Cited by 3,342Time Series Analysis and ForecastingMusic and Audio ProcessingNeural Networks and Applications

Deep learning for time series classification: a review

Open access
Ismail Fawaz, Hassan, Forestier, Germain, Weber, Jonathan, Idoumghar, Lhassane, Muller, Pierre-Alain·2019·Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review empirically compares nine end-to-end deep learning architectures for time series classification across 97 univariate and multivariate datasets, training 8,730 models. It finds that a deep residual network (ResNet) is the strongest DNN, significantly outperforming most other deep models and reaching performance not significantly different from COTE/HIVE-COTE on the UCR/UEA archive.

Key findings

  • ResNet significantly outperformed the other deep learning approaches on the 85 univariate UCR/UEA datasets, with an average rank of almost 2, winning on 50 out of 85 problems; FCN and Encoder followed as second and third.
  • ResNet was not significantly different from COTE/HIVE-COTE in pairwise statistical tests, while NN-DTW-WW and EE showed the lowest average ranks among compared state-of-the-art methods.
  • MCNN and t-LeNet, which use window slicing/subsequence extraction, yielded very low accuracies with only one win (Earthquakes); MCDCNN and Time-CNN performed similarly to MLP.
  • ResNet was more stable across random initializations than FCN, with average standard deviation 1.48 versus 1.70; on DiatomSizeReduction, ResNet and FCN reached only 30% accuracy while Time-CNN reached 95%.

Methods

  • The authors reimplemented nine discriminative end-to-end deep learning models (MLP, FCN, ResNet, Encoder, MCNN, t-LeNet, MCDCNN, Time-CNN, TWIESN) in a common Keras/TensorFlow framework and trained each with 10 random initializations on 97 datasets: 85 univariate UCR/UEA datasets and 12 multivariate datasets.
  • In total, 8,730 experiments were run on a cluster of 60 GPUs; accuracy was averaged over the 10 runs, and comparisons with published state-of-the-art results used median test error.
  • Statistical comparison used the Friedman test followed by pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm’s alpha correction (5%), visualized with critical difference diagrams.

Limitations

  • The paper states that generative models and models using hand-engineered features were excluded, and that transfer learning, data augmentation, training/testing time, and normalization effects were not thoroughly studied.
  • The paper acknowledges that non-deep state-of-the-art algorithms were not trained or tuned by the authors, so the comparison may favor DNNs; it also notes that the compared architectures may have been overfitted or empirically designed for the UCR/UEA archive.
  • Evident from the text: the multivariate archive contains only 12 datasets, and the statistical test failed to find significant differences among the nine classifiers on that archive; ResNet’s hyperparameters were not tuned per dataset, and random initialization can significantly affect DNN accuracy.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10618-019-00619-1

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 84 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation
    § 1 Introduction · p. 3

    DNNs are able to achieve results that are not significantly different than COTE and HIVE-COTE using a deep residual network architecture.

    “our experiments showed that not only DNNs are able to significantly outperform the NN-DTW, but are also able to achieve results that are not significantly different than COTE and HIVE-COTE using a deep residual network architecture (He et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites He et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wang et al., 2017b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The UCR/UEA archive datasets are representative of TSC problems.
    • Rests on an assumption: The deep learning implementations in the framework faithfully represent the original methods.
  • Findingcitation
    § 1 Introduction · p. 3

    DNNs are able to significantly outperform NN-DTW on the evaluated TSC datasets.

    “our experiments showed that not only DNNs are able to significantly outperform the NN-DTW, but are also able to achieve results that are not significantly different than COTE and HIVE-COTE using a deep residual network architecture (He et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites He et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wang et al., 2017b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The UCR/UEA archive datasets are representative of TSC problems.
    • Rests on an assumption: The deep learning implementations in the framework faithfully represent the original methods.
  • Findingreasoning
    § 3.2.2 Fully Convolutional Neural Network · p. 15

    One of the advantages of FCNs is the invariance in the number of parameters for 4 layers (out of 5) across time series of different lengths.

    “In addition, one of the advantages of FCNs is the invariance (denoted by # invar in Table 1) in the number of parameters for 4 layers (out of 5) across time series of different lengths.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given
    § 4.1.1 Univariate archive · p. 20

    Twenty datasets contain a relatively small training set (50 or fewer instances) which surprisingly was not an impediment for obtaining high accuracy when applying a very deep architecture such as ResNet.

    “We should note that twenty datasets contains a relatively small training set (50 or fewer instances) which surprisingly was not an impediment for obtaining high accuracy when applying a very deep architecture such as ResNet.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 2.3.2 Discriminative models · p. 12

    CNN is the most widely applied architecture for the TSC problem.

