the length of a time series is not an issue for TSC problems.”
MethodWang, Z., & Oates, T. (2015) · National Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Classification of time-series images using deep convolutional neural networks
Debayle, J., Hatami, N., & Gavet, Y. (2018) · International Conference on Machine Vision · doi:10.1117/12.2309486 · Cited by 374 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…extraction method for hand engineering approaches is the transformation of time series into images using specific imaging methods such as Gramian fields (Wang and Oates, 2015b,a), recurrence plots (Hatami et al., 2017; Tripathy and Acharya, 2018) and Markov transition fields (Wang and Oates, 2015).”
MethodA Bag-of-Features Framework to Classify Time Series
Baydogan, M. G., Runger, G., & Tuv, E. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.72 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Keogh, E., & Mueen, A. (2010) · Encyclopedia of Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_192 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Using dynamic time warping distances as features for improved time series classification
Kate, R. J. (2015) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-015-0418-x · Cited by 347 · cited 13× · see citing works
“Despite the fact that a huge number of parameters risks overfitting (Zhang et al., 2017) the relatively small train set in the UCR/UEA archive, our experiments showed that not only DNNs are able to significantly outperform the NN-DTW, but are also able to achieve results that are not significantly different than COTE…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialData Augmentation for Time Series Classification using Convolutional Neural Networks
Guennec, A. L., Malinowski, S., & Tavenard, R. (2016) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Lines, J., Taylor, S., & Bagnall, A. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3182382 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Transfer learning for time series classification
Ismail Fawaz, H., Forestier, G., Weber, J., Idoumghar, L., & Muller, P.-A. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2018.8621990 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Self-citationShould we really use post-hoc tests based on mean-ranks?Preprint
Benavoli, A., Corani, G., & Mangili, F. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1505.02288 · Cited by 294 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Then we performed the pairwise posthoc analysis recommended by Benavoli et al. (2016) where the average rank comparison is replaced by a Wilcoxon signed-rank test (Wilcoxon, 1945) with Holm’s alpha (5”
MethodBaird, H. S. (1992) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-77281-8_26 · Cited by 285 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Another popular technique is data augmentation, which tackles the problem of overfitting a small dataset by increasing the number of training instances (Baird 1992).”
MethodTime Series Classification With Multivariate Convolutional Neural Network
Liu, C.-L., Hsaio, W., & Tu, Y.-C. (2019) · IEEE transactions on industrial electronics (1982. Print) · doi:10.1109/tie.2018.2864702 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Zheng, Y., Liu, Q., Chen, E., Ge, Y., & Zhao, J. L. (2015) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-015-4478-2 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Multilevel Wavelet Decomposition Network for Interpretable Time Series Analysis
Wang, J., Wang, Z., Li, J., & Wu, J. (2018) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3219819.3220060 · Cited by 243 · cited 2× · see citing works
“More recently in Wang et al. (2018), the architectures proposed in Wang et al. (2017b) were modified to leverage a filter initialization technique based on the Daubechies 4 Wavelet values (Rowe and Abbott, 1995).”
BackgroundMethodReservoir Computing Approaches for Representation and Classification of Multivariate Time Series
Bianchi, F. M., Scardapane, S., Løkse, S., & Jenssen, R. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.3001377 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Detecting and interpreting myocardial infarction using fully convolutional neural networks
Strodthoff, N., & Strodthoff, C. (2018) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/1361-6579/aaf34d · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Generating Synthetic Time Series to Augment Sparse Datasets
Forestier, G., Petitjean, F., Dau, H. A., Webb, G. I., & Keogh, E. (2017) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2017.106 · Cited by 201 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…extensive experimental evaluation, deep learning for time series classification, unlike for computer vision and NLP tasks, still lacks a thorough study of data augmentation (Ismail Fawaz et al., 2018a; Forestier et al., 2017) and transfer learning (Ismail Fawaz et al., 2018c; Serrà et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationLines, J., Taylor, S. L., & Bagnall, A. J. (2016) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2016.0133 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Che, Z., Cheng, Y., Zhai, S., Sun, Z., & Liu, Y. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) · doi:10.1109/icdm.2017.93 · Cited by 162 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Other ESN-based approaches (Chen et al., 2015a, 2013; Che et al., 2017b) define a kernel over the learned representation followed by an SVM or an MLP classifier.”
BackgroundMethodDeep Learning for Time-Series AnalysisPreprint
Gamboa, J. C. B. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.01887 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Tripathy, R. K., & Acharya, U. R. (2018) · Journal of Applied Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2018.05.005 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Proximity Forest: an effective and scalable distance-based classifier for time series
Lucas, B., Shifaz, A., Pelletier, C., O’Neill, L., Zaidi, N. A., (15827960), B. G., Petitjean, F., & (14480133), G. W. (2024) · Figshare · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Mid-infrared spectroscopy and authenticity problems in selected meats: a feasibility study
Al-Jowder, O., Kemsley, E. K., & Wilson, R. H. (1997) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0308-8146(96)00289-0 · Cited by 140 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Al-Jowder et al. (1997) described how the data is acquired from 60 independent samples using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy with attenuated total reflectance (ATR) sampling.”
MethodPetitjean, F., Forestier, G., Webb, G. I., Nicholson, A. E., Chen, Y., & Keogh, E. (2015) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-015-0878-8 · Cited by 132 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Following Lucas et al. (2018); Forestier et al. (2017); Petitjean et al. (2016); Grabocka et al. (2014) we used the mean accuracy measure averaged over the 10 runs on the test set.”
