The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A group decision making sustainable supplier selection approach using extended TOPSIS under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Due to the increasing awareness of environmental and social issues, sustainable supplier selection becomes an important problem. The aim of this paper is to develop a novel group decision making sustainable supplier selection approach using extended Techniques for Order Preferences by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Sustainable supplier selection often involves uncertain information due to the subjective nature of human judgments, and the interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy set (IVPFS) has great ability to address strong fuzziness, ambiguity and inexactness during the decision-making process. The first contribution of this research is to use the IVPFS to capture the uncertain information of decision makers. Moreover, sustainable supplier selection often involves multiple decision makers from different groups. The second contribution of this research is to develop a group decision making approach for sustainable supplier selection. TOPSIS is the most commonly used technique in sustainable supplier selection. The third contribution of this research is to propose an extended TOPSIS method by integrating distance and similarity between alternatives concurrently to evaluate performances of suppliers. In this research, the group decision making approach and extended TOPSIS method is also extended to IVPFSs. Finally, experiments are conducted to verify the feasibility and efficiency of the proposed sustainable supplier selection approach. Experiments results show that the proposed approach is effective and efficient to help decision makers to select optimal sustainable suppliers. Therefore, the proposed approach can be applied by managers to evaluate and determine appropriate suppliers in sustainable supplier selection process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Atanassov, K. T. (1986) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(86)80034-3 · Cited by 16,465
The Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E., Weaver, W., & Wiener, N. (1950) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3067010 · Cited by 9,801
Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
Chen, S.-J. J., Hwang, C. L., Beckmann, M. J., & Krelle, W. E. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,207
Introduction to Grey system theory
Deng, J. (1989) · The journal of grey system/Journal of grey system · doi:10.5555/90757.90758 · Cited by 4,197
Mathematical Theory of Communication
(2013) · Encyclopedia of Systems Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_100015 · Cited by 3,290
Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Atanassov, K., & Gargov, G. (1989) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/0165-0114(89)90205-4 · Cited by 2,916
Pythagorean Membership Grades in Multicriteria Decision Making
Yager, R. R. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2013.2278989 · Cited by 2,847
Vendor selection criteria and methods
Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., & Benton, W. C. (1991) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(91)90033-r · Cited by 2,137
Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
Atanassov, K. T. (2020) · Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32090-4 · Cited by 1,822
Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Szmidt, E., & Kacprzyk, J. (2000) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(98)00244-9 · Cited by 1,627
Cited by
Ecer, F., & Pamucar, D. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121981 · Cited by 420
Bakioglu, G., & Atahan, A. O. (2021) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106948 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, C., Shao, Y., Wang, K., & Zhang, L.
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 121
- Pages
- 1-17
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2904468863
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 28.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A group decision making sustainable supplier selection approach using extended TOPSIS under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.010
- The paper
- Yu, C., Shao, Y., Wang, K., & Zhang, L. (2019). A group decision making sustainable supplier selection approach using extended TOPSIS under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.