    “During our study, we found that CNN is the most widely applied architecture for the TSC problem”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 47
  • May combine two claims. 52
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § 1 Introduction · p. 3

    Poor random initializations can have a significant effect on a DNN's performance.

    “Finally, we analyze how poor random initializations can have a significant effect on a DNN's performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 3.2.2 Fully Convolutional Neural Network · p. 15

    FCN does not hold any pooling nor a regularization operation.

    “We can see that FCN does not hold any pooling nor a regularization operation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § 3.2.3 Residual Network · p. 15

    Similarly to the FCN model, the layers (except the final one) in the ResNet architecture have an invariant number of parameters across different datasets.

    “Similarly to the FCN model, the layers (except the final one) in the ResNet architecture have an invariant number of parameters across different datasets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 22

    ResNet significantly outperforms the other approaches on the 85 univariate UCR/UEA datasets with an average rank of almost 2.

    “The ResNet significantly outperforms the other approaches with an average rank of almost 2.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 27

    Time-CNN is the smallest model: it contains a very small number of parameters by design with only 18 filters compared to the 512 filters of FCN.

    “This suggestion is also supported by the fact that Time-CNN is the smallest model: it contains a very small number of parameters by design with only 18 filters compared to the 512 filters of FCN.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 27

    ResNet and FCN dominate with not much of a difference when grouped by training set size.

    “Again, ResNet and FCN still dominate with not much of a difference.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 23

    ResNet is the most accurate DNN of the study with similar runtime to FCN, the second most accurate DNN.

    “our empirical study strongly suggests to use ResNet instead of any other deep learning algorithm - it is the most accurate one with similar runtime to FCN (the second most accurate DNN).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 22

    Although the datasets used in the experiments are relatively small compared to billions of labeled images, the deepest networks reached competitive accuracies on the UCR/UEA archive benchmark.

    “Although the datasets used in our experiments are relatively small compared to the billions of labeled images (such as ImageNet (Russakovsky et al., 2015) and OpenImages (Krasin et al., 2017) challenges), the deepest networks did reach competitive accuracies on the UCR/UEA archive benchmark.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 23

    MCNN and t-LeNet architectures yielded very low accuracies with only one win for the Earthquakes dataset.

    “The MCNN and t-LeNet architectures yielded very low accuracies with only one win for the Earthquakes dataset.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 23

    FCN wins on 36 datasets whereas Encoder wins only on 17.

    “FCN wins on 36 datasets whereases Encoder wins only on 17”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 27

    On DiatomSizeReduction, ResNet and FCN achieved the worst accuracy (30%) while Time-CNN reached the best accuracy (95%).

    “ResNet and FCN achieved the worst accuracy (30%) on this dataset while Time-CNN reached the best accuracy (95%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 26

    TWIESN did reach competitive accuracies on several long time series datasets, such as reaching a 96.8% accuracy on Meat whose time series length is equal to 448.

    “However, TWIESN did reach competitive accuracies on several long time series datasets such as reaching a 96.8% accuracy on Meat whose time series length is equal to 448.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 28

    Overall, on average, ResNet is the best architecture with FCN and Encoder following as second and third respectively.

    “Overall, our results show that, on average, ResNet is the best architecture with FCN and Encoder following as second and third respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 6.2 Multi-Dimensional Scaling · p. 36

    FCN's learned representation has too many data points close to the decision boundary, whereas ResNet's hidden features enable projecting data points further away from the decision boundary.

    “In other words, FCN's learned representation has too many data points close to the decision boundary whereas ResNet's hidden features enables projecting data points further away from the decision boundary.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: MDS plots with Euclidean distance on GAP vectors preserve class separability sufficiently to interpret model performance.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 6.2 Multi-Dimensional Scaling · p. 36

    FCN and ResNet accuracy on Wine are 58.7% and 74.4% respectively.

    “which is evident by the relatively low accuracy of both models FCN and ResNet which is equal respectively to 58.7% and 74.4%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 6.1.2 Meat dataset · p. 32

    FCN's CAM contains smoother regions with cyan, green and yellow, whereas ResNet's CAM contains more dark red and blue subsequences.

    “In other words, FCN's CAM contains much more smoother regions with cyan, green and yellow regions, whereas ResNet's CAM contains more dark red and blue subsequences”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 28

    ResNet performed very well in general except for the ECG datasets where it was outperformed by FCN.