MethodSelf-citationData augmentation using synthetic data for time series classification with deep residual networksPreprint
Fawaz, H. I., Forestier, G., Weber, J., Idoumghar, L., & Müller, P.-A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.02455 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Self-citationTimeNet: Pre-trained deep recurrent neural network for time series classificationPreprint
Malhotra, P., Tv, V., Vig, L., Agarwal, P., & Shroff, G. M. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.08838 · Cited by 127 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In Mehdiyev et al. (2017); Malhotra et al. (2018); Rajan and Thiagarajan (2018), an RNN auto-encoder was designed to first generate the time series then using the learned latent representation, they trained a classifier (such as SVM or Random Forest) on top of these representations to predict the…”
MethodMehdiyev, N., Lahann, J., Emrich, A., Enke, D. L., Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2017) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2017.09.066 · Cited by 125 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In Mehdiyev et al. (2017); Malhotra et al. (2018); Rajan and Thiagarajan (2018), an RNN auto-encoder was designed to first generate the time series then using the learned latent representation, they trained a classifier (such as SVM or Random Forest) on top of these representations to predict the…”
MethodTime-Series Classification Methods: Review and Applications to Power Systems Data
Susto, G. A., Cenedese, A., & Terzi, M. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-811968-6.00009-7 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Wang, L., Wang, Z., & Liu, S. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.08.055 · Cited by 123 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Another sub task that has been at the center of recent studies is early time series classification (Wang et al., 2016a) where deep CNNs were modified to include an early classification of time series.”
BackgroundMethodA 1 TOPS/W Analog Deep Machine-Learning Engine With Floating-Gate Storage in 0.13 µm CMOS
Lu, J., Young, S. R., Arel, I., & Holleman, J. H. (2014) · IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · doi:10.1109/jssc.2014.2356197 · Cited by 122 · cited 9× · see citing works
“This step is very important for deep learning models whose architecture depends on the length of the input time series (such as a MLP) and for parallel computation over the GPUs.”
BackgroundInfluentialEvaluating Surgical Skills from Kinematic Data Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Fawaz, H. I., Forestier, G., Weber, J., Idoumghar, L., & Müller, P.-A. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00937-3_25 · Cited by 121 · cited 8× · see citing works
“…extensive experimental evaluation, deep learning for time series classification, unlike for computer vision and NLP tasks, still lacks a thorough study of data augmentation (Ismail Fawaz et al., 2018a; Forestier et al., 2017) and transfer learning (Ismail Fawaz et al., 2018c; Serrà et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationModel-based kernel for efficient time series analysis
Chen, H., Tang, F., Peter Tiňo, B., & Yao, X. (2013) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/2487575.2487700 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Functional echo state network for time series classification
Ma, Q., Shen, L., Chen, W., Wang, J., Wei, J., & Yu, Z. (2016) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.08.081 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Speeding up similarity search under dynamic time warping by pruning unpromising alignments
Silva, D. F., Giusti, R., Keogh, E., & Batista, G. E. A. P. A. (2018) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-018-0557-y · Cited by 95 · cited 2× · see citing works
“With the increase of temporal data availability (Silva et al., 2018), hundreds of TSC algorithms have been proposed since 2015 (Bagnall et al.”
BackgroundDeep Echo State Network (DeepESN): A Brief SurveyPreprint
Gallicchio, C., & Micheli, A. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.04323 · Cited by 91 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Given the aforementioned limitations, a relatively recent type of recurrent architecture was proposed for time series: Echo State Networks (ESNs) (Gallicchio and Micheli 2017).”
BackgroundClassification of Time-Series Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural NetworksPreprint
Hatami, N., Gavet, Y., & Debayle, J. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.00886 · Cited by 89 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…extraction method for hand engineering approaches is the transformation of time series into images using specific imaging methods such as Gramian fields (Wang and Oates, 2015b,a), recurrence plots (Hatami et al., 2017; Tripathy and Acharya, 2018) and Markov transition fields (Wang and Oates, 2015).”
MethodMultiobjective Learning in the Model Space for Time Series Classification
Gong, Z., Chen, H., Yuan, B., & Yao, X. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2018.2789422 · Cited by 84 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In Gong et al. (2018); Wang et al. (2016), a meta-learning evolutionary-based algorithm was proposed to construct an optimal ESN architecture for univariate and multivariate time series.”
BackgroundBinary Shapelet Transform for Multiclass Time Series Classification
Bostrom, A. G., & Bagnall, A. J. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22729-0_20 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Time Series Classification Using Time Warping Invariant Echo State Networks
Tanisaro, P., & Heidemann, G. (2016) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla.2016.0149 · Cited by 79 · cited 13× · see citing works
“Although ESNs were originally proposed for time series forecasting, Tanisaro and Heidemann (2016) proposed a variant of ESNs that uses directly the raw input time series and predicts a probability distribution over the class variables.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDaubechies wavelets and Mathematica
Rowe, A. C. H., & Abbott, P. C. (1995) · Computers in Physics · doi:10.1063/1.168556 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Spatio-Temporal Neural Networks for Space-Time Series Forecasting and Relations Discovery
Ziat, A., Delasalles, E., Denoyer, L., & Gallinari, P. (2017) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2017.80 · Cited by 72 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For spatio-temporal series forecasting problems, such as meteorology and oceanography, DNNs were proposed in Ziat et al. (2017).”
