Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A group decision making sustainable supplier selection approach using extended TOPSIS under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment

Open access
Yu, Chunxia, Shao, Yifan, Wang, Kai, Zhang, Luping·2019·Expert Systems with Applications

Abstract

Abstract Due to the increasing awareness of environmental and social issues, sustainable supplier selection becomes an important problem. The aim of this paper is to develop a novel group decision making sustainable supplier selection approach using extended Techniques for Order Preferences by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Sustainable supplier selection often involves uncertain information due to the subjective nature of human judgments, and the interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy set (IVPFS) has great ability to address strong fuzziness, ambiguity and inexactness during the decision-making process. The first contribution of this research is to use the IVPFS to capture the uncertain information of decision makers. Moreover, sustainable supplier selection often involves multiple decision makers from different groups. The second contribution of this research is to develop a group decision making approach for sustainable supplier selection. TOPSIS is the most commonly used technique in sustainable supplier selection. The third contribution of this research is to propose an extended TOPSIS method by integrating distance and similarity between alternatives concurrently to evaluate performances of suppliers. In this research, the group decision making approach and extended TOPSIS method is also extended to IVPFSs. Finally, experiments are conducted to verify the feasibility and efficiency of the proposed sustainable supplier selection approach. Experiments results show that the proposed approach is effective and efficient to help decision makers to select optimal sustainable suppliers. Therefore, the proposed approach can be applied by managers to evaluate and determine appropriate suppliers in sustainable supplier selection process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.010

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Metadata

Authors
Yu, C., Shao, Y., Wang, K., & Zhang, L.
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
121
Pages
1-17
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2904468863
Cited by
313
References
40
FWCI
28.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A group decision making sustainable supplier selection approach using extended TOPSIS under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.010
The paper
Yu, C., Shao, Y., Wang, K., & Zhang, L. (2019). A group decision making sustainable supplier selection approach using extended TOPSIS under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.