    “ResNet performed very well in general except for the ECG datasets where it was outperformed by FCN.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.5 Effect of random initializations · p. 29

    The weight's initial value can easily decrease the accuracy of FCN whereas ResNet maintained a relatively high accuracy when taking the worst initial weight values.

    “In other words, the weight's initial value can easily decrease the accuracy of FCN whereas ResNet maintained a relatively high accuracy when taking the worst initial weight values.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 28

    There is small variance between the approaches that replace the GAP layer with an FC dense layer (MCDCNN, CNN), which also showed similar performance to TWIESN and MLP.

    “We found small variance between the approaches that replace the GAP layer with an FC dense layer (MCDCNN, CNN) which also showed similar performance to TWIESN and MLP.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 6.2 Multi-Dimensional Scaling · p. 35

    Both FCN and ResNet managed to project the GunPoint data into a linearly separable space.

    “We note that both deep learning models (FCN and ResNet) managed to project the data from GunPoint into a linearly separable space”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: MDS plots with Euclidean distance on GAP vectors preserve class separability sufficiently to interpret model performance.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.5 Effect of random initializations · p. 28

    DNNs for TSC suffer from a significant decrease (increase) in accuracy when initialized with bad (good) random weights.

    “we observed in our experiments, that DNNs for TSC suffer from a significant decrease (increase) in accuracy when initialized with bad (good) random weights.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Deep learning for time series classification: a review · p. 1

    DNNs have revolutionized computer vision, especially with deeper architectures such as Residual and Convolutional Neural Networks.

    “DNNs have indeed revolutionized the field of computer vision especially with the advent of novel deeper architectures such as Residual and Convolutional Neural Networks.”
    • Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
      “Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have revolutionized the field of computer vision (Krizhevsky et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Krizhevsky et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1 Introduction · p. 2

    HIVE-COTE is hugely computationally intensive and impractical to run on a real big data mining problem.

    “To achieve its high accuracy, HIVE-COTE becomes hugely computationally intensive and impractical to run on a real big data mining problem (Bagnall et al., 2017).”
    • Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · hedged
      “The approach requires training 37 classifiers as well as cross-validating each hyperparameter of these algorithms, which makes the approach infeasible to train in some situations (Lucas et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bagnall et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lucas et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Deep learning for time series classification: a review · p. 1

    Sequential data such as text and audio can be processed with DNNs to reach state-of-the-art performance for document classification and speech recognition.

    “Apart from images, sequential data such as text and audio can also be processed with DNNs to reach state-of-the-art performance for document classification and speech recognition.”
    • Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
      “Following the success of deep neural networks (DNNs) in computer vision, a huge amount of research proposed several DNN architectures to solve natural language processing (NLP) tasks such as machine translation (Sutskever et al., 2014; Bahdanau et al., 2015), learning word embeddings (Mikolov et al., 2013; Mikolov et al., 2013) and document classification (Le and Mikolov, 2014; Goldberg, 2016). DN”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Sutskever et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hinton et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Le and Mikolov, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation
    § 1 Introduction · p. 3

    The paper used a Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Holm's alpha correction for pairwise post-hoc analysis.

    “Once we have established that a statistical difference exists within the classifiers' performance, we followed the pairwise post-hoc analysis recommended by Benavoli et al. (2016) where the average rank comparison is replaced by a Wilcoxon signed-rank test (Wilcoxon, 1945) with Holm's alpha correction (Holm, 1979; Garcia and Herrera, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Benavoli et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wilcoxon, 1945 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Holm, 1979

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 1 Introduction · p. 3

    Deep learning models can handle the curse of dimensionality by leveraging different degrees of smoothness in compositional function and parallel computations of GPUs.

    “The multivariate evaluation shows another benefit of deep learning models, which is the ability to handle the curse of dimensionality (Bellman, 2010; Keogh and Mueen, 2017) by leveraging different degrees of smoothness in compositional function (Poggio et al., 2017) as well as the parallel computations of the GPUs (Lu et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bellman, 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Poggio et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lu et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The UCR/UEA archive datasets are representative of TSC problems.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.2.3 Echo State Networks · p. 8

    RNNs were rarely applied for time series classification because they are designed mainly to predict an output for each time stamp.

    “Apart from time series forecasting, we found that these neural networks were rarely applied for time series classification which is mainly due to three factors: (1) the type of this architecture is designed mainly to predict an output for each element (time stamp) in the time series (L¨ angkvist et al., 2014);”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites L¨ angkvist et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.2.3 Echo State Networks · p. 8

    RNNs are considered hard to train and parallelize.

