Cited by 111Ionic liquids properties and applicationsCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics

Modeling of CO2 capture ability of [Bmim][BF4] ionic liquid using connectionist smart paradigms

Daryayehsalameh, Bahador, Nabavi, Miralireza, Vaferi, Behzad·2021·Environmental Technology & Innovation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101484

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daryayehsalameh, B., Nabavi, M., & Vaferi, B.
Affiliations
  • Iran University of Science and Technology (IR)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Islamic Azad University of Shiraz (IR)
Corresponding author
Vaferi, Behzad
Venue
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
22
Pages
101484
ISSN
2352-1864 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133899235
Cited by
111
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 40
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental Technology & Innovation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Keywords
CO2 capture, ionic liquids, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate, CO2 solubility, artificial neural networks, support vector machine, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, CO2 separation, temperature and pressure effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review