BackgroundGCRNN: Group-Constrained Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network
Lin, S., & Runger, G. C. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2017.2772336 · Cited by 70 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We mention one final type of hybrid architectures that showed promising results for the TSC task on the UCR/UEA archive datasets, where mainly CNNs were combined with other types of architectures such as Gated Recurrent Units (Lin and Runger, 2018) and the”
MethodGallicchio, C., & Micheli, A. (2018) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2018.8489464 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Time-series classification with COTE: The collective of transformation-based ensembles
Bagnall, A. J., Lines, J., Hills, J., & Bostrom, A. G. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde.2016.7498418 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Early Classification of Time Series
Martinez, C., Perrin, G., Ramasso, E., & Rombaut, M. (2018) · European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) · doi:10.23919/eusipco.2018.8553544 · Cited by 62 · cited 1× · see citing works
“More recently, a deep reinforcement learning approach was also proposed for the early TSC task (Martinez et al., 2018).”
BackgroundFeasibility of an AI-Based Measure of the Hand Motions of Expert and Novice Surgeons
Uemura, M., Tomikawa, M., Miao, T., Souzaki, R., Ieiri, S., Akahoshi, T., Lefor, A. K., & Hashizume, M. (2018) · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · doi:10.1155/2018/9873273 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Model metric co-learning for time series classification
Chen, H., Tang, F., Peter Tiňo, B., Cohn, A. G., & Yao, X. (2015) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Wang, Z., & Oates, T. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1509.07481 · Cited by 48 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…extraction method for hand engineering approaches is the transformation of time series into images using specific imaging methods such as Gramian fields (Wang and Oates, 2015b,a), recurrence plots (Hatami et al., 2017; Tripathy and Acharya, 2018) and Markov transition fields (Wang and Oates, 2015).”
MethodA Deep Transfer Learning Approach for Improved Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Diagnosis
Banerjee, D., Islam, K. A., Mei, G., Xiao, L., Zhang, G., Xu, R., Ji, S., & Jiang, L. (2017) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2017.10 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Towards a Universal Neural Network Encoder for Time Series
Joan, S., Santiago, P., & Karatzoglou, A. (2018) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-918-8-120 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Time Series Classification by Sequence Learning in All-Subsequence Space
Nguyen, T. L., Gsponer, S., & Ifrim, G. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde.2017.142 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Time-series modeling with undecimated fully convolutional neural networksPreprint
Mittelman, R. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1508.00317 · Cited by 46 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A generative CNN-based model was proposed in Wang et al. (2016b); Mittelman (2015) where the authors introduced a deconvolutional operation followed by an upsampling technique that helps in reconstructing a multivariate time series.”
MethodA Generative Modeling Approach to Limited Channel ECG Classification
Rajan, D., & Thiagarajan, J. J. (2018) · doi:10.1109/embc.2018.8512757 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Liu, G., Wang, D., Wang, M., Zhu, C., & Wang, M. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2018.2798565 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Large, J., Lines, J., & Bagnall, A. J. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.09220 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Convolutional neural network with multi-task learning scheme for acoustic scene classification
Nwe, T. L., Dat, T. H., & Ma, B. (2017) · Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC) · doi:10.1109/apsipa.2017.8282241 · Cited by 40 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 2018) to acoustic scene classification (Nwe et al., 2017) and cyber-security (Susto et al.”
BackgroundA Run Length Transformation for Discriminating Between Auto Regressive Time Series
Bagnall, A. J., & Janacek, G. J. (2013) · Journal of Classification · doi:10.1007/s00357-013-9135-6 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Applied Gaussian Process in Optimizing Unburned Carbon Content in Fly Ash for Boiler Combustion
Wang, C. L., Liu, Y., Everson, R., Rahat, A. A.-A. M., & Zheng, S. (2017) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2017/6138930 · Cited by 32 · cited 18× · see citing works
“In Wang et al. (2017b); Geng and Luo (2018), an MLP was designed to learn from scratch a discriminative time series classifier.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialInternational conference on machine vision
(2007) · International Conference on Machine Vision · doi:10.1109/icmv.2007.4469255 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Earliness-Aware Deep Convolutional Networks for Early Time Series ClassificationPreprint
Wang, W., Chen, C., Wang, W., Rai, P., & Carin, L. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.04578 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Dau, H. A., Silva, D. F., Petitjean, F., Forestier, G., Bagnall, A. J., & Keogh, E. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2017.8258009 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationTime Series Classification in Reservoir- and Model-Space
Aswolinskiy, W., Reinhart, F., & Steil, J. J. (2017) · Neural Processing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11063-017-9765-5 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Cost-Sensitive Convolution based Neural Networks for Imbalanced Time-Series ClassificationPreprint
Geng, Y., & Luo, X. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1801.04396 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Generalized Dynamic Time Warping: Unleashing the Warping Power Hidden in Point-Wise Distances
Neamtu, R., Ahsan, R., Rundensteiner, E. A., Sárközy, G. N., Keogh, E., Dau, H. A., Nguyen, C., & Lovering, C. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde.2018.00054 · Cited by 23 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In this context, this paper targets the following open questions:What is the current state-of-the-art DNN for TSC? Is there a current DNN approach that reaches stateof-the-art performance for TSC and is less complex than HIVE-COTE? What type of DNN architectures works best for the TSC task? How does the random initial…”
BackgroundTime Series Classification in Reservoir- and Model-Space: A Comparison
Aswolinskiy, W., Reinhart, F., & Steil, J. J. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46182-3_17 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
A Cycle Deep Belief Network Model for Multivariate Time Series Classification
Wang, S., Hua, G., Hao, G., & Xie, C. (2017) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2017/9549323 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
A Literature Survey Of Early Time Series Classification And Deep Learning
Santos, T., & Kern, R. (2017) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.495150 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Improving time series similarity measures by integrating preprocessing steps
Höppner, F. (2017) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-016-0490-x · Cited by 17 · cited 9× · see citing works
“Despite the fact that a huge number of parameters risks overfitting (Zhang et al., 2017) the relatively small train set in the UCR/UEA archive, our experiments showed that not only DNNs are able to significantly outperform the NN-DTW, but are also able to achieve results that are not significantly different than COTE…”
MethodInfluentialChouikhi, N., Ammar, B., & Alimi, A. M. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1804.08996 · Cited by 16 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Other studies such as in Aswolinskiy et al. (2017); Bianchi et al. (2018); Chouikhi et al. (2018); Ma et al. (2016) used self-predict modeling for time series classification where ESNs were first used to re-construct the time series and then the learned representation in the reservoir space was…”
BackgroundMethodWang, Z., Song, W., Liu, L., Zhang, F., Xue, J., Ye, Y., Fan, M. Y., & Xu, M. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.07258 · Cited by 10 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Another sub task that has been at the center of recent studies is early time series classification (Wang et al., 2016a) where deep CNNs were modified to include an early classification of time series.”