    “(3) RNNs are considered hard to train and parallelize which led the researchers to avoid using them for computational reasons (Pascanu et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pascanu et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.2.3 Echo State Networks · p. 9

    ESNs were designed to mitigate the challenges of RNNs by eliminating the need to compute the gradient for hidden layers, reducing training time and avoiding the vanishing gradient problem.

    “They were designed to mitigate the challenges of RNNs by eliminating the need to compute the gradient for the hidden layers which reduces the training time of these neural networks thus avoiding the vanishing gradient problem.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gallicchio and Micheli, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Deep learning for time series classification: a review · p. 1

    Deep learning has seen very successful applications in the last years.

    “This is surprising as deep learning has seen very successful applications in the last years.”
    • Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
      “After having established the current state-of-the-art of non deep classifiers for TSC (Bagnall et al., 2017), we discuss the success of Deep Learning (LeCun et al., 2015) in various classification tasks which motivated the recent utilization of deep learning models for TSC (Wang et al., 2017b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites LeCun et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wang et al., 2017b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2.3 Generative or discriminative approaches · p. 10

    Deep learning approaches for TSC can be separated into two main categories: generative and discriminative models.

    “Deep learning approaches for TSC can be separated into two main categories: the generative and the discriminative models (as proposed in L¨ angkvist et al. (2014)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites L¨ angkvist et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § 1 Introduction · p. 3

    The paper used the Friedman test to reject the null hypothesis when comparing classifiers over multiple datasets.

    “As for comparing the classifiers over multiple datasets, we followed the recommendations in Demˇ sar (2006) and used the Friedman test (Friedman, 1940) to reject the null hypothesis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Demˇ sar, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Friedman, 1940 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2.3.1 Generative models · p. 10

    Generative models usually exhibit an unsupervised training step that precedes the learning phase of the classifier.

    “Generative models usually exhibit an unsupervised training step that precedes the learning phase of the classifier (L¨ angkvist et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites L¨ angkvist et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1 Introduction · p. 2

    The decision taken by HIVE-COTE's 37 classifiers cannot be interpreted easily by domain experts.

    “Finally, adding to the huge runtime of HIVE-COTE, the decision taken by 37 classifiers cannot be interpreted easily by domain experts, since researchers already struggle with understanding the decisions taken by an individual classifier.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.2.1 Multi Layer Perceptron · p. 14

    MLP does not have any layer whose number of parameters is invariant across time series of different lengths, which means that the transferability of the network is not trivial: the number of parameters (weights) of the network depends directly on the length of the input time series.

    “MLP does not have any layer whose number of parameters is invariant across time series of different lengths (denoted by # invar in Table 1) which means that the transferability of the network is not trivial: the number of parameters (weights) of the network depends directly on the length of the input time series.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2.4 Encoder · p. 16

    The careful design of Encoder's attention mechanism enabled the invariance across all layers which encouraged the authors to implement a transfer learning approach.

    “One final note is that the careful design of Encoder's attention mechanism enabled the invariance across all layers which encouraged the authors to implement a transfer learning approach.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Serr` a et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.3.2 Discriminative models · p. 12

    Residual Networks (ResNets) add linear shortcut connections for the convolutional layers, potentially enhancing the model's accuracy.

    “Residual Networks (ResNets) (Wang et al., 2017b; Geng and Luo, 2018) which add linear shortcut connections for the convolutional layers potentially enhancing the model's accuracy (He et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites He et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation
    § 2.2 Deep learning for time series classification · p. 5

    The paper adopted accuracy to measure model performance on test data.

    “To measure the performance of the model on the test data (generalization), we adopted the accuracy measure (similarly to Bagnall et al. (2017)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bagnall et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2.9 Time Warping Invariant Echo State Network · p. 19

    ESNs were originally proposed for time series forecasting, but Tanisaro and Heidemann (2016) proposed a variant of ESNs that uses directly the raw input time series and predicts a probability distribution over the class variables.

    “Although ESNs were originally proposed for time series forecasting, Tanisaro and Heidemann (2016) proposed a variant of ESNs that uses directly the raw input time series and predicts a probability distribution over the class variables.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tanisaro and Heidemann, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2.2 Fully Convolutional Neural Network · p. 14

    The replacement of the traditional final FC layer with a Global Average Pooling (GAP) layer reduces drastically the number of parameters in a neural network while enabling the use of the CAM that highlights which parts of the input time series contributed the most to a certain classification.

    “In addition, one of the main characteristics of this architecture is the replacement of the traditional final FC layer with a Global Average Pooling (GAP) layer which reduces drastically the number of parameters in a neural network while enabling the use of the CAM (Zhou et al., 2016) that highlights which parts of the input time series contributed the most to a certain classification.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhou et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2.4 Encoder · p. 15

    The latter approach (pre-train then fine-tune) reached higher accuracy thus benefiting from the transfer learning technique.

