Cited by 77Animal testing and alternativesContact Dermatitis and AllergiesImmunotoxicology and immune responses

The minipig in dermatotoxicology: Methods and challenges

Mahl, Jörg Andreas, Vogel, Beate E., Court, Mireille, Kolopp, Maryelle, Roman, Danielle, Nogués, Vicente·2006·Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology

Abstract

In view of more morphological and physiological similarities between human and porcine skin than for other laboratory animal species, the minipig is a preferred model to evaluate the safety profile of dermally applied xenobiotics. Different methods of dermal administration and examples of non-invasive and invasive investigations during the in-life phase of the studies are described. Routine and special post-mortem examinations in dermal studies are presented to assess responses to the topical treatment of minipig skin. Challenges in dermal minipig studies are discussed with respect to animal welfare and husbandry, test formulations, application methods and different types of investigations. One of the most significant issues for dermal minipig studies is the extensive measures required to prevent cross-contamination of blood and tissue samples taken to monitor local and systemic exposure to the test item.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.etp.2006.03.004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Minipig skin most closely resembles human skin, with similar thicknesses of various layers and hair follicle density.

    “In recent years, general toxicity studies and irritation evaluations have been conducted using minipigs, whose skin most closely resembles human skin, with similar thicknesses of various layers and hair follicle density6, 7, 8.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mahl, J. A., Vogel, B. E., Court, M., Kolopp, M., Roman, D., & Nogués, V.
Affiliations
Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
Venue
Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-07
Volume
57
Issue
5-6
Pages
341-345
ISSN
0940-2993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087772905
Cited by
77
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Keywords
minipigs, dermatotoxicology, porcine skin, autopsy, animal welfare, cross-contamination prevention, xenobiotics, topical exposure
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare, Irritants, Skin, Swine, Swine, Miniature, Xenobiotics, Toxicity Tests, Models, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review