BackgroundMethodModel-Based Time Series Classification
Kotsifakos, A., & Papapetrou, P. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12571-8_16 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Generalized Denoising Auto-Encoders as Generative Models
Bengio, Y., Yao, L., Alain, G., & Vincent, P. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1305.6663 · cited 2×
“Usually, to model the time series, classifiers are preceded by an unsupervised pre-training phase such as stacked denoising auto-encoders (SDAEs) (Bengio et al., 2013; Hu et al., 2016). A generative CNN-based model was proposed in Wang et al. (2016b);”
BackgroundMethod
Flagged first, then by citations
7 of the 149 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Che Z, He X, Xu K, Liu Y (2017b) DECADE: a deep metric learning model for multivariate time series. In: KDD workshop on mining and learning from time series
- Ismail Fawaz H, Forestier G, Weber J, Idoumghar L, Muller PA (2018c) Transfer learning for time series classification. In: IEEE international conference on big data, pp 1367–1376 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Transformer-based Framework for Multivariate Time Series Representation Learning
Zerveas, G., Jayaraman, S., Patel, D., Bhamidipaty, A., & Eickhoff, C. (2021) · Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3447548.3467401 · Cited by 1,278 · see citing works
Transformers in Time Series: A Survey
Wen, Q., Zhou, T., Zhang, C., Chen, W., Ma, Z., Yan, J., & Sun, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2023/759 · Cited by 1,260 · see citing works
Tuli, S., Casale, G., & Jennings, N. R. (2022) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3514061.3514067 · Cited by 1,100 · see citing works
Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces
Gu, A., & Dao, T. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.00752 · Cited by 1,579 · see citing works
Dempster, A., Petitjean, F., & Webb, G. I. (2020) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-020-00701-z · Cited by 1,080 · see citing works
“A kernel is convolved with an input time series through a sliding dot product operation, to produce a featuremapwhich is, in turn, used as the basis for classification (see Ismail Fawaz et al. 2019a).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA CNN–LSTM model for gold price time-series forecasting
Livieris, I. E., Pintelas, E. G., & Pintelas, P. (2020) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-020-04867-x · Cited by 870 · see citing works
“Long short-term memory (LSTM) networks and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are probably the most popular, efficient and widely used deep learning techniques [11].”
BackgroundDeep Learning for Time Series Forecasting: A Survey
Torres, J. F., Hadjout, D., Sebaa, A., Alvarez, F. M., & Troncoso, A. (2020) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2020.0159 · Cited by 847 · see citing works
“Another remarkable work can be found in Ref., 14 in which the authors introduced the time series classification problem and provided an open-source framework with implemented algorithms and the University of East Anglia/University of California in Riverside repository.”
Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection in Time-Series Data: Review, Analysis, and Guidelines
Choi, K., Yi, J., Park, C., & Yoon, S. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3107975 · Cited by 621 · see citing works
An Experimental Review on Deep Learning Architectures for Time Series Forecasting
Lara-Benítez, P., Carranza-García, M., & Riquelme, J. C. (2020) · International Journal of Neural Systems · doi:10.1142/s0129065721300011 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Theissler, A., Pérez-Velázquez, J., Kettelgerdes, M., & Elger, G. (2021) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2021.107864 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
Jin, M., Koh, H. Y., Wen, Q., Zambon, D., Alippi, C., Webb, G. I., King, I., & Pan, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3443141 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
“The analysis of time series not only provides insights into past trends but also facilitates a multitude of tasks such as forecasting [4], classification [5], anomaly detection [6], and data imputation [7].”
BackgroundDeep Learning for ECG Analysis: Benchmarks and Insights from PTB-XL
Strodthoff, N., Wagner, P., Schaeffter, T., & Samek, W. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2020.3022989 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
ECOD: Unsupervised Outlier Detection Using Empirical Cumulative Distribution Functions
Li, Z., Zhao, Y., Hu, X., Botta, N., Ionescu, C., & Chen, G. H. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3159580 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
“We report both the raw comparison results and the critical difference (CD) plots to show statistical difference [55], [56], where it visualize the statistical comparison by Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Holm’s correction.”
MethodDempster, A., Schmidt, D. F., & Webb, G. I. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3447548.3467231 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
“Figures showing mean ranks were produced using code from [15].”