    “The latter approach reached higher accuracy thus benefiting from the transfer learning technique.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Serr` a et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2.3.2 Discriminative models · p. 12

    End-to-end deep learning aims to incorporate the feature learning process while fine-tuning the discriminative classifier.

    “In contrast to feature engineering, end-to-end deep learning aims to incorporate the feature learning process while fine-tuning the discriminative classifier (Nweke et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nweke et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2.3.2 Discriminative models · p. 12

    The popularity of CNNs for TSC is probably due to their robustness and the relatively small amount of training time compared to complex architectures such as RNNs or MLPs.

    “which is probably due to their robustness and the relatively small amount of training time compared to complex architectures such as RNNs or MLPs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § 4.1.2 Multivariate archive · p. 21

    For memory usage limitations over a single GPU, we left the MTS dataset Performance Measurement System (PeMS) out of our experimentations.

    “For memory usage limitations over a single GPU, we left the MTS dataset Performance Measurement System (PeMS) out of our experimentations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.2.6 Time Le-Net · p. 17

    Unlike ResNet and FCN, t-LeNet does not have much invariant layers (2 out of 4) due to the use of an FC layer instead of a GAP layer, thus increasing drastically the number of parameters needed to be trained which also depends on the length of the input time series.

    “Unlike ResNet and FCN, this approach does not have much invariant layers (2 out of 4) due to the use of an FC layer instead of a GAP layer, thus increasing drastically the number of parameters needed to be trained which also depends on the length of the input time series.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1 Why discriminative end-to-end approaches ? · p. 13

    The accuracy of deep learning methods in human activity recognition depends highly on the quality of the extracted features.

    “This has also been the consensus in the human activity recognition literature, where the accuracy of deep learning methods depends highly on the quality of the extracted features (Nweke et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nweke et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation
    § 4.1.2 Multivariate archive · p. 21

    We also evaluated all deep learning models on Baydogan's archive that contains 13 MTS classification datasets.

    “We also evaluated all deep learning models on Baydogan's archive (Baydogan, 2015) that contains 13 MTS classification datasets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baydogan, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 3.1 Why discriminative end-to-end approaches ? · p. 13

    Any deep learning algorithm can benefit from modifications for solving imbalanced TSC tasks.

    “However, any deep learning algorithm can benefit from this type of modification.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.2.3 Residual Network · p. 15

    We can easily pre-train a model on a source dataset, then transfer and fine-tune it on a target dataset without having to modify the hidden layers of the network.

    “That being said, we can easily pre-train a model on a source dataset, then transfer and fine-tune it on a target dataset without having to modify the hidden layers of the network.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1.2 Multivariate archive · p. 21

    This archive also exhibits datasets with different characteristics such as the length of the time series which, unlike the UCR/UEA archive, varies among the same dataset. This is due to the fact that the datasets in the UCR/UEA archive are already re-scaled to have an equal length among one dataset.

    “This archive also exhibits datasets with different characteristics such as the length of the time series which, unlike the UCR/UEA archive, varies among the same dataset. This is due to the fact that the datasets in the UCR/UEA archive are already re-scaled to have an equal length among one dataset (Bagnall et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bagnall et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.2.2 Fully Convolutional Neural Network · p. 14

    FCNs are mainly convolutional networks that do not contain any local pooling layers, which means that the length of a time series is kept unchanged throughout the convolutions.

    “FCNs are mainly convolutional networks that do not contain any local pooling layers which means that the length of a time series is kept unchanged throughout the convolutions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2.5 Multi-scale Convolutional Neural Network · p. 16

    Cui et al. (2016) were the first to introduce the Window Slicing (WS) method as a data augmentation technique.

    “Cui et al. (2016) were the first to introduce the Window Slicing (WS) method as a data augmentation technique.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cui et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2.3 Residual Network · p. 15

    A linear shortcut is added to link the output of a residual block to its input thus enabling the flow of the gradient directly through these connections, which makes training a DNN much easier by reducing the vanishing gradient effect.

    “Actually, the difference with the usual convolutions (such as in FCNs) is that a linear shortcut is added to link the output of a residual block to its input thus enabling the flow of the gradient directly through these connections, which makes training a DNN much easier by reducing the vanishing gradient effect (He et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites He et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2.3.2 Discriminative models · p. 12

    The problem with an MLP approach is that temporal information is lost and the features learned are no longer time-invariant.

