Cited by 55Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvancements in Battery MaterialsReliability and Maintenance Optimization

Model-free reconstruction of capacity degradation trajectory of lithium-ion batteries using early cycle data

Open access
Kim, Seongyoon, Jung, Hangsoon, Lee, Minho, Choi, Yun Young, Choi, Jung-Il·2023·eTransportation

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.etran.2023.100243

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Capacity loss and internal resistance growth are the main indices used to illustrate battery degradation.

    “Capacity loss and internal resistance growth have been considered as the main indices used to illustrate battery degradation [13,14].”

    From Research on Aging Evolution and Safety Characteristics of Lithium-Ion Batteries Cycling at Low Temperature (2025) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says battery degradation reduces capacity and increases internal resistance, supporting their use as signs of degradation. It does not identify those two as the main indices; it instead calls state of health and remaining useful life the primary indicators of battery health. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. S. F. Schuster, T. Bach, E. Fleder, J. Müller, M. Brand, G. Sextl, A. Jossen, Nonlinear aging charac- teristics of lithium-ion cells under different operational conditions, Journal of Energy Storage 1 (2015) 44-53.
  2. P. M. Attia, A. A. Bills, F. B. Planella, P. Dechent, G. Dos Reis, M. Dubarry, P. Gasper, R. Gilchrist, S. Greenbank, D. Howey, O. Liu, E. Khoo, Y. Preger, A. Soni, S. Sripad, A. Stefanopoulou, V. Sulzer, "knees" in lithium-ion battery aging trajectories, Journal of The Electrochemical Society 169 (6) (2022) 060517.
  3. Z. Lyu, R. Gao, A model-based and data-driven joint method for state-of-health estimation of lithium- ion battery in electric vehicles, International Journal of Energy Research 43 (14) (2019) 7956-7969.
  4. Y. Zhou, M. Huang, M. Pecht, Remaining useful life estimation of lithium-ion cells based on k-nearest neighbor regression with differential evolution optimization, Journal of Cleaner Production 249 (2020) 119409.
  5. S. Kim, Y. Y. Choi, K. J. Kim, J.-I. Choi, Forecasting state-of-health of lithium-ion batteries using variational long short-term memory with transfer learning, Journal of Energy Storage 41 (2021) 102893.
  6. D. Kong, S. Wang, P. Ping, State-of-health estimation and remaining useful life for lithium-ion battery based on deep learning with bayesian hyperparameter optimization, International Journal of Energy Research 46 (5) (2022) 6081-6098.
  7. P. Li, Z. Zhang, Q. Xiong, B. Ding, J. Hou, D. Luo, Y. Rong, S. Li, State-of-health estimation and remaining useful life prediction for the lithium-ion battery based on a variant long short term memory neural network, Journal of Power Sources 459 (2020) 228069.
  8. S. Saxena, L. Ward, J. Kubal, W. Lu, S. Babinec, N. Paulson, A convolutional neural network model for battery capacity fade curve prediction using early life data, Journal of Power Sources 542 (2022) 231736.
  9. Z. Deng, X. Lin, J. Cai, X. Hu, Battery health estimation with degradation pattern recognition and transfer learning, Journal of Power Sources 525 (2022) 231027.
  10. J. Snoek, H. Larochelle, R. P. Adams, Practical bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms, Vol. 25, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2012.
  11. F. N. Fritsch, J. Butland, A method for constructing local monotone piecewise cubic interpolants, SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 5 (2) (1984) 300-304.
  12. L. Wright, N. Demeure, Ranger21: a synergistic deep learning optimizer, arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.13731 (2021). · arXiv
  13. L. Liu, H. Jiang, P. He, W. Chen, X. Liu, J. Gao, J. Han, On the variance of the adaptive learning rate and beyond, International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.
  14. M. Zhang, J. Lucas, J. Ba, G. E. Hinton, Lookahead optimizer: k steps forward, 1 step back, Vol. 32, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019.
  15. A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Bradbury, G. Chanan, T. Killeen, Z. Lin, N. Gimelshein, L. Antiga, A. Desmaison, A. Kopf, E. Yang, Z. DeVito, M. Raison, A. Tejani, S. Chilamkurthy, B. Steiner, L. Fang, J. Bai, S. Chintala, Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library, Vol. 32, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019.
  16. Y. Gal, Z. Ghahramani, Bayesian convolutional neural networks with bernoulli approximate variational inference, arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.02158 (2015). · arXiv
  17. P. Agarwal, O. D. Crisalle, M. E. Orazem, L. H. Garcia-Rubio, Application of measurement models to impedance spectroscopy: Ii. determination of the stochastic contribution to the error structure, Journal of the Electrochemical Society 142 (12) (1995) 4149.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, S., Jung, H., Lee, M., Choi, Y. Y., & Choi, J.-I.
Affiliations
Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Choi, Yun Young
  • Choi, Jung-Il
Venue
eTransportation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
17
Pages
100243
ISSN
2590-1168 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4363651729
Cited by
55
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eTransportation (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Supercomputing Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KSC-2022-CRE-0131)
  • Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy
  • National IT Industry Promotion Agency
  • Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (20214910100070)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
Keywords
lithium-ion batteries, capacity fade, degradation trajectory prediction, model-free prediction, deep learning, Bayesian optimization, knot selection, retention level, battery warranty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review