Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence and Trends in Kidney Stone Among Adults in the USA: Analyses of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2018 Data

Abufaraj, Mohammad, Xu, Tianlin, Cao, Chao, Waldhoer, Thomas, Seitz, Christian, D’andrea, David, Siyam, Abdelmuez, Tarawneh, Rand, Fajkovic, Harun, Schernhammer, Eva, Yang, Lin, Shariat, Shahrokh F.·2021·European Urology Focus

Abstract

BACKGROUND The contemporary prevalence and trends of kidney stones are not clear. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the gender-specific prevalence and trends in kidney stones among the US population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Data on self-reported history of kidney stones from 34 749 participants aged ≥20 yr from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were analyzed. INTERVENTION Six 2-yr study cycles (2007-2008 to 2017-2018) of nationally representative series of surveys evaluated the health status of the US population. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Weighted prevalence estimates of kidney stones and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in each study cycle. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models were used to investigate the temporal trends. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS In the 2017-2018 cycle, the prevalence of kidney stones was 10.9% (CI: 9.3-12.7) in men as compared with 9.5% (CI: 8-11.2) in women. The prevalence of kidney stones increased steadily from 6.5% in the 2007-2008 cycle to 9.4% in the 2017-2018 cycle (ptrend = 0.001) among women but not among men (ptrend = 0.1). These trends remained after adjusting for sociodemographic correlates in both genders. Sensitivity analyses further adjusting for dietary information held the same results in trends (men: ptrend = 0.15; women: ptrend = 0.001). Non-Hispanic white ethnicity, obesity, gout, history of two or more pregnancies, menopause, and using female hormones were associated with a higher prevalence of kidney stones. The main limitation is the cross-sectional design of the study. CONCLUSIONS Although kidney stones are more common in men than in women in the USA, the gender gap in kidney stone prevalence appears to be closing in the past decade. Kidney stones are consistently higher among non-Hispanic white and obese, and women who have had multiple pregnancies or have used female hormone therapy. PATIENT SUMMARY The prevalence of kidney stones remains higher in adult US men than in women, but the trend has been increasing only in women, closing the gender gap in kidney stone prevalence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euf.2020.08.011

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 283

Metadata

Authors
Abufaraj, M., Xu, T., Cao, C., Waldhoer, T., Seitz, C., D’andrea, D., Siyam, A., Tarawneh, R., Fajkovic, H., Schernhammer, E., Yang, L., & Shariat, S. F.
Venue
European Urology Focus
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
1468-1475
ISSN
2405-4569 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3083530670
Cited by
283
References
25
FWCI
10.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and Trends in Kidney Stone Among Adults in the USA: Analyses of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2018 Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.euf.2020.08.011
The paper
Abufaraj, M., Xu, T., Cao, C., Waldhoer, T., Seitz, C., D’andrea, D., Siyam, A., Tarawneh, R., Fajkovic, H., Schernhammer, E., Yang, L., & Shariat, S. F. (2021). Prevalence and Trends in Kidney Stone Among Adults in the USA: Analyses of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2018 Data. European Urology Focus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2020.08.011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.