    “The problem with an MLP approach is that temporal information is lost and the features learned are no longer time-invariant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1 Why discriminative end-to-end approaches ? · p. 13

    The main goal of deep learning approaches is to remove the bias due to manually designed features, thus enabling the network to learn the most discriminant useful features for the classification task.

    “We made this choice because we believe that the main goal of deep learning approaches is to remove the bias due to manually designed features (Ord´ o¨ nez and Roggen, 2016), thus enabling the network to learn the most discriminant useful features for the classification task.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ord´ o¨ nez and Roggen, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1.2 Multivariate archive · p. 21

    The length of a time series is not an issue for time series classification problems.

    “This form of pre-processing has also been used by Ratanamahatana and Keogh (2005) to show that the length of a time series is not an issue for TSC problems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ratanamahatana and Keogh (2005)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 3.2.7 Multi Channel Deep Convolutional Neural Network · p. 18

    By using an FC layer before the softmax classifier, the transferability of MCDCNN is limited to the first and second convolutional layers.

    “By using an FC layer before the softmax classifier, the transferability of this network is limited to the first and second convolutional layers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.2.8 Time Convolutional Neural Network · p. 18

    Time-CNN uses mean squared error (MSE) instead of the traditional categorical cross-entropy loss function, and the final layer is a traditional FC layer with sigmoid as the activation function, which does not guarantee a sum of probabilities equal to 1.

    “The first characteristic of Time-CNN is the use of the mean squared error (MSE) instead of the traditional categorical cross-entropy loss function, which has been used by all the deep learning approaches we have mentioned so far. Hence, instead of a softmax classifier, the final layer is a traditional FC layer with sigmoid as the activation function, which does not guarantee a sum of probabilities”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.2.6 Time Le-Net · p. 17

    Unlike GAP, local pooling introduces invariance to small perturbations in the activation map by taking the maximum value in a local pooling window.

    “Unlike GAP, local pooling introduces invariance to small perturbations in the activation map (the result of a convolution) by taking the maximum value in a local pooling window.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § 5.2.1 The need of a fair comparison · p. 25

    Since the authors did not train nor test any of the state-of-the-art non-deep learning algorithms, it is possible that they allowed much more training time for the described DNNs.

    “Since we did not train nor test any of the state-of-the-art non deep learning algorithms, it is possible that we allowed much more training time for the described DNNs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 22

    Deeper neural networks are much more successful than shallower architectures in computer vision.

    “our findings are in agreement with the deep learning for computer vision literature where deeper neural networks are much more successful than shallower architectures (He et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites He et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 27

    DiatomSizeReduction is the smallest dataset in the UCR/UEA archive with 16 training instances, which suggests that ResNet and FCN are easily overfitting this dataset.

    “Interestingly, DiatomSizeReduction is the smallest datasets in the UCR/UEA archive (with 16 training instances), which suggests that ResNet and FCN are easily overfitting this dataset.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.1.2 Multivariate archive · p. 21

    Linear interpolation preprocessing is very important for deep learning models whose architecture depends on input time series length, such as MLP, and for parallel computation over GPUs.

    “This step is very important for deep learning models whose architecture depends on the length of the input time series (such as a MLP) and for parallel computation over the GPUs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The MTS archive contains time series of unequal length.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 25

    HIVE-COTE's classification time is bounded by a linear scan of the training set due to employing a nearest neighbor classifier, whereas the trivial GPU parallelization of DNNs provides instant classification.

    “In addition to the huge training time, HIVE-COTE's classification time is bounded by a linear scan of the training set due to employing a nearest neighbor classifier, whereas the trivial GPU parallelization of DNNs provides instant classification.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 26

    Because increasing the number of convolutional layers increases the path length viewed by the CNN model, ResNet and FCN managed to outperform other approaches whose filter length is longer, such as Encoder.

    “since increasing the number of convolutional layers will increase the path length viewed by the CNN model (Vaswani et al., 2017), ResNet and FCN managed to outperform other approaches whose filter length is longer (21) such as Encoder.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vaswani et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 23

    The FC layer reduces the effect of learning time invariant features, which explains why MLP, Time-CNN and MCDCNN exhibit very similar performance.

    “This FC layer reduces the effect of learning time invariant features which explains why MLP, Time-CNN and MCDCNN exhibit very similar performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5.2.1 The need of a fair comparison · p. 25

    Allowing a much more thorough search of DTW's warping window would lead to a fairer comparison between deep learning approaches and other state-of-the-art TSC algorithms.