MethodRuiz, A. P., Flynn, M., Large, J., Middlehurst, M., & Bagnall, A. J. (2020) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-020-00727-3 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Deep learning in ECG diagnosis: A review
Liu, X., Wang, H., Li, Z., & Qin, L. (2021) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107187 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
Real-time crash risk prediction on arterials based on LSTM-CNN
Li, P., Abdel-Aty, M. A., & Yuan, J. (2019) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.105371 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Machine learning and deep learning based predictive quality in manufacturing: a systematic review
Tercan, H., & Meisen, T. (2022) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-022-01963-8 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
“In current deep learning research, there are already a number of different model approaches for performing time series classification (Ismail Fawaz et al., 2019) or forecasting (Lim & Zohren, 2021).”
MethodRWKV: Reinventing RNNs for the Transformer Era
Peng, B., Alcaide, E., Anthony, Q., Albalak, A., Arcadinho, S., Biderman, S., Cao, H., Cheng, X., Chung, M., Derczynski, L., et al. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.936 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
“These applications often involve complex sequential data processing tasks that include nat-ural language understanding, conversational AI, time-series analysis, and even indirect modalities that can be reframed as sequences, such as images and graphs (Brown et al., 2020; Ismail Fawaz et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2020; Alb…”
BackgroundPrediction of groundwater quality using efficient machine learning technique
Singha, S., Pasupuleti, S., Singha, S. S., Singh, R., & Kumar, S. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130265 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
TadGAN: Time Series Anomaly Detection Using Generative Adversarial Networks
Geiger, A., Liu, D., Alnegheimish, S., Cuesta‐Infante, A., & Veeramachaneni, K. K. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9378139 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
“A few aspects of this problem make it both distinct from and more difficult than time series classification [15] or supervised time series anomaly detection [16], as well as more pertinent to many industrial applications.”
BackgroundSelf-attention for raw optical Satellite Time Series Classification
Rußwurm, M., & Körner, M. (2020) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.06.006 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Signal propagation in complex networks
Ji, P., Ye, J., Mu, Y., Lin, W. J., Tian, Y., Hens, C., Perc, M., Tang, Y. S., Sun, J., & Kurths, J. (2023) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.03.005 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Foundations and Modeling of Dynamic Networks Using Dynamic Graph Neural Networks: A Survey
Skarding, J., Gabryś, B., & Musiał, K. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3082932 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
HIVE-COTE 2.0: a new meta ensemble for time series classification
Middlehurst, M., Large, J., Flynn, M., Lines, J., Bostrom, A. G., & Bagnall, A. J. (2021) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-021-06057-9 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Deep learning models for predictive maintenance: a survey, comparison, challenges and prospects
Serradilla, O., Zugasti, E., Rodriguez, J., & Zurutuza, U. (2022) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-021-03004-y · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Shrestha, Y. R., Krishna, V., & von Krogh, G. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.068 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Forecast evaluation for data scientists: common pitfalls and best practices
Hewamalage, H., Ackermann, K., & Bergmeir, C. (2022) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-022-00894-5 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
“In the present era of Big Data, Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) based techniques are driving the automatic decision making in many domains such as Natural Language Processing (NLP) or Time Series Classification (TSC, Bagnall et al., 2016; Fawaz et al., 2019).”
BackgroundTransfer learning for time series classification
Ismail Fawaz, H., Forestier, G., Weber, J., Idoumghar, L., & Muller, P.-A. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2018.8621990 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
“In fact, the convolutional neural network’s ability to learn temporal invariant features is one of main the reasons behind its recent success, as well as the availability of big data across different domains [26].”
BackgroundSelf-citationTaherkhani, A., Cosma, G., & McGinnity, T. M. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.03.064 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
“The performance of AdaBoost-CNN is compared to the ResNet used in [36].”
MethodDeep learning for early warning signals of tipping points
Bury, T. M., Sujith, R. I., Pavithran, I., Scheffer, M., Lenton, T. M., Anand, M., & Bauch, C. T. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2106140118 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
“Supervised DL algorithms can also detect patterns (features) in time series, and have achieved state of the art in time series classification (23)—the ability to classify time series based on characteristic features in the data.”
BackgroundDeep Learning for Time Series Classification and Extrinsic Regression: A Current Survey
Foumani, N. M., Miller, L., Tan, C. W., Webb, G. I., Forestier, G., & Salehi, M. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3649448 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects
Zhang, K., Wen, Q., Zhang, C., Cai, R., Jin, M., Liu, Y., Zhang, J. Y., Liang, Y., Pang, G., Song, D., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3387317 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
“The first category focuses on different tasks, such as classification [37], [38], forecasting [39], [40], [41], [42], and anomaly detection [43], [44].”
BackgroundMulti-scale Attention Convolutional Neural Network for time series classification
Chen, W., & Shi, K. (2021) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2021.01.001 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Improving position encoding of transformers for multivariate time series classification
Foumani, N. M., Tan, C. W., Webb, G. I., & Salehi, M. (2023) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-023-00948-2 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
“It was also proven to be an accurate deep learning model for MTSC [4, 5].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBuilding energy prediction using artificial neural networks: A literature survey
Lu, C., Li, S., & Lu, Z. (2021) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111718 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Thakkar, A., & Chaudhari, K. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114800 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Electricity price forecasting on the day-ahead market using machine learning
Tschora, L., Pierre, E., Plantevit, M., & Robardet, C. (2022) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118752 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
“In the field of forecasting, ML models have been able to solve very complex problems in image processing [39, 74, 30] but also in multivariate Time Series regression [6, 66, 84, 8, 58, 34].”
