Cited by 24Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesTopic ModelingMachine Learning in Healthcare

A dictionary-guided attention network for biomedical named entity recognition in Chinese electronic medical records

Zhu, Zhichao, Li, Jianqiang, Zhao, Qing, Akhtar, Faheem·2023·Expert Systems with Applications

Abstract

Biomedical named entity recognition (BNER) is a critical task for biomedical information extraction. Most popular BNER approaches based on deep learning utilize words and characters as features to represent medical texts. However, many medical terminologies are composed of multiple words and characters, and splitting medical terminology into multiple words (or characters) and assigning weight values for each word (or character) by a standard attention mechanism may disperse the attention score and result in a lower weight value for the medical terminology. This paper proposes a Dictionary-guided Attention Network (DGAN) for BNER in Chinese electronic medical records (EMRs). First, the medical concepts are extracted as large-size words to supplement the comprehensive semantic information of the medical terminology by matching the EMR text to the biomedical dictionary. Then, based on the matched dictionary results, an optimized attention strategy is proposed to focus on the medical concept and adaptively assign higher weights to the characters contained in a concept. Furthermore, semisupervised learning is introduced to reduce the manual labeling of data and to handle the entities not defined in the medical dictionary. To validate our new model in recognizing biomedical named entities, we conduct comprehensive experiments on a real-world Chinese EMR dataset and the CCKS2017 dataset. Our promising results illustrate that our method not only achieves a state-of-the-art performance in BNER but also reduces manual data annotation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120709

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transformer is valuable for processing and modeling diverse modalities of medical data, encompassing clinical texts, medical images, and time series data.

    “In the realm of medical diagnosis, A transformer proves valuable for processing and modeling diverse modalities of medical data, encompassing clinical texts, medical images, and time series data [59,60,61].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, Z., Li, J., Zhao, Q., & Akhtar, F.
Affiliations
  • Beijing University of Technology (CN)
  • Sukkur IBA University (PK)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Qing
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
231
Pages
120709
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380077823
Cited by
24
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62266041)
  • Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (KM202310005031)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
biomedical named entity recognition, Chinese electronic medical records, medical terminology, attention mechanism, semi-supervised learning, biomedical information extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review