    “Therefore, we believe that allowing a much more thorough search of DTW's warping window would lead to a fairer comparison between deep learning approaches and other state-of-the-art TSC algorithms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 25

    ResNet's hyperparameters were not tuned for each dataset; rather, the same architecture was used for the whole benchmark.

    “unlike HIVE-COTE, ResNet's hyperparameters were not tuned for each dataset but rather the same architecture was used for the whole benchmark”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 27

    In order to achieve high accuracies while training a DNN, a large training set is needed.

    “One final observation that is in agreement with the deep learning literature is that in order to achieve high accuracies while training a DNN, a large training set is needed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 24

    NN-DTW-WW and EE are no longer competitive with current state-of-the-art algorithms for TSC.

    “suggesting that these methods are no longer competitive with current state-of-the-art algorithms for TSC.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 25

    Further investigation of ResNet's hyperparameters should improve DNNs' accuracy for TSC.

    “suggesting further investigation of these hyperparameters should improve DNNs' accuracy for TSC.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 23

    Discovering patterns in a one-dimensional space (time) should be an easier task for CNNs than in two-dimensional space, thus requiring less data to learn from.

    “it is only natural to think that discovering patterns in a one dimensional space (time) should be an easier task for CNNs thus requiring less data to learn from.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 4.2 Experiments · p. 21

    Taking the mean accuracy over 10 runs with different random weight initializations reduces the bias due to the weights' initial values.

    “which enables us to take the mean accuracy over the 10 runs in order to reduce the bias due to the weights' initial values.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5.2.1 The need of a fair comparison · p. 25

    For a lazy machine learning algorithm such as NN-DTW, training time is zero when allowing maximum warping, whereas judicially setting the warping window can lead to a significant increase in accuracy.

    “for a lazy machine learning algorithm such as NN-DTW, training time is zero when allowing maximum warping whereas it has been shown that judicially setting the warping window Dau et al. (2017) can lead to a significant increase in accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dau et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5.3 Results for multivariate time series · p. 25

    There is a need to have an equally large MTS classification archive in order to evaluate hybrid univariate/multivariate time series classifiers.

    “These observations reinforces the need to have an equally large MTS classification archive in order to evaluate hybrid univariate/multivariate time series classifiers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 24

    The fact that ResNet is not significantly different than COTE suggests that more datasets would give a better insight into these performances.

    “but the fact that ResNet is not significantly different than COTE suggests that more datasets would give a better insight into these performances (Demˇ sar, 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Demˇ sar, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5.2 Comparing with state-of-the-art approaches · p. 24

    Cliques formed by the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test with Holm's alpha correction do not necessarily reflect the rank order.

    “It is worthwhile noting that cliques formed by the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test with Holm's alpha correction do not necessary reflect the rank order (Lines et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lines et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 5.3 Results for multivariate time series · p. 25

    Time-CNN and MCDCNN are the only architectures originally proposed for MTS data.

    “Although Time-CNN and MCDCNN are the only architectures originally proposed for MTS data”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5.1 Results for univariate time series · p. 22

    The success of ResNet is highly due to its deep flexible architecture.

    “We believe that the success of ResNet is highly due to its deep flexible architecture.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1.2 Multivariate archive · p. 21

    Normalization is known to have a huge effect on DNNs' learning capabilities.

    “especially since normalization is known to have a huge effect on DNNs' learning capabilities (Zhang et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhang et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 6.1.2 Meat dataset · p. 32

    The difference in accuracy between ResNet and FCN on Meat is probably explained by ResNet's ability to filter out non-discriminative and discriminative regions with higher confidence.

    “which probably explains why FCN is less accurate than ResNet on this dataset.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: CAM visualizations faithfully indicate which time series regions contribute to class identification.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 5.4 What can the dataset's characteristics tell us about the best architecture? · p. 27

    Most DNN architectures, with categorical cross-entropy as their cost function, employ mainly the same classifier: softmax, which is basically designed for multi-class classification.

    “In fact, most DNNs architectures, with the categorical cross-entropy as their cost function, employ mainly the same classifier: softmax which is basically designed for multi-class classification.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 6.1.1 GunPoint dataset · p. 32

    The shapelet transformation classifier (Hills et al., 2014) is an ensemble approach, which makes unclear how the shapelets affect the decision taken by the individual classifiers, whereas for an end-to-end deep learning model the classification can be directly explained by using the Class Activation Map.

    “we stress that the shapelet transformation classifier (Hills et al., 2014) is an ensemble approach, which makes unclear how the shapelets affect the decision taken by the individual classifiers whereas for an end-to-end deep learning model we can directly explain the classification by using the Class Activation Map.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hills et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 6.1.1 GunPoint dataset · p. 32

    The part where the actor raises his/her arm seems to be also a discriminative part of the data, which suggests that the deep learning algorithms are identifying more 'shapelets'.

    “On the other hand, the part where the actor raises his/her arm seems to be also a discriminative part of the data which suggests that the deep learning algorithms are identifying more 'shapelets'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § 6.1.1 GunPoint dataset · p. 32

    CNNs have the ability to localize a given discriminative shape regardless where it appears in the time series, which is evidence for CNNs' capability of learning time-invariant warped features.

    “Finally, another interesting observation is the ability of CNNs to localize a given discriminative shape regardless where it appears in the time series, which is evidence for CNNs' capability of learning time-invariant warped features.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 6.1.1 GunPoint dataset · p. 32

    This observation cannot confirm which classifier extracted the most discriminative subsequences especially because all algorithms achieved similar accuracy on the GunPoint dataset.

    “We should note that this observation cannot confirm which classifier extracted the most discriminative subsequences especially because all algorithms achieved similar accuracy on GunPoint dataset.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
86 of 86
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The UCR/UEA archive datasets are representative of TSC problems.

    “we tested the approaches on 12 Multivariate Time Series (MTS) datasets (Baydogan, 2015).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 97 time series datasets used are sufficient to generalize about DNN performance for TSC.

    “By training 8,730 deep learning models on 97 time series datasets, we propose the most exhaustive study of DNNs for TSC to date.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The deep learning implementations in the framework faithfully represent the original methods.

    “We also provide an open source deep learning framework to the TSC community where we implemented each of the compared approaches and evaluated them on a univariate TSC benchmark (the UCR/UEA archive) and 12 multivariate time series datasets.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The MTS archive contains time series of unequal length.

    “In order to solve the problem of unequal length time series in the MTS archive”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    CAM visualizations faithfully indicate which time series regions contribute to class identification.

    “Highlighting with the Class Activation Map the contribution of each time series region for the three classes in Meat when using the FCN and ResNet classifiers.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    MDS plots with Euclidean distance on GAP vectors preserve class separability sufficiently to interpret model performance.

    “Figure 15 shows three MDS plots for the GunPoint dataset using: (1) the raw input time series (Figure 15a); (2) the learned latent features from the GAP layer for FCN (Figure 15b); and (3)”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These approaches, categorized as temporal representation, divide the entire framework into two stages: "temporal representation" and "temporal prediction."

    “These approaches, categorized as temporal representation[105,106], divide the entire framework into two stages: “temporal representation” and “temporal prediction.””

    From Advancements in the estimation of the state of charge of lithium-ion battery: a comprehensive review of traditional and deep learning approaches (2025) · cites this paper as [105]

    Section 2.3.1 (p. 10) describes generative approaches that learn a time-series representation before training a classifier, supporting a two-stage account for those approaches. The paper categorizes them as generative models, however, and describes the second stage as classification—not a general framework called “temporal representation” followed by “temporal prediction.” (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Multiple-instance configurations incur high computational cost from running multiple instances.

    “These include the high computational cost incurred by running multiple instances [18,19]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • WalkVsRun's new length exceeds its stated maximum

    Minor

    The paper says interpolation makes each series as long as the longest original series. For WalkVsRun, the table gives an original maximum length of 1918 but a new length of 1919.

  • MLP is said to have no length-invariant layers

    Minor

    The first fully connected layer depends on input length, but the subsequent 500-to-500 hidden layers have parameter counts independent of that length. This conflicts with the claim that no MLP layer is invariant.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 149 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Che Z, He X, Xu K, Liu Y (2017b) DECADE: a deep metric learning model for multivariate time series. In: KDD workshop on mining and learning from time series
  2. Ismail Fawaz H, Forestier G, Weber J, Idoumghar L, Muller PA (2018c) Transfer learning for time series classification. In: IEEE international conference on big data, pp 1367–1376 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ismail Fawaz, H., Forestier, G., Weber, J., Idoumghar, L., & Muller, P.-A.
Affiliations
Université de Haute-Alsace (FR)
Venue
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Published
2019-03-02
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
917-963
ISSN
  • 1384-5810 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-756X
OpenAlex
W2892035503
Cited by
3,342
References
149
Citations by year
2026: 385 · 2025: 493 · 2024: 507 · 2023: 517 · 2022: 527 · 2021: 494 · 2020: 328 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
227.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL Portal Artxiker (Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (India)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CE23-0015)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
time series classification, deep neural network, deep learning architectures, convolutional neural networks, ResNet, multivariate time series, univariate time series

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review