MethodReservoir Computing Approaches for Representation and Classification of Multivariate Time Series
Bianchi, F. M., Scardapane, S., Løkse, S., & Jenssen, R. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.3001377 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
“We implement baselines based on popular deep learning architectures (MLP, FCN, and ResNets) [53], [54] and report results where available on the original articles for BOSS [55], PROP [56], COTE [57], an advanced deep learning architecture that combines an LSTM with attention to a CNN architecture (LSTM-FCN) [58], a mo…”
MethodA Novel Evolutionary-Based Deep Convolutional Neural Network Model for Intelligent Load Forecasting
Jalali, S. M. J., Ahmadian, S., Khosravi, A., Shafie‐khah, M., Nahavandi, S., & Catalào, J. P. S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2021.3065718 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
“Generally, for time series forecasting problems, the most DL algorithms which have been used by researchers in the literature are recurrent neural network (RNN), stacked autoencoder (SAE), long short-term memory (LSTM), deep belief networks (DBN), and their modification [9].”
MethodTS-CHIEF: a scalable and accurate forest algorithm for time series classification
Shifaz, A., Pelletier, C., Petitjean, F., & Webb, G. I. (2020) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-020-00679-8 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Converting tabular data into images for deep learning with convolutional neural networks
Zhu, Y., Brettin, T. S., Xia, F., Partin, A., Shukla, M. P., Yoo, H., Evrard, Y. A., Doroshow, J. H., & Stevens, R. L. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-90923-y · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Machine learning for forecasting a photovoltaic (PV) generation system
Scott, C., Ahsan, M., & Albarbar, A. (2023) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.127807 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Deep learning-based remote and social sensing data fusion for urban region function recognition
Cao, R., Tu, W., Yang, C., Li, Q., Liu, J., Zhu, J., Zhang, Q., Li, Q., & Qiu, G. (2020) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.02.014 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Rahman, M. M., Shakeri, M., Tiong, S., Khatun, F., Amin, N., Pasupuleti, J., & Hasan, M. K. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13042393 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
“Figure 9 illustrates an example of a basic CNN architecture for time-series data prediction [114,115].”
BackgroundBake off redux: a review and experimental evaluation of recent time series classification algorithms
Middlehurst, M., Schäfer, P., & Bagnall, A. J. (2024) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-024-01022-1 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
“We extend and encompass recent experimental evaluations (e.g. (Ruiz et al., 2021; Bagnall et al., 2020a; Middlehurst et al., 2021; Fawaz et al., 2019)) to provide insights into the current state of the art in the field and highlight future directions.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSingle-Particle Diffusion Characterization by Deep Learning
Granik, N., Weiss, L. E., Nehme, E., Levin, M., Chein, M., Perlson, E., Roichman, Y., & Shechtman, Y. (2019) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2019.06.015 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Rice Crop Detection Using LSTM, Bi-LSTM, and Machine Learning Models from Sentinel-1 Time Series
Filho, H. C. D. C., Júnior, O. A. D. C., de Carvalho, O. L. F., de Bem, P. P., de Moura, R. D. S., de Albuquerque, A. O., Silva, C. R., Ferreira, P. H. G., Guimarães, R. F., & Gomes, R. A. T. (2020) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs12162655 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Explainable AI for Time Series Classification: A Review, Taxonomy and Research Directions
Theissler, A., Spinnato, F., Schlegel, U., & Guidotti, R. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3207765 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
“works of [28], [29], and [30] are probably most updated and 144”
BackgroundMethodSafat, W., Asghar, S., & Gillani, S. A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3078117 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
“Time series classification tasks are different from traditional classification and regression predictive modeling problems and have been considered challenging in terms of data mining for the last two decades [46].”
BackgroundRiaboff, L., Shalloo, L., Smeaton, A. F., Couvreur, S., Madouasse, A., & Keane, M. T. (2021) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2021.106610 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
TRNN: An efficient time-series recurrent neural network for stock price prediction
Lu, M., & Xu, X. (2023) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2023.119951 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Stock Market Forecasting Using Deep Learning and Technical Analysis: A Systematic Review
Li, A. W., & Bastos, G. S. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3030226 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
“[22] concluded that DL techniques were able to achieve performance similar to the state-of-theart for time series classification.”
MethodRTFN: A robust temporal feature network for time series classification
Xiao, Z., Xu, X., Xing, H., Luo, S., Dai, P., & Zhan, D. (2021) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2021.04.053 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Analysis of ToN-IoT, UNW-NB15, and Edge-IIoT Datasets Using DL in Cybersecurity for IoT
Tareq, I., Elbagoury, B. M., El-Regaily, S. A., & El-Horbaty, E.-S. M. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12199572 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Attack Graph Model for Cyber-Physical Power Systems Using Hybrid Deep Learning
Presekal, A., Stefanov, A. I., Rajkumar, V. S., & Pálenský, P. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2023.3237011 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
“TSC for anomaly detection was studied in [32], [33], [34], [35].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialsktime: A Unified Interface for Machine Learning with Time SeriesPreprint
Löning, M., Bagnall, A. J., Ganesh, S., Kazakov, V., Lines, J., & Király, F. J. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.07872 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
TAnoGAN: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Networks
Bashar, M. A., & Nayak, R. (2020) · IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) · doi:10.1109/ssci47803.2020.9308512 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
“[33] explained the effectiveness of critical difference in ranking performance of models when the number of datasets for evaluation is high.”
BackgroundToward an AI Era: Advances in Electronic Skins
Fu, X., Cheng, W., Wan, G., Yang, Z., & Tee, B. C. K. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00049 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Densely Knowledge-Aware Network for Multivariate Time Series Classification
Xiao, Z., Xing, H., Qu, R., Feng, L., Luo, S., Dai, P., Zhao, B., & Dai, Y. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2023.3342640 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
“1) Three Distance-Based Benchmark Algorithms: ED I , DTW I , and DTW D [7], [23].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCARLA: Self-supervised contrastive representation learning for time series anomaly detection
Darban, Z. Z., Webb, G. I., Pan, S., Aggarwal, C. C., & Salehi, M. (2024) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2024.110874 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
ShapeNet: A Shapelet-Neural Network Approach for Multivariate Time Series Classification
Li, G., Choi, B., Xu, J., S Bhowmick, S., Chun, K.-P., & Wong, G. L.-H. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i9.17018 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
“A nice review paper (Fawaz et al. 2019) summarizes many neural networks-based methods for time series classification.”
MethodYang, C.-L., Chen, Z.-X., & Yang, C.-Y. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20010168 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Deep Learning Based Systems Developed for Fall Detection: A Review
Islam, M. M., Tayan, O., Islam, M. R., Islam, M. S., Nooruddin, S., Kabir, M. N., & Islam, M. R. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3021943 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
“SisFall 2017 38(19/19) [19-75] Gym Hall 19/15 4505(2707/1798) A, A, G * 1 Wa”
Yu, W., Kim, I. Y., & Mechefske, C. K. (2020) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107322 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
An Efficient Federated Distillation Learning System for Multitask Time Series Classification
Xing, H., Xiao, Z., Qu, R., Zhu, Z., & Zhao, B. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2022.3201203 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
“TSC algorithms are usually data-driven, where data come from various application domains [8], [9], [10], [11], [14].”
BackgroundMethodDeep Contrastive Representation Learning With Self-Distillation
Xiao, Z., Xing, H., Zhao, B., Qu, R., Luo, S., Dai, P., Li, K., & Zhu, Z. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tetci.2023.3304948 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
“R. Qu is with the School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD 455356, UK (rong.qu@nottingham.ac.uk). effectively capture both local and global patterns of the input time series [10].”
BackgroundMethodAdversarial Attacks on Deep Neural Networks for Time Series Classification
Fawaz, H. I., Forestier, G., Weber, J., Idoumghar, L., & Müller, P.-A. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2019.8851936 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
“In a recent empirical evaluation [13] on the 85 datasets from the UCR archive, we identified that ResNet achieved state-ofthe-art performance for TSC, with results that are not significantly different than the Collective Of Transformation-based Ensembles, the current state-of-the-art classifier, which is an ensemble o…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationEadro: An End-to-End Troubleshooting Framework for Microservices on Multi-source Data
Lee, C., Yang, T., Chen, Z., Su, Y., & Lyu, M. R. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) · doi:10.1109/icse48619.2023.00150 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
“Deep learning has demonstrated a powerful capacity in extracting features from complicated time series [29], [55], [56].”
BackgroundMulti-Source Deep Domain Adaptation with Weak Supervision for Time-Series Sensor Data
Wilson, G., Doppa, J. R., & Cook, D. J. (2020) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3394486.3403228 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Cui, J., Lan, Z., Liu, Y., Li, R., Li, F., Sourina, O., & Müller‐Wittig, W. (2021) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.04.017 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
A Large Comparison of Normalization Methods on Time Series
Lima, F. T., & Souza, V. M. A. (2023) · Big Data Research · doi:10.1016/j.bdr.2023.100407 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
The Canonical Interval Forest (CIF) Classifier for Time Series Classification
Middlehurst, M., Large, J., & Bagnall, A. J. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9378424 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
“However, many deep learning algorithms do not appear to perform that well [19], at least on the UCR archive which contains a number of datasets that may be”
BackgroundEnd-to-end deep learning approach for Parkinson’s disease detection from speech signals
Quan, C., Ren, K., Luo, Z., Chen, Z., & Ling, Y. (2022) · Journal of Applied Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2022.04.002 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Computer vision and deep learning for fish classification in underwater habitats: A survey
Saleh, A., Sheaves, M. J., & Azghadi, M. R. (2022) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12666 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Qian, B., Su, J., Wen, Z., Jha, D. N., Li, Y., Guan, Y., Puthal, D., James, P., Yang, R., Zomaya, A. Y., et al. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3398020 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Revisiting a Methodology for Efficient CNN Architectures in Profiling Attacks
Wouters, L., Arribas, V., Gierlichs, B., & Bart Preneel, A. (2020) · IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems · doi:10.46586/tches.v2020.i3.147-168 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Fully learnable deep wavelet transform for unsupervised monitoring of high-frequency time series
Michau, G., Frusque, G., & Fink, O. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2106598119 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
“Very often these features are a spectrogram [38], wavelet coefficients statistics [19], or others [12, 36, 13].”
BackgroundEvaluation of post-hoc interpretability methods in time-series classification
Turbé, H., Bjelogrlic, M., Lovis, C., & Mengaldo, G. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00620-w · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Causal inference for time series analysis: problems, methods and evaluation
Moraffah, R., Sheth, P., Karami, M., Bhattacharya, A., Wang, Q., Tahir, A., Raglin, A. J., & Liu, H. (2021) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-021-01621-0 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Time series extrinsic regression: Predicting numeric values from time series data.
Tan, C. W., Bergmeir, C., Petitjean, F., & Webb, G. I. (2021) · PubMed Central · doi:10.1007/s10618-021-00745-9 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
DTCM: Deep Transformer Capsule Mutual Distillation for Multivariate Time Series Classification
Xiao, Z., Xu, X., Xing, H., Zhao, B., Wang, X., Song, F., Qu, R., & Li, F. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · doi:10.1109/tcds.2024.3370219 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
“These algorithms can roughly be divided into two categories, i.e., traditional and deep learning algorithms [13].”
BackgroundTime-Series Data Augmentation based on Interpolation
Oh, C., Han, S., & Jeong, J. (2020) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.07.012 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Wang, M. W. H., Goodman, J. M., & Allen, T. E. H. (2020) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00316 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Unsupervised log message anomaly detection
Farzad, A., & Gulliver, T. A. (2020) · ICT Express · doi:10.1016/j.icte.2020.06.003 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
“They can also be used for feature extraction and to reduce data dimensionality [9].”
Approaches and Applications of Early Classification of Time Series: A Review
Gupta, A., Gupta, H. P., Biswas, B., & Dutta, T. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2020.3027279 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
“Recently, deep learning based TSC algorithms, discussed in [22], have also demonstrated a significant progress in time series classification.”
BackgroundAdversarial Attacks on Time Series
Karim, F., Majumdar, S., & Darabi, H. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.2986319 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Cheng, X., Li, G., Ellefsen, A. L., Chen, S., Hildre, H. P., & Zhang, H. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2020.2967115 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
“6) ResNet: We use the same settings as in ResNet from [29].”
BackgroundMethodHuman Action Recognition Systems: A Review of the Trends and State-of-the-Art
Karim, M. F. A., Khalid, S., Aleryani, A., Khan, J., Ullah, I., & Ali, Z. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3373199 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
“In recent years, this field has undergone significant advancements with HAR systems evolving from basic motion sensors to sophisticated networks capable of intricate pattern recognition and real-time processing [2], [3], [4].”
BackgroundTAnoGAN: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Networks
Bashar, M. A., & Nayak, R. (2020) · QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Predictive analytics in education: a comparison of deep learning frameworks
Doleck, T., Lemay, D. J., Basnet, R. B., & Bazelais, P. (2019) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-019-10068-4 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“…increased substantially as deep learning has made important progress across a range of complex tasks including voice and image recognition, and so-called complete knowledge games such as chess, go, and StarCraft (Batmaz et al. 2018; Ismail Fawaz et al. 2019; Nguyen et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSatellite Image Time Series Analysis for Big Earth Observation Data
Simões, R. E. D. O., Câmara, G., de Queiroz, G. R., de Souza, F. C., Andrade, P. R., Santos, L., Carvalho, A., & Ferreira, K. R. (2021) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs13132428 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“There are two types of classifiers: (a) feature space methods, where all inputs are treated equally as part of an n-dimensional space, including SVM, Random Forest, and multilayer perceptrons; and (b) multiresolution methods based on 1D convolutional neural networks, including TempCNN and ResNet [8,18].”
MethodTimeCLR: A self-supervised contrastive learning framework for univariate time series representation
Yang, X., Zhang, Z., & Cui, R. (2022) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108606 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
SelfMatch: Robust semisupervised time‐series classification with self‐distillation
Xing, H., Xiao, Z., Zhan, D., Luo, S., Dai, P., & Li, K. (2022) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.22957 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
“This method measures the similarities between spatial features of data, for example, DTWI and DTWA.(6) On the basis of DTW and NN techniques, many DTW‐NN‐based ensemble algorithms were developed.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNguyen, T. L., Gsponer, S., Ilie, I., O’Reilly, M., & Ifrim, G. (2019) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-019-00633-3 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
“For deep learning algorithms, we select Encoder which is comparable to the benchmark (DTW CV) and FCN, ResNet (Ismail Fawaz et al, 2019) which are signifi-cantly better than the benchmark.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGated Transformer Networks for Multivariate Time Series ClassificationPreprint
Liu, M., Ren, S., Ma, S., Jiao, J., Chen, Y., Wang, Z., & Song, W. G. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.14438 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Data-driven science and machine learning methods in laser–plasma physics
Döpp, A., Eberle, C., Howard, S., Irshad, F., Lin, J., & Streeter, M. J. V. (2023) · High Power Laser Science and Engineering · doi:10.1017/hpl.2023.47 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“[135] Hassan Ismail Fawaz, Germain Forestier, Jonathan Weber, Lhassane Idoumghar, and Pierre-Alain Muller.”
Hydra: competing convolutional kernels for fast and accurate time series classification
Dempster, A., Schmidt, D. F., & Webb, G. I. (2023) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-023-00939-3 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Deep learning for predicting respiratory rate from biosignals
Kumar, A., Ritam, M., Han, L., Guo, S., & Chandra, R. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105338 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Instance-Based Counterfactual Explanations for Time Series Classification
Delaney, E. D., Greene, D., & Keane, M. T. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86957-1_3 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ismail Fawaz, H., Forestier, G., Weber, J., Idoumghar, L., & Muller, P.-A.
- Affiliations
- Université de Haute-Alsace (FR)
- Venue
- Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
- Published
- 2019-03-02
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 917-963
- ISSN
- 1384-5810 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-756X
- OpenAlex
- W2892035503
- Cited by
- 3,342
- References
- 149
- Citations by year
- 2026: 385 · 2025: 493 · 2024: 507 · 2023: 517 · 2022: 527 · 2021: 494 · 2020: 328 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 227.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL Portal Artxiker (Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (India)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CE23-0015)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Keywords
- time series classification, deep neural network, deep learning architectures, convolutional neural networks, ResNet, multivariate time series, univariate time series
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review