The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Condition Monitoring using Machine Learning: A Review of Theory, Applications, and Recent Advances
Open accessAbstract
In modern industry, the quality of maintenance directly influences equipment’s operational uptime and efficiency. Hence, based on monitoring the condition of the machinery, predictive maintenance can minimize machine downtime and potential losses. Throughout the field, machine learning (ML) methods have become noteworthy for predicting failures before they occur. However, the efficacy of the predictive maintenance strategy relies on selecting the appropriate data processing method and ML model. Existing surveys do not comprehensively inform users or evaluate the quality of the monitoring systems proposed. Hence, this survey reviews the recent literature on ML-driven condition monitoring systems that have been beneficial in many cases. Furthermore, in the reviewed literature, we provide an insight into the underlying findings on successful, intelligent condition monitoring systems. It is prudent to consider all factors when narrowing the search for the most effective model for a particular task. Therefore, the tradeoff between task constraints and the performance of each diagnostic technique are quantitively and comparatively evaluated to obtain the given problem's optimal solution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks
Sokolova, M., & Lapalme, G. (2009) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002 · Cited by 7,515
Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1968) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008455 · Cited by 6,568
The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis
Daubechies, I. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.57199 · Cited by 6,483
Fundamentals of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Network
Sherstinsky, A. (2020) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/j.physd.2019.132306 · Cited by 5,680
Gardner, M. W., & Dorling, S. R. (1998) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00447-0 · Cited by 3,324
Dynamic bayesian networks: representation, inference and learning
Murphy, K. P., & Russell, S. (2002) · Cited by 2,575
Ensemble Methods: Foundations and Algorithms
Zhou, Z.-H. (2012) · doi:10.1201/b12207 · Cited by 2,534
Dong, X., Yu, Z., Cao, W., Shi, Y., & Ma, Q. (2020) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-019-8208-z · Cited by 1,928
Support vector machine in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis
Widodo, A., & Yang, B.-S. (2007) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.12.007 · Cited by 1,650
Cited by
Wu, Y., Sicard, B., & Gadsden, S. A. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124678 · Cited by 357
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Surucu, O., Gadsden, S. A., & Yawney, J.
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-07
- Volume
- 221
- Pages
- 119738
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4321793224
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 87
- FWCI
- 36.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Condition Monitoring using Machine Learning: A Review of Theory, Applications, and Recent Advances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119738
- The paper
- Surucu, O., Gadsden, S. A., & Yawney, J. (2023). Condition Monitoring using Machine Learning: A Review of Theory, Applications, and Recent Advances